All Mississippi races
2026 race

MS — U.S. Senate

5 active candidates on file with the FEC. Incumbent: Cindy Hyde-Smith.

Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See where these candidates stand — and who's funding them.

DeepSyte tracks the money and the record in every race against the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your alignment.

Democratic primary · Tuesday, March 10, 2026
Called by manual backfill (AP/Wikipedia/state SOS)
Scott ColomWon72.9%
  • DPriscilla Williams TillDefeated18.6%
  • DAlbert LittellDefeated8.5%
Republican primary · Tuesday, March 10, 2026
Called by manual backfill (AP/Wikipedia/state SOS)
Cindy Hyde-SmithWon80.8%
  • RSarah Anne AdlakhaDefeated19.2%
Election day
135days
Tuesday, November 3, 2026
Disclosed money in race
$6.2M
Candidate + outside spending. See finance breakdown below.
Incumbent

Currently in office

Challengers

Sorted by fundraising

Scott Colom

D
ChallengerFEC S6MS00133

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$1.6M
Cash on hand: $560K

Ty Pinkins

I
ChallengerFEC S4MS00187

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$90K
Cash on hand: $632
2 defeated candidates — show

Sarah Anne Adlakha

RDefeated
ChallengerFEC S6MS00109

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$566K
Cash on hand: $10K

Priscilla Williams Till

DDefeated
ChallengerFEC S6MS00158

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$9K
Cash on hand: $0
Local signal

Early read on MS — U.S. Senate

A directional read on where this seat is trending, from the signals we have so far. This is an early scaffold — more inputs light up as coverage and constituent activity accrue.

Coverage tone · the matchup
Recent news coverage of the nominees heading to the general election.
Cindy Hyde-Smithlimited coverage
No tracked coverage in the last 90 days yet.
Scott Colomlimited coverage
No tracked coverage in the last 90 days yet.
A media signal, not a poll of the district.
Constituent stakes
No one here has staked a position on a tracked vote yet. As neighbors weigh in on /pressure campaigns, the district's lean will show up here.
Money in the race

Finance breakdown

Disclosed funding shaping this race — both the money candidates raise themselves and the outside spending dropped by independent groups. Issue-ad spending by 501(c)(4) groups is excluded; the FEC doesn't require disclosure of it. See the note below for details.

Total disclosed
$6.2M
Candidate fundraising + independent expenditures (FEC).
Candidate-direct (Schedule A)
$5.7M
Raised by candidate committees themselves.
Outside spending (Schedule E)
$555K
$468K for · $87K against
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Cindy Hyde-Smith(R)incumbent
+ CONSERVATIVE LEADERS OF AMERICA $134K
NEW SOUTHERN MAJORITY IE PAC $76K
REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FREEDOM FUND $10K
REALLY AMERICAN PAC $613
$3.4M$134K$87K$3.4M
Scott Colom(D)
+ FULCRUM PAC $322K
+ NEW SOUTHERN MAJORITY IE PAC $12K
$1.6M$334K$2.0M
Ty Pinkins(I)
$90K$90K
2 defeated candidates — show finances
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Sarah Anne Adlakha(R)defeated
$566K$566K
Priscilla Williams Till(D)defeated
$9K$9K
Where the money comes from

In-state vs out-of-state

Share of each candidate's itemized individual contributions from donors inside MS versus the rest of the country. Excludes sub-$200 unitemized donations (no geography on file) and PAC money — see note below.

Cindy Hyde-Smith(R)44% in-state · $2.2M itemized
$986K in-state$1.3M out-of-state
Scott Colom(D)35% in-state · $1.1M itemized
$394K in-state$733K out-of-state
Ty Pinkins(I)36% in-state · $29K itemized
$10K in-state$19K out-of-state
2 defeated candidates — show
Sarah Anne Adlakha(R)defeated63% in-state · $65K itemized
$41K in-state$24K out-of-state
Priscilla Williams Till(D)defeated75% in-state · $2K itemized
$1K in-state$375 out-of-state
What's counted, what isn't

Candidate-direct is each campaign's reported receipts on FEC Schedule A — individual contributions plus PAC contributions to the candidate's own committee — through the most recent filing.

Outside spending is independent expenditures on FEC Schedule E: money spent by PACs, super PACs, and party committees for or against a candidate, without legal coordination with the campaign. The committees listed under each candidate are the largest disclosed spenders on either side.

In-state vs out-of-state covers only itemized individual contributions — donations over $200, which are the only ones that carry a contributor address at the FEC. Sub-$200 unitemized donations (often a large share for grassroots campaigns) have no geography on file and are excluded, as is PAC money. So the percentages describe where a candidate's itemized individual money comes from, not where every dollar raised comes from.

Not counted: 501(c)(4) "social welfare" organizations run issue ads that frequently mention candidates by name but aren't classified as express advocacy under FEC rules — they file no Schedule E and don't appear in this breakdown. Press reporting on a race may cite figures that include this dark-money spending; ours doesn't.

About this race page

Candidate roster is sourced from the FEC's active-candidate list for the 2026 cycle. Fundraising totals reflect committee filings through the last reporting period.

Alignment % compares the candidate's extracted policy positions against your quiz answers. Positions are pulled from the candidate's campaign issues page by AI; we save the source quote for each position so you can verify the extraction. Candidates without a campaign issues page show position data pending — we're working through the roster and re-checking stale extractions every 90 days.

News coverage is from the GDELT 2.0 global news feed, filtered to a curated list of national, political, and regional outlets.