See how Suzanne Bonamici's votes line up with your values.
DeepSyte scores Suzanne Bonamici's record on the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your personal alignment.
Sign in and take the values quiz to see how Suzanne Bonamici's votes line up with your views.
Prediction track record
How often we called Suzanne Bonamici's passage votes correctly, from their stated positions on each bill's tagged topics. Excludes “unclear” calls and abstentions.
To prohibit the disclosure of records by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development of individuals for the purposes of immigration enforcement, and for other purposes.
No paired statements and votes yet for Suzanne Bonamici
We haven't yet found statement/vote pairs on the same topic for Suzanne Bonamici. This usually means either the rep hasn't taken public positions on bills that have come to a passage vote, or those bills haven't been tagged yet. The checker runs as new press releases and votes come in.
Pro analysis
AI rep analysis — Pro
Get an AI-narrated read on Suzanne Bonamici's full voting record against your stated values — aligned themes, conflicts, notable votes, and what to watch for.
Positions Suzanne Bonamici took during their campaign, scored against their subsequent record — public statements cross-checked with related votes. “Kept” means 80%+ of those statement-vs-vote pairs aligned; “Broken” means 30% or fewer.
0 kept0 broken0 mixed0 no action yet
Suzanne Bonamici has 5 tracked positions but no scored statement-vs-vote pairs touching them yet. Verdicts will appear here as related statements and votes accumulate.
No action yetSupports
A national law should protect access to abortion in every state.
“Take Action on Abortion Rights! ... Defending reproductive rights”
Passage votes where Suzanne Bonamici broke ranks with ≥75% of Democrats. Threshold catches substantively partisan splits; unanimous-ish or close votes are excluded.
Bonamici, Wyden, Merkley Demand Investigation into ICE Tire Slashing Incident
Position: The lawmakers call for an Inspector General investigation into an October 7, 2026 incident in which ICE agents allegedly slashed the tires of a couple observing and recording agents in Hillsboro, Oregon, and assert that First Amendment protections for observing and recording law enforcement must be respected.
WASHINGTON, DC [11/2/26] – Today Congresswoman Suzanne Bonamici (OR-01) and Senators Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley demanded an investigation into Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents for slashing a couple’s tires in Hillsboro.
The couple was observing and recording ICE agents in a supermarket parking lot on October 7, 2026, before multiple masked ICE agents in three vehicles tailed the couple, boxed them in, and repeatedly stabbed and slashed their tires before driving away. A video of the incident can be viewed here.
“ICE agents cannot act with impunity,” the lawmakers wrote. “The First Amendment protects the right to observe, gather information, and record law enforcement officers performing their duties in public. These constitutional protections are necessary for the public to learn about and freely debate the government’s actions, including potential misconduct, and demand accountability when necessary.”
The lawmakers noted that there have been many documented cases of excessive use of force and intimidation tactics against peaceful community members and legal observers by ICE in Oregon and across the country. They called for the Inspector General for the Department of Homeland Security to immediately investigate the Oct. 7 incident in Hillsboro, identify the agents involved, and preserve all evidence, so that those responsible may be disciplined.
“Without videos from bystanders, observers, journalists, and protestors, the public would never know the full scale of federal retaliation against those who seek to document ICE activity,” the lawmakers wrote.
Bonamici, Wyden, Merkley, and Dexter also recently raised concerns about the lack of access to counsel for individuals detained by ICE and what appear to be new protocols for bypassing the Portland ICE facility entirely. That letter can be found here.
The full letter about the Oct. 7 incident can be read here and below:
Dear Inspector General Cuffari:
We write to request an investigation into an alarming incident that occurred on October 7, 2026, in which U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents harassed, intimidated, and retaliated against a couple in Hillsboro, Oregon for engaging in First Amendment activities. The incident occurred when our constituents observed and recorded ICE agents in a supermarket parking lot. Soon thereafter, multiple masked ICE agents in three vehicles recklessly tailed the couple, boxed them in, and dangerously vandalized their vehicle by repeatedly stabbing and puncturing one of their tires before driving away.1
ICE agents cannot act with impunity. The First Amendment protects the right to observe, gather information about, and record law enforcement officers performing their duties in public.2 These constitutional protections are necessary for the public to learn about and freely debate the government’s actions, including potential misconduct, and demand accountability when necessary.
Since President Trump returned to office in January 2025, federal ICE agents across the country have repeatedly failed to respect rights afforded under the Constitution, especially the First Amendment. We have seen many documented cases of excessive use of force and intimidation tactics by ICE in Oregon, including federal agents needlessly deploying tear-gas and other projectiles against peaceful community members as well as driving erratically and verbally threatening legal observers. This pattern of irresponsible and illegal behavior from federal agents is also evident across the country. For example, federal agents in Memphis, Tennessee harassed observers by swerving at them, tailing them, boxing them in, and pulling them over without reasonable suspicion; sitting outside of their homes; and assaulting and arresting them.3 In Los Angeles, federal agents fired crowd control weapons into the heads and other sensitive areas of observers, journalists, and protestors. A judge later granted an injunction against this behavior4 and found that the plaintiffs have plausibly alleged that DHS had a policy of retaliating against people who record the activities of agents.5
Most troubling, federal immigration agents killed Alex Pretti while he was peacefully recording and protesting ICE’s actions.6 Through all of this, the Trump administration has repeatedly covered up officer misconduct and obstructed investigations.7 To this day, there is no evidence that the federal government has meaningfully investigated Mr. Pretti’s killing, with his parents noting that “at every turn, they have ignored us, misled us and shielded Alex’s killers.”8 This reckless behavior and senseless violence endangers everyone across the country and does not advance ICE’s mission of enforcing immigration laws to preserve national security and public safety.
Without videos from bystanders, observers, journalists, and protestors, the public would never know the full scale of federal retaliation against those who seek to document ICE activity.
We hereby demand that your offices immediately undertake an investigation of the October 7, 2026, incident in Hillsboro, Oregon outlined above. Please identify the ICE agents involved and preserve all relevant evidence so the officers can be disciplined and prosecuted as appropriate.
Further, we request that you undertake a comprehensive investigation of the pervasive pattern of ICE agents acting unlawfully and retaliating against individuals exercising their First Amendment rights. We ask that you work with Congress to make lasting changes to ICE training, oversight, and accountability. The rights of our constituents must not be jeopardized any longer.
Sincerely,
###
Salinas, Bonamici, Merkley, Wyden Secure over $500,000 for Tualatin Soil and Water Conservation District
Position: The release announces that the delegation secured the release of roughly $530,000 in previously obligated NRCS funding to the Tualatin Soil and Water Conservation District for fish habitat and culvert replacement work, and criticizes the federal government for paying only about half of the promised amount.
Tualatin, OR — Today, Congresswomen Andrea Salinas (OR-06) and Suzanne Bonamici (OR-01), alongside Oregon Senators Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley, announced they secured the release of over $530,000 in federal funding from the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) to support Tualatin Soil and Water Conservation District (TSWCD).
In 2022, TSWCD applied to the NRCS for funding to improve fish habitat in Washington County. This work included replacing deteriorated culverts with bridges and modern culverts that help threatened species like steelhead trout move through local waterways. In February 2024, NRCS approved and obligated $1,074,887 to reimburse TSWCD for their work.
As of early September 2026, NRCS had only paid $543,837 of the over $1.07 million they had promised to TSWCD. This $531,000 shortfall has severely challenged TSWCD’s budget and would have stuck the taxpayers of Washington County with the bill. Following outreach from the Oregon delegation, NRSC honored its commitment and released the final sum to TSWCD.
“When Oregonians make a promise, we keep it. The federal government should be held to the same standard,” said Rep. Salinas. “Tualatin Soil and Water did the work to improve our waterways, and Washington County taxpayers should never have been left holding the bag. I’m glad we got this money out the door and where it belongs.”
“Supporting threatened species and their habitats reflects Oregon values and our commitment to environmental protection, and I was grateful when the Tualatin Soil and Water Conservation District secured federal funds to improve fish habitat in Washington County,” said Rep. Bonamici. “Unfortunately, the Trump administration paid only about half of the promised funding, leaving Washington County taxpayers to pick up the balance. I’m glad that my colleagues and I were able to help resolve this issue and secure all the funds the water conservation district needed for the project."
“Thanks to our efforts, this funding is finally moving forward and will help ensure the Tualatin Soil and Water Conservation District can continue its work to improve waterways in Washington County,” said Sen. Merkley. “Oregon’s native fish are the lifeblood of our state, supporting the health and vitality of our communities, local economies, and Tribes who have been here since time immemorial. I’ll keep pushing to secure the necessary federal funds to protect our state’s ecosystems for generations to come.”
“I’m glad the full-court press by the delegation unlocked these resources promised by the federal government to the Tualatin Soil and Water Conservation District,” Wyden said. “These funds will keep waterways improvements on track, helping with water quality and fish habitat alike in Washington County.”
“The Tualatin Soil and Water Conservation District much appreciates Congresswoman Salinas and her staff for their work in helping the District receive payment from the U.S. Department of Agriculture for a successful fish habitat project in the Gales Creek watershed of Washington County,” said Dean P. Moberg, Tualatin Soil and Water Conservation District Treasurer. “We were impressed with the staff's quick understanding of the payment problem we faced, and we are grateful for the Congresswoman's exceptional response. The letter Congresswoman Salinas provided, along with Congresswoman Bonamici and Senators Merkley and Wyden, was surely instrumental in cutting through red tape and securing the payment of over one half million dollars in federal assistance that had been held up for this project. This payment will greatly facilitate the Tualatin Soil and Water Conservation District's work in helping residents of Washington County conserve natural resources with voluntary and locally led projects.
Issues:Energy and EnvironmentTransportation and Infrastructure
Oregon Delegation Celebrates Federal Support for Oregon’s Hazelnut, Seafood Industries
Position: The delegation welcomes the USDA's decision to purchase Oregon hazelnuts and Pacific whiting fillets under the Section 32 program, citing support for domestic producers and rural and coastal economies.
Washington, D.C. – Today, Oregon’s U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley led Oregon Congressional Delegation members—including Senator Ron Wyden and U.S. Representatives Suzanne Bonamici (OR-01), Val Hoyle (OR-04), Andrea Salinas (OR-06), Maxine Dexter (OR-03), and Janelle Bynum (OR-05)—to announce that after pressure from the delegation, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) will purchase hazelnuts and Pacific Whiting fillets under the agency’s Section 32 purchase program. These purchases will benefit communities and rural economies across Oregon by supporting domestic production and distribution of these agricultural goods during periods of significant market disruption and economic uncertainty.
“Our fisheries and farms deliver incredible products all around the world and are the lifeblood of our communities,” said Merkley, who led the Oregon delegation in pressing USDA to include hazelnuts and whiting in its latest food purchase. “This announcement ensures Oregon’s harvesters, processors, and producers will receive critical financial assistance needed to continue operating and providing services here in Oregon and beyond. I am elated the USDA has decided to make these purchases—this is a win for communities across our state.”
“Iconic state industries like agriculture and fishing count on the U.S. Department of Agriculture to do its job and support Oregonians working hard to keep producing their world-class goods,” said Wyden. “I’m glad the full-court press from the delegation has unlocked this win for Oregonians fishing Pacific whiting and growing hazelnuts.”
“Oregonians know that hazelnuts and seafood are some of the state’s most popular and delicious products,” said Bonamici. “Our growers and producers work tirelessly and bolster the local economy. I’m glad the USDA is making this investment.”
“These investments from the USDA will support the people who harvest, process and bring Pacific Whiting fish and hazelnuts to market,” said Hoyle. “By putting Oregon fishermen and farmers first, we’re boosting our coastal and rural economies."
“Oregon’s specialty crop growers are the backbone of our economy, but too many are struggling with rising costs and uncertain markets,” said Salinas. “In the Willamette Valley, generations of farmers have depended on the hazelnut industry for their livelihoods. That’s why I joined my colleagues in pushing USDA to purchase Oregon hazelnuts and Pacific whiting. These purchases will provide much-needed support for our growers and fishing communities while putting more Oregon-grown and Oregon-caught food onto kitchen tables. I’m proud we secured this win for Oregon producers, and I’ll keep fighting to make sure our specialty crop farmers have the markets and resources they need to succeed.”
"Oregon’s farmers and fishermen work hard to feed our communities, and they deserve a federal government that stands behind them,” said Dexter. “Our delegation pushed USDA to act, and these $34 million in purchases will support Oregon’s hazelnut growers and fishermen during a difficult economic stretch. This investment will help sustain local jobs, strengthen rural and coastal economies, and get nutritious food to families who need it.”
“Our farmers are putting in the work every day to keep Oregon families fed,” said Bynum. “And they’re not just helping put food on the table, they’re keeping money with our families, creating good jobs close to home, and giving people what they need to put down roots here in Oregon. Money back in our state and with our farmers is a win-win.”
Previously, Merkley and the Oregon delegation pressed the USDA to include Pacific whiting and Oregon hazelnuts, which account for 99 percent of hazelnuts produced in the United States, in this year’s Section 32 purchases. Following their efforts, the USDA announced it was purchasing $22 million in hazelnuts and $12 million in Pacific whiting.
Issues:Jobs and Economy
Bonamici, Wyden, Merkley Demand Answers from USPS About Mail Delivery Problems on Oregon Coast
Position: The release demands that the U.S. Postal Service answer oversight questions about mail delivery problems in Astoria, Oregon, requests a meeting with local officials, and asks for a public informational session within 60 days.
WASHINGTON, DC [10/16/26] – Representative Suzanne Bonamici (OR-01) and Oregon Senators Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley demanded answers from the United States Postal Service (USPS) about significant ongoing mail delivery issues in Astoria and surrounding areas.
The lawmakers noted that the city government, county government, and several downtown businesses are within a few blocks of the Astoria Post Office, but they have not been receiving mail regularly, and some are not receiving mail at all.
“The Astoria Post Office will not hold mail for city officials to pick up, which has caused major disruptions in local commerce and governance,” the Members of Congress wrote. “Payments sent through the mail to the city are being delivered late or not being delivered at all and downtown businesses are experiencing sporadic delivery. We are hearing concerning anecdotes indicating that Amazon packages, which are delivered via USPS in Astoria, are still regularly arriving on time. It’s unacceptable that mail from a billion-dollar retailer is successfully delivered to its destination on time, but mail to and from local small businesses is unreliable.”
The Members of Congress demanded answers to a series of oversight questions and requested that USPS set a time to meet with local elected officials in Clatsop and Columbia counties. They also requested USPS hold an informational session within the next 60 days for residents to discuss the agency's plans to address these issues.
“Timely, reliable mail delivery is essential infrastructure. Businesses, residents, and local governments rely on USPS for commerce, communication, medications, and more,” the Members of Congress wrote. “This is not an exhaustive list of issues with USPS brought to our attention.”
On October 15, 2026, Representative Bonamici visited the Astoria Post Office in person and asked to speak with the Postmaster to try to find a solution to the late and missing mail. The Postmaster denied the request.
The full letter can be read here and below:
Dear Postmaster General Steiner:
We write with significant concerns about the state of operations of the United States Postal Service (USPS) in northwest Oregon. Many community members from across the region are alarmed about inconsistent and unacceptable USPS delivery.
In Astoria, the city government, county government, and several downtown businesses have not been receiving mail regularly, and some are not receiving mail at all. This is happening despite the Astoria Post Office’s central location, just minutes away from Astoria City Hall and the county government building. Additionally, the Astoria Post Office will not hold mail for city officials to pick up which has caused major disruptions in local commerce and governance. Payments sent through the mail to the city are being delivered late or not being delivered at all and downtown businesses are experiencing sporadic delivery. We are hearing concerning anecdotes indicating that Amazon packages, which are delivered via USPS in Astoria, are still regularly arriving on time. It’s unacceptable that mail from a billion-dollar retailer is successfully delivered to its destination on time, but mail to and from local small businesses is unreliable.
The city had scheduled a meeting with the Astoria Postmaster to work to resolve the issue, but the Postmaster did not attend, and the meeting has not been rescheduled.
In Warrenton, USPS has been looking for a new post office location for several years. When the city of Warrenton has asked USPS about location options, USPS directs inquiries to a third-party contractor. This contractor directs all inquiries back to the USPS, resulting in a frustrating cycle where constituents are no closer to getting answers to their questions.
In Gearhart, roughly half the residents in town must travel to the Seaside post office to get their mail which is an unacceptable inconvenience for Gearhart residents. We have been advised that one possible solution involves the placement of a 950-unit cluster box which is exceedingly difficult for a town this size. It is unacceptable that residents of Gearhart cannot receive home delivery or at least have cluster boxes installed at several points throughout the community. The USPS must find a reasonable solution. Furthermore, there are concerning reports that mail pickup is inaccessible on Saturdays to Gearhart residents.
Recently, residents in Gearhart have heard rumors that the Seaside Post office will be remodeled to accommodate permanent mail pick up for Gearhart residents. Though Gearhart residents want a permanent solution to the problems they experience receiving mail, travelling to Seaside is not a practical or acceptable long-term or permanent solution.
Similar issues of concern also exist in Columbia County. In Rainier, roughly a third of the town is not included in the mail route and must use a PO Box. If mail is addressed to a home that is ineligible for home delivery instead of to their PO Box, the mail is not held – it is returned to sender. In a world where people often shop online, many online retailers don’t offer a format for a PO Box address, resulting in orders never reaching their intended addresses. Finally, it is concerning that not every residence is eligible for home delivery in Rainier, considering the small size of the town and well-maintained streets.
Timely, reliable mail delivery is essential infrastructure. Businesses, residents, and local governments rely on USPS for commerce, communication, medications, and more. This is not an exhaustive list of issues with USPS brought to our attention.
We ask that you respond to us in writing within 14 days of receipt of this letter outlining how the USPS will address the issues described and answer the following questions:
When will Astoria downtown businesses, city government, and county government receive regular mail services?
When will USPS announce a new location for the Warrenton post office? What is the current status of the search? Please provide the name and contact information for a specific person who can provide updates to the city.
Why are so many Gearhart residents unable to receive mail at their doors?
What is the plan to deliver mail to residents in Gearhart and/or provide additional PO boxes in Gearhart?
Why are some residents of Rainier, who live within city limits, unable to receive mail at home?
If these issues are caused by post offices being understaffed, what is USPS doing to remedy this?
In light of the volume and gravity of these concerns, we respectfully request that USPS set a time to meet with local elected officials in Clatsop and Columbia counties. We also ask that USPS hold an informational session within the next 60 days for residents to discuss the agency's plans to address these issues.
Our offices will gladly work with USPS and community leaders to find mutually agreeable times and locations for these meetings.
Sincerely,
###
99 Democratic Lawmakers Slam Department of Education for Failure to Enforce Title IX and Protect Student Survivors
Position: Democratic lawmakers urge the Department of Education's Office of Inspector General to investigate the Department's staffing reductions, Title IX rollbacks, and enforcement practices for sexual harassment and assault cases affecting student survivors.
WASHINGTON, DC – Today, Democratic Women’s Caucus (DWC) member Maxine Dexter (OR-03), DWC member Suzanne Bonamici (OR-01), DWC Chair Teresa Leger Fernández (NM-03) and Rep. Mark Takano (CA-41) led a letter to the Office of the Inspector General at the Department of Education. The letter urges the Acting Inspector General to open an investigation into the Department’s gutting of the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) and Title IX rollbacks and its impact on the Department’s ability to enforce Title IX protections for student survivors of sexual assault and harassment. 99 House Democrats joined the effort.
The call for the investigation comes after Jane Doe’s story from Cornell University and Kendall Francis’ story from Louisiana State University (LSU) sparked a national outcry about the high rate of sexual violence on college campuses. Additionally the survivors’ stories have renewed scrutiny of how colleges and universities respond, and how the Department of Education enforces Title IX protections for survivors.
One in four undergraduate women experience sexual assault or rape while in college. Sexual violence against women on college campuses is a public health crisis, yet significant barriers remain that block accountability and protections for students. Changes in staffing, resources, case-processing, and enforcement priorities under the Trump administration have only made that worse and have undermined the Department’s ability to properly investigate complaints and enforce Title IX protections.
As of January 2025, OCR reportedly faced a backlog of nearly 12,000 civil rights cases, while the administration reduced OCR’s workforce by nearly half. The Department has closed zero college sexual harassment or sexual violence cases. The Department also formalized weaker protections and processes for student survivors: narrowing the definition of sexual harassment, reducing school liability, and implementing intimidating investigative and hearing procedures that are retraumatizing to survivors.
Without proper federal enforcement and institutional accountability, Title IX protections become just words on a page. The Department of Education is failing student survivors. Protections for survivors are not partisan and should always be a priority, however the Department’s rollback of vital protections creates additional barriers for survivors and is leaving them to fend for themselves in their most vulnerable moments.
In their letter, the members explained how the Department’s changes will leave student survivors vulnerable and why an investigation is necessary:
“We urge the Office of Inspector General to immediately open an investigation into the Department’s failure to adequately enforce Title IX protections for survivors of sexual harassment and assault, including whether changes in staffing, resources, case-processing, and enforcement priorities have undermined the Department’s ability to protect students, investigate complaints in a timely manner, and hold institutions accountable.”
The members outlined the Department’s policies that have weakened protections for student survivors:
“At the same time that OCR’s staff and regional capacity were substantially reduced, the Department announced and pursued Title IX enforcement priorities concerning transgender students’ participation in athletics and access to sex-separated facilities, and also dismantling Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs. These reprioritizations do nothing to address the backlog of sexual violence cases.”
The letter also explains how reprioritizations and restructuring by the Department have decreased OCR’s capacity to investigate cases of sexual violence on campus:
“This restructuring threatens to further delay investigations, erode OCR’s institutional expertise, and create additional barriers for survivors seeking accountability. These reprioritizations, staff reductions, and the interagency agreement raise significant questions about whether OCR has sufficient capacity to investigate Title IX complaints, communicate with complainants, and fulfill its civil rights enforcement responsibilities in a timely and effective manner.”
The members also outlined what they are urging the Inspector General to investigate:
Examining whether the Department has fulfilled its legal and administrative responsibilities to investigate and resolve Title IX complaints in a timely and effective manner.
The causes and consequences of the absence of resolution agreements involving college sexual harassment and assault complaints since January 2025.
Whether reductions in OCR staffing, the closure of regional offices, or changes in enforcement priorities have contributed to delays, backlogs, or failures to resolve these complaints.
Examining whether OCR has sufficient staffing, resources, policies, and procedures to effectively enforce Title IX and protect students from sex discrimination, including sexual harassment and violence.
Identifying how survivors have been harmed by these changes.
Lastly, the members asked the Inspector General to answer the following questions:
How many Title IX sexual harassment and sexual violence complaints are currently pending before OCR, and how long have they been pending?
How have processing times, case closures, investigations, and resolution agreements changed since January 2025?
Have staffing reductions or office closures affected OCR’s ability to investigate complaints or communicate with survivors?
Have Department officials directed, formally or informally, OCR personnel to deprioritize certain categories of Title IX complaints?
What safeguards are currently in place to ensure Title IX complaints involving sexual violence receive timely and appropriate review?
What corrective actions are necessary to ensure the Department is meeting its obligations to protect students under Title IX?
Read the full letter here.
The letter was signed by: Amo, Gabe; Ansari, Yassamin; Balint, Becca; Barragán, Nanette; Beatty, Joyce; Beyer, Donald; Bonamici, Suzanne; Brownley, Julia; Brown, Shontel; Bynum, Janelle; Carter, Troy; Castor, Kathy; Chu, Judy; Clarke, Yvette; Craig, Angie; Crockett, Jasmine; Davids, Sharice; Dean, Madeleine; DeGette, Diana; DeSaulnier, Mark; Dexter, Maxine; Dingell, Debbie; Elfreth, Sarah; Escobar, Veronica; Espaillat, Adriano; Evans, Dwight; Fletcher, Lizzie; Foster, Bill; Foushee, Valerie; Frankel, Lois; Frost, Maxwell; Garamendi, John; Garcia, Sylvia; Goldman, Daniel; Goodlander, Maggie; Grijalva, Adelita; Houlahan, Chrissy; Hoyle, Val; Ivey, Glenn; Jackson, Jonathan; Jayapal, Pramila; Johnson, Julie; Kamlager-Dove, Sydney; Kelly, Robin; Kennedy, Timothy; Khanna, Ro; Landsman, Greg; Latimer, George; Lee, Summer; Leger Fernandez, Teresa; Lynch, Stephen; Magaziner, Seth; Matsui, Doris; McBride, Sarah; McClain Delaney, April; McClellan, Jennifer; McIver, LaMonica; Mejia, Analilia; Menefee, Christian; Meng, Grace; Mfume, Kweisi; Morelle, Joseph; Mullin, Kevin; Nadler, Jerrold; Norton, Eleanor; Omar, Ilhan; Pelosi, Nancy; Pettersen, Brittany; Pingree, Chellie; Quigley, Mike; Ramirez, Delia; Randall, Emily; Raskin, Jamie; Ross, Deborah; Salinas, Andrea; Scanlon, Mary Gay; Schakowsky, Janice; Scholten, Hillary; Sewell, Terri; Simon, Lateefah; Stansbury, Melanie; Stanton, Greg; Stevens, Haley; Strickland, Marilyn; Subramanyam, Suhas; Sykes, Emilia; Takano, Mark; Thompson, Bennie; Thompson, Mike; Titus, Dina; Tlaib, Rashida; Tokuda, Jill; Tonko, Paul; Trahan, Lori; Velázquez, Nydia; Walkinshaw, James; Watson Coleman, Bonnie; Williams, Nikema; Wilson, Frederica.
Issues:Civil RightsEducation
Washington Lawmakers, Colleagues Demand Transparency After U.S. Forest Service Coordinates with ICE on Public Lands
Position: The release calls for transparency from the U.S. Forest Service regarding its coordination with ICE on immigration enforcement on federal public lands, and argues that such enforcement diverts Forest Service resources from its core mission, including wildfire response and land management.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, U.S. Congresswoman Emily Randall (D, WA-06), and Representatives Kim Schrier, M.D. (D, WA-08), Rick Larsen (D, WA-02), Suzan DelBene (D, WA-01), Jared Huffman (D, CA-02), Ranking Member of the House Natural Resources Committee, Adriano Espaillat (D, NY-13), Chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, Andrea Salinas (D, OR-06), Adam Smith (D, WA-09), Val Hoyle (D, OR-04), Marilyn Strickland (D, WA-10), Suzanne Bonamici (D, OR-01), and Pramila Jayapal (D, WA-07) sent a letter to U.S. Forest Chief Tom Schultz demanding transparency regarding immigration enforcement activities on U.S. Forest Service (USFS) lands.
This letter comes after a shocking incident over Labor Day Weekend where U.S. Forest Service Law Enforcement Officers (LEO) coordinated with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to arrest five men who were camping with their families in Mount Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest. As of October 5, 2026, four of the five men arrested remain in detention at the Tacoma NW ICE Detention Center.
“As Members of Congress representing the Pacific Northwest and Democratic leadership of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, the House Natural Resources Committee, and the House Agriculture Committee, we are concerned that the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) is misusing taxpayer dollars by neglecting their mission and directing career staff to prioritize immigration enforcement on federal public lands. Particularly during a difficult wildfire season, we want to express our gratitude to the Forest Service for fighting wildfires in the Pacific Northwest and across the country,” wrote the members.
The U.S. Forest Service has undergone significant funding cuts and reorganizations efforts since the start of Trump’s second term. Since 2025, the USFS has lost nearly 6,000 workers through DOGE cuts and other factors, raising concerns about wildfire preparedness, forest health research, and public land management. Earlier this year, USFS announced consolidation efforts to shutter research and development facilities nationwide. USFS backtracked on their original proposal to close 57 out of 77 research labs after public outcry. In September 2026, USFS announced they will be closing 23 labs.
The 2026 wildfire season is still underway, and Washington state has recorded one of the worst wildfire seasons to date with almost 900,000 acres being burned as of early September.
The members conclude the letter by demanding answers to the following questions by October 15, 2026:
Questions for the U.S. Forest Service:
Which agency first identified those arrested as targets for investigation, when were they identified, and what information about the targets was used to justify the raid?
Can you confirm that the law enforcement officers that first approached the families were employees of the USFS?
To what extent did USFS participate in the raid, and under what authority? Please provide any agreement or memorandum that governs cooperation between the U.S. Forest Service and DHS.
Please provide any agreement or memorandum between the U.S. Forest Service and DHS that governs the collection and sharing of visitors' identification and reservation data with DHS or ICE.
What other immigration raids has the U.S. Forest Service participated in since January 21, 2025?
What appropriations account(s) has the USFS used to fund its participation in immigration enforcement operations since January 21, 2025, and how much funding has been obligated or expended for this purpose?
Has any USFS law enforcement personnel time, budget, or resources been reallocated from other law enforcement priorities (e.g., resource protection, search and rescue, wildfire-adjacent enforcement) to support immigration enforcement operations? If so, how much of this reallocation has been disclosed to Congress since these funds were appropriated for land management and resource protection purposes rather than immigration enforcement?
Given limited agency resources, why is it a priority of the USFS to use employees in the targeting of families on public land?
The full text of the letter is available HERE.
Issues:Energy and Environment
Bonamici, Moore Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Safely Dispose Opioids
Position: Representatives Bonamici and Moore introduced bipartisan legislation establishing a national grant program to install and maintain about 10,000 secure drop-off receptacles for unused prescription opioids at healthcare facilities and community pharmacies, funded by a fee on opioid manufacturers with a rebate protecting hospice and cancer patients from cost pass-through.
WASHINGTON, DC [10/1/26] – Representatives Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR) and Riley M. Moore (R-WV) introduced bipartisan legislation to help people securely and safely dispose of unnecessary prescription medication.
The Safe Disposal of Opioids Act aims to stop prescription drug abuse by establishing a national grant program to install and maintain roughly 10,000 secure disposal receptacles across the country. These drop boxes will be conveniently located throughout healthcare facilities and community pharmacies where patients pick up their prescriptions, providing an easy way to dispose of excess medication.
"Providing a safe, easy way to get rid of unused medication is something we can do right now to protect families and neighbors across Oregon and the country," said Congresswoman Suzanne Bonamici. "When people have a convenient place in their community to drop off leftover opioids, it keeps medication out of the wrong hands, reduces the risk of abuse, and gives everyone peace of mind. This bipartisan legislation will make a real difference in keeping homes and neighborhoods safe."
“The dangerous scourge of opioids has devastated communities across West Virginia, more than anywhere else across the country,” said Congressman Riley M. Moore. “We must do everything we can to keep these deadly drugs off our streets and prevent unused opioids from being diverted for abuse. I’m proud to be the Republican leader on the Safe Disposal of Opioids Act, and I support commonsense solutions that help protect our families and communities.”
The grant program is funded through a fee imposed on pharmaceutical manufacturers that produce opioids. The legislation includes a rebate program to prevent the cost from being passed on to patients in hospice or with cancer who rely on opioid medication for pain management.
The Safe Disposal of Opioids Act legislative text can be viewed here.
Bonamici first introduced this bipartisan bill in 2018 based on feedback she got while hosting a series of community discussions about the opioid crisis in NW Oregon.
###
Issues:Health Care
Wyden, Merkley, Bonamici, Salinas, Hoyle, Dexter, Bynum Oppose Trump’s Undermining of Due Process and Politicizing Immigration Courts
Position: The lawmakers oppose the administration's use of "mega master" immigration hearings and related changes to immigration court procedures, arguing they undermine due process and limit immigrants' access to legal counsel. They demand the practice be ended.
Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senators Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley, along with U.S. Representatives Suzanne Bonamici, Andrea Salinas, Val Hoyle, Maxine Dexter and Janelle Bynum, today demanded the Trump administration end the practice of “mega master” immigration hearings that expedite the review of hundreds of immigrants’ cases in a day, resulting in a fast-track to removing immigrants without due process.
“This unwarranted blitzkrieg of assaults on justice and fair treatment raises serious constitutional concerns and is unworthy of the oaths you swore to uphold,” the Oregon lawmakers wrote to Attorney General Todd Blanche, Sirce E. Owen, Acting Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review and David Venturella, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
“Over the past year, your agencies have increased the number of immigrants who must appear on little-to-no notice for so-called ‘mega master’ hearings on overcrowded dockets in front of Trump’s handpicked judges at courts across the country, all while stripping immigrants of their legal status, ramping up arrests and detention, and limiting their access to legal counsel for representation in court and fast-tracked asylum interviews,” they wrote.
“These policy changes confuse and terrify law-abiding immigrants in our communities and prevent them from having a fair day in court.”
The lawmakers wrote that the Portland Immigration Court in Oregon is now holding about two “mega master” hearings every week, in addition to maintaining its previously scheduled docket hearings and individual merit hearings. That has forced immigrants anticipating court dates in 2027 or 2028 to suddenly show up on extremely short notice and scrambling both to figure out how to get to the court on time, and to find an attorney to represent them.
“As if the changes at the Portland Immigration Court weren’t bad enough, the neighboring Tacoma Immigration Court has now had judges deciding in mid-August to stop allowing immigration attorneys across Oregon, Idaho, and Alaska from appearing remotely on behalf of their clients detained at the regional detention center,” the lawmakers continued. “Previously, the Tacoma Immigration Court allowed out-of-state attorneys to represent their clients by making court appearances through video conferencing technology. Now attorneys—and when applicable, expert witnesses— have to attend these hearings in person.”
The new requirement for immigration attorneys to represent their clients in person comes as immigration judges allow Department of Homeland Security prosecutors to participate in hearings remotely. In other cases even the presiding judge is attending remotely as well, with attorneys sharing that remote appearances by judges happen in about half the cases that they must attend in-person at the Tacoma Immigration Court.
These new in-person requirements also come as attorneys share that the court is sending “notices to appear” and setting hearings for that same morning giving the attorneys little time to prepare or make travel arrangements from out of state. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has also been routinely denying immigration attorneys access to their clients at detention centers, and transferring clients thousands of miles away to detention centers across the country.
“Immigration court proceedings must uphold fairness and rule of law and not be politicized to satisfy Donald Trump’s arbitrary detention quotas. We call on the Trump administration to discontinue policies and tactics that undermine constitutional due process. Our legal system relies on accountability; therefore, we demand that you establish fair and meaningful hearings that provide a genuine day in court and uphold the integrity of our nation’s immigration system,” the lawmakers concluded.
The lawmakers ended their letter demanding a written response by October 15th, 2026 detailing the steps that the Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security will take to achieve the following:
Terminate “mega master” hearings.
Provide immigrants with sufficient notice of their proceedings.
Reduce hardships on immigration attorneys.
Ensure that immigration judges hear cases individually, free from political influence.
The full text of the letter is here.
A web version of the release is here.
Issues:Civil Rights
Merkley, Bonamici, Wyden, Oregon Leaders Unlock $14 Million in Federal Funding for Oregon Coast Project
Position: The release describes the release of $14.57 million in FEMA BRIC funding for a tsunami-resilient hospital expansion at Columbia Memorial Hospital in Astoria, and criticizes the prior suspension of the BRIC program as having jeopardized the project.
Washington, D.C. – Today, Oregon’s U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley, U.S. Congresswoman Suzanne Bonamici (OR-01), Oregon’s U.S. Senator Ron Wyden, Oregon Governor Tina Kotek, Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield, and Oregon State Representative Cyrus Javadi announced that, thanks to their efforts, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has released $14,567,624 in federal funds for Clatsop County and Columbia Memorial Hospital (CMH) to build a tsunami-resilient hospital expansion in Astoria, featuring a vertical evacuation structure for 1,900 people.
CMH had received an award for the expansion under the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program—which provides grants for hazard mitigation planning and projects that reduce risks posed by natural hazards to communities—but faced roadblocks to accessing the funding after the Trump Administration suspended the BRIC program in 2025. Following legal challenges and advocacy by Oregon lawmakers, CMH’s BRIC funding has finally been released.
“You can’t wait for a disaster to happen to start preparing, and this funding finally moving forward will be transformative for disaster resiliency along the North Coast. Thanks to the partnership of state and local leaders, we held the Trump Administration accountable to deliver on the promise of this common-sense project to help Oregonians prepare for disasters and save lives,” said Senator Merkley. “I’ll keep pushing to get this project over the finish line and to deliver critical funding for disaster resiliency efforts in Oregon and communities across the country.”
“This grant funding is long overdue for Columbia Memorial Hospital and everyone who lives on or visits the Oregon Coast,” said Congresswoman Bonamici. “The BRIC grant for this lifesaving vertical evacuation structure should never have been jeopardized, and we’ve fought long and hard for it to be released. I look forward to celebrating the completion of this important project with the community in Astoria.”
“Ensuring that Oregon’s coastal communities have access to health care in the wake of natural disasters is absolutely essential,” said Senator Wyden. “I am thankful we were able to get critical funding released for the Columbia Memorial Hospital after it was illegally withheld under the Trump administration’s draconian funding cuts that are putting Oregon families at risk. I’ll continue to pull out all the stops to ensure our state has the resources it needs to keep families safe.”
“This award is a critical investment in the North Coast’s ability to be resilient in the face of disasters,” said Governor Kotek. “This project can now move forward with confidence in its completion, and the families on the North Coast will benefit from reliable health care access when they need it most. Thank you to our Congressional delegation and community leaders for your persistence to get this done.”
“Disaster relief should have never been held up over partisan politics,” said Attorney General Rayfield. “Oregonians’ safety is too important to play games with. That’s why we took immediate action to fight back and make sure this critically needed project will continue moving forward, providing peace of mind to the entire North Coast community.”
“Natural disasters don’t care if you’re in a red state or a blue state - FEMA shouldn’t either. So when the Trump Administration went back on its word, I promised we’d keep fighting until Columbia Memorial got what it was owed. Today that fight paid off. This funding will help our community be ready when the ground shakes or the water rises,” said Representative Javadi.
“We could not be more thrilled with the news that our BRIC grant funding has been restored! This $14 million grant completes our project budget and ensures that our community will receive a fully resilient, modern healthcare facility. The BRIC funds will help offset the cost of constructing a deep-pile foundation and a tsunami vertical evacuation structure capable of accommodating 1,900 people. The project will also locate critical infrastructure, generators, and the helipad on the roof of the new hospital—important features that will help ensure the facility can remain operational when our community needs it most. Our sincerest appreciation goes to Congresswoman Bonamici, Senator Merkley, Senator Wyden, Oregon Attorney General Rayfield, and all our state delegates for their unwavering support and tireless efforts to secure these funds. We are incredibly grateful,” said Erik Thorsen, Chief Executive Officer of Columbia Memorial Hospital.
"Thanks to the tireless advocacy of Senator Merkley, Senator Wyden, Representative Bonamici, and Representative Bentz, this critical funding is returning to Clatsop County. This victory was made possible by a shared commitment from Governor Kotek, Attorney General Rayfield, Senator Weber, Representative Javadi, and the Oregon legislature's Joint Ways and Means Committee. Above all, it is a direct result of our community keeping this project front and center. I want to thank my fellow Commissioners, County Manager Don Bohn, Sheriff Matt Phillips, and Emergency Management Director Justin Gibbs, and of course the leadership of CMH and CEO Erik Thorsen. This truly was a team effort that showcased the undeniable power of local, state, and federal collaboration,” said Mark Kujala, Chair of the Clatsop County Board of Commissioners.
###
Issues:Energy and EnvironmentTransportation and Infrastructure
Bonamici Introduces Human-Centered Framework to Provide Guardrails for AI in Education and Workforce
Position: Introduces the Artificial Intelligence Education and Workforce Readiness Act, a federal framework to establish safeguards against AI risks in education and the workforce, including workforce strategies, evidence-based research, professional development, and enforceable protections for students, educators, and workers.
WASHINGTON, DC [9/22/26] – Today Congresswoman Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR) introduced comprehensive legislation to establish guardrails against AI risks in education and the workforce and invest in protections for students, educators, and workers.
The Artificial Intelligence Education and Workforce Readiness Act is a robust federal framework to protect students, educators, and workers and help them safely navigate the technology in their classrooms and careers. The bill establishes national workforce strategies and coordinates evidence-based programs across the Departments of Education and Labor, and it directs safety research at federal science agencies. It creates enforceable safeguards, protects workers and communities, invests in professional development, and more.
“AI is already shaping how students learn and how people earn a living, but federal rules and regulations to protect students, support workers, and enforce ethical standards do not exist,” said Congresswoman Bonamici. “The companies building these tools don’t get to regulate themselves; we need clear rules and accountability for how AI is used in classrooms and workplaces. My human-centered legislation will empower and protect students, families, educators and others in the workforce by investing in evidence-based research, reskilling, transparency, safety, and long-term strategies. Congress must act now so AI does not continue to threaten the development of critical thinking skills and the wellbeing of humanity.”
The legislation has been endorsed by Alliance for Learning Innovation, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), American Council on Education, American Federation of Teachers, Center for American Progress, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, and Workday.
“As concerns about the risks of AI mount and industry leaders urge the federal government to act, Congresswoman Bonamici is answering the call with urgency,” said Center for American Progress Senior Director of K-12 Education Policy Weadé James, Ph.D. “This bill advances safeguards to promote responsible AI adoption in schools and the workforce, ensuring our nation’s 49 million public school students continue to receive an education rooted in learning science and human interaction.”
“As educators, school systems, and parents confront the rapidly changing use of artificial intelligence applications throughout society, including with children in schools, education researchers applaud Congresswoman Bonamici’s effort to establish a comprehensive federal framework for the responsible use of AI in our nation’s schools including professional development and open-access evidence-based research,” said Emily Tanner-Smith, Dean, University of Oregon College of Education and Thomson Professor in Counseling Psychology and Human Services. “Our faculty are committed to generating the research and preparing the educators needed to ensure AI is used responsibly, ethically, and in ways that expand opportunity for all learners.”
"We appreciate Rep. Bonamici's efforts to encourage students and assist our institutions in navigating the fast-changing AI frontier,” said Sarah Spreitzer, Vice President and Chief of Staff for Government Relations, American Council on Education. “This much-needed legislation will create new programs and provide resources to ensure that postsecondary education is ready to respond to the array of questions and challenges posed by AI."
“Workday is pleased to support Congresswoman Bonamici’s Artificial Intelligence (AI) Education and Workforce Readiness Act,” said Chandler Morse, Chief Corporate Affairs Officer at Workday. “AI will fundamentally reshape the world of work and Congress needs to take steps to help modernize labor market data, pinpoint the skills of the future, and empower employers to invest deeply in upskilling their talent. By bridging the gap between emerging technology and workforce development, this legislation creates a framework for driving responsible innovation while building an AI-ready workforce.”
Additional statements of support can be found here.
The full text of the legislation can be found here. A summary of the legislation can be found here, and a section-by-section breakdown can be found here. The bill will:
Require AI risk assessment standards for classroom technology, safeguards against harmful content, parental notice and opt-out rights, human review of automated decisions in federally funded workforce programs, and a secure student data breach reporting portal, enforced jointly by the Department of Education and the Federal Trade Commission;
Create strict safety compliance requirements, including prohibiting the use of student data to train AI models, open licensing and access of funded research and learning materials, independent evaluations and audits, human oversight and bias testing, robust data security protocols, and adoption of NIST's AI risk management framework;
Prohibit model developers from directing school instructional content or requiring exclusive use of their AI product;
Require data center operators to disclose pre-construction energy and water consumption projections and actual operational consumption, direct NIST to develop AI infrastructure energy and water measurement standards, and funds state, local, and community capacity for data center oversight, audits, and environmental research;
Establish an Interagency Council on Artificial Intelligence in Education and the Workforce to publish and update list of AI-disrupted jobs to guide program design;
Establish grants for regional career pathways and stackable micro-credential pilot programs to support interdisciplinary studies and project-based learning;
Support in-service training for school leaders that pairs AI literacy with humanities, critical thinking, and work-based learning, including on algorithmic bias, student data privacy, and preventing reliance on AI for critical educator roles;
Provide resources for educator professional development on responsible and ethical AI use; facilitate open-access education research on evidence-based, voluntary materials for AI-related literacy, ethics, civics, and humanities;
Fund open-access research on AI effects in education, Regional Centers for Human-Centered AI in Education and Work, and updated federal practice guides for the responsible use of AI in the classroom;
Invest in applied AI workforce research on employment disruption, regional training with wraparound supports, and evidence-based educator toolkits;
Direct a National AI Workforce Strategy and State AI Workforce Implementation Plans, supported by a national workforce coordination council, to assess skills gaps, identify disrupted occupations, and align programs with regional labor needs;
Provide grants for community colleges, small employers, and workforce programs to develop research and upskilling resources for individuals in non-traditional career pathways;
Create grants for apprenticeships, reskilling, and public service fellowships; require AI accessibility in vocational programs; provide a small business reskilling tax credit; and require reporting on AI-caused worker displacement;
Establish grants for equitable AI education access, capacity building at minority serving institutions, career scholarships, mentorship networks, and technical assistance; and
Require EEOC liability guidance on preventing discriminatory AI use in recruitment, training, and performance evaluation.
The package is cosponsored by Representatives Ted Lieu (D-CA), Valerie P. Foushee (D-NC), Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ), Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL), Jimmy Panetta (D-CA), Bennie Thompson (D-MS), Frederica Wilson (D-FL), and Greg Landsman (D-OH).
###
Issues:EducationJobs and Economy
Source: GDELT 2.0 GKG, filtered to a curated list of national outlets. Inclusion is not endorsement; opinion pieces and reported news are mixed.
Recent stock activity
Periodic transaction reports filed under the STOCK Act — disclosed by the rep, sourced from public filings.
No disclosed trades on record.
Source: open-data mirrors of the Senate eFD and House Clerk financial-disclosure systems. Disclosure within 30 days of trade is required by law (45 for spouse/dependent trades).
Top PAC donors · 2026 cycle
Political action committees that gave the most to this rep's principal campaign committee this cycle. PAC giving is direct organizational support — industry, ideological, or leadership.
1.CARPENTERS LEGISLATIVE IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERSLabor2 contributionsTrade-union PAC for the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners — backs prevailing-wage protections, federal infrastructure funding, project labor agreements, and worker safety standards.AI$10,000
2.AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS PAC2 contributions$10,000
3.AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, AFL-CIO COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATIONLabor2 contributionsTrade-union PAC for teachers — backs candidates supporting public education funding, collective bargaining rights, and worker protections.AI$10,000
4.AMERICA'S CREDIT UNIONS PAC OF CREDIT UNION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, INC.Finance5 contributionsCredit union industry PAC — backs candidates and policies supporting credit union operations, member protections, and regulatory positions favoring cooperative financial institutions.AI$10,000
5.COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM PAC4 contributions$10,000
6.AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES P E O P L E4 contributions$10,000
7.AAJ PAC4 contributions$9,500
8.CAMBIA HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC. PAC6 contributions$9,100
9.AMERICAN COUNCIL OF ENGINEERING CO. (ACEC PAC)3 contributions$8,000
10.AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NURSE-MIDWIVES MIDWIVES-PAC2 contributions$7,500
Source: OpenFEC (api.open.fec.gov) Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “committee.” Aggregated by contributing committee. Self-transfers from joint-fundraising / victory committees are excluded.
Top individual contributors · 2026 cycle
Itemized individual contributions over $200 to this rep's campaign committee, aggregated by donor employer. PAC giving is shown above; this section is people, not organizations.
1.SELF$16,550
2.VERNIER SCIENCE EDUCATION$11,000
3.METRO WEST AMBULA$7,000
4.DIGITAL VISION INC$5,849
5.ESCAPE LODGING$5,500
6.CFM STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS$5,000
7.CASSIDY & ASSOCIATES$5,000
8.SCHAEFFER MFG.$5,000
9.METRO WEST$5,000
10.BREWSTER & MAYNE PC$4,052
Source: OpenFEC Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “individual,” aggregated by the donor's self-reported employer. This is a geographic / industry correlation, not a corporate endorsement.
