DeepSyte™
Bill FeedAll repsScoreboardsPrimariesProAboutSign inGet started
DeepSyte™™

A nonpartisan civic accountability tool. We match federal legislation to your stated values — without partisan bias.

Learn

  • About
  • About the name
  • Methodology
  • Glossary

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Refund Policy
  • Contact

Sources

Bill data from Congress.gov. Summaries from the Congressional Research Service where available.

Follow

  • Bluesky — @deepsyte.app
  • X — @deepsyteapp
All content is for informational purposes only. Always verify against primary sources.
Back to bill feed
Greg Casar official portrait

Greg Casar

D

house · TX-35

CompareSign in to get alerts
Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See how Greg Casar actually votes — against your values.

DeepSyte scores Greg Casar's record on the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your personal alignment.

Get started freeTake the values quiz
Official websiteSee this seat's 2026 race

Alignment with your views

Sign in and take the values quiz to see how Greg Casar's votes line up with your views.

Prediction track record

How often we called Greg Casar's passage votes correctly, from their stated positions on each bill's tagged topics. Excludes “unclear” calls and abstentions.

67%
Accuracy
2
Correct
1
Incorrect
34
Pending
  1. Right119-hr-1223

    ANCHOR Act

    Predicted YES
    Actual YES
    Bill
  2. Wrong119-hr-1919

    Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act

    Predicted YES
    Actual NO
    Bill
  3. Right119-hr-1770

    Consumer Safety Technology Act

    Predicted YES
    Actual YES
    Bill
  4. Pending vote119-hr-5340

    To prohibit the disclosure of records by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development of individuals for the purposes of immigration enforcement, and for other purposes.

    Predicted YES
    Bill
  5. Pending vote119-s-4344

    A bill to extend section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 for 3 years.

    Predicted NO
    Bill
  6. Pending vote119-hr-7757

    KIDS Act

    Predicted YES
    Bill

Consistency insights

Greg Casar · statement ↔ vote record

84
Consistency score

Based on 10 data points across public statements and recorded votes · AI analysis of public records

  • 119-hr-3486·Consistent

    Stop Illegal Entry Act of 2025

    85/100

    What they said

    Jan 28, 2026

    Congressman Casar and 80 members of Congress are calling on the Trump administration to allow Any Lucía Lopez Belloza, a student deported in violation of a court order, to return to the United States and pursue available legal remedies. The members express concern about a pattern of ICE deportations based on acknowledged mistakes and in violation of court orders.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Sep 11, 2025

    Voted Nay on Stop Illegal Entry Act of 2025

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Congressman Casar's statement opposes ICE deportations based on mistakes and in violation of court orders, advocating for legal remedies and due process protections. The Stop Illegal Entry Act increases criminal penalties for illegal reentry and establishes mandatory minimum sentences without addressing the procedural safeguards or court-order compliance concerns Casar raised. His NO vote on this amendment aligns with his stated position opposing harsh immigration enforcement that disregards judicial oversight. However, because this is an amendment vote rather than a passage vote, the specific substantive intent cannot be fully determined from the vote alone.

    medium confidence
    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-5717·Consistent

    No Bailout for Sanctuary Cities Act

    85/100

    What they said

    Jan 28, 2026

    Congressman Casar and 80 members of Congress are calling on the Trump administration to allow Any Lucía Lopez Belloza, a student deported in violation of a court order, to return to the United States and pursue available legal remedies. The members express concern about a pattern of ICE deportations based on acknowledged mistakes and in violation of court orders.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Sep 20, 2024

    Voted Nay on No Bailout for Sanctuary Cities Act

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Congressman Casar's statement criticizes ICE deportations that violate court orders and calls for remedying harm to a wrongfully deported individual. The bill penalizes jurisdictions that restrict cooperation with ICE detainers and information-sharing about immigration status. Casar's NO vote aligns with his stated concern about ICE overreach and due-process violations—he opposes measures that would strengthen ICE's enforcement authority and reduce local oversight. The statement and vote point in the same direction on immigration enforcement policy, though the bill addresses a different specific mechanism (sanctuary city funding) than the statement's focus (court-order compliance and individual remedy).

    medium confidence
    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-2·Consistent

    Secure the Border Act of 2023

    85/100

    What they said

    Jan 28, 2026

    Congressman Casar and 80 members of Congress are calling on the Trump administration to allow Any Lucía Lopez Belloza, a student deported in violation of a court order, to return to the United States and pursue available legal remedies. The members express concern about a pattern of ICE deportations based on acknowledged mistakes and in violation of court orders.

    Read statement

    What they did

    May 11, 2023

    Voted Nay on Secure the Border Act of 2023

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Congressman Casar's statement opposes ICE deportations that violate court orders and calls for remedying deportation mistakes. The Secure the Border Act of 2023 focuses on border wall construction, asylum eligibility limits, and employment verification—provisions that expand enforcement capacity and restrict asylum access rather than address judicial oversight of deportation decisions or remedies for deportation errors. Casar's NO vote on a bill that strengthens enforcement mechanisms is consistent with his stated concern about deportations conducted in violation of court orders and his call for accountability in immigration enforcement.

    medium confidence
    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-6678·Consistent

    Consequences for Social Security Fraud Act

    85/100

    What they said

    Jan 28, 2026

    Congressman Casar and 80 members of Congress are calling on the Trump administration to allow Any Lucía Lopez Belloza, a student deported in violation of a court order, to return to the United States and pursue available legal remedies. The members express concern about a pattern of ICE deportations based on acknowledged mistakes and in violation of court orders.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Jan 31, 2024

    Voted Nay on Consequences for Social Security Fraud Act

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Congressman Casar's statement opposes deportations based on ICE mistakes and violations of court orders, advocating for legal remedies and due process. The bill expands deportation grounds for Social Security and identity document fraud. Casar's NO vote aligns with his stated concern about improper deportations—he opposes expanding deportation authority, particularly when due process concerns are central to his advocacy. The bill does not directly address court-order violations, but expanding deportation grounds runs counter to his emphasis on protecting individuals from erroneous removal.

    medium confidence
    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-5525·Consistent

    Continuing Appropriations and Border Security Enhancement Act, 2024

    85/100

    What they said

    Jan 28, 2026

    Congressman Casar and 80 members of Congress are calling on the Trump administration to allow Any Lucía Lopez Belloza, a student deported in violation of a court order, to return to the United States and pursue available legal remedies. The members express concern about a pattern of ICE deportations based on acknowledged mistakes and in violation of court orders.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Sep 29, 2023

    Voted Nay on Continuing Appropriations and Border Security Enhancement Act, 2024

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Congressman Casar's statement opposes ICE deportations that violate court orders and calls for remedying such mistakes. The bill imposes limits on asylum eligibility and includes provisions prohibiting DHS from using funds for certain immigration-related purposes. While the bill's specific asylum restrictions are not directly addressed in the statement, Casar's NO vote on a bill that tightens immigration enforcement aligns with his expressed concern about protecting individuals from wrongful deportation and his call for DHS accountability. The vote is consistent with his stated position, though the bill addresses immigration policy more broadly than the specific Lopez Belloza case.

    medium confidence
    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-7511·Consistent

    Laken Riley Act

    85/100

    What they said

    Jan 28, 2026

    Congressman Casar and 80 members of Congress are calling on the Trump administration to allow Any Lucía Lopez Belloza, a student deported in violation of a court order, to return to the United States and pursue available legal remedies. The members express concern about a pattern of ICE deportations based on acknowledged mistakes and in violation of court orders.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Mar 7, 2024

    Voted Nay on Laken Riley Act

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Congressman Casar's statement opposes ICE deportations that violate court orders and calls for remedying wrongful deportations. The Laken Riley Act mandates detention of non-U.S. nationals arrested for certain property crimes and authorizes states to sue over immigration enforcement decisions. Casar's NO vote on the bill aligns with his stated concern about aggressive immigration enforcement practices that disregard legal protections and due process. The bill's mandatory detention provisions and expanded state litigation authority represent the type of enforcement-focused approach that conflicts with his advocacy for protecting individuals from unlawful deportation.

    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-3602·Consistent

    Transnational Criminal Organization Illicit Spotter Prevention and Elimination Act

    85/100

    What they said

    Jan 28, 2026

    Congressman Casar and 80 members of Congress are calling on the Trump administration to allow Any Lucía Lopez Belloza, a student deported in violation of a court order, to return to the United States and pursue available legal remedies. The members express concern about a pattern of ICE deportations based on acknowledged mistakes and in violation of court orders.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Apr 20, 2024

    Voted Nay on Transnational Criminal Organization Illicit Spotter Prevention and Elimination Act

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Congressman Casar's statement opposes ICE deportations that violate court orders and calls for remedying enforcement mistakes. The bill criminalizes conduct that interferes with border control enforcement and enhances penalties for immigration-related crimes. Casar's NO vote on a bill that strengthens immigration enforcement aligns with his stated concern about aggressive ICE practices and deportations based on acknowledged errors. The vote reflects opposition to expanded enforcement tools, consistent with his advocacy for protecting individuals harmed by enforcement mistakes.

    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-7343·Consistent

    Detain and Deport Illegal Aliens Who Assault Cops Act

    85/100

    What they said

    Jan 28, 2026

    Congressman Casar and 80 members of Congress are calling on the Trump administration to allow Any Lucía Lopez Belloza, a student deported in violation of a court order, to return to the United States and pursue available legal remedies. The members express concern about a pattern of ICE deportations based on acknowledged mistakes and in violation of court orders.

    Read statement

    What they did

    May 15, 2024

    Voted Nay on Detain and Deport Illegal Aliens Who Assault Cops Act

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Congressman Casar's statement opposes ICE deportations that violate court orders and occur based on acknowledged mistakes, emphasizing due process and legal remedies. The bill mandates detention and deportation of non-U.S. nationals arrested for assaulting law enforcement, a narrower provision focused on a specific criminal conduct category. Casar's NO vote on a bill that expands mandatory detention/deportation authority is generally consistent with his stated concern about improper deportations and support for legal process, though the bill addresses a distinct criminal-conduct scenario rather than the erroneous deportation pattern he criticizes.

    medium confidence
    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-5585·Consistent

    Agent Raul Gonzalez Officer Safety Act

    85/100

    What they said

    Jan 28, 2026

    Congressman Casar and 80 members of Congress are calling on the Trump administration to allow Any Lucía Lopez Belloza, a student deported in violation of a court order, to return to the United States and pursue available legal remedies. The members express concern about a pattern of ICE deportations based on acknowledged mistakes and in violation of court orders.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Jan 30, 2024

    Voted Nay on Agent Raul Gonzalez Officer Safety Act

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Congressman Casar's statement opposes ICE deportations based on mistakes and in violation of court orders, advocating for legal remedies and due process protections. The bill creates new criminal offenses and mandatory deportation consequences for fleeing law enforcement near the border, with no relief provisions. While both touch immigration enforcement, they address different specific questions—one concerns wrongful deportations and court-order violations; the other concerns criminal penalties for fleeing police. Casar's NO vote is consistent with his stated concern about due-process violations and overly harsh deportation consequences, though the bill's focus on criminal conduct (fleeing law enforcement) rather than administrative error creates some directional ambiguity.

    medium confidence
    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-4367·Consistent

    Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2024

    75/100

    What they said

    Jan 28, 2026

    Congressman Casar and 80 members of Congress are calling on the Trump administration to allow Any Lucía Lopez Belloza, a student deported in violation of a court order, to return to the United States and pursue available legal remedies. The members express concern about a pattern of ICE deportations based on acknowledged mistakes and in violation of court orders.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Sep 29, 2023

    Voted Nay on Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2024

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    The statement criticizes ICE deportations that violate court orders and calls for remedying harm to a specific individual. The bill funds DHS agencies including ICE. A NO vote on DHS appropriations could reflect opposition to ICE's practices and funding levels, which aligns directionally with the statement's concerns about ICE misconduct. However, the bill is a broad appropriations measure funding multiple DHS agencies and functions; the NO vote does not specifically target ICE deportation practices or court-order violations, and may reflect other budgetary or policy objections unrelated to the statement's focus.

    medium confidence
    Sign in to report

Pairs with ambiguous language and high uncertainty are withheld until more data is available. Procedural, cloture, and amendment votes are excluded — they don't cleanly signal substantive support or opposition.

Pro analysis

AI rep analysis — Pro

Get an AI-narrated read on Greg Casar's full voting record against your stated values — aligned themes, conflicts, notable votes, and what to watch for.

Sign in to use AI analysis

Campaign promises

We haven't extracted campaign positions for Greg Casar yet. Once their campaign website or position pages are processed, this card will track what they said vs how they voted.

Crossing the aisle

Passage votes where Greg Casar broke ranks with ≥75% of Democrats. Threshold catches substantively partisan splits; unanimous-ish or close votes are excluded.

19
Cross-aisle votes
  1. 119-hr-4216·Sep 2, 2025·91% of D voted YES

    Made-in-America Defense Act

    Rep voted NO
    Bill
  2. 118-hr-5349·Dec 6, 2024·81% of D voted YES

    Crucial Communism Teaching Act

    Rep voted NO
    Bill
  3. 118-hres-915·Nov 21, 2024·99% of D voted YES

    Urging the Government of Ukraine to review and modify its decision to suspend adoption by foreign nationals with a view to resuming such adoptions, particularly in cases where the mutual concerns of the Governments of Ukraine and of the United States can be substantially addressed.

    Rep voted NO
    Bill
  4. 118-hr-7073·Sep 24, 2024·90% of D voted YES

    Next Generation Pipelines Research and Development Act

    Rep voted NO
    Bill
  5. 118-hr-1157·Sep 9, 2024·94% of D voted YES

    Countering the PRC Malign Influence Fund Authorization Act of 2023

    Rep voted NO
    Bill
  6. 118-hr-6572·May 15, 2024·78% of D voted YES

    Deploying American Blockchains Act of 2023

    Rep voted NO
    Bill

+ 13 more in the record

Recent votes

  • Nay
    Condemning actors seeking to defraud the United States Government, and expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that governmentwide fraud and improper payment prevention reforms will meaningfully improve the financial prosperity of the United States, and that Federal program eligibility should be verified before payment.
    119-hres-1335··June 11, 2026
  • Nay
    To amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes.
    119-hr-9238··June 11, 2026
  • Nay
    To amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes.
    119-hr-9238··June 11, 2026
  • Nay
    Fraud Prevention and Accountability Act
    119-hr-8312··June 10, 2026
  • Nay
    No Aid for Ghost Students Act of 2026
    119-hr-7892··June 10, 2026
  • Yea
    Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5408) to accelerate workplace time-to-contract under the National Labor Relations Act.
    119-hres-1140·2 votes·Jun 9, 2026
    • ·June 9, 2026
    • ·June 9, 2026
  • Yea
    Faster Labor Contracts Act
    119-hr-5408··June 9, 2026
  • Yea
    Federal Fraud Prevention Workforce Training Act
    119-hr-8428··June 8, 2026
  • Yea
    Ukraine Support Act
    119-hr-2913··June 5, 2026
  • Nay
    Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agency Appropriations Act, 2027
    119-hr-8646··June 4, 2026
  • Nay
    Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.
    119-hres-1336··June 4, 2026
  • Yea
    Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agency Appropriations Act, 2027
    119-hr-8646··June 4, 2026
  • Nay
    Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.
    119-hres-1336··June 4, 2026
  • Yea
    ARTIST Act
    119-s-254··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
    119-hconres-86··June 3, 2026
  • Nay
    Stop Child Care Scams Act of 2026
    119-hr-7726··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2913) to authorize support for Ukraine, and for other purposes.
    119-hres-518··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    Stop Child Care Scams Act of 2026
    119-hr-7726··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    Northwest Straits Marine Conservation Initiative Reauthorization Act of 2025
    119-hr-2860··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    Fiscal Year 2025 Veterans Affairs Major Medical Facility Authorization Act
    119-s-2393··May 20, 2026
  • Nay
    Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
    119-hr-2853··May 12, 2026
  • Nay
    Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026
    119-hr-7567··April 30, 2026
  • Nay
    A bill to amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes.
    119-s-4465··April 30, 2026
  • Yea
    Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026
    119-hr-7567··April 30, 2026

Recent statements

April 29, 2026press_release_house

NEWS: Casar, Riley Introduce Bill to Crack Down on Utilities Overcharging Consumers

Position: The representatives support legislation that would regulate for-profit utility companies by prohibiting them from passing certain costs (lobbying, private jet expenses, political contributions) to consumers and establishing federal standards for reasonable profit margins to reduce utility rates.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – On Wednesday, Rep. Greg Casar (D-TX) and Rep. Josh Riley (D-NY) introduced a new bill to crack down on utilities overcharging consumers. The Lowering Utility Bills Act reins in the runaway profits of for profit utilities, which are raising utility prices across the country by demanding exorbitant profits and forcing consumers to pay for outrageous expenses like private jet rides, lobbying, and contributions to politicians. The bill bars transmission providers and for profit utilities from requiring consumers to pay for private jet rides, lobbying, and contributions to politicians, and it sets a national standard for a reasonable ‘Return on Equity,’ to clamp down on for profit utilities charging consumers unreasonable rates. The bill would save families $500 a year, according to experts from the American Economic Liberties Project. The bill comes as millions of Americans are struggling to pay surging utility prices, in part because for-profit Investor Owned Utilities are artificially inflating prices. The cost of electricity has increased at more than twice the rate of inflation in recent years. Utility prices went up for 56 million Americans in 2025, and nearly one-quarter of Americans were unable to pay their utility bills in recent years. Rates at for-profit ‘Investor Owned Utilities’ are driving much of the increase. The Lowering Utility Bills Act would provide immediate relief to working families by preventing utility companies from artificially inflating their own profits. “Your utility bill should not be higher so that a utility company CEO can rent a private jet or make astronomical profits,” said Rep Casar. “Utility companies are supposed to abide by a basic deal: in exchange for being the only provider in an area, they charge people a fair rate. Utility companies across the country are breaking that deal, and our bill cracks down on their obscene profits to save working families money.” “Utility executives shouldn’t be flying around on private jets while Upstate families are sitting at the kitchen table making impossible choices between paying their electric bill and buying groceries," said Rep. Riley. "Right now, working people are footing the bill for outrageous corporate profits just to keep the lights on. That’s wrong. Our bill will crack down on these excessive rates, rein in corporate greed, and deliver real relief for families.” The bill: Cracks down on for-profit utilities making consumers pay for wasteful spending. Bans corrupt rate recovery pass through, such as lobbying, private planes for board of directors or officers, or contributions to political candidates, for transmission providers and for profit utilities; Cracks down on for-profit utilities demanding profit margins (returns on equity) far higher than the market would set. Directs FERC to calculate a reasonable rate of return for utility investments, taking into account the reduced risk of the industry. Directs FERC to use this new rate when determining rates. Requires for-profit utilities to use this rate when presenting rate proposals to the state regulatory authority... Cracks down on the building of unnecessary projects that raise costs. Requires the prioritization of cost saving investments ahead of capital investments for transmission providers and covered utilities. The bill is co-sponsored by: Reps. Yassamin Ansari, Valerie Foushee, Jesús “Chuy” García, Dan Goldman, Maggie Goodlander, Al Green, Adelita S Grijalva, Eleanor Holmes Norton, Hank Johnson, John Mannion, April McClain Delaney, Frank Mrvan, Pat Ryan, Lateefah Simon, Suhas Subramanyam, Shri Thanedar, Rashida Tlaib, and Bonnie Watson Coleman. “For too long, greedy utility companies have gamed the system to jack up prices on hardworking Americans while raking in record-breaking profits. Central Hudson executives are giving themselves millions in kickbacks, funded by price hikes on families struggling to keep the lights on. It’s completely unacceptable and a total abuse of their power,” said Rep. Pat Ryan (D-NY). “What kind of system lets a company like Central Hudson set their own profits at our expense? A fundamentally broken one. It’s time to hold these companies accountable and put the power back where it belongs: with the people.” “As the climate crisis continues to grow in Arizona and across the country, keeping a home cool is a matter of life and death,” said Rep. Yassamin Ansari (D-AZ). “Yet instead of providing relief, utility companies continue to profit by passing junk charges onto customers. I’m proud to introduce this legislation alongside my colleagues to put an end to this abuse and ban unnecessary costs from people's bills,” “It is fundamentally wrong to force hardworking Americans to subsidize private jets, political lobbying, and backroom contributions every time they pay their monthly electric bill," said Rep. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.). "The Lowering Utility Bills Act puts an end to these ‘investor-owned’ excesses by ensuring that rates reflect the actual cost of service, not the desire for runaway profits. This bill is a necessary step to stop the artificial inflation of energy costs and put $500 back into the pockets of families who need it most.” The bill is endorsed by: American Economic Liberties Project (AELP), Center for Biological Diversity, Congressional Lowering Utility Bills Caucus, Indivisible, League of Conservation Voters, Public Citizen, Inc., Sierra Club. “While utility monopolies collect billions in profit from ratepayers and pay their CEOs millions, American families struggle to keep the lights on,” said Marissa P. Gillett, Senior Fellow at the American Economic Liberties Project and former Chairman of Connecticut’s Public Utilities Regulatory Authority. “The Lowering Utility Bills Act would save consumers money by addressing bloated rates of return and stop utilities from passing costs for private jets and political activity on to consumers. We applaud Rep. Casar, Rep. Riley, and the entire Lowering Utility Bills Caucus for their leadership to stop this corporate profiteering." "Energy costs are out of control and struggling consumers want to hold accountable those causing the problems,” said Matthew Davis, League of Conservation Voters’ Vice President of Federal Policy. “Thank you to Reps. Casar and Riley for fighting to bring more accountability to the Trump administration, extreme Republican leadership, and greedy fossil fuel CEOs, for lowering energy bills for families across the country, and for working to increase access to clean energy." A section by section guide to the bill is available here. ### Issues:Economy

economyinfrastructure
Source
April 21, 2026press_release_house

NEWS: Casar, Gallego Demand Answers From JetBlue About Surveillance Pricing

Position: Representatives Casar and Gallego are demanding transparency from JetBlue regarding its use of customer data and artificial intelligence in pricing decisions, expressing concern that surveillance-based pricing may discriminate against consumers based on personal circumstances.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – On Monday, Rep. Greg Casar (TX-35) and Sen. Ruben Gallego (AZ) sent a letter to JetBlue Airlines requesting information about JetBlue’s potential use of customer data and artificial intelligence to set prices for consumers. On Monday, JetBlue’s X account suggested a customer try clearing their “cache and cookies or booking with an incognito window” after the customer complained about a price increase, a clear suggestion that the company is using surveillance pricing. While JetBlue subsequently claimed that airfares are not “determined” by cached data or personal information, Casar and Gallego are demanding answers about the company's definition of personal data; whether JetBlue is working with external vendors to set prices using personal data; and whether personal data is used in any capacity to inform prices. Casar and Gallego write they are “especially concerned that customers could be charged different prices for the same flight based on their need for travel, such as attending a funeral.” A copy of the letter, including the seven questions posed to CEO Joanna Geraghty, is available here. Both Casar and Gallego have introduced bills to crack down on surveillance pricing. ###

technologyeconomy
Source
April 9, 2026press_release_house

NEWS: Casar Statement on Tesla Gigafactory Subsides

Position: Congressman Casar supports Travis County's decision to withhold subsidies from Tesla due to the company's failure to meet contractual obligations and protect worker safety. He argues that taxpayers should not fund subsidies for a company with a record of endangering workers.

AUSTIN, TEXAS – Following news that Travis county will withhold subsidies from Tesla because of failure to meet its contractual obligations and protect workers, Congressman Greg Casar issued the following statement: “Tesla has a track record of illegally endangering workers, and I am glad to see Travis County saving taxpayer money by withholding some of these unnecessary subsidies. Travis County taxpayers should not be paying to put workers at risk, and Elon Musk doesn’t need our money in the first place. Given the terrible death of Victor Gomez Sr., Travis County should withhold future subsidies.” Casar has been a consistent advocate for safety of workers at the Gigafactory. Casar’s first act as a member of Congress was to demand an investigation into the death of Antelmo Ramirez. Last year, he demanded and secured the release of the investigation into the death of Mr. Gomez Sr.. The subsidies reviewed this week cover the period in which Mr. Ramriez died at the factory. In future, Travis County officials will be asked to vote on subsidies for the period in which Mr. Gomez Sr. died. ###

economycriminal_justice
Source
March 26, 2026press_release_house

NEWS: Casar, Sanders Introduce 'Home Team Act' to Prevent Owners from Moving Teams Without Giving Locals Chance to Buy

WASHINGTON – Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) on Thursday introduced the Home Team Act, which would require owners of professional sports teams to give local communities the chance to buy teams before relocating them. The bill would protect fans from losing teams and protect taxpayers from being extorted for huge subsidies by the threat of relocation. It: Requires sports franchise owners to provide notice a year before moving the team to a new community, defined by crossing state lines or moving to a new Metropolitan Statistical Area; During that year, it gives communities the chance to purchase the team at a fair price, including through the sort of successful community ownership model used by the Green Bay Packers. Teams could also be purchased by a government entity, a nonprofit or public partnership, or a private person, group, or company; Enforces a penalty for franchise owners who do not comply and provides a right of action for state and local governments. The bill would not require anyone to purchase a team and it would not prevent teams from moving if there is not a buyer able to meet a fair and reasonable price, as assessed by a team of appraisers. The bill is co-sponsored by: Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT), Reps. Chuy Garcia (D-IL), Chris Deluzio (D-PA), Sylvia Garcia (D-TX), Lateefah Simon (D-CA), and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI). Team relocation has plagued communities across America for decades, from the Brooklyn Dodgers moving in 1958 to recent moves such as the Oakland Athletics departing for Las Vegas. In other instances, the threat of relocation forces cities or states to offer billions of dollars in subsidies to teams already worth billions of dollars. Currently, the Chicago Bears are threatening to leave the city after more than 100 years in response to the state of Indiana offering massive subsidies. The bill would prevent the Bears from being moved across state lines without being offered for sale. “Sports in America should be about more than just making billionaire owners even richer,” Casar said. “Far too many Americans know the pain of losing a team, and far too many communities have had to fork over billions in subsidies just to keep an already profitable team home. Our bill is about creating a level playing field so leagues work for fans and taxpayers, not just owners.” “The American people are sick and tired of billionaires threatening to move the sports teams they own to different states unless they get hundreds of millions in corporate welfare to build new stadiums,” Sanders said. “In my view, professional sports teams should be owned and controlled by the fans who love them, not by the multibillionaire oligarchs who are getting even richer by charging outrageous prices and getting taxpayers to pick up their extravagant costs. You shouldn’t have to be wealthy to take your family to a football game. You shouldn’t have to fear that a multibillionaire will move your favorite team to a different city if taxpayers refuse to subsidize it. The Home Team Act is a very modest piece of legislation that begins to address this problem. I am proud to support it.” "For decades, Oakland residents lovingly and passionately cheered on the Athletics, Raiders, and Warriors -- win or lose. Sports are in the blood of our city and are a key part of our cultural identity, which is why I'm proud to support the Home Team Act to ensure that community-owned sports teams cannot be relocated without community input and the opportunity to keep their home team local," said Simon. "Thank you to Representative Casar and Senator Sanders for their leadership on this legislation that empowers local communities like Oakland and gives fans a say in what happens to their hometown teams." “Sports is more than just business. All across Pennsylvania, we love our teams and being a fan is a part of our way of life,” said Deluzio. “The community and fans that root for the teams they love—and often put public money into the stadiums they play in—should always have a chance to buy the team before sports team owners sell it off to the highest bidder. I’m proud to add my name to the Home Team Act led by Congressman Casar and Senator Sanders.” The bill is endorsed by: Americans for Tax Fairness, American Economic Liberties Project, Good Jobs First, Groundwork Collaborative, Sports Fan Coalition, and ThruSports. "For decades, billionaire team owners have held communities hostage, forcing taxpayers to subsidize stadiums or threatening relocation," said David Kass, ATF's executive director. "We proudly endorse The Home Team Act, which would end this extortion by requiring leagues to allow community ownership options at fair prices and extended relocation notice periods. Our tax dollars should be spent investing in our communities and improving public services—not subsidizing billionaires threatening to rip the heart out of our communities." "For too long, billionaire team owners have held cities hostage, demanding massive public subsidies or threatening to skip town, leaving fans and taxpayers on the hook,” said Brian Hess, Sports Fan Coalition executive director. “The HOME Team Act flips the script. By giving communities the first right to keep their teams, demanding transparency before relocations, and banning anti-public ownership rules, this bill is a game-changer. It arms cities and fans with real tools to protect their teams and their local investments from exploitative power plays. It’s a bold, innovative step that puts fans in control of their fandom." "For decades, rich team owners have been able to hold cities hostage, demanding public subsidies or threatening to leave. This bill flips that dynamic. If a team is going to be sold, the people who actually built its value, the community, the fans, the local economy, should have a real chance to keep it," said Pat Garofalo, Director of State and Local Policy at the American Economic Liberties Project. "This bill should be part of any agenda that puts individuals first, not corporations, and recognizes that teams are civic assets, not just private playthings." A recording of Casar and Sanders’ press conference announcing the bill is available here. Text of the bill is available here. ### Congressman Greg Casar represents Texas’s 35th Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives, which runs down I-35 from East Austin to Hays County to the West Side of San Antonio. A labor organizer and son of Mexican immigrants, Casar serves as the Chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus for the 119th Congress. He also serves on the Committee on Education and Labor and the Committee on Oversight and Accountability. Issues:CorporationsEconomy

Source
March 24, 2026press_release_house

NEWS: House Oversight Democrats Demand Investigation into Death of Ruben Ray Martinez

Position: Representatives Garcia and Casar are demanding an independent investigation into the death of a U.S. citizen shot by ICE agents, citing concerns about DHS concealment of facts and a pattern of misleading statements about lethal force incidents.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – On Monday, Congressman Robert Garcia and Congressman Greg Casar demanded an independent investigation into the death of Ruben Ray Martinez, a 23-year-old U.S. Citizen shot and killed by ICE agents in South Padre Island, Texas. In a letter to the Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Garcia and Casar call for an investigation into the circumstances surrounding Martinez’s death and into “any subsequent action taken by HSI and other DHS officials to conceal the facts and circumstances” around it. Martinez was shot by an HSI agent on March 15, 2025, one of 23 people shot by DHS personnel over the last 14 months. For nearly a year, DHS and the Texas Department of Public Safety attempted to conceal ICE’s involvement in the shooting and lied about the circumstances, falsely claiming that Martinez intentionally struck an agent with his vehicle. The claim was later contradicted by video evidence, released only after demands by Members of Congress. “Mr. Martinez’s death is a tragedy that should never have happened,” Garcia and Casar write. “DHS’s repeated lies and omissions about the shooting of Mr. Martinez reflect a troubling pattern in which official statements about the use of lethal force are later challenged by video footage, witness testimony, or subsequent investigations.” Garcia is the Ranking Member and Casar a member of the House Oversight Committee, which is the principal oversight committee of the House of Representatives. They request a briefing no later than April 6th. ### Congressman Greg Casar represents Texas’s 35th Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives, which runs down I-35 from East Austin to Hays County to the West Side of San Antonio. A labor organizer and son of Mexican immigrants, Casar serves as the Chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus for the 119th Congress. He also serves on the Committee on Education and Labor and the Committee on Oversight and Accountability. Issues:Immigrant Rights

immigrationcriminal_justice
Source
January 28, 2026press_release_house

NEWS: Casar Leads Members of Congress Demanding Return of Any Lopez Belloza

Position: Congressman Casar and 80 members of Congress are calling on the Trump administration to allow Any Lucía Lopez Belloza, a student deported in violation of a court order, to return to the United States and pursue available legal remedies. The members express concern about a pattern of ICE deportations based on acknowledged mistakes and in violation of court orders.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congressman Greg Casar (TX-35) and Senator Elizabeth Warren (MA) led 80 members of Congress demanding that Any Lucía Lopez Belloza be allowed to return to the United States after the Trump administration admitted her deportation was a “mistake.” Lopez Belloza, a student at Babson College, was detained and deported in violation of a court order while traveling home to Austin to visit her family for Thanksgiving. According to the Trump administration, she was deported despite a judge’s orders because an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer failed to inform officials in Texas of the judge’s orders. The Trump Administration acknowledged their “mistake” in court but has not allowed her to return. “As a result of your administration’s ‘mistake,’ Ms. Lopez Belloza, who has no criminal history, was handcuffed and forced to sleep on the floor in a detention center before being deported to Honduras in shackles,” the members of Congress write. “We appreciate your acknowledgment of your error and ask that you remedy the harm you have caused this young woman and her family by allowing her to return to the United States to pursue the legal options available to her.” The members of Congress also raise concerns that Lopez Belloza being deported despite a court order is no isolated incident. “We are concerned that this incident is the latest in a pattern of DHS deporting people based on what it admits are mistakes and in violation of court orders — and then failing to promptly rectify those mistakes, despite the life-threatening or life-altering stakes of such deportations. The letter, addressed to Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Immigration and Customs Enforcement Acting Director Todd Lyons, can be found here. It is signed by Senators Elizabeth Warren (MA) and Edward J. Markey (MA). It is also signed by U.S. Representatives Amo, Gabe (RI-01); Ansari, Yassamin (AZ-03); Auchincloss, Jake (MA-04); Balint, Becca (VT); Barragán, Nanette (CA-44); Brown, Shontel (OH-11); Carbajal, Salud (CA-24); Carson, André (IN-07); Castro, Joaquin (TX-20); Chu, Judy (CA-28); Cisneros, Gilbert (CA-31); Clarke, Yvette (NY-09); Crockett, Jasmine (TX-30); DeGette, Diana (CO-01); DeSaulnier, Mark (CA-10); Dexter, Maxine (OR-03); Doggett, Lloyd (TX-37); Escobar, Veronica (TX-16); Espaillat, Adriano (NY-13); Fletcher, Lizzie (TX-07); Frost, Maxwell (FL-10); Garamendi, John (CA-08); García, Jesús “Chuy” (IL-04); Garcia, Robert (CA-42); Garcia, Sylvia (TX-29); Goldman, Daniel (NY-10); Gomez, Jimmy (CA-34); Gonzalez, Vicente (TX-34); Grijalva, Adelita (AZ-07); Hayes, Jahana (CT-05); Horsford, Steven (NV-04); Hoyle, Val (OR-04); Jackson, Jonathan (IL-01); Jayapal, Pramila (WA-07); Johnson, Henry (GA-04); Johnson, Julie (TX-32); Kamlager-Dove, Sydney (CA-37); Keating, William (MA-09); Khanna, Ro (CA-17); Lee, Summer (PA-12); Lieu, Ted (CA-36); Lynch, Stephen (MA-08); McBride, Sarah (DE); McGovern, James (MA-02); McIver, LaMonica (NJ-10); Menendez, Robert (NJ-08); Min, Dave (CA-47); Moore, Gwen (WI-04); Moulton, Seth (MA-06); Neal, Richard (MA-01); Norton, Eleanor (DC); Pocan, Mark (WI-02); Pou, Nellie (NJ-09); Pressley, Ayanna (MA-07); Ramirez, Delia (IL-03); Randall, Emily (WA-06); Rivas, Luz (CA-29); Ruiz, Raul (CA-25); Salinas, Andrea (OR-06); Sánchez, Linda (CA-38); Scanlon, Mary Gay (PA-05); Schakowsky, Janice (IL-09); Simon, Lateefah (CA-12); Smith, Adam (WA-09); Stansbury, Melanie (NM-01); Suozzi, Thomas (NY-03); Thanedar, Shri (MI-13); Tlaib, Rashida (MI-12); Tokuda, Jill (HI-02); Tonko, Paul (NY-20); Torres, Ritchie (NY-15); Trahan, Lori (MA-03); Vargas, Juan (CA-52); Vasquez, Gabe (NM-02); Veasey, Marc (TX-33); Velázquez, Nydia (NY-07); and Watson Coleman, Bonnie (NJ-12). ### Congressman Greg Casar represents Texas’s 35th Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives, which runs down I-35 from East Austin to Hays County to the West Side of San Antonio. A labor organizer and son of Mexican immigrants, Casar serves as the Chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus for the 119th Congress. He also serves on the Committee on Education and Labor and the Committee on Oversight and Accountability. Issues:Immigrant Rights

immigration
Source

Recent news mentions

Articles from a curated list of national outlets that mention Greg Casar.

  • CNN·June 11, 2026
    Alexandria ocasio cortez 2028 strategy
  • CNN·June 11, 2026
    Alexandria ocasio cortez 2028 strategy
  • CBS News·May 27, 2026
    Maureen Galindo projected to lose Texas Democratic House runoff after antisemitism accusations
  • CBS News·May 26, 2026
    Here
  • CBS News·May 22, 2026
    Primary fight in key California Latino district highlights questions over Democratic Party
  • Chicago Tribune·May 12, 2026
    Patty García gets Congressional Progressive Caucus endorsement in race to replace US Rep. Jesús ‘Chuy’ García
  • Fox News·May 7, 2026
    Far-left groups pivot from May Day protests to mobilize voters for 2026 midterms, pushing Dems leftward
  • Fox News·May 6, 2026
    Senate candidate running as 'independent' continues to be bankrolled by left-wing donors

Source: GDELT 2.0 GKG, filtered to a curated list of national outlets. Inclusion is not endorsement; opinion pieces and reported news are mixed.

Recent stock activity

Periodic transaction reports filed under the STOCK Act — disclosed by the rep, sourced from public filings.

No disclosed trades on record.

Source: open-data mirrors of the Senate eFD and House Clerk financial-disclosure systems. Disclosure within 30 days of trade is required by law (45 for spouse/dependent trades).

Top PAC donors · 2026 cycle

Political action committees that gave the most to this rep's principal campaign committee this cycle. PAC giving is direct organizational support — industry, ideological, or leadership.

  1. 1.MACHINISTS NON PARTISAN POLITICAL LEAGUE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPACE WORKERSLabor6 contributionsTrade-union PAC of the International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers — backs candidates supporting union organizing, prevailing wages, and aerospace manufacturing jobs.AI$30,000
  2. 2.COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA - COPE POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS COMMITTEELabor6 contributionsTrade-union PAC for telecommunications and media workers — backs candidates supporting union organizing, collective bargaining, and worker protections in the communications industry.AI$30,000
  3. 3.CARPENTERS LEGISLATIVE IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERSLabor5 contributionsTrade-union PAC for the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners — backs prevailing-wage protections, federal infrastructure funding, project labor agreements, and worker safety standards.AI$25,000
  4. 4.UNITE HERE TIP CAMPAIGN COMMITTEELabor5 contributionsTrade-union PAC for hospitality and food-service workers — backs candidates supporting union organizing, workplace standards, and worker protections in the service industry.AI$25,000
  5. 5.SEIU COPE (SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION)Labor4 contributionsTrade-union PAC for the Service Employees International Union — backs candidates supporting union organizing, collective bargaining, prevailing wages, and worker protections.AI$20,000
  6. 6.OFFICE AND PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION (OPEIU) JB MOSS VOICE OF THE ELECTORATE (VOTE)3 contributions$15,000
  7. 7.DEMAND JUSTICE PACIdeological3 contributionsAdvocacy PAC focused on criminal justice reform — supports candidates backing sentencing reform, police accountability, and related policy changes.AI · low$15,000
  8. 8.JANE FONDA CLIMATE PAC3 contributions$15,000
  9. 9.UAW - V - CAP (UAW VOLUNTARY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM) 'INT'L UNION UNITED AUTOMOBILE AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA UAWLabor3 contributionsTrade-union PAC for the United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers — backs candidates supporting union organizing, collective bargaining, and worker protections in manufacturing and related sectors.AI$15,000
  10. 10.PAC TO THE FUTURELeadership3 contributionsMember-of-Congress leadership PAC — specific affiliations and policy positions not inferable from the name.AI · low$15,000

Source: OpenFEC (api.open.fec.gov) Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “committee.” Aggregated by contributing committee. Self-transfers from joint-fundraising / victory committees are excluded.

Top individual contributors · 2026 cycle

Itemized individual contributions over $200 to this rep's campaign committee, aggregated by donor employer. PAC giving is shown above; this section is people, not organizations.

  1. 1.SELF$64,180
  2. 2.HEISING-SIMONS FOUNDATION$7,250
  3. 3.PRESTON-WERNER VENTURES LLC$7,000
  4. 4.ADELANTO HEALTHCARE VENTURES LLC$7,000
  5. 5.ZYDECO DEVELOPMENT$7,000
  6. 6.HILLCO PARTNERS$6,800
  7. 7.CITY OF AUSTIN$6,100
  8. 8.LAW OFFICES OF DOMINGO GARCIA$6,000
  9. 9.NIXTA TAQUERIA$5,000
  10. 10.COMPASS$4,000

Source: OpenFEC Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “individual,” aggregated by the donor's self-reported employer. This is a geographic / industry correlation, not a corporate endorsement.