2026 race

CA-34 — U.S. House

2 candidates on the November ballot. Incumbent: Jimmy Gomez.

Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See where these candidates stand — and who's funding them.

DeepSyte tracks the money and the record in every race against the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your alignment.

How we got here · 1 earlier contest
Primary · Tuesday, June 2, 2026
Called by AP
Top-two primary — Jimmy Gomez and Angela Gonzales-Torres advanced to the general election.
  • DJimmy Gomez· inc.Advanced to general46.1%
  • DAngela Gonzales-TorresAdvanced to general30.6%
  • RCalvin LeeDefeated13.7%
  • DRob LuceroDefeated5.1%
  • DArthur DixonDefeated3.4%
  • Loren ColinDefeated1.1%
Election held
Counting
Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Results appear here once a race is called and verified. Official returns from the California Secretary of State.

Disclosed money in race
$2.0M
Candidate + outside spending. See finance breakdown below.
Incumbent

Currently in office

Challengers

Sorted by fundraising

Angela Gonzales-Torres

D
ChallengerFEC H6CA34286

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$510K
Cash on hand: $105K

Rob Lucero

D
ChallengerFEC H6CA34294

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$183K
Cash on hand: $106

Arthur Dixon

D
ChallengerFEC H6CA34302

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$17K
Cash on hand: $12K

Loren Colin

I
ChallengerFEC H6CA34278

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$9K
Cash on hand: $0

Calvin Lee

R
ChallengerFEC H4CA34091

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$0
Cash on hand: $0
Local signal

Early read on CA-34 — U.S. House

A directional read on where this seat is trending, from the signals we have so far. This is an early scaffold — more inputs light up as coverage and constituent activity accrue.

Coverage tone · leans negative
Recent news coverage of Jimmy Gomez over the last 90 days.
0 positive11 neutral5 negative
16 articles · AI-assessed sentiment toward the rep. A media signal, not a poll of the district.
Constituent stakes
No one here has staked a position on a tracked vote yet. As neighbors weigh in on /pressure campaigns, the district's lean will show up here.
Money in the race

Finance breakdown

Disclosed funding shaping this race — both the money candidates raise themselves and the outside spending dropped by independent groups. Issue-ad spending by 501(c)(4) groups is excluded; the FEC doesn't require disclosure of it. See the note below for details.

Candidate fundraising: FEC reports through October 14, 2026 · 2025–26 cycle

Total disclosed
$2.0M
Candidate fundraising + independent expenditures (FEC).
Candidate-direct (Schedule A)
$2.1M
Raised by candidate committees themselves.
Outside spending (Schedule E)
−$25K
No outside spending reported yet.
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Jimmy Gomez(D)incumbent
+ SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION $10
+ PLANNED PARENTHOOD ADVOCACY PROJECT LOS ANGELES COUNTY ACTION FUND $0
+ UNITED DEMOCRACY PROJECT ('UDP') −$28K
$1.3M——$1.3M
Angela Gonzales-Torres(D)
+ WORKING FAMILIES PARTY PAC $3K
$510K$3K—$513K
Rob Lucero(D)
$183K——$183K
Arthur Dixon(D)
$17K——$17K
Loren Colin
$9K——$9K
Calvin Lee(R)
$0——$0
Where the money comes from

In-state vs out-of-state

Share of each candidate's itemized individual contributions from donors inside CA versus the rest of the country. Excludes sub-$200 unitemized donations (no geography on file) and PAC money — see note below.

Jimmy Gomez(D)67% in-state · $638K itemized
$428K in-state$211K out-of-state
Angela Gonzales-Torres(D)72% in-state · $113K itemized
$81K in-state$32K out-of-state
Rob Lucero(D)74% in-state · $156K itemized
$116K in-state$40K out-of-state
Arthur Dixon(D)100% in-state · $3K itemized
$3K in-state$0 out-of-state
Loren Colin90% in-state · $5K itemized
$4K in-state$500 out-of-state
What's counted, what isn't

Candidate-direct is each campaign's reported receipts on FEC Schedule A — individual contributions plus PAC contributions to the candidate's own committee — through the most recent filing.

Outside spending is independent expenditures on FEC Schedule E: money spent by PACs, super PACs, and party committees for or against a candidate, without legal coordination with the campaign. The committees listed under each candidate are the largest disclosed spenders on either side.

In-state vs out-of-state covers only itemized individual contributions — donations over $200, which are the only ones that carry a contributor address at the FEC. Sub-$200 unitemized donations (often a large share for grassroots campaigns) have no geography on file and are excluded, as is PAC money. So the percentages describe where a candidate's itemized individual money comes from, not where every dollar raised comes from.

Not counted: 501(c)(4) "social welfare" organizations run issue ads that frequently mention candidates by name but aren't classified as express advocacy under FEC rules — they file no Schedule E and don't appear in this breakdown. Press reporting on a race may cite figures that include this dark-money spending; ours doesn't.

Where they stand

Issue-by-issue comparison

Positions extracted from each candidate's campaign issues page by AI. Contested rows — where candidates disagree with each other — appear first.

StatementGomezGonzales-torresLuceroDixonColinLeeYou
Agriculture
SNAP (food stamp) eligibility and benefit levels should be expanded.
—
Economy
The federal government should require employers to provide paid family and medical leave.
—
Education
The government should forgive some federal student loan debt.
—
Healthcare
The government should provide healthcare for everyone.
—
Housing
The government should spend more building affordable housing.
—
Housing
Section 8 housing voucher funding should be increased substantially.
—
Immigration
People who were brought to the U.S. illegally as children should have a path to citizenship.
—
Immigration
The U.S. should do more to enforce immigration laws and secure the border.
—
Governance & Other
Outside political spending — from PACs and super PACs — should be limited more strictly.
—
Taxes
People making over $400,000 a year should pay higher taxes.
—
Abortion
A national law should protect access to abortion in every state.
—
Abortion
Access to contraception should be guaranteed by federal law in all states (Right to Contraception Act).
—
Abortion
States should be prohibited from criminalizing residents who travel out-of-state for abortion services.
—
Antitrust & Competition
Pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) should be subject to stricter federal antitrust scrutiny.
—
Criminal Justice
The federal government should send more money to local police departments.
—
Criminal Justice
Marijuana should be legal under federal law.
—
Criminal Justice
Federal law should allow individuals to sue police officers for civil-rights violations even when officers claim qualified immunity.
—
Economy
The federal minimum wage should be raised.
—
Economy
The expanded child tax credit (refundable, paid monthly) should be made permanent.
—
Education
Parents should be able to use public funds — through vouchers — to send their kids to private or charter schools.
—
Education
Federal Title IX protections should explicitly include sexual orientation and gender identity.
—
Environment
The government should set legally enforceable limits on greenhouse gas emissions.
—
Environment
The government should stop subsidizing oil and gas companies.
—
Foreign Policy
The U.S. should spend more on the military.
—
Foreign Policy
Conditions on U.S. military aid to Israel — tied to humanitarian or human-rights compliance — should be strengthened.
—
Healthcare
A government-run public health insurance option should be added to the ACA marketplace.
—
Healthcare
Federal enforcement of mental-health insurance parity (equal coverage to medical care) should be strengthened.
—
Judicial Reform
The number of Supreme Court justices should be increased above nine.
—
Judicial Reform
Supreme Court justices should be subject to fixed terms (e.g. 18 years) rather than life tenure.
—
Judicial Reform
Supreme Court justices should be bound by a binding code of ethics enforceable by Congress.
—

Showing top 30 of 35 questions with extracted positions.

SupportsOpposesNo public positionRinged = confirmed by the campaign

Recent coverage

In the news

About this race page

Candidate roster is sourced from the FEC's active-candidate list for the 2026 cycle. Fundraising totals reflect committee filings through the last reporting period.

Alignment % compares the candidate's extracted policy positions against your quiz answers. Positions are pulled from the candidate's campaign issues page by AI; we save the source quote for each position so you can verify the extraction. Candidates without a campaign issues page show position data pending — we're working through the roster and re-checking stale extractions every 90 days.

News coverage is from the GDELT 2.0 global news feed, filtered to a curated list of national, political, and regional outlets.