Back to bill feed
Jason Crow official portrait

Jason Crow

D

house · CO-6

Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See how Jason Crow's votes line up with your values.

DeepSyte scores Jason Crow's record on the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your personal alignment.

Alignment with your views

Sign in and take the values quiz to see how Jason Crow's votes line up with your views.

Prediction track record

How often we called Jason Crow's passage votes correctly, from their stated positions on each bill's tagged topics. Excludes “unclear” calls and abstentions.

100%
Accuracy
1
Correct
0
Incorrect
21
Pending
  1. Right119-hconres-68

    To direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from Venezuela that have not been authorized by Congress.

    Predicted YES
    Actual YES
    Bill
  2. Pending vote119-hr-7802

    DISCLOSE Act of 2026

    Predicted YES
    Bill
  3. Pending vote119-sjres-184

    A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.

    Predicted YES
    Bill
  4. Pending vote119-hjres-122

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to the authority of Congress and the States to regulate contributions and expenditures intended to affect elections and to enact public financing systems for political campaigns.

    Predicted YES
    Bill
  5. Pending vote119-s-3991

    DISCLOSE Act of 2026

    Predicted YES
    Bill
  6. Pending vote119-sjres-104

    A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.

    Predicted YES
    Bill

Consistency insights

Jason Crow · statement ↔ vote record

85
Consistency score

Based on 1 data point across public statements and recorded votes · AI analysis of public records

  • 119-hconres-93Consistent

    Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

    85/100

    What they said

    Apr 23, 2026

    Congressman Crow and 12 House Democratic veterans are calling for an investigation into the deaths of six servicemembers killed in an Iranian attack in Kuwait, demanding the Secretary of Defense explain enhanced protections for U.S. forces. They argue that servicemembers were inadequately protected against known Iranian capabilities and criticize the Trump administration's decision to initiate conflict with Iran as a 'war of choice' lacking strategy or planning.

    What they did

    Sep 16, 2026

    Voted Yea on Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

    AI analysis

    Crow's statement criticizes the Trump administration's decision to launch a 'war of choice' with Iran without a plan or strategy and calls for ending the conflict, which aligns with a resolution directing removal of U.S. forces from hostilities with Iran except for defensive operations. Crow's yes vote on passage matches that position on the core question of continued military engagement with Iran, though the statement focuses mainly on force protection and investigation rather than explicitly endorsing withdrawal.

Pairs with ambiguous language and high uncertainty are withheld until more data is available. Procedural, cloture, and amendment votes are excluded — they don't cleanly signal substantive support or opposition.

Pro analysis

AI rep analysis — Pro

Get an AI-narrated read on Jason Crow's full voting record against your stated values — aligned themes, conflicts, notable votes, and what to watch for.

Campaign promises

We haven't extracted campaign positions for Jason Crow yet. Once their campaign website or position pages are processed, this card will track what they said vs how they voted.

Crossing the aisle

No party-break passage votes recorded for Jason Crow. Either they've voted with Democrats on every substantive passage vote in the corpus, or their tenure overlaps few high-threshold party-line votes so far.

Recent votes

Recent statements

May 1, 2026House press release

Crow Introduces War Powers Resolution to End Trump’s War with Iran

Position: Congressman Crow opposes the current U.S. military conflict with Iran under President Trump, arguing it is illegal, costly, and lacks congressional authorization. He introduced a War Powers resolution to end the conflict and reassert Congress's constitutional authority over decisions to wage war.

WASHINGTON — Congressman Jason Crow (D-CO), a former paratrooper and Army Ranger who serves on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and House Armed Services Committee, introduced a new War Powers resolution to end President Donald Trump’s war of choice with Iran. Crow continues to push his colleagues to reclaim Congress’ authority over war and peace, even as Republicans refuse to rein in this conflict. The resolution was also introduced by Congressman Seth Moulton (D-MA), a fellow veteran and member of the House Armed Services Committee. “Congress must end President Trump’s illegal war of choice with Iran. His war has cost the lives of U.S. servicemembers, raised prices for Americans at home, damaged our alliances, and made us less safe,” said Congressman Crow. “The President is spending tens of billions of taxpayer dollars on Middle East conflicts as Americans back home can’t afford gas and are losing their health care. Congress must end this conflict now.” “As veterans, we know firsthand the cost of war,” said Congressman Seth Moulton. “We also know that military force is not always the answer. Brute force will not reopen the Strait of Hormuz. We have already lost 13 Americans in this conflict, and we cannot continue to send our troops into harm’s way without a strategy. We are introducing this resolution because the American people deserve a say in how their military is used, and it is clear that this reckless war of choice must end.” Crow has repeatedly condemned Trump’s illegal war of choice in Iran and supported numerous War Powers resolutions to end the war. As an Army Ranger who grew up in a working class family and served in Iraq and Afghanistan, Crow saw firsthand the repercussions of forever wars on servicemembers and hardworking Americans. He has also demanded answers on civilian deaths related to the war, including a U.S. strike on an Iranian girls’ elementary school where at least 175 civilians, many of them children, were killed. ### Issues:National Security

Foreign Policy
Source
April 30, 2026House press release

Crow Presses Secretary Pete Hegseth Over Defense Department Corruption, Conflicts of Interest

WASHINGTON — Congressman Jason Crow (D-CO), a former paratrooper and Army Ranger, pressed Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth about conflicts of interest swirling around a top advisor Hegseth described as a “long term friend” and “great patriot” during his appearance before the House Armed Services Committee. While serving at the Pentagon, Special Advisor to the Secretary of Defense Tim Parlatore maintains a private law practice that represents clients who may have business before the U.S. Government and benefit from having an attorney with close personal ties to the Secretary. When asked about Parlatore’s conflicts of interest, Hegseth refused to answer whether Parlatore represents and profits off clients from foreign governments or whether he represents and profits off U.S. military officers who are under consideration for promotions by Hegseth. Secretary Hegseth commissioned Parlatore into the Navy Reserve in March 2025, bypassing vetting and oversight by the White House Presidential Personnel Office and the U.S. Senate. Hegseth’s decision to keep Parlatore at the Pentagon despite conflicts of interest is indicative of his failed leadership for servicemembers and the American people. CONGRESSMAN CROW: He [Parlatore] maintains a private law practice, does he represent foreign governments or foreign persons in that private law practice? SECRETARY HEGSETH: Uhh, I don’t know. CONGRESSMAN CROW: You don’t know? Somebody who is sitting in your meetings, a special advisor, you don’t know? Image

Source
April 29, 2026House press release

Crow Statement on Supreme Court Voting Rights Act Decision

Position: Congressman Crow opposes the Supreme Court's decision striking down a Voting Rights Act provision and calls for Congress to enact a nationwide ban on gerrymandering and campaign finance reforms.

WASHINGTON — Congressman Jason Crow (D-CO) released the following statement on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Louisiana v. Callais, gutting a key provision of the Voting Rights Act: “The Supreme Court just gave Republicans the green light to pursue more partisan gerrymandering. Their disastrous decision will further corrode our politics, eliminate fair maps, and embolden corporate special interests. “By eroding civil rights laws like the Voting Rights Act, the Supreme Court is attacking the right of every citizen to vote and make their voice heard. “This extreme Supreme Court has failed the American people. Congress must act to ban gerrymandering nationwide, end dark money influencing our elections, and reform our government so it works for working people.” ###

Source
April 23, 2026House press release

Crow Demands Answers on Protection of U.S. Forces in the Middle East

Position: Congressman Crow and 12 House Democratic veterans are calling for an investigation into the deaths of six servicemembers killed in an Iranian attack in Kuwait, demanding the Secretary of Defense explain enhanced protections for U.S. forces. They argue that servicemembers were inadequately protected against known Iranian capabilities and criticize the Trump administration's decision to initiate conflict with Iran as a 'war of choice' lacking strategy or planning.

WASHINGTON — Congressman Jason Crow (D-CO), a former paratrooper and Army Ranger who serves on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and House Armed Services Committee, is calling for an investigation into the deaths of the six servicemembers who were tragically killed during an Iranian attack in Kuwait on March 1, 2026. Crow is also demanding that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth explain how they’re enhancing protections for all servicemembers as the conflict in the Middle East continues to escalate. Testimony from servicemembers injured in the attack and public reporting claims that U.S. troops were not properly protected against known and predictable Iranian capabilities, directly contradicting Secretary Hegseth’s accounting of the incident. "President Trump's reckless decision to start a war with Iran has claimed the lives of American servicemembers and injured hundreds more, said Congressman Crow. “The Commander in Chief launched a war of choice with no plan, no strategy, and no end game. The American people deserve answers on how the Trump Administration plans to end this conflict and protect our servicemembers overseas.” Joining Congressman Crow on this letter calling for an investigation are 12 House Democratic veterans, including Representatives Pat Ryan (D-NY), Gil Cisneros (D-CA), Herb Conaway (D-NJ), Chris Deluzio (D-PA), Maggie Goodlander (D-NH), Chrissy Houlahan (D-PA), Ted Lieu (D-CA), Seth Moulton (D-MA), Jimmy Panetta (D-CA), Mike Thompson (D-CA), Derek Tran (D-CA), and Eugene Vindman (D-VA). “Brave servicemembers have come forward detailing the reality on the ground. One servicemember injured in the attack explicitly called the Department’s characterization a ‘falsehood,' saying ‘the unit… was unprepared to provide any defense for itself. It was not a fortified position.’ When asked specifically what fortifications were in place, another servicemember replied, ‘I would put it in the “none” category, from a drone defense capability…none,’” the Representatives wrote. They continued: “We remain deeply concerned about the broader implications for U.S. force posture and protection across the region. The evolving threat environment, particularly the proliferation of low-cost, low-altitude drones capable of evading traditional air defense systems, demands urgent attention. Especially as it relates to the safety and security of our 50,000+ servicemembers deployed to the CENTCOM AOR.” Crow has repeatedly condemned Trump’s illegal war of choice in Iran. As an Army Ranger who grew up in a working-class family and served in Iraq and Afghanistan, Crow saw firsthand the repercussions of forever wars on servicemembers and hard-working Americans. He voted to reclaim Congressional authority over war with Iran and has demanded answers on recent civilian deaths, including a U.S. strike on an Iranian girls’ elementary school where at least 175 civilians, many of them children, were killed. A PDF of the letter can be found here, with full text appearing below: Dear Secretary Hegseth, We write to demand a formal, immediate investigation into the deaths of six U.S. servicemembers killed in Kuwait on March 1, 2026, during operations associated with the war in Iran. Congress must be kept fully and promptly informed of the investigation’s progress and any emerging findings. Based on direct testimony from servicemembers injured in the attack and public reporting, it is clear that there was a deadly failure to protect our troops from known and predictable Iranian capabilities. As the Department and the President continue to amass U.S. troops and assets in the region without an end in sight, it is essential that we prioritize the safety of troops deployed in theater. In addition to your failure to protect our troops, you, Secretary Hegseth, have also misled the public about the circumstances of the attack and failed to take accountability for the deaths of these brave men and women. In a press briefing you characterized the attack as “a squirter” that hit a “fortified” tactical operations center. Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said the command post was a “secure facility” that was “fortified with 6-foot walls.” Despite these claims, we know these fatalities were in fact the result of a failure to provide sufficient overhead protection against known and predictable one-way attack drone threats. Brave servicemembers have come forward detailing the reality on the ground. One servicemember injured in the attack explicitly called the Department’s characterization a “falsehood,” saying “the unit… was unprepared to provide any defense for itself. It was not a fortified position.” When asked specifically what fortifications were in place, another servicemember replied, “I would put it in the ‘none’ category, from a drone defense capability … none.” These reports raise serious questions about the adequacy of force protection measures in theater, particularly in the face of increasingly sophisticated and persistent unmanned aerial system (UAS) threats. In addition to including all physical evidence, operational data, first-hand accounts, and after-action reviews, please ensure your investigation also addresses the following questions: Was the threat of Iranian drone strikes on U.S. military sites and personnel assessed prior to the conflict? Why was overhead force protection not accounted for at the operations center in Port Shuaiba, Kuwait? Has overhead force protection been accounted for on the other 19 military sites in the Area of Responsibility (AOR) and across U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM)? Was the force protection posture based on previous in-theater operations with outdated or insufficient information? What are the preliminary findings regarding vulnerabilities in base infrastructure, including overhead protection and hardened facilities? How systemic and widespread were these targeting operations? How many Iranian drones have penetrated our defenses? Please provide any information on other Iranian drone or aerial incursions. What accountability measures are being considered in light of findings to date? We remain deeply concerned about the broader implications for U.S. force posture and protection across the region. The evolving threat environment, particularly the proliferation of low-cost, low-altitude drones capable of evading traditional air defense systems, demands urgent attention. Especially as it relates to the safety and security of our 50,000+ servicemembers deployed to the CENTCOM AOR. Accordingly, we also request information on the steps the Department of Defense is taking to ensure the safety of U.S. personnel, including: Enhancements to counter-UAS capabilities at forward-deployed locations; Improvements to early warning systems and detection of low-flying drones; Efforts to harden facilities and provide adequate overhead protection for critical operational and living spaces; Adjustments to force posture, dispersal, or basing strategies to mitigate risk; Coordination with partner nations to strengthen integrated air and missile defense in the region. The loss of these servicemembers is a profound tragedy, and we owe it to them, their families, and all those currently serving to ensure that every possible measure is taken to prevent similar incidents in the future. I appreciate your prompt attention to this matter and request a written response delivered to Congress no later than May 22, 2026. ### Issues:National Security

Foreign PolicyVeterans
Source

Recent news mentions

Articles from a curated list of national outlets that mention Jason Crow.

No recent news mentions yet.

Source: GDELT 2.0 GKG, filtered to a curated list of national outlets. Inclusion is not endorsement; opinion pieces and reported news are mixed.

Recent stock activity

Periodic transaction reports filed under the STOCK Act — disclosed by the rep, sourced from public filings.

No disclosed trades on record.

Source: open-data mirrors of the Senate eFD and House Clerk financial-disclosure systems. Disclosure within 30 days of trade is required by law (45 for spouse/dependent trades).

Top PAC donors · 2026 cycle

Political action committees that gave the most to this rep's principal campaign committee this cycle. PAC giving is direct organizational support — industry, ideological, or leadership.

  1. 1.WITH HONOR PACIdeological2 contributionsMilitary-veteran advocacy PAC — supports candidates committed to responsible defense spending, veterans' benefits, and pragmatic foreign policy.AI$10,000
  2. 2.LIFTOFF PAC2 contributions$10,000
  3. 3.SERVICE FIRST PAC2 contributions$10,000
  4. 4.GIDDY UP PAC2 contributions$10,000
  5. 5.VOTEVETSIdeological4 contributionsMilitary-veteran advocacy PAC — supports candidates backing veterans' benefits, healthcare access, and foreign policy positions aligned with veteran community priorities.AI$10,000
  6. 6.AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES P E O P L E4 contributions$10,000
  7. 7.NATIONAL AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATION PAC3 contributions$7,000
  8. 8.UNITED ASSOCIATION POLITICAL EDUCATION COMMITTEE (UNITED ASSOCIATION OF JOURNEYMEN AND APPLabor1 contributionTrade-union PAC for plumbers, pipefitters, and HVAC technicians — backs prevailing-wage protections, apprenticeship funding, and infrastructure investment.AI$5,000
  9. 9.MACHINISTS NON PARTISAN POLITICAL LEAGUE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS &Labor1 contributionTrade-union PAC for the International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers — backs candidates supporting union organizing, prevailing wages, and aerospace manufacturing jobs.AI$5,000
  10. 10.VOTER PROTECTION PROJECT1 contribution$5,000

Source: OpenFEC (api.open.fec.gov) Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “committee.” Aggregated by contributing committee. Self-transfers from joint-fundraising / victory committees are excluded.

Top individual contributors · 2026 cycle

Itemized individual contributions over $200 to this rep's campaign committee, aggregated by donor employer. PAC giving is shown above; this section is people, not organizations.

  1. 1.SELF$82,612
  2. 2.HOLLAND & HART LLP$22,500
  3. 3.PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES$15,800
  4. 4.CONSIDERED MEDIA$14,000
  5. 5.SIERRA NEVADA CORPORATION$14,000
  6. 6.NA$12,215
  7. 7.HOLLAND & HART$10,750
  8. 8.YORK SPACE SYSTEMS$9,000
  9. 9.UNITED LAUNCH ALLIANCE$8,500
  10. 10.BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK$8,250

Source: OpenFEC Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “individual,” aggregated by the donor's self-reported employer. This is a geographic / industry correlation, not a corporate endorsement.