DeepSyte™
Bill FeedAll repsScoreboardsPrimariesProAboutSign inGet started
DeepSyte™™

A nonpartisan civic accountability tool. We match federal legislation to your stated values — without partisan bias.

Learn

  • About
  • About the name
  • Methodology
  • Glossary

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Refund Policy
  • Contact

Sources

Bill data from Congress.gov. Summaries from the Congressional Research Service where available.

Follow

  • Bluesky — @deepsyte.app
  • X — @deepsyteapp
All content is for informational purposes only. Always verify against primary sources.
Back to bill feed
James E. Clyburn official portrait

James E. Clyburn

D

house · SC-6

CompareSign in to get alerts
Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See how James E. Clyburn actually votes — against your values.

DeepSyte scores James E. Clyburn's record on the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your personal alignment.

Get started freeTake the values quiz
Official websiteSee this seat's 2026 race

Alignment with your views

Sign in and take the values quiz to see how James E. Clyburn's votes line up with your views.

Prediction track record

We haven't made any vote predictions for James E. Clyburn yet. Predictions are generated for bills with tagged effects; they show up here as soon as the predict-votes job covers this rep's upcoming docket.

Consistency insights

No paired statements and votes yet for James E. Clyburn

We haven't yet found statement/vote pairs on the same topic for James E. Clyburn. This usually means either the rep hasn't taken public positions on bills that have come to a passage vote, or those bills haven't been tagged yet. The checker runs as new press releases and votes come in.

Pro analysis

AI rep analysis — Pro

Get an AI-narrated read on James E. Clyburn's full voting record against your stated values — aligned themes, conflicts, notable votes, and what to watch for.

Sign in to use AI analysis

Campaign promises

We haven't extracted campaign positions for James E. Clyburn yet. Once their campaign website or position pages are processed, this card will track what they said vs how they voted.

Crossing the aisle

Passage votes where James E. Clyburn broke ranks with ≥75% of Democrats. Threshold catches substantively partisan splits; unanimous-ish or close votes are excluded.

2
Cross-aisle votes
  1. 118-hr-8790·Sep 24, 2024·76% of D voted NO

    Fix Our Forests Act

    Rep voted YES
    Bill
  2. 118-hr-6572·May 15, 2024·78% of D voted YES

    Deploying American Blockchains Act of 2023

    Rep voted NO
    Bill

Recent votes

  • Nay
    To amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes.
    119-hr-9238··June 11, 2026
  • Nay
    To amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes.
    119-hr-9238··June 11, 2026
  • Nay
    Condemning actors seeking to defraud the United States Government, and expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that governmentwide fraud and improper payment prevention reforms will meaningfully improve the financial prosperity of the United States, and that Federal program eligibility should be verified before payment.
    119-hres-1335··June 11, 2026
  • Nay
    Fraud Prevention and Accountability Act
    119-hr-8312··June 10, 2026
  • Nay
    No Aid for Ghost Students Act of 2026
    119-hr-7892··June 10, 2026
  • Yea
    Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5408) to accelerate workplace time-to-contract under the National Labor Relations Act.
    119-hres-1140·2 votes·Jun 9, 2026
    • ·June 9, 2026
    • ·June 9, 2026
  • Yea
    Faster Labor Contracts Act
    119-hr-5408··June 9, 2026
  • Yea
    Federal Fraud Prevention Workforce Training Act
    119-hr-8428··June 8, 2026
  • Yea
    Ukraine Support Act
    119-hr-2913··June 5, 2026
  • Yea
    Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agency Appropriations Act, 2027
    119-hr-8646··June 4, 2026
  • Nay
    Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.
    119-hres-1336··June 4, 2026
  • Nay
    Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agency Appropriations Act, 2027
    119-hr-8646··June 4, 2026
  • Nay
    Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.
    119-hres-1336··June 4, 2026
  • Yea
    ARTIST Act
    119-s-254··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
    119-hconres-86··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    Northwest Straits Marine Conservation Initiative Reauthorization Act of 2025
    119-hr-2860··June 3, 2026
  • Nay
    Stop Child Care Scams Act of 2026
    119-hr-7726··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2913) to authorize support for Ukraine, and for other purposes.
    119-hres-518··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    Stop Child Care Scams Act of 2026
    119-hr-7726··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    Fiscal Year 2025 Veterans Affairs Major Medical Facility Authorization Act
    119-s-2393··May 20, 2026
  • Yea
    Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
    119-hr-2853··May 12, 2026
  • Nay
    Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026
    119-hr-7567··April 30, 2026
  • Yea
    A bill to amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes.
    119-s-4465··April 30, 2026
  • Yea
    Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026
    119-hr-7567··April 30, 2026

Recent statements

May 20, 2026press_release_house

Republican Transportation, Housing, and Urban Development Funding Bill Makes Cost of Living Crisis Worse - Congressman James E. Clyburn

Position: The release opposes the Republican fiscal year 2027 Transportation, Housing, and Urban Development funding bill, arguing that it cuts housing and transportation investments, worsens affordability, and fails to address homelessness and the housing shortage.

Bill Makes It More Difficult for Americans to Buy a Home or Find Secure and Affordable, Safe Rental Housing WASHINGTON — House Appropriations Committee Republicans today released the draft fiscal year 2027 Transportation, and Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies funding bill, which will be considered in subcommittee tomorrow. While Americans continue to struggle with the high cost of living, the bill makes it more expensive for Americans to keep a roof over their heads, commute to work and school, and have a chance at homeownership. For 2027, the funding bill provides $92.2 billion, including $434 million to support maritime defense readiness programs at the Department of Transportation. After accounting for housing revenues, $100.9 billion is provided for federal transportation and housing programs, a cut of nearly $8.8 billion, or 8 percent, from 2026. “The bill before us falls short of the American people’s needs, and once again, fails to meet this country’s growing housing shortage, most especially in the area of homelessness, and our aging populace,” Transportation, and Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Subcommittee Ranking Member James E. Clyburn (D-SC-06) said. “We have yet to realize the full potential of resources approved by this Committee on a bipartisan basis. The current state of accessibility and affordability in America require us to take stock of our national priorities, and this appropriations bill fails to meet the moment. I implore my colleagues on this panel to work together on a bipartisan basis to find real solutions to the housing and jobs crisis and drive down the cost of living for everyday Americans.” “House Republicans are doing nothing to address the cost of living crisis. Instead, they want to make it harder for the working class, the middle class, and vulnerable Americans to keep a roof over their heads, own a home, rent a safe place to raise their families, and commute to work and school,” Appropriations Committee Ranking Member Rosa DeLauro (D-CT-03) said. “Republicans’ 2027 Transportation, Housing, and Urban Development bill misses the reality that Americans just want relief from skyrocketing prices. It strips away critical investments in housing and community development while cutting Amtrak and other critical transportation resources, putting more commuters on the road, and adding more delays getting to work or school. Republicans’ bill slows the shipment of products American families depend on, further threatening to raise prices at a time when President Trump’s tariffs continue to weaken the economy. This bill would have lasting, harmful consequences on the health and safety of our communities.” A summary of House Republicans’ 2027 Transportation, and Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies funding bill is here. A fact sheet is here. The text of the bill is here. The subcommittee markup will be webcast live on the House Committee on Appropriations website.

housinginfrastructure
Source
April 29, 2026press_release_house

Clyburn Statement on Supreme Court Ruling on Louisiana v. Callais - Congressman James E. Clyburn

Position: Congressman Clyburn opposes the Supreme Court's Louisiana v. Callais decision, characterizing it as dismantling the Voting Rights Act and threatening to increase partisan redistricting conflicts and reduce Black political representation.

WASHINGTON, DC — Congressman James E. Clyburn (SC-06) released the following statement on the Supreme Court’s ruling on Louisiana v. Callais: “Today’s Supreme Court decision in Louisiana v. Callais is a giant step backward in our “pursuit of a more perfect Union,” as this activist court continues to dismantle the 1965 Voting Rights Act, one decision at a time. “This decision threatens to send our country deeper into the thicket of never-ending redistricting fights, with repeated aggressive map redraws, protracted legal battles, and relentless partisan tugs-of-war, all of which are destined to result in more regressive Court decisions. “This Court seems hellbent on redeeming the post-Reconstruction America that neutered the 1875 Civil Rights Act and other legislative and judicial actions that drastically limited Black participation and achievement, and eliminated African American political representation in multiple Southern states.”

criminal_justice
Source

Recent news mentions

Articles from a curated list of national outlets that mention James E. Clyburn.

  • The Boston Globe·June 10, 2026
    Evette and Wilson advance to runoff for South Carolina governor while Graham clinches nomination - The Boston Globe
  • Los Angeles Times·June 10, 2026
    Former Fox News host Steve Hilton clinches a top spot in governor's race, will challenge Xavier Becerra
  • Chicago Tribune·June 9, 2026
    What to watch in Tuesday’s primaries as Graham Platner tries to clinch Senate nomination in Maine
  • The Virginian-Pilot·June 9, 2026
    What to watch in Tuesday’s primaries as Graham Platner tries to clinch Senate nomination in Maine
  • Los Angeles Times·June 1, 2026
    The mystery behind Becerra leapfrogging over his rivals in California's governor's race
  • New Hampshire Union Leader·May 27, 2026
    Trump
  • NBC News·May 26, 2026
    South Carolina’s Trump-backed redistricting push fails in the state Senate amid GOP opposition
  • The Atlantic·May 23, 2026
    Some Lawmakers Want a Gerrymandering Truce
  • NBC News·May 15, 2026
    Trump wraps visit with Xi Jinping and CIA director meets with Cuban officials: Morning Rundown
  • Los Angeles Times·May 15, 2026
    Jeffries' job grows more difficult in race for House and speaker's gavel
  • Fox News·May 15, 2026
    McMaster revives Trump-backed push to oust Biden kingmaker from Congress
  • NBC News·May 14, 2026
    South Carolina governor calls for a special session on redistricting
  • The Virginian-Pilot·May 14, 2026
    Jeffries’ job grows more difficult in race for House and speaker’s gavel
  • The Philadelphia Inquirer·May 14, 2026
    South Carolina governor plans special session to redraw House maps
  • The Seattle Times·May 14, 2026
    Jeffries’ job grows more difficult in race for House and speaker’s gavel

Source: GDELT 2.0 GKG, filtered to a curated list of national outlets. Inclusion is not endorsement; opinion pieces and reported news are mixed.

Recent stock activity

Periodic transaction reports filed under the STOCK Act — disclosed by the rep, sourced from public filings.

No disclosed trades on record.

Source: open-data mirrors of the Senate eFD and House Clerk financial-disclosure systems. Disclosure within 30 days of trade is required by law (45 for spouse/dependent trades).

Top PAC donors · 2026 cycle

Political action committees that gave the most to this rep's principal campaign committee this cycle. PAC giving is direct organizational support — industry, ideological, or leadership.

  1. 1.NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEReal Estate3 contributionsTrade association PAC for U.S. real estate agents and brokers — backs candidates supporting property-rights protections, mortgage-lending access, and tax incentives for homeownership.AI$15,000
  2. 2.UNION PACIFIC CORP. FUND FOR EFFECTIVE GOVERNMENTTransport2 contributionsRailroad company PAC — supports candidates and policies favoring freight rail operations, infrastructure investment, and regulatory positions aligned with the rail industry.AI$10,000
  3. 3.INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS POLITICAL ACTION LEAGUELabor2 contributionsTrade-union PAC for sheet metal, air, rail, and transportation workers — backs candidates supporting union organizing, prevailing wages, and infrastructure investment.AI$10,000
  4. 4.BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS & TRAINMEN PAC FUNDLabor2 contributionsTrade-union PAC for locomotive engineers and trainmen — backs candidates supporting rail worker wages, benefits, workplace safety, and collective-bargaining protections.AI$10,000
  5. 5.UNITED ASSOCIATION POLITICAL EDUCATION COMMITTEE (UNITED ASSOCIATION OF JOURNEYMEN AND APPLabor2 contributionsTrade-union PAC for plumbers, pipefitters, and HVAC technicians — backs prevailing-wage protections, apprenticeship funding, and infrastructure investment.AI$10,000
  6. 6.NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE DEALERS ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEBusiness2 contributionsTrade association PAC for new-car dealers — backs candidates supporting dealer franchise protections, vehicle sales regulations, and automotive retail interests.AI$10,000
  7. 7.FEDERAL BIPARTISAN VOLUNTARY PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE OF THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP,Finance2 contributionsBanking PAC for PNC Financial Services Group — supports candidates aligned with financial-services industry priorities including regulatory policy and lending practices.AI$10,000
  8. 8.EMPLOYEES OF RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION PACDefense2 contributionsDefense contractor employee PAC — supports candidates aligned with Raytheon Technologies' interests in aerospace, defense systems, and military contracting.AI$10,000
  9. 9.AMERICAN COUNCIL OF ENGINEERING COMPANIES (ACEC/PAC)Business2 contributionsEngineering industry association PAC — supports candidates backing infrastructure investment, regulatory streamlining, and federal contracting policies favorable to engineering firms.AI$10,000
  10. 10.NUCOR CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEEnergy2 contributionsSteel manufacturer PAC — backs candidates supporting domestic steel production, infrastructure investment, and trade policies favorable to U.S. steelmakers.AI$10,000

Source: OpenFEC (api.open.fec.gov) Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “committee.” Aggregated by contributing committee. Self-transfers from joint-fundraising / victory committees are excluded.

Top individual contributors · 2026 cycle

Itemized individual contributions over $200 to this rep's campaign committee, aggregated by donor employer. PAC giving is shown above; this section is people, not organizations.

  1. 1.PSP PARTNERS$7,000
  2. 2.SEIU$5,000
  3. 3.MOTA DESIGN$3,500
  4. 4.CAROLINA CONCESSION LLC$3,500
  5. 5.WILLOUGHBY & HOEFER$3,500
  6. 6.BB&T$3,500
  7. 7.K&R FARM$3,500
  8. 8.SSP SOLUTIONS LLC$3,500
  9. 9.HOLLIDAY ASSOCIATES, LLC$3,125
  10. 10.SELF$2,375

Source: OpenFEC Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “individual,” aggregated by the donor's self-reported employer. This is a geographic / industry correlation, not a corporate endorsement.