All Michigan races
2026 race

MI-10 — U.S. House

10 active candidates on file with the FEC. Incumbent: John James.

Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See where these candidates stand — and who's funding them.

DeepSyte tracks the money and the record in every race against the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your alignment.

Currently held by
John James (R)not seeking re-election in 2026. They've publicly announced their retirement; their committee is still on the FEC's 2026 roster for routine compliance, but this is effectively an open seat.
Election day
135days
Tuesday, November 3, 2026
Disclosed money in race
$7.2M
Candidate + outside spending. See finance breakdown below.
Incumbent

Currently in office

Challengers

Sorted by fundraising

Eric Chung

D
ChallengerFEC H6MI10292

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$1.5M
Cash on hand: $931K

Robert Lulgjuraj

R
ChallengerFEC H6MI10326

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$1.2M
Cash on hand: $822K

Tim Greimel

D
ChallengerFEC H6MI10284

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$1.1M
Cash on hand: $634K

Michael Bouchard

R
ChallengerFEC H6MI10359

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$977K
Cash on hand: $847K

Christina Hines

D
ChallengerFEC H6MI10276

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$884K
Cash on hand: $312K

Justin Kirk

R
ChallengerFEC H6MI10334

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$411K
Cash on hand: $347K

Alexander Hawkins

D
ChallengerFEC H6MI10268

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$376K
Cash on hand: $0

George Adams

D
ChallengerFEC H6MI10300

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$198K
Cash on hand: $173K

Steven Elliott

R
ChallengerFEC H2MI13311

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$48K
Cash on hand: $462
Local signal

Early read on MI-10 — U.S. House

A directional read on where this seat is trending, from the signals we have so far. This is an early scaffold — more inputs light up as coverage and constituent activity accrue.

Coverage tone · mixed
Recent news coverage of John James over the last 90 days.
0 positive3 neutral0 negative
3 articles · AI-assessed sentiment toward the rep. A media signal, not a poll of the district.
Constituent stakes
No one here has staked a position on a tracked vote yet. As neighbors weigh in on /pressure campaigns, the district's lean will show up here.
Money in the race

Finance breakdown

Disclosed funding shaping this race — both the money candidates raise themselves and the outside spending dropped by independent groups. Issue-ad spending by 501(c)(4) groups is excluded; the FEC doesn't require disclosure of it. See the note below for details.

Total disclosed
$7.2M
Candidate fundraising + independent expenditures (FEC).
Candidate-direct (Schedule A)
$7.2M
Raised by candidate committees themselves.
Outside spending (Schedule E)
$0
No outside spending reported yet.
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Eric Chung(D)
$1.5M$1.5M
Robert Lulgjuraj(R)
$1.2M$1.2M
Tim Greimel(D)
$1.1M$1.1M
Michael Bouchard(R)
$977K$977K
Christina Hines(D)
$884K$884K
John James(R)incumbent
$554K$554K
Justin Kirk(R)
$411K$411K
Alexander Hawkins(D)
$376K$376K
George Adams(D)
$198K$198K
Steven Elliott(R)
$48K$48K
Where the money comes from

In-state vs out-of-state

Share of each candidate's itemized individual contributions from donors inside MI versus the rest of the country. Excludes sub-$200 unitemized donations (no geography on file) and PAC money — see note below.

Eric Chung(D)6% in-state · $1.2M itemized
$74K in-state$1.1M out-of-state
Robert Lulgjuraj(R)80% in-state · $1.2M itemized
$928K in-state$239K out-of-state
Tim Greimel(D)86% in-state · $872K itemized
$754K in-state$119K out-of-state
Michael Bouchard(R)92% in-state · $913K itemized
$836K in-state$77K out-of-state
Christina Hines(D)65% in-state · $625K itemized
$405K in-state$220K out-of-state
John James(R)7% in-state · $411K itemized
$30K in-state$381K out-of-state
What's counted, what isn't

Candidate-direct is each campaign's reported receipts on FEC Schedule A — individual contributions plus PAC contributions to the candidate's own committee — through the most recent filing.

Outside spending is independent expenditures on FEC Schedule E: money spent by PACs, super PACs, and party committees for or against a candidate, without legal coordination with the campaign. The committees listed under each candidate are the largest disclosed spenders on either side.

In-state vs out-of-state covers only itemized individual contributions — donations over $200, which are the only ones that carry a contributor address at the FEC. Sub-$200 unitemized donations (often a large share for grassroots campaigns) have no geography on file and are excluded, as is PAC money. So the percentages describe where a candidate's itemized individual money comes from, not where every dollar raised comes from.

Not counted: 501(c)(4) "social welfare" organizations run issue ads that frequently mention candidates by name but aren't classified as express advocacy under FEC rules — they file no Schedule E and don't appear in this breakdown. Press reporting on a race may cite figures that include this dark-money spending; ours doesn't.

Where they stand

Issue-by-issue comparison

Positions extracted from each candidate's campaign issues page by AI. Contested rows — where candidates disagree with each other — appear first.

StatementChungLulgjurajGreimelBouchardHinesJamesKirkHawkinsAdamsElliottYou
Economy
The federal minimum wage should be raised.
Healthcare
States, not the federal government, should decide who gets Medicaid and what it covers.
Labor
Federal labor law should make it easier for workers to form unions (PRO Act-style reforms).

SupportsOpposesNo public positionRinged = confirmed by the campaign

About this race page

Candidate roster is sourced from the FEC's active-candidate list for the 2026 cycle. Fundraising totals reflect committee filings through the last reporting period.

Alignment % compares the candidate's extracted policy positions against your quiz answers. Positions are pulled from the candidate's campaign issues page by AI; we save the source quote for each position so you can verify the extraction. Candidates without a campaign issues page show position data pending — we're working through the roster and re-checking stale extractions every 90 days.

News coverage is from the GDELT 2.0 global news feed, filtered to a curated list of national, political, and regional outlets.