DeepSyte™
Bill FeedAll repsScoreboardsPrimariesProAboutSign inGet started
DeepSyte™™

A nonpartisan civic accountability tool. We match federal legislation to your stated values — without partisan bias.

Learn

  • About
  • About the name
  • Methodology
  • Glossary

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Refund Policy
  • Contact

Sources

Bill data from Congress.gov. Summaries from the Congressional Research Service where available.

Follow

  • Bluesky — @deepsyte.app
  • X — @deepsyteapp
All content is for informational purposes only. Always verify against primary sources.
Back to bill feed
119-hr-6547Introduced
Sign in to get alerts

Least Cost Exception Act

Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See how your representatives voted on this bill.

DeepSyte matches this bill to the issues you care about and shows whether your reps' votes line up — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your alignment.

Get started freeTake the values quiz

Alignment with your views

Sign in and take the values quiz to see how this bill lines up with what you've said.

Summary

Official CRS summary
This bill allows the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to waive the least-cost resolution requirement for failed insured depository institutions and use alternative methods of resolution, particularly alternatives that do not involve global systemically important banks (G-SIBs). Under current law, the FDIC must use the resolution method (such as a deposit payoff or the purchase and assumption of a bank’s assets and liabilities) that costs the FDIC's Deposit Insurance Fund the least to implement when an insured depository institution fails. The bill provides an exception to this requirement if the following criteria are met: the alternative method is the least costly of all alternatives that do not involve a G-SIB and that do not exceed the cost of liquidation; the difference in cost between the selected alternative and the cost of a resolution involving a purchase and assumption by a G-SIB is less than a maximum cost as established by rule; if the alternative involves a person purchasing assets or assuming liabilities, that person must pay an assessment to the FDIC; and it is determined that the risks to the fund are outweighed by the benefits of limiting the concentration of U.S. banking under G-SIBs. FDIC must issue a report on any use of the exception established by this bill containing an analysis of the economic impact of cost differences between the selected alternative and the least-cost alternative.
Read full bill text

Values analysis

Sign in and take the values quiz to get a personalized read on how this bill lines up with your positions.

Bill details

Congress
119
Bill type
hr
Introduced
December 10, 2025
Sponsor
Mike FloodRNE
Cosponsors
4
Last action
February 2, 2026— Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 405.

How your representatives voted

Sign in to see how your representatives voted on this bill.