2026 race

AZ-05 — U.S. House

2 candidates on the November ballot. Incumbent: Andy Biggs.

Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See where these candidates stand — and who's funding them.

DeepSyte tracks the money and the record in every race against the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your alignment.

How we got here · 2 earlier contests
Democratic primary · Tuesday, July 21, 2026
Called by audit: web-verified
Elizabeth LeeWon64.4%
  • DChristopher Lee JamesDefeated
  • DBrian HualdeDefeated
Republican primary · Tuesday, July 21, 2026
Called by audit: web-verified
Mark LambWon58.7%
  • RDaniel KeenanDefeated41.3%
  • RTravis GranthamDefeated
  • RMike GrossDefeated
Currently held by
Andy Biggs (R) — not seeking re-election in 2026. They've publicly announced their retirement; their committee is still on the FEC's 2026 roster for routine compliance, but this is effectively an open seat.
Election held
Counting
Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Results appear here once a race is called and verified. Official returns from the Arizona Secretary of State.

Disclosed money in race
$5.7M
Candidate + outside spending. See finance breakdown below.
Incumbent

Currently in office

Challengers

Sorted by fundraising

Mark Lamb

R
ChallengerFEC H6AZ05265

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$1.8M
Cash on hand: $181K

Elizabeth Lee

D
ChallengerFEC H6AZ05240

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$376K
Cash on hand: $124K
6 defeated candidates — show

Daniel Keenan

RDefeated
ChallengerFEC H6AZ05182

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$2.3M
Cash on hand: −$6K

Travis Grantham

RDefeated
ChallengerFEC H2AZ06155

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$613K
Cash on hand: $55K

Christopher Lee James

DDefeated
ChallengerFEC H6AZ05216

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$138K
Cash on hand: $0

Brian Hualde

DDefeated
ChallengerFEC H6AZ05224

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$57K
Cash on hand: $0

Blake Bracht

DDefeated
ChallengerFEC H6AZ05208

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$10K
Cash on hand: $0

Mike Gross

RDefeated
ChallengerFEC H6AZ05273

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$0
Cash on hand: $0
Local signal

Early read on AZ-05 — U.S. House

A directional read on where this seat is trending, from the signals we have so far. This is an early scaffold — more inputs light up as coverage and constituent activity accrue.

Coverage tone · the matchup
Recent news coverage of the nominees heading to the general election.
Mark Lambmixed
0 pos2 neutral0 neg2 articles
Elizabeth Leelimited coverage
No coverage in our tracked outlets in the last 90 days.
A media signal, not a poll of the district.
Constituent stakes
No one here has staked a position on a tracked vote yet. As neighbors weigh in on /pressure campaigns, the district's lean will show up here.
Money in the race

Finance breakdown

Disclosed funding shaping this race — both the money candidates raise themselves and the outside spending dropped by independent groups. Issue-ad spending by 501(c)(4) groups is excluded; the FEC doesn't require disclosure of it. See the note below for details.

Candidate fundraising: FEC reports through October 14, 2026 · 2025–26 cycle

Total disclosed
$5.7M
Candidate fundraising + independent expenditures (FEC).
Candidate-direct (Schedule A)
$5.3M
Raised by candidate committees themselves.
Outside spending (Schedule E)
$348K
$348K for · $0 against
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Mark Lamb(R)
+ WIN IT BACK PAC $251K
+ GOD FAMILY FREEDOM PAC $72K
+ CLUB FOR GROWTH PAC $18K
$1.8M$348K—$2.1M
Elizabeth Lee(D)
$376K——$376K
7 defeated candidates — show finances
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Daniel Keenan(R)defeated
$2.3M——$2.3M
Travis Grantham(R)defeated
$613K——$613K
Christopher Lee James(D)defeated
$138K——$138K
Brian Hualde(D)defeated
$57K——$57K
Andy Biggs(R)incumbentdefeated
+ FREEDOM CAUCUS FUND $181
$28K$181—$28K
Blake Bracht(D)defeated
$10K——$10K
Mike Gross(R)defeated
$0——$0
Where the money comes from

In-state vs out-of-state

Share of each candidate's itemized individual contributions from donors inside AZ versus the rest of the country. Excludes sub-$200 unitemized donations (no geography on file) and PAC money — see note below.

Mark Lamb(R)59% in-state · $596K itemized
$351K in-state$246K out-of-state
Elizabeth Lee(D)59% in-state · $79K itemized
$47K in-state$32K out-of-state
6 defeated candidates — show
Daniel Keenan(R)defeated96% in-state · $66K itemized
$64K in-state$3K out-of-state
Travis Grantham(R)defeated72% in-state · $219K itemized
$157K in-state$62K out-of-state
Christopher Lee James(D)defeated21% in-state · $83K itemized
$18K in-state$65K out-of-state
Brian Hualde(D)defeated94% in-state · $9K itemized
$8K in-state$500 out-of-state
Andy Biggs(R)defeated13% in-state · $8K itemized
$1K in-state$7K out-of-state
Blake Bracht(D)defeated0% in-state · $2K itemized
$0 in-state$2K out-of-state
What's counted, what isn't

Candidate-direct is each campaign's reported receipts on FEC Schedule A — individual contributions plus PAC contributions to the candidate's own committee — through the most recent filing.

Outside spending is independent expenditures on FEC Schedule E: money spent by PACs, super PACs, and party committees for or against a candidate, without legal coordination with the campaign. The committees listed under each candidate are the largest disclosed spenders on either side.

In-state vs out-of-state covers only itemized individual contributions — donations over $200, which are the only ones that carry a contributor address at the FEC. Sub-$200 unitemized donations (often a large share for grassroots campaigns) have no geography on file and are excluded, as is PAC money. So the percentages describe where a candidate's itemized individual money comes from, not where every dollar raised comes from.

Not counted: 501(c)(4) "social welfare" organizations run issue ads that frequently mention candidates by name but aren't classified as express advocacy under FEC rules — they file no Schedule E and don't appear in this breakdown. Press reporting on a race may cite figures that include this dark-money spending; ours doesn't.

Where they stand

Issue-by-issue comparison

Positions extracted from each candidate's campaign issues page by AI. Contested rows — where candidates disagree with each other — appear first.

StatementLambLeeYou
Abortion
Tax dollars should not pay for abortions.
—
Abortion
Each state should set its own abortion laws.
—
Abortion
Access to in vitro fertilization (IVF) and other fertility treatments should be protected by federal law.
—
Economy
Reducing the national debt should be a higher priority than new spending.
—
Education
Parents should be able to use public funds — through vouchers — to send their kids to private or charter schools.
—
Guns
A concealed-carry permit from one state should be valid in every state.
—
Housing
The government should spend more building affordable housing.
—
Immigration
The U.S. should do more to enforce immigration laws and secure the border.
—
Immigration
The U.S. should allow more legal immigration each year.
—
Governance & Other
Voters should be required to show photo ID, with the same rule in every state.
—
Governance & Other
Outside political spending — from PACs and super PACs — should be limited more strictly.
—
Governance & Other
Federal elections should use ranked-choice voting.
—
Social Security
High earners should pay Social Security taxes on more of their income.
—
Veterans
The VA should cover more veterans and more health conditions.
—

SupportsOpposesNo public positionRinged = confirmed by the campaign

Recent coverage

In the news

About this race page

Candidate roster is sourced from the FEC's active-candidate list for the 2026 cycle. Fundraising totals reflect committee filings through the last reporting period.

Alignment % compares the candidate's extracted policy positions against your quiz answers. Positions are pulled from the candidate's campaign issues page by AI; we save the source quote for each position so you can verify the extraction. Candidates without a campaign issues page show position data pending — we're working through the roster and re-checking stale extractions every 90 days.

News coverage is from the GDELT 2.0 global news feed, filtered to a curated list of national, political, and regional outlets.