All Texas races
2026 race

TX-15 — U.S. House

3 active candidates on file with the FEC. Incumbent: Monica De La Cruz.

Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See where these candidates stand — and who's funding them.

DeepSyte tracks the money and the record in every race against the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your alignment.

Democratic primary · Tuesday, March 3, 2026
Called by manual backfill (AP/Wikipedia/Ballotpedia)
Bobby PulidoWon67.5%
  • DAda CuellarDefeated32.5%
Republican primary · Tuesday, March 3, 2026
Called by manual backfill (AP/Wikipedia/Ballotpedia)
Monica De La CruzWon100.0%
Election day
135days
Tuesday, November 3, 2026
Make sure you can vote
Disclosed money in race
$8.3M
Candidate + outside spending. See finance breakdown below.
Incumbent

Currently in office

Challengers

Sorted by fundraising

Bobby Pulido

D
ChallengerFEC H6TX15246

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$1.6M
Cash on hand: $403K
1 defeated candidate — show

Ada Cuellar

DDefeated
ChallengerFEC H6TX15238

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$1.3M
Cash on hand: $86
Local signal

Early read on TX-15 — U.S. House

A directional read on where this seat is trending, from the signals we have so far. This is an early scaffold — more inputs light up as coverage and constituent activity accrue.

Coverage tone · the matchup
Recent news coverage of the nominees heading to the general election.
Monica De La Cruzlimited coverage
No tracked coverage in the last 90 days yet.
Bobby Pulidoleans negative
0 pos1 neutral1 neg2 articles
A media signal, not a poll of the district.
Constituent stakes
No one here has staked a position on a tracked vote yet. As neighbors weigh in on /pressure campaigns, the district's lean will show up here.
Money in the race

Finance breakdown

Disclosed funding shaping this race — both the money candidates raise themselves and the outside spending dropped by independent groups. Issue-ad spending by 501(c)(4) groups is excluded; the FEC doesn't require disclosure of it. See the note below for details.

Total disclosed
$8.3M
Candidate fundraising + independent expenditures (FEC).
Candidate-direct (Schedule A)
$7.1M
Raised by candidate committees themselves.
Outside spending (Schedule E)
$1.2M
$1.2M for · $0 against
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Monica De La Cruz(R)incumbent
$4.2M$4.2M
Bobby Pulido(D)
+ BDA PAC $998K
+ LATINO VICTORY FUND $83K
+ PROJECT 218 $56K
$1.6M$1.2M$2.8M
1 defeated candidate — show finances
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Ada Cuellar(D)defeated
$1.3M$1.3M
Where the money comes from

In-state vs out-of-state

Share of each candidate's itemized individual contributions from donors inside TX versus the rest of the country. Excludes sub-$200 unitemized donations (no geography on file) and PAC money — see note below.

Monica De La Cruz(R)41% in-state · $3.1M itemized
$1.3M in-state$1.9M out-of-state
Bobby Pulido(D)40% in-state · $1.1M itemized
$444K in-state$659K out-of-state
1 defeated candidate — show
Ada Cuellar(D)defeated56% in-state · $58K itemized
$32K in-state$25K out-of-state
What's counted, what isn't

Candidate-direct is each campaign's reported receipts on FEC Schedule A — individual contributions plus PAC contributions to the candidate's own committee — through the most recent filing.

Outside spending is independent expenditures on FEC Schedule E: money spent by PACs, super PACs, and party committees for or against a candidate, without legal coordination with the campaign. The committees listed under each candidate are the largest disclosed spenders on either side.

In-state vs out-of-state covers only itemized individual contributions — donations over $200, which are the only ones that carry a contributor address at the FEC. Sub-$200 unitemized donations (often a large share for grassroots campaigns) have no geography on file and are excluded, as is PAC money. So the percentages describe where a candidate's itemized individual money comes from, not where every dollar raised comes from.

Not counted: 501(c)(4) "social welfare" organizations run issue ads that frequently mention candidates by name but aren't classified as express advocacy under FEC rules — they file no Schedule E and don't appear in this breakdown. Press reporting on a race may cite figures that include this dark-money spending; ours doesn't.

Where they stand

Issue-by-issue comparison

Positions extracted from each candidate's campaign issues page by AI. Contested rows — where candidates disagree with each other — appear first.

StatementDe la cruzPulidoYou
Agriculture
Federal farm subsidies should be reduced and redirected toward smaller producers.
Economy
Reducing the national debt should be a higher priority than new spending.
Economy
Tariffs on foreign goods should be used to protect American jobs.
Environment
The government should set legally enforceable limits on greenhouse gas emissions.
Environment
The government should stop subsidizing oil and gas companies.
Environment
Federal permitting and subsidies for new nuclear power plants should be expanded.
Immigration
People who were brought to the U.S. illegally as children should have a path to citizenship.
Immigration
The U.S. should do more to enforce immigration laws and secure the border.
Social Security
Future workers should have to wait longer to collect full Social Security.
Taxes
People making over $400,000 a year should pay higher taxes.

SupportsOpposesNo public positionRinged = confirmed by the campaign

Recent coverage

In the news

About this race page

Candidate roster is sourced from the FEC's active-candidate list for the 2026 cycle. Fundraising totals reflect committee filings through the last reporting period.

Alignment % compares the candidate's extracted policy positions against your quiz answers. Positions are pulled from the candidate's campaign issues page by AI; we save the source quote for each position so you can verify the extraction. Candidates without a campaign issues page show position data pending — we're working through the roster and re-checking stale extractions every 90 days.

News coverage is from the GDELT 2.0 global news feed, filtered to a curated list of national, political, and regional outlets.