Roger Marshall
RIncumbentFEC S0KS00315
Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
Raised this cycle$3.3M
Cash on hand: $4.8M
All Kansas races
2026 race
KS — U.S. Senate
8 active candidates on file with the FEC. Incumbent: Roger Marshall.
Read the record. Not the rhetoric.
See where these candidates stand — and who's funding them.
DeepSyte tracks the money and the record in every race against the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your alignment.
Election day
135days
Tuesday, November 3, 2026
Make sure you can vote
Disclosed money in race
$4.3M
Candidate + outside spending. See finance breakdown below.
Incumbent
Currently in office
Challengers
Sorted by fundraising
Sandy Spidel Neumann
DChallengerFEC S6KS00262
Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
Raised this cycle$187K
Cash on hand: $38K
Erik Murray
DChallengerFEC S6KS00270
Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
Raised this cycle$180K
Cash on hand: $46K
Patrick Schmidt
DChallengerFEC S6KS00288
Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
Raised this cycle$177K
Cash on hand: $130K
Christy Davis
DChallengerFEC S6KS00247
Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
Raised this cycle$137K
Cash on hand: $59K
Noah Taylor
DChallengerFEC S6KS00296
Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
Raised this cycle$72K
Cash on hand: $69K
Lois Anne Elizabeth Lea Parelkar
DChallengerFEC S6KS00239
Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
Raised this cycle$20K
Cash on hand: $190
Jason Hart
DChallengerFEC S6KS00304
Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
Raised this cycle$11K
Cash on hand: $5K
Local signal
Early read on KS — U.S. Senate
A directional read on where this seat is trending, from the signals we have so far. This is an early scaffold — more inputs light up as coverage and constituent activity accrue.
Coverage tone · leans negative
Recent news coverage of Roger Marshall over the last 90 days.
0 positive14 neutral2 negative
16 articles · AI-assessed sentiment toward the rep. A media signal, not a poll of the district.
Constituent stakes
No one here has staked a position on a tracked vote yet. As neighbors weigh in on /pressure campaigns, the district's lean will show up here.
Money in the race
Finance breakdown
Disclosed funding shaping this race — both the money candidates raise themselves and the outside spending dropped by independent groups. Issue-ad spending by 501(c)(4) groups is excluded; the FEC doesn't require disclosure of it. See the note below for details.
Total disclosed
$4.3M
Candidate fundraising + independent expenditures (FEC).
Candidate-direct (Schedule A)
$4.1M
Raised by candidate committees themselves.
Outside spending (Schedule E)
$183K
$182K for · $613 against
| Candidate | Raised directly | Outside for | Outside against | Net in corner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Roger Marshall(R)incumbent + SENATE CONSERVATIVES FUND $149K + SENATE CONSERVATIVES ACTION $35K + KANSAS AG COMMUNITIES COALITION $-1,386 − REALLY AMERICAN PAC $613 | $3.3M | $182K | $613 | $3.5M |
Sandy Spidel Neumann(D) | $187K | — | — | $187K |
Erik Murray(D) | $180K | — | — | $180K |
Patrick Schmidt(D) | $177K | — | — | $177K |
Christy Davis(D) | $137K | — | — | $137K |
Noah Taylor(D) | $72K | — | — | $72K |
Lois Anne Elizabeth Lea Parelkar(D) | $20K | — | — | $20K |
Jason Hart(D) | $11K | — | — | $11K |
Where the money comes from
In-state vs out-of-state
Share of each candidate's itemized individual contributions from donors inside KS versus the rest of the country. Excludes sub-$200 unitemized donations (no geography on file) and PAC money — see note below.
Roger Marshall(R)18% in-state · $2.1M itemized
$381K in-state$1.7M out-of-state
Sandy Spidel Neumann(D)32% in-state · $48K itemized
$15K in-state$33K out-of-state
Erik Murray(D)48% in-state · $170K itemized
$82K in-state$88K out-of-state
Patrick Schmidt(D)62% in-state · $149K itemized
$92K in-state$57K out-of-state
Christy Davis(D)86% in-state · $52K itemized
$45K in-state$7K out-of-state
Noah Taylor(D)82% in-state · $33K itemized
$27K in-state$6K out-of-state
Lois Anne Elizabeth Lea Parelkar(D)58% in-state · $10K itemized
$6K in-state$4K out-of-state
Jason Hart(D)52% in-state · $3K itemized
$2K in-state$1K out-of-state
What's counted, what isn't
Candidate-direct is each campaign's reported receipts on FEC Schedule A — individual contributions plus PAC contributions to the candidate's own committee — through the most recent filing.
Outside spending is independent expenditures on FEC Schedule E: money spent by PACs, super PACs, and party committees for or against a candidate, without legal coordination with the campaign. The committees listed under each candidate are the largest disclosed spenders on either side.
In-state vs out-of-state covers only itemized individual contributions — donations over $200, which are the only ones that carry a contributor address at the FEC. Sub-$200 unitemized donations (often a large share for grassroots campaigns) have no geography on file and are excluded, as is PAC money. So the percentages describe where a candidate's itemized individual money comes from, not where every dollar raised comes from.
Not counted: 501(c)(4) "social welfare" organizations run issue ads that frequently mention candidates by name but aren't classified as express advocacy under FEC rules — they file no Schedule E and don't appear in this breakdown. Press reporting on a race may cite figures that include this dark-money spending; ours doesn't.
About this race page
Candidate roster is sourced from the FEC's active-candidate list for the 2026 cycle. Fundraising totals reflect committee filings through the last reporting period.
Alignment % compares the candidate's extracted policy positions against your quiz answers. Positions are pulled from the candidate's campaign issues page by AI; we save the source quote for each position so you can verify the extraction. Candidates without a campaign issues page show position data pending — we're working through the roster and re-checking stale extractions every 90 days.
News coverage is from the GDELT 2.0 global news feed, filtered to a curated list of national, political, and regional outlets.