Back to bill feed
James E. Clyburn official portrait

James E. Clyburn

D

house · SC-6

Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See how James E. Clyburn actually votes — against your values.

DeepSyte scores James E. Clyburn's record on the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your personal alignment.

Alignment with your views

Sign in and take the values quiz to see how James E. Clyburn's votes line up with your views.

Prediction track record

We haven't made any vote predictions for James E. Clyburn yet. Predictions are generated for bills with tagged effects; they show up here as soon as the predict-votes job covers this rep's upcoming docket.

Consistency insights

No paired statements and votes yet for James E. Clyburn

We haven't yet found statement/vote pairs on the same topic for James E. Clyburn. This usually means either the rep hasn't taken public positions on bills that have come to a passage vote, or those bills haven't been tagged yet. The checker runs as new press releases and votes come in.

Pro analysis

AI rep analysis — Pro

Get an AI-narrated read on James E. Clyburn's full voting record against your stated values — aligned themes, conflicts, notable votes, and what to watch for.

Campaign promises

We haven't extracted campaign positions for James E. Clyburn yet. Once their campaign website or position pages are processed, this card will track what they said vs how they voted.

Crossing the aisle

Passage votes where James E. Clyburn broke ranks with ≥75% of Democrats. Threshold catches substantively partisan splits; unanimous-ish or close votes are excluded.

2
Cross-aisle votes
  1. 118-hr-8790·Sep 24, 2024·76% of D voted NO

    Fix Our Forests Act

    Rep voted YES
    Bill
  2. 118-hr-6572·May 15, 2024·78% of D voted YES

    Deploying American Blockchains Act of 2023

    Rep voted NO
    Bill

Recent votes

Recent statements

May 20, 2026press_release_house

Republican Transportation, Housing, and Urban Development Funding Bill Makes Cost of Living Crisis Worse - Congressman James E. Clyburn

Position: The release opposes the Republican fiscal year 2027 Transportation, Housing, and Urban Development funding bill, arguing that it cuts housing and transportation investments, worsens affordability, and fails to address homelessness and the housing shortage.

Bill Makes It More Difficult for Americans to Buy a Home or Find Secure and Affordable, Safe Rental Housing WASHINGTON — House Appropriations Committee Republicans today released the draft fiscal year 2027 Transportation, and Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies funding bill, which will be considered in subcommittee tomorrow. While Americans continue to struggle with the high cost of living, the bill makes it more expensive for Americans to keep a roof over their heads, commute to work and school, and have a chance at homeownership. For 2027, the funding bill provides $92.2 billion, including $434 million to support maritime defense readiness programs at the Department of Transportation. After accounting for housing revenues, $100.9 billion is provided for federal transportation and housing programs, a cut of nearly $8.8 billion, or 8 percent, from 2026. “The bill before us falls short of the American people’s needs, and once again, fails to meet this country’s growing housing shortage, most especially in the area of homelessness, and our aging populace,” Transportation, and Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Subcommittee Ranking Member James E. Clyburn (D-SC-06) said. “We have yet to realize the full potential of resources approved by this Committee on a bipartisan basis. The current state of accessibility and affordability in America require us to take stock of our national priorities, and this appropriations bill fails to meet the moment. I implore my colleagues on this panel to work together on a bipartisan basis to find real solutions to the housing and jobs crisis and drive down the cost of living for everyday Americans.” “House Republicans are doing nothing to address the cost of living crisis. Instead, they want to make it harder for the working class, the middle class, and vulnerable Americans to keep a roof over their heads, own a home, rent a safe place to raise their families, and commute to work and school,” Appropriations Committee Ranking Member Rosa DeLauro (D-CT-03) said. “Republicans’ 2027 Transportation, Housing, and Urban Development bill misses the reality that Americans just want relief from skyrocketing prices. It strips away critical investments in housing and community development while cutting Amtrak and other critical transportation resources, putting more commuters on the road, and adding more delays getting to work or school. Republicans’ bill slows the shipment of products American families depend on, further threatening to raise prices at a time when President Trump’s tariffs continue to weaken the economy. This bill would have lasting, harmful consequences on the health and safety of our communities.” A summary of House Republicans’ 2027 Transportation, and Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies funding bill is here. A fact sheet is here. The text of the bill is here. The subcommittee markup will be webcast live on the House Committee on Appropriations website.

housinginfrastructure
Source
April 29, 2026press_release_house

Clyburn Statement on Supreme Court Ruling on Louisiana v. Callais - Congressman James E. Clyburn

Position: Congressman Clyburn opposes the Supreme Court's Louisiana v. Callais decision, characterizing it as dismantling the Voting Rights Act and threatening to increase partisan redistricting conflicts and reduce Black political representation.

WASHINGTON, DC — Congressman James E. Clyburn (SC-06) released the following statement on the Supreme Court’s ruling on Louisiana v. Callais: “Today’s Supreme Court decision in Louisiana v. Callais is a giant step backward in our “pursuit of a more perfect Union,” as this activist court continues to dismantle the 1965 Voting Rights Act, one decision at a time. “This decision threatens to send our country deeper into the thicket of never-ending redistricting fights, with repeated aggressive map redraws, protracted legal battles, and relentless partisan tugs-of-war, all of which are destined to result in more regressive Court decisions. “This Court seems hellbent on redeeming the post-Reconstruction America that neutered the 1875 Civil Rights Act and other legislative and judicial actions that drastically limited Black participation and achievement, and eliminated African American political representation in multiple Southern states.”

criminal_justice
Source

Recent news mentions

Articles from a curated list of national outlets that mention James E. Clyburn.

Source: GDELT 2.0 GKG, filtered to a curated list of national outlets. Inclusion is not endorsement; opinion pieces and reported news are mixed.

Recent stock activity

Periodic transaction reports filed under the STOCK Act — disclosed by the rep, sourced from public filings.

No disclosed trades on record.

Source: open-data mirrors of the Senate eFD and House Clerk financial-disclosure systems. Disclosure within 30 days of trade is required by law (45 for spouse/dependent trades).

Top PAC donors · 2026 cycle

Political action committees that gave the most to this rep's principal campaign committee this cycle. PAC giving is direct organizational support — industry, ideological, or leadership.

  1. 1.NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEReal Estate3 contributionsTrade association PAC for U.S. real estate agents and brokers — backs candidates supporting property-rights protections, mortgage-lending access, and tax incentives for homeownership.AI$15,000
  2. 2.UNION PACIFIC CORP. FUND FOR EFFECTIVE GOVERNMENTTransport2 contributionsRailroad company PAC — supports candidates and policies favoring freight rail operations, infrastructure investment, and regulatory positions aligned with the rail industry.AI$10,000
  3. 3.INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS POLITICAL ACTION LEAGUELabor2 contributionsTrade-union PAC for sheet metal, air, rail, and transportation workers — backs candidates supporting union organizing, prevailing wages, and infrastructure investment.AI$10,000
  4. 4.BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS & TRAINMEN PAC FUNDLabor2 contributionsTrade-union PAC for locomotive engineers and trainmen — backs candidates supporting rail worker wages, benefits, workplace safety, and collective-bargaining protections.AI$10,000
  5. 5.UNITED ASSOCIATION POLITICAL EDUCATION COMMITTEE (UNITED ASSOCIATION OF JOURNEYMEN AND APPLabor2 contributionsTrade-union PAC for plumbers, pipefitters, and HVAC technicians — backs prevailing-wage protections, apprenticeship funding, and infrastructure investment.AI$10,000
  6. 6.NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE DEALERS ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEBusiness2 contributionsTrade association PAC for new-car dealers — backs candidates supporting dealer franchise protections, vehicle sales regulations, and automotive retail interests.AI$10,000
  7. 7.FEDERAL BIPARTISAN VOLUNTARY PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE OF THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP,Finance2 contributionsBanking PAC for PNC Financial Services Group — supports candidates aligned with financial-services industry priorities including regulatory policy and lending practices.AI$10,000
  8. 8.EMPLOYEES OF RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION PACDefense2 contributionsDefense contractor employee PAC — supports candidates aligned with Raytheon Technologies' interests in aerospace, defense systems, and military contracting.AI$10,000
  9. 9.AMERICAN COUNCIL OF ENGINEERING COMPANIES (ACEC/PAC)Business2 contributionsEngineering industry association PAC — supports candidates backing infrastructure investment, regulatory streamlining, and federal contracting policies favorable to engineering firms.AI$10,000
  10. 10.NUCOR CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEEnergy2 contributionsSteel manufacturer PAC — backs candidates supporting domestic steel production, infrastructure investment, and trade policies favorable to U.S. steelmakers.AI$10,000

Source: OpenFEC (api.open.fec.gov) Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “committee.” Aggregated by contributing committee. Self-transfers from joint-fundraising / victory committees are excluded.

Top individual contributors · 2026 cycle

Itemized individual contributions over $200 to this rep's campaign committee, aggregated by donor employer. PAC giving is shown above; this section is people, not organizations.

  1. 1.MICROSOFT$9,035
  2. 2.PSP PARTNERS$7,000
  3. 3.SEIU$5,000
  4. 4.HOLLIDAY ASSOCIATES, LLC$4,225
  5. 5.SELF$4,143
  6. 6.WILLOUGHBY & HOEFER$3,500
  7. 7.K&R FARM$3,500
  8. 8.ACM$3,500
  9. 9.HPI$3,500
  10. 10.MOTA DESIGN$3,500

Source: OpenFEC Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “individual,” aggregated by the donor's self-reported employer. This is a geographic / industry correlation, not a corporate endorsement.