All Massachusetts races
2026 race

MA-06 — U.S. House

9 active candidates on file with the FEC. Incumbent: Seth Moulton.

Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See where these candidates stand — and who's funding them.

DeepSyte tracks the money and the record in every race against the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your alignment.

Currently held by
Seth Moulton (D)not seeking re-election in 2026. They've publicly announced their retirement; their committee is still on the FEC's 2026 roster for routine compliance, but this is effectively an open seat.
Election day
135days
Tuesday, November 3, 2026
Disclosed money in race
$7.6M
Candidate + outside spending. See finance breakdown below.
Incumbent

Currently in office

Challengers

Sorted by fundraising

Daniel Arrigg Koh

D
ChallengerFEC H8MA03072

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$3.5M
Cash on hand: $3.0M

John Beccia

D
ChallengerFEC H6MA06152

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$2.4M
Cash on hand: $2.1M

Tram Nguyen

D
ChallengerFEC H6MA06160

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$431K
Cash on hand: $253K

Rick Jakious

D
ChallengerFEC H6MA06178

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$353K
Cash on hand: $198K

Micah Jones

R
ChallengerFEC H6MA06202

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$258K
Cash on hand: $205K

Beth Andres-Beck

D
ChallengerFEC H6MA06145

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$248K
Cash on hand: $10K

Mariah Lancaster

D
ChallengerFEC H6MA06186

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$207K
Cash on hand: $102K

Jamie Marie Zahlaway Belsito

D
ChallengerFEC H0MA06098

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$134K
Cash on hand: $69K
Local signal

Early read on MA-06 — U.S. House

A directional read on where this seat is trending, from the signals we have so far. This is an early scaffold — more inputs light up as coverage and constituent activity accrue.

Coverage tone · leans negative
Recent news coverage of Seth Moulton over the last 90 days.
2 positive21 neutral3 negative
26 articles · AI-assessed sentiment toward the rep. A media signal, not a poll of the district.
Constituent stakes
No one here has staked a position on a tracked vote yet. As neighbors weigh in on /pressure campaigns, the district's lean will show up here.
Money in the race

Finance breakdown

Disclosed funding shaping this race — both the money candidates raise themselves and the outside spending dropped by independent groups. Issue-ad spending by 501(c)(4) groups is excluded; the FEC doesn't require disclosure of it. See the note below for details.

Total disclosed
$7.6M
Candidate fundraising + independent expenditures (FEC).
Candidate-direct (Schedule A)
$7.6M
Raised by candidate committees themselves.
Outside spending (Schedule E)
$0
No outside spending reported yet.
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Daniel Arrigg Koh(D)
$3.5M$3.5M
John Beccia(D)
$2.4M$2.4M
Tram Nguyen(D)
$431K$431K
Rick Jakious(D)
$353K$353K
Micah Jones(R)
$258K$258K
Beth Andres-Beck(D)
$248K$248K
Mariah Lancaster(D)
$207K$207K
Jamie Marie Zahlaway Belsito(D)
$134K$134K
Seth Moulton(D)incumbent
$0$0
Where the money comes from

In-state vs out-of-state

Share of each candidate's itemized individual contributions from donors inside MA versus the rest of the country. Excludes sub-$200 unitemized donations (no geography on file) and PAC money — see note below.

Daniel Arrigg Koh(D)54% in-state · $3.4M itemized
$1.8M in-state$1.5M out-of-state
John Beccia(D)19% in-state · $379K itemized
$70K in-state$309K out-of-state
What's counted, what isn't

Candidate-direct is each campaign's reported receipts on FEC Schedule A — individual contributions plus PAC contributions to the candidate's own committee — through the most recent filing.

Outside spending is independent expenditures on FEC Schedule E: money spent by PACs, super PACs, and party committees for or against a candidate, without legal coordination with the campaign. The committees listed under each candidate are the largest disclosed spenders on either side.

In-state vs out-of-state covers only itemized individual contributions — donations over $200, which are the only ones that carry a contributor address at the FEC. Sub-$200 unitemized donations (often a large share for grassroots campaigns) have no geography on file and are excluded, as is PAC money. So the percentages describe where a candidate's itemized individual money comes from, not where every dollar raised comes from.

Not counted: 501(c)(4) "social welfare" organizations run issue ads that frequently mention candidates by name but aren't classified as express advocacy under FEC rules — they file no Schedule E and don't appear in this breakdown. Press reporting on a race may cite figures that include this dark-money spending; ours doesn't.

Where they stand

Issue-by-issue comparison

Positions extracted from each candidate's campaign issues page by AI. Contested rows — where candidates disagree with each other — appear first.

StatementKohBecciaNguyenJakiousJonesAndres-beckLancasterBelsitoMoultonYou
Abortion
A national law should protect access to abortion in every state.
Criminal Justice
The federal government should send more money to local police departments.
Economy
The federal minimum wage should be raised.
Environment
The government should set legally enforceable limits on greenhouse gas emissions.
Healthcare
Medicare should be allowed to negotiate lower prescription drug prices.
Immigration
People who were brought to the U.S. illegally as children should have a path to citizenship.
Governance & Other
Outside political spending — from PACs and super PACs — should be limited more strictly.

SupportsOpposesNo public positionRinged = confirmed by the campaign

Recent coverage

In the news

About this race page

Candidate roster is sourced from the FEC's active-candidate list for the 2026 cycle. Fundraising totals reflect committee filings through the last reporting period.

Alignment % compares the candidate's extracted policy positions against your quiz answers. Positions are pulled from the candidate's campaign issues page by AI; we save the source quote for each position so you can verify the extraction. Candidates without a campaign issues page show position data pending — we're working through the roster and re-checking stale extractions every 90 days.

News coverage is from the GDELT 2.0 global news feed, filtered to a curated list of national, political, and regional outlets.