See how John Boozman actually votes — against your values.
DeepSyte scores John Boozman's record on the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your personal alignment.
Sign in and take the values quiz to see how John Boozman's votes line up with your views.
Prediction track record
We haven't made any vote predictions for John Boozman yet. Predictions are generated for bills with tagged effects; they show up here as soon as the predict-votes job covers this rep's upcoming docket.
Consistency insights
No paired statements and votes yet for John Boozman
We haven't yet found statement/vote pairs on the same topic for John Boozman. This usually means either the rep hasn't taken public positions on bills that have come to a passage vote, or those bills haven't been tagged yet. The checker runs as new press releases and votes come in.
Pro analysis
AI rep analysis — Pro
Get an AI-narrated read on John Boozman's full voting record against your stated values — aligned themes, conflicts, notable votes, and what to watch for.
We haven't extracted campaign positions for John Boozman yet. Once their campaign website or position pages are processed, this card will track what they said vs how they voted.
Crossing the aisle
No party-break passage votes recorded for John Boozman. Either they've voted with Republicans on every substantive passage vote in the corpus, or their tenure overlaps few high-threshold party-line votes so far.
Boozman Votes to Fully Fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Border Patrol
Position: Senator Boozman supports full funding for CBP and ICE through fiscal year 2029, arguing that immigration enforcement is essential to border security and public safety.
WASHINGTON—U.S. Senator John Boozman (R-AR) released the following statement after voting to approve the Secure America Act that funds Customs and Border Protection (CBP) as well as Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for the next three years:
"Funding the vital mission to defend our communities and country from criminal illegal immigrants, potential terrorism, drug smuggling and human trafficking should be a bipartisan effort, yet Senate Democrats abandoned the regular appropriations process and good-faith negotiations in order to score political points. My Republican colleagues and I stand with the men and women working non-stop to secure our border, enforce the law and protect Americans from the threats that result from reckless open-border policies. I was proud to help ensure funding for Border Patrol and immigration enforcement activity cannot be held hostage again during the Trump administration so the personnel performing these roles are fully resourced and focused on providing for our safety and national security."
The Secure America Act is narrowly targeted budget reconciliation legislation that:
- Fully funds CBP and ICE through Fiscal Year 2029.
- Provides $5 billion to the Department of Homeland Security through FY29 to assist immigration enforcement and law enforcement efforts.
Permalink: https://www.boozman.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2026/6/boozman-votes-to-fully-fund-immigration-and-customs-enforcement-border-patrol
Position: The senators introduce legislation to ensure VA disability compensation and other veterans' benefits increase annually to keep pace with inflation, aligning with Social Security cost-of-living adjustments.
WASHINGTON—U.S. Senator John Boozman (R-AR), a member of the Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs, joined committee Chairman Jerry Moran (R-KS) and Ranking Member Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) to introduce legislation ensuring the rate of disability compensation and other financial benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for veterans, their families and military survivors keeps pace with the rate of inflation.
The Veterans' Compensation Cost-of-Living Adjustment Act of 2026 will increase certain VA benefits – including disability compensation, clothing allowances, and dependency and indemnity compensation for surviving spouses and children – to reflect changes in the everyday cost of living while aligning VA with annual benefit increases by the Social Security Administration.
"Our country must fulfill the promises made to those who wear our nation's uniform, and that includes benefit levels that reflect current economic conditions to help meet their needs and those of their loved ones," Boozman said. "I am pleased to work in a bipartisan way with our Chairman and Ranking Member to deliver this critical update for veterans in Arkansas and across the nation."
"Congress has a responsibility to deliver meaningful benefits for veterans and their families, and the annual cost-of-living adjustment helps make certain VA benefits keep pace with changes in the economy," said Moran. "These increases will strengthen VA's ability to support veterans with service-connected disabilities, as well as their dependents and survivors, by adjusting for inflation and aligning with Social Security benefit increases to provide the financial stability veterans and their families have earned."
"As the cost of groceries, housing, and gas continues to skyrocket, veterans deserve to know their benefits will keep pace," said Blumenthal. "I'm proud to join Senator Moran in introducing legislation that will make much needed adjustments to veterans' benefits during this cost-of-living crisis."
The legislation is cosponsored by Sens. Patty Murray (D-WA), Thom Tillis (R-NC), Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Kevin Cramer (R-ND), Mazie Hirono (D-HI), Jim Banks (R-IN), Maggie Hassan (D-NH), Tim Sheehy (R-MT), Angus King (I-ME), Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), Tommy Tuberville (R-AL), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) and Elissa Slotkin (D-MI).
Permalink: https://www.boozman.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2026/6/boozman-moran-blumenthal-introduce-veterans-cost-of-living-increase-legislation
Boozman Among Lawmakers Pushing Restoration of Protect Life Rule
Position: Senator Boozman and 158 colleagues urge the HHS Secretary to restore the Protect Life Rule, which requires complete physical and financial separation between federally funded family planning services and abortion-related activities, and to ensure Title X funding does not support abortion providers.
WASHINGTON—U.S. Senator John Boozman (R-AR) joined 158 of his colleagues in the U.S. House and Senate urging U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to restore the Protect Life Rule and ensure Title X Family Planning Program funding does not support abortion or abortion services.
"We ask you to correct the misguided actions of the previous administration and reimplement the Protect Life Rule to ensure taxpayer dollars are not used to subsidize the abortion industry," the lawmakers wrote to Kennedy.
The bicameral letter calls on HHS to rescind a Biden-era Title X rule and reinstate a policy implemented during President Trump's first term that required complete physical and financial separation between federally funded family planning services and abortion-related activities. The pro-life members argued the Biden administration's changes compromised the integrity of the Title X program and allowed abortion providers to receive taxpayer funding contrary to congressional intent.
The letter was led by Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-MS), chair of the Senate Pro-Life Caucus, along with Representatives Ron Estes (R-KS) and Virginia Foxx (R-NC). In total, 41 senators and 118 members of the House of Representatives signed the letter, including Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA).
The full letter is available here and below:
We write to urge your administration to swiftly propose and finalize the "Compliance with Statutory Program Integrity Requirements" rule, commonly known as the "Protect Life Rule," to restore crucial safeguards to the Title X Family Planning Program. Created by Congress in 1970, Title X of the Public Health Service Act clearly intended to prohibit federal funds from being spent in programs where abortion is a method of family planning. We ask you to correct the misguided actions of the previous administration and reimplement the Protect Life Rule to ensure taxpayer dollars are not used to subsidize the abortion industry.
During President Trump's first administration, the Protect Life Rule successfully fulfilled the spirit and letter of this decades-old law by firmly separating abortion from family planning. The rule appropriately eliminated the egregious abortion referral mandate, which protected the conscience rights of health care providers and increased the potential for diversity among program applicants. Furthermore, it stipulated that Title X projects had to be organized with complete physical and financial separation between a grantee's Title X activities and abortion activities. This much-needed reform ended the practice of "co-location," which had made federal funds vulnerable to misuse and implied that abortion was a method of family planning. The Protect Life Rule also implemented a stronger focus on protecting women and children from being victimized by abuse, rape, incest, and trafficking by bolstering oversight of grantee compliance with state abuse reporting requirements.
Unfortunately, the Biden administration's decision to suspend and revise the Protect Life Rule compromised the integrity of the Title X program. By mandating abortion referrals, the Biden rule effectively required grantees to encourage or promote abortion in order to receive funding, operating exactly opposite to the requirements of the Title X statute. This mandate also directly violated the Weldon Amendment, which makes it illegal for the federal government to discriminate against health care entities that do not refer for abortion. Furthermore, by permitting the "co-location" of abortion clinics and Title X clinics in the same facility, the revised rule provided funding to clinics that perform abortions, allowing them to reallocate financial resources to advance their abortion agenda at the taxpayer's expense. The Biden administration even punished the pro-life states of Oklahoma and Tennessee by stripping their lifesaving Title X funding. Even now, Oklahoma is still waiting for the approximately $9 million Title X funds that were stripped in 2023 and 2024.
History confirms that without the Protect Life Rule, Title X serves as a funding stream for the abortion industry. For example, between 2013 and 2015, Title X funds made up over $170 million of Planned Parenthood's expenditures. Restoring these critical reforms is not without precedent; regulations requiring the physical separation of abortion activities and prohibiting abortion referrals were promulgated under President Ronald Reagan in 1988 and upheld by the Supreme Court in 1991.
Permalink: https://www.boozman.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2026/6/boozman-among-lawmakers-pushing-restoration-of-protect-life-rule
Boozman, Luján Champion Greater Access to Radiology Services
Position: Senators Boozman and Luján introduced legislation to allow radiologist assistants to bill Medicare for services performed in hospital settings, matching reimbursement rules already in place for office-based settings, to improve access to medical imaging services particularly in rural areas.
WASHINGTON—U.S. Senators John Boozman (R-AR) and Ben Ray Luján (D-NM) introduced legislation to improve Medicare beneficiaries' access to medical imaging services and address the provider shortage that exists nationwide, particularly in rural America. The Medicare Access to Radiology Care Act (MARCA) would allow radiologists to submit claims to Medicare for non-diagnostic services performed by radiologist assistants (RAs) they directly supervise in both the hospital and office setting.
While RAs are recognized under Medicare to perform services under direct supervision, the radiology practices that employ them are unable to submit claims to Medicare for RA-performed services in hospitals, where they most frequently work.
"Medicare patients need timely access to medical imaging, but current guidelines continue to limit providers' ability to utilize this important diagnostic tool. We can remedy that by ensuring radiologist assistants, who are well qualified to assist on diagnostic and therapeutic radiology procedures, have the same opportunity whether in a hospital or doctor's office. Updating the regulations to allow reimbursement in either setting is a commonsense solution that I am pleased has bipartisan support," Boozman said.
"Too many Medicare patients, especially in rural communities across New Mexico, are struggling to access timely care because of health care workforce shortages and unnecessary barriers," said Luján. "Qualified RAs are already playing an important role in delivering care, and Medicare policy should reflect that. This legislation will help expand access to quality care, reduce strain on providers, and ensure more seniors get the care they need closer to home."
In 2019, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services adjusted RA supervision requirements, which allowed providers to be reimbursed by Medicare for services performed by RAs in the office setting. However, the adjustment did not include reimbursement by Medicare for RA services performed in the hospital setting, creating a disparity that negatively impacts the radiology care available in hospitals. The bipartisan MARCA bill addresses that gap to restore access for patients in either setting and removes disincentives that jeopardize the ability of radiologists to meet demand for diagnosis and treatment.
Supporters of the legislation include the Arkansas Society of Radiologic Technologists, Arkansas Radiological Society, American College of Radiology, American Registry of Radiologic Technologists, American Society of Radiologic Technologists, Society of Radiology Physician Extenders, Association for Medical Imaging Management and RAYUS Radiology.
Permalink: https://www.boozman.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2026/5/boozman-luj-n-champion-greater-access-to-radiology-services
Source: GDELT 2.0 GKG, filtered to a curated list of national outlets. Inclusion is not endorsement; opinion pieces and reported news are mixed.
Recent stock activity
Periodic transaction reports filed under the STOCK Act — disclosed by the rep, sourced from public filings.
No disclosed trades on record.
Source: open-data mirrors of the Senate eFD and House Clerk financial-disclosure systems. Disclosure within 30 days of trade is required by law (45 for spouse/dependent trades).
Top PAC donors · 2026 cycle
Political action committees that gave the most to this rep's principal campaign committee this cycle. PAC giving is direct organizational support — industry, ideological, or leadership.
1.VOTESANE PACIdeological8 contributionsSingle-issue advocacy PAC — supports candidates based on positions related to mental health, healthcare policy, or rational governance approaches.AI · low$56,500
2.PRO-ISRAEL AMERICA PAC4 contributions$39,505
3.TAKE BACK THE SENATE5 contributions$34,850
4.2021 SENATORS CLASSIC COMMITTEELeadership2 contributionsMember-of-Congress leadership PAC — likely affiliated with a Senate Republican or Democrat who organizes an annual fundraising event or caucus.AI$17,270
5.TEAM MCCONNELL2 contributions$11,200
Source: OpenFEC (api.open.fec.gov) Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “committee.” Aggregated by contributing committee. Self-transfers from joint-fundraising / victory committees are excluded.
Top individual contributors · 2026 cycle
Itemized individual contributions over $200 to this rep's campaign committee, aggregated by donor employer. PAC giving is shown above; this section is people, not organizations.
1.ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ$21,000
2.ROBINHOOD MARKETS$7,000
3.SOROBAN CAPITAL PARTNERS LP$7,000
4.O'KEEFFE SHAHMORADI STRATEGIES$7,000
5.1ST FINANCIAL BANK USA$7,000
6.RIVER BEND INDUSTRIES$7,000
7.ROBINHOOD$6,000
8.VETERANS UNITED HOME LOANS$3,900
9.COINBASE$3,500
10.AE INDUSTRIAL$2,000
Source: OpenFEC Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “individual,” aggregated by the donor's self-reported employer. This is a geographic / industry correlation, not a corporate endorsement.
