2026 race

MS — U.S. Senate

3 candidates on the November ballot. Incumbent: Cindy Hyde-Smith.

Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See where these candidates stand — and who's funding them.

DeepSyte tracks the money and the record in every race against the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your alignment.

How we got here · 2 earlier contests
Democratic primary · Tuesday, March 10, 2026
Called by manual backfill (AP/Wikipedia/state SOS)
Scott ColomWon72.9%
  • DPriscilla Williams TillDefeated18.6%
  • DAlbert LittellDefeated8.5%
Republican primary · Tuesday, March 10, 2026
Called by manual backfill (AP/Wikipedia/state SOS)
Cindy Hyde-SmithWon80.8%
  • RSarah Anne AdlakhaDefeated19.2%
Election held
Counting
Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Results appear here once a race is called and verified. Official returns from the Mississippi Secretary of State.

Disclosed money in race
$12M
Candidate + outside spending. See finance breakdown below.
Incumbent

Currently in office

Challengers

Sorted by fundraising

Scott Colom

D
ChallengerFEC S6MS00133

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$4.4M
Cash on hand: $1.0M

Ty Pinkins

I
ChallengerFEC S4MS00187

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$105K
Cash on hand: $4K
3 defeated candidates — show

Sarah Anne Adlakha

RDefeated
ChallengerFEC S6MS00109

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$566K
Cash on hand: $10K

Priscilla Williams Till

DDefeated
ChallengerFEC S6MS00158

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$9K
Cash on hand: $0

Albert Littell

DDefeated
ChallengerFEC S6MS00117

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$0
Cash on hand: $0
Local signal

Early read on MS — U.S. Senate

A directional read on where this seat is trending, from the signals we have so far. This is an early scaffold — more inputs light up as coverage and constituent activity accrue.

Coverage tone · the matchup
Recent news coverage of the nominees heading to the general election.
Cindy Hyde-Smithleans negative
0 pos21 neutral1 neg22 articles
Scott Colomleans positive
3 pos20 neutral0 neg23 articles
A media signal, not a poll of the district.
Constituent stakes
No one here has staked a position on a tracked vote yet. As neighbors weigh in on /pressure campaigns, the district's lean will show up here.
Money in the race

Finance breakdown

Disclosed funding shaping this race — both the money candidates raise themselves and the outside spending dropped by independent groups. Issue-ad spending by 501(c)(4) groups is excluded; the FEC doesn't require disclosure of it. See the note below for details.

Candidate fundraising: FEC reports through October 14, 2026 · 2025–26 cycle

Total disclosed
$12M
Candidate fundraising + independent expenditures (FEC).
Candidate-direct (Schedule A)
$9.7M
Raised by candidate committees themselves.
Outside spending (Schedule E)
$2.4M
$919K for · $1.5M against
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Scott Colom(D)
+ BLACKPAC $411K
+ FULCRUM PAC $322K
+ VOTE COURAGE 4 DEMOCRACY FUND $23K
$4.4M$785K—$5.2M
Cindy Hyde-Smith(R)incumbent
+ CONSERVATIVE LEADERS OF AMERICA $134K
− AB PAC $1.4M
− NEW SOUTHERN MAJORITY IE PAC $77K
$4.6M$134K$1.5M$3.3M
Ty Pinkins(I)
$105K——$105K
3 defeated candidates — show finances
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Sarah Anne Adlakha(R)defeated
$566K——$566K
Priscilla Williams Till(D)defeated
$9K——$9K
Albert Littell(D)defeated
$0——$0
Where the money comes from

In-state vs out-of-state

Share of each candidate's itemized individual contributions from donors inside MS versus the rest of the country. Excludes sub-$200 unitemized donations (no geography on file) and PAC money — see note below.

Scott Colom(D)32% in-state · $1.7M itemized
$536K in-state$1.2M out-of-state
Cindy Hyde-Smith(R)45% in-state · $2.5M itemized
$1.1M in-state$1.3M out-of-state
Ty Pinkins(I)39% in-state · $33K itemized
$13K in-state$20K out-of-state
2 defeated candidates — show
Sarah Anne Adlakha(R)defeated63% in-state · $65K itemized
$41K in-state$24K out-of-state
Priscilla Williams Till(D)defeated75% in-state · $2K itemized
$1K in-state$375 out-of-state
What's counted, what isn't

Candidate-direct is each campaign's reported receipts on FEC Schedule A — individual contributions plus PAC contributions to the candidate's own committee — through the most recent filing.

Outside spending is independent expenditures on FEC Schedule E: money spent by PACs, super PACs, and party committees for or against a candidate, without legal coordination with the campaign. The committees listed under each candidate are the largest disclosed spenders on either side.

In-state vs out-of-state covers only itemized individual contributions — donations over $200, which are the only ones that carry a contributor address at the FEC. Sub-$200 unitemized donations (often a large share for grassroots campaigns) have no geography on file and are excluded, as is PAC money. So the percentages describe where a candidate's itemized individual money comes from, not where every dollar raised comes from.

Not counted: 501(c)(4) "social welfare" organizations run issue ads that frequently mention candidates by name but aren't classified as express advocacy under FEC rules — they file no Schedule E and don't appear in this breakdown. Press reporting on a race may cite figures that include this dark-money spending; ours doesn't.

Where they stand

Issue-by-issue comparison

Positions extracted from each candidate's campaign issues page by AI. Contested rows — where candidates disagree with each other — appear first.

StatementHyde-smithColomPinkinsYou
Immigration
The U.S. should do more to enforce immigration laws and secure the border.
—
Criminal Justice
The federal government should send more money to local police departments.
—
Economy
The federal minimum wage should be raised.
—
Economy
Reducing the national debt should be a higher priority than new spending.
—
Healthcare
Enhanced ACA premium subsidies should be made permanent at expanded levels.
—
Governance & Other
Outside political spending — from PACs and super PACs — should be limited more strictly.
—
Technology
When the government uses AI, it should be required to disclose how those systems work.
—
Trade
Presidents should be able to impose broad tariffs unilaterally under emergency powers (IEEPA-style authority).
—

SupportsOpposesNo public positionRinged = confirmed by the campaign

Recent coverage

In the news

About this race page

Candidate roster is sourced from the FEC's active-candidate list for the 2026 cycle. Fundraising totals reflect committee filings through the last reporting period.

Alignment % compares the candidate's extracted policy positions against your quiz answers. Positions are pulled from the candidate's campaign issues page by AI; we save the source quote for each position so you can verify the extraction. Candidates without a campaign issues page show position data pending — we're working through the roster and re-checking stale extractions every 90 days.

News coverage is from the GDELT 2.0 global news feed, filtered to a curated list of national, political, and regional outlets.