All Wisconsin races
2026 race

WI-03 — U.S. House

4 active candidates on file with the FEC. Incumbent: Derrick Van Orden.

Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See where these candidates stand — and who's funding them.

DeepSyte tracks the money and the record in every race against the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your alignment.

Election day
135days
Tuesday, November 3, 2026
Disclosed money in race
$13M
Candidate + outside spending. See finance breakdown below.
Incumbent

Currently in office

Challengers

Sorted by fundraising

Rebecca Cooke

D
ChallengerFEC H4WI03169

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$6.5M
Cash on hand: $4.4M

Emily Berge

D
ChallengerFEC H6WI03172

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$566K
Cash on hand: $97K

Laura Benjamin

D
ChallengerFEC H6WI03180

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$32K
Cash on hand: $7K
Local signal

Early read on WI-03 — U.S. House

A directional read on where this seat is trending, from the signals we have so far. This is an early scaffold — more inputs light up as coverage and constituent activity accrue.

Coverage tone · leans negative
Recent news coverage of Derrick Van Orden over the last 90 days.
0 positive8 neutral1 negative
9 articles · AI-assessed sentiment toward the rep. A media signal, not a poll of the district.
Constituent stakes
No one here has staked a position on a tracked vote yet. As neighbors weigh in on /pressure campaigns, the district's lean will show up here.
Money in the race

Finance breakdown

Disclosed funding shaping this race — both the money candidates raise themselves and the outside spending dropped by independent groups. Issue-ad spending by 501(c)(4) groups is excluded; the FEC doesn't require disclosure of it. See the note below for details.

Total disclosed
$13M
Candidate fundraising + independent expenditures (FEC).
Candidate-direct (Schedule A)
$13M
Raised by candidate committees themselves.
Outside spending (Schedule E)
$171K
$139K for · $32K against
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Rebecca Cooke(D)
$6.5M$6.5M
Derrick Van Orden(R)incumbent
+ LAW ENFORCEMENT FOR A SAFER AMERICA PAC $139K
THE WISCO PROJECT PAC $24K
DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF WISCONSIN FEDERAL $4K
ACTIVATE AMERICA $3K
$5.7M$139K$32K$5.8M
Emily Berge(D)
$566K$566K
Laura Benjamin(D)
$32K$32K
Where the money comes from

In-state vs out-of-state

Share of each candidate's itemized individual contributions from donors inside WI versus the rest of the country. Excludes sub-$200 unitemized donations (no geography on file) and PAC money — see note below.

Rebecca Cooke(D)25% in-state · $4.0M itemized
$1.0M in-state$3.0M out-of-state
Derrick Van Orden(R)16% in-state · $4.1M itemized
$650K in-state$3.5M out-of-state
Emily Berge(D)65% in-state · $175K itemized
$113K in-state$61K out-of-state
What's counted, what isn't

Candidate-direct is each campaign's reported receipts on FEC Schedule A — individual contributions plus PAC contributions to the candidate's own committee — through the most recent filing.

Outside spending is independent expenditures on FEC Schedule E: money spent by PACs, super PACs, and party committees for or against a candidate, without legal coordination with the campaign. The committees listed under each candidate are the largest disclosed spenders on either side.

In-state vs out-of-state covers only itemized individual contributions — donations over $200, which are the only ones that carry a contributor address at the FEC. Sub-$200 unitemized donations (often a large share for grassroots campaigns) have no geography on file and are excluded, as is PAC money. So the percentages describe where a candidate's itemized individual money comes from, not where every dollar raised comes from.

Not counted: 501(c)(4) "social welfare" organizations run issue ads that frequently mention candidates by name but aren't classified as express advocacy under FEC rules — they file no Schedule E and don't appear in this breakdown. Press reporting on a race may cite figures that include this dark-money spending; ours doesn't.

Where they stand

Issue-by-issue comparison

Positions extracted from each candidate's campaign issues page by AI. Contested rows — where candidates disagree with each other — appear first.

StatementCookeVan ordenBergeBenjaminYou
Abortion
A national law should protect access to abortion in every state.
Abortion
Tax dollars should not pay for abortions.
Agriculture
Federal farm subsidies should be reduced and redirected toward smaller producers.
Agriculture
Federal antitrust enforcement against meatpacking consolidation should be increased.
Antitrust & Competition
Federal antitrust laws should be strengthened to break up dominant technology platforms.
Economy
The federal minimum wage should be raised.
Education
The government should forgive some federal student loan debt.
Environment
The government should set legally enforceable limits on greenhouse gas emissions.
Environment
Federal permitting and subsidies for new nuclear power plants should be expanded.
Healthcare
Medicare should be allowed to negotiate lower prescription drug prices.
Healthcare
Enhanced ACA premium subsidies should be made permanent at expanded levels.
Housing
The government should spend more building affordable housing.
Infrastructure
The government should invest in expanding passenger rail, including high-speed rail.
Labor
Federal labor law should make it easier for workers to form unions (PRO Act-style reforms).
Social Security
High earners should pay Social Security taxes on more of their income.

SupportsOpposesNo public positionRinged = confirmed by the campaign

Recent coverage

In the news

About this race page

Candidate roster is sourced from the FEC's active-candidate list for the 2026 cycle. Fundraising totals reflect committee filings through the last reporting period.

Alignment % compares the candidate's extracted policy positions against your quiz answers. Positions are pulled from the candidate's campaign issues page by AI; we save the source quote for each position so you can verify the extraction. Candidates without a campaign issues page show position data pending — we're working through the roster and re-checking stale extractions every 90 days.

News coverage is from the GDELT 2.0 global news feed, filtered to a curated list of national, political, and regional outlets.