All Arizona races
2026 race

AZ-05 — U.S. House

8 active candidates on file with the FEC. Incumbent: Andy Biggs.

Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See where these candidates stand — and who's funding them.

DeepSyte tracks the money and the record in every race against the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your alignment.

Currently held by
Andy Biggs (R)not seeking re-election in 2026. They've publicly announced their retirement; their committee is still on the FEC's 2026 roster for routine compliance, but this is effectively an open seat.
Election day
135days
Tuesday, November 3, 2026
Disclosed money in race
$3.3M
Candidate + outside spending. See finance breakdown below.
Incumbent

Currently in office

Challengers

Sorted by fundraising

Daniel Keenan

R
ChallengerFEC H6AZ05182

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$1.6M
Cash on hand: $1.2M

Mark Lamb

R
ChallengerFEC H6AZ05265

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$760K
Cash on hand: $347K

Travis Grantham

R
ChallengerFEC H2AZ06155

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$612K
Cash on hand: $75K

Christopher Lee James

D
ChallengerFEC H6AZ05216

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$125K
Cash on hand: $14K

Elizabeth Lee

D
ChallengerFEC H6AZ05240

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$94K
Cash on hand: $23K

Brian Hualde

D
ChallengerFEC H6AZ05224

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$43K
Cash on hand: $82

Blake Bracht

D
ChallengerFEC H6AZ05208

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$9K
Cash on hand: $2K
Local signal

Early read on AZ-05 — U.S. House

A directional read on where this seat is trending, from the signals we have so far. This is an early scaffold — more inputs light up as coverage and constituent activity accrue.

Coverage tone · leans negative
Recent news coverage of Andy Biggs over the last 90 days.
0 positive5 neutral3 negative
8 articles · AI-assessed sentiment toward the rep. A media signal, not a poll of the district.
Constituent stakes
No one here has staked a position on a tracked vote yet. As neighbors weigh in on /pressure campaigns, the district's lean will show up here.
Money in the race

Finance breakdown

Disclosed funding shaping this race — both the money candidates raise themselves and the outside spending dropped by independent groups. Issue-ad spending by 501(c)(4) groups is excluded; the FEC doesn't require disclosure of it. See the note below for details.

Total disclosed
$3.3M
Candidate fundraising + independent expenditures (FEC).
Candidate-direct (Schedule A)
$3.3M
Raised by candidate committees themselves.
Outside spending (Schedule E)
$0
No outside spending reported yet.
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Daniel Keenan(R)
$1.6M$1.6M
Mark Lamb(R)
$760K$760K
Travis Grantham(R)
$612K$612K
Christopher Lee James(D)
$125K$125K
Elizabeth Lee(D)
$94K$94K
Brian Hualde(D)
$43K$43K
Andy Biggs(R)incumbent
$28K$28K
Blake Bracht(D)
$9K$9K
Where the money comes from

In-state vs out-of-state

Share of each candidate's itemized individual contributions from donors inside AZ versus the rest of the country. Excludes sub-$200 unitemized donations (no geography on file) and PAC money — see note below.

Daniel Keenan(R)97% in-state · $42K itemized
$41K in-state$1K out-of-state
Mark Lamb(R)66% in-state · $407K itemized
$270K in-state$137K out-of-state
Travis Grantham(R)72% in-state · $219K itemized
$157K in-state$62K out-of-state
What's counted, what isn't

Candidate-direct is each campaign's reported receipts on FEC Schedule A — individual contributions plus PAC contributions to the candidate's own committee — through the most recent filing.

Outside spending is independent expenditures on FEC Schedule E: money spent by PACs, super PACs, and party committees for or against a candidate, without legal coordination with the campaign. The committees listed under each candidate are the largest disclosed spenders on either side.

In-state vs out-of-state covers only itemized individual contributions — donations over $200, which are the only ones that carry a contributor address at the FEC. Sub-$200 unitemized donations (often a large share for grassroots campaigns) have no geography on file and are excluded, as is PAC money. So the percentages describe where a candidate's itemized individual money comes from, not where every dollar raised comes from.

Not counted: 501(c)(4) "social welfare" organizations run issue ads that frequently mention candidates by name but aren't classified as express advocacy under FEC rules — they file no Schedule E and don't appear in this breakdown. Press reporting on a race may cite figures that include this dark-money spending; ours doesn't.

Where they stand

Issue-by-issue comparison

Positions extracted from each candidate's campaign issues page by AI. Contested rows — where candidates disagree with each other — appear first.

StatementKeenanLambGranthamJamesLeeHualdeBiggsBrachtYou
Abortion
Tax dollars should not pay for abortions.
Abortion
Each state should set its own abortion laws.
Economy
Reducing the national debt should be a higher priority than new spending.
Guns
A concealed-carry permit from one state should be valid in every state.
Immigration
The U.S. should do more to enforce immigration laws and secure the border.
Immigration
The U.S. should allow more legal immigration each year.
Governance & Other
Voters should be required to show photo ID, with the same rule in every state.
Governance & Other
Federal elections should use ranked-choice voting.
Social Security
High earners should pay Social Security taxes on more of their income.
Veterans
The VA should cover more veterans and more health conditions.

SupportsOpposesNo public positionRinged = confirmed by the campaign

Recent coverage

In the news

About this race page

Candidate roster is sourced from the FEC's active-candidate list for the 2026 cycle. Fundraising totals reflect committee filings through the last reporting period.

Alignment % compares the candidate's extracted policy positions against your quiz answers. Positions are pulled from the candidate's campaign issues page by AI; we save the source quote for each position so you can verify the extraction. Candidates without a campaign issues page show position data pending — we're working through the roster and re-checking stale extractions every 90 days.

News coverage is from the GDELT 2.0 global news feed, filtered to a curated list of national, political, and regional outlets.