Est. 2026 · Nonpartisan · Verified
Read the record.
Not the rhetoric.
Take the two-minute values quiz once. From then on, every bill — and every roll-call vote your reps cast — is scored against your positions, with the gap between what they say and what's in the record out in the open.
Built on public records: congress.gov, the FEC, and official roll calls. Plus the seats, the money, and the ethics flags that move accountability across every race this cycle.
119-HR-0000 · 119th Congress · Housing +1
AI summaryFair Housing Preservation Act
Amends federal housing law to extend fair-housing enforcement authority and expands rental assistance eligibility for low- and moderate-income households.
Consistency
82
Rep. Smith · 119-HR-0000
Vote matched stated position
New press release
Rep. Smith · just now
Layer 1 · Where you stand
Start with where you stand on the issues.
Take a quick quiz once. From there, every bill, every rep, and every campaign in our system gets scored against your stated positions — not against a generic ideology slider.
Your representatives
Three reps, scored against your positions
Enter your address once. We resolve your two senators and your House rep, score their voting record against your quiz answers, and keep watching as new votes land.
- Federal senators and House rep resolved from your address
- Alignment score grows as they cast votes on bills you flagged
- One tap to their full record, statements, and consistency flags
U.S. Senator · IL
68%
Aligned
U.S. Senator · IL
71%
Aligned
U.S. Representative · IL-7
73%
Aligned
Where a score comes from
Your quiz answers map to specific policy questions. Each bill we analyze is tagged with what it does to those questions — advance them or counter them. When your rep casts a passage vote, their vote times the bill's effects becomes their stance on each question, and we compare it with yours.
Skipped questions don't count. Procedural votes don't count — a “nay” on a motion isn't a position on the bill. Where the record is thin we show fewer claims, not noisier ones.
Worked example
19 questions overlap the record
13 votes agree · 6 conflict
13 ÷ (13 + 6) = 68%
Cards above are illustrative · your numbers come from your answers and your reps' actual votes
Said vs done · AI-scored
Do they vote the way they talk?
A rep tells their district one thing in a press release and votes the opposite way on the floor — that gap is what most accountability tools miss. We score it. A specially tuned AI compares public statements against the related roll calls and quantifies the alignment in plain English, with citations back to the source on both sides.
- Press releases, floor speeches, and official-page positions matched to passage votes on bills sharing the same issue tags
- Every flag is a clickable trail — the original quote on one side, the roll call on the other
- Scored 0–100 with uncertainty disclosed; you see the model's confidence, not just its conclusion
Rep. Smith · 119-HR-0042 · Inconsistent (32)
Public statement said “protecting working families.” Vote opposed the rental-assistance expansion.
Press release on Apr 22 framed the bill as a tax burden on landlords. The floor speech repeated the framing. The roll call on Apr 30 was a NO on the provision that funds a $1.2B housing-voucher expansion.
Layer 2 · Watch the cycle
Then watch the field around them.
Bills are only half the story this cycle. We track every federal seat — who's running, what they're raising, who's vulnerable, who's retiring, and what's making news. Public surfaces, refreshed daily.
Race intelligence
Every seat. Every challenger. Every dollar.
Drill into any state and chamber to see the active race — who's filed, what they've raised, where their stated positions land relative to your quiz, and how the incumbent's voting record holds up alongside their challengers'.
- Every FEC-filed candidate scored against your quiz where stated positions are public
- Incumbent vs each challenger compared head-to-head — voting record, fundraising, alignment with you
- AI synthesis of where the field actually splits on policy, not just party (Pro)
North Carolina · U.S. Senate · 2026
3 candidates · $4.2M raised
- RThomas TillisRetiring$0
- DWiley NickelChallenger$2.1M62% aligned
- DRoy CooperChallenger$2.0M71% aligned
At-risk incumbents · Daily index
Who's actually vulnerable this cycle
A composite vulnerability score (0–100) for every incumbent with a seat on the ballot — weighted across challenger fundraising, statement-vote consistency, late STOCK Act filings, and recent news pressure. Recomputed daily.
- Stacked decomposition shows the four signals — challenger money, consistency, ethics, news — and their relative weights
- Day-over-day deltas surface the movers, so you see who got worse this week without watching all 535 reps yourself
- Drill into any rep to see the underlying evidence — challenger filings, recent press, late STOCK trades, every receipt
Bill Cassidy (R)
Top driver: news pressure
Money & ethics
Where the money is — and where the rules slip
Federal fundraising aggregated to the state level on a US tile-grid map, top-fundraiser leaderboards, and STOCK Act tracking with late-filing flags. The patterns most accountability tools bury, surfaced as small visualizations you can read in five seconds.
- Money-concentration cartogram colored by total raised
- Late STOCK Act filings (>45-day window) flagged automatically
- Top fundraiser board across both chambers, refreshed hourly
Total raised by state
- CA$18.2M
- TX$14.6M
- NY$9.4M
Public scoreboards
Read the field at a glance
Seven public boards summarize everything in this layer: most-contested seats, at-risk incumbents, top fundraisers, statement-vote distribution, money concentration by state, retirement watch, and most-mentioned reps. No login required. Each row links back to the source data.
- Updated hourly from FEC filings, Congress.gov, and a curated news outlet list
- Sortable and sharable — every URL is the canonical view of that board
- Free — no login required to view
7 boards · refreshed daily
money · consistency · news · ethics
0 ────────── 50 ────────── 100
Layer 3 · Pro tools
When you need to read the whole record.
For journalists, researchers, organizers, and engaged voters who need to dig past the summary. Specially tuned AI reads the full bill text, the whole race, or two reps side-by-side — and produces a structured nonpartisan read in seconds.
Bill deep-read · Pro AI
Read the full bill against your positions
On any bill, run a full-text AI analysis against your quiz answers. The report calls out which provisions align, which conflict, and gives you a plain-English bottom line — so you're not guessing from a summary.
- Reads the full bill text — picks up amendments, definitions, sunset clauses, and effective dates that summaries skip
- Provisions mapped section-by-section to the specific positions you took on the quiz
- Bottom line in one sentence, supporting detail in three paragraphs — built to be read, not just glanced at
Values analysis · Pro
Full bill readBottom line
The bill aligns with your stated positions on housing access and rental-assistance expansion, but conflicts with your position on federal enforcement scope.
Aligned (2)
- §201 voucher expansion
- §104 income-tier eligibility
Conflicts (1)
- §312 federal preemption clause
Head-to-head compare · Pro AI
See exactly where two reps actually diverge
Pick any two reps from a card, a search, or your own delegation. We pull their voting records, statements, fundraising, and consistency pairs into a side-by-side. The AI synthesis names the issues where their records actually split — not the rhetoric, the votes.
- Side-by-side on every comparable signal — alignment, consistency, fundraising, news pressure, ethics flags
- AI synthesis names the 3–5 issues where their voting records actually split — not the rhetoric, the votes
- Built to share — drop the link in a group chat, an article, or a slide deck and the comparison renders inline
Bottom line: Both are retiring Republicans with similar floor records, but their statement-vote consistency diverges sharply on healthcare — McConnell's ACA-related statements are 21 points further from his votes than Tillis's.
Extended quiz · Pro
Higher resolution on what you actually believe
The free quiz covers 16 broad policy topics — enough to score reps and bills at the headline level. Pro unlocks the extended question bank: dozens more sub-positions across each issue, so a rep's alignment with you reflects nuance instead of bucket averages. More questions answered means more bills have a position to compare against, and more votes count toward your alignment score.
- Sub-positions for each topic — not just "support healthcare reform" but the specific provisions you back
- Sharper alignment scores: a 71% match where the free quiz couldn't tell 65% from 75%
- More votes count — fringe-issue bills that had no signal under the free quiz now contribute to your rep scores
Healthcare · 5 sub-positions
- Public option for ACA marketplacesupport
- Medicare expansion to age 60support
- Federal drug-price negotiationsupport
- HSA contribution limit raiseoppose
- Surprise-billing patient protectionssupport
Alerts · Free + Pro
Never miss what actually moves
Subscribe to a rep, a bill, or a race. Get notified when a vote passes, a press release lands, a new consistency flag fires, or — for Pro — a stock trade is disclosed or a vulnerability score crosses a threshold. Bundled into The Daily Read (9am ET) or The Weekly Read (Monday morning) so you get the day’s changes in one inbox sweep.
- Per-rep, per-bill, and per-race subscriptions
- The Daily Read or The Weekly Read — your inbox, your cadence
- Every alert links back to source
Rep. Tammy Duckworth — any vote
The Daily Read · 12 votes since you subscribed
119-HR-0042 — status changes
Instant · last update Apr 30
Sen. Durbin — press releases
The Weekly Read · 3 since last roundup
Editorial principles
Built for verification, not influence
Official sources
Bill data and roll calls come from Congress.gov; FEC filings from openFEC; STOCK Act filings from House Clerk + Senate eFD. Every page links back so you can verify.
Neutral language
We state what a bill does and what a vote was. No "champions," no "attacks." AI-generated summaries are clearly labeled as such, on every surface they appear.
Private by default
Your quiz answers and watchlists stay tied to your account. We don't sell, share, or use them to train models.
The 2026 cycle is on the ballot.
Read the record while it's being written.
Free to use the core tools. Pro is $5/mo at the founding-member rate, locked in for life — or browse the public boards without an account.