DeepSyte™
Bill FeedAll repsScoreboardsPrimariesProAboutSign inGet started
DeepSyte™™

A nonpartisan civic accountability tool. We match federal legislation to your stated values — without partisan bias.

Learn

  • About
  • About the name
  • Methodology
  • Glossary

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Refund Policy
  • Contact

Sources

Bill data from Congress.gov. Summaries from the Congressional Research Service where available.

Follow

  • Bluesky — @deepsyte.app
  • X — @deepsyteapp
All content is for informational purposes only. Always verify against primary sources.
Back to bill feed
John Fetterman official portrait

John Fetterman

D

senate · PA

CompareSign in to get alerts
Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See how John Fetterman actually votes — against your values.

DeepSyte scores John Fetterman's record on the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your personal alignment.

Get started freeTake the values quiz
Official websiteSee this seat's 2026 race

Alignment with your views

Sign in and take the values quiz to see how John Fetterman's votes line up with your views.

Prediction track record

We haven't made any vote predictions for John Fetterman yet. Predictions are generated for bills with tagged effects; they show up here as soon as the predict-votes job covers this rep's upcoming docket.

Consistency insights

No paired statements and votes yet for John Fetterman

We haven't yet found statement/vote pairs on the same topic for John Fetterman. This usually means either the rep hasn't taken public positions on bills that have come to a passage vote, or those bills haven't been tagged yet. The checker runs as new press releases and votes come in.

Pro analysis

AI rep analysis — Pro

Get an AI-narrated read on John Fetterman's full voting record against your stated values — aligned themes, conflicts, notable votes, and what to watch for.

Sign in to use AI analysis

Campaign promises

We haven't extracted campaign positions for John Fetterman yet. Once their campaign website or position pages are processed, this card will track what they said vs how they voted.

Crossing the aisle

Passage votes where John Fetterman broke ranks with ≥75% of Democrats. Threshold catches substantively partisan splits; unanimous-ish or close votes are excluded.

4
Cross-aisle votes
  1. 119-sjres-181·Jul 30, 2026·98% of D voted YES

    A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.

    Rep voted NO
    Bill
  2. 119-sjres-185·Jun 25, 2026·98% of D voted YES

    A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.

    Rep voted NO
    Bill
  3. 119-sjres-184·Apr 30, 2026·97% of D voted YES

    A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.

    Rep voted NO
    Bill
  4. 118-sjres-60·Feb 29, 2024·84% of D voted NO

    A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the Government of Turkiye of certain defense articles and services.

    Rep voted YES
    Bill

Recent votes

  • Nay
    A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
    119-sjres-181··July 30, 2026
  • Yea
    SEED Act
    119-hr-5334··July 28, 2026
  • Yea
    A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services of the Department of Health and Human Services relating to "Medicare Program; Implementation of Prior Authorization for Select Services for the Wasteful and Inappropriate Services Reduction (WISeR) Model".
    119-sjres-198··July 16, 2026
  • Not voting
    National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027
    119-s-4784··July 14, 2026
  • Nay
    A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
    119-sjres-185··June 25, 2026
  • Yea
    Fallen Servicemembers Religious Heritage Restoration Act
    119-s-1318··June 5, 2026
  • Yea
    Secure America Act
    119-s-2·2 votes·Jun 5, 2026
    • ·June 5, 2026
    • ·June 5, 2026
  • Nay
    Secure America Act
    119-s-2··June 5, 2026
  • Yea
    Secure America Act
    119-s-2·2 votes·Jun 4, 2026
    • ·June 4, 2026
    • ·June 4, 2026
  • Yea
    A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units: Final Repeal".
    119-sjres-188··June 3, 2026
  • Nay
    Secure America Act
    119-s-2··June 3, 2026
  • Nay
    A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
    119-sjres-185··May 19, 2026
  • Nay
    An executive resolution authorizing the en bloc consideration in Executive Session of certain nominations on the Executive Calendar.
    119-sres-690··April 30, 2026
  • Nay
    A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
    119-sjres-184··April 30, 2026
  • Nay
    An executive resolution authorizing the en bloc consideration in Executive Session of certain nominations on the Executive Calendar.
    119-sres-690··April 28, 2026
  • Nay
    A concurrent resolution setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2026 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2027 through 2035.
    119-sconres-33··April 23, 2026
  • Nay
    A concurrent resolution setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2026 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2027 through 2035.
    119-sconres-33··April 21, 2026
  • Yea
    Homeland Security and Further Additional Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026.
    119-hr-7147·6 votes·Feb 24, 2026 – Mar 26, 2026
    • ·March 26, 2026
    • ·March 25, 2026
    • ·March 20, 2026
    • ·March 12, 2026
    • ·March 5, 2026
    • ·February 24, 2026

Recent statements

June 30, 2026press_release_senate

Fetterman Urges Federal Reserve to Expedite Payment Speeds for Working Families and Small Businesses - U.S. Senator John Fetterman

Position: Senator Fetterman urges the Federal Reserve to initiate rulemaking under the Expedited Funds Availability Act to accelerate check clearing and direct deposit speeds, arguing that current regulations have not kept pace with technological advances and that faster payment access would reduce financial hardship for working families and small businesses.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Last week, U.S. Senator John Fetterman (D-PA) penned a letter to Federal Reserve Board Chairman Kevin Warsh urging the board to begin rulemaking under the 1987 Expedited Funds Availability Act to expedite payments and speed up paychecks for every American. “I write to urge you to begin rulemaking pursuant to the directives of the Expedited Funds Availability Act (EFAA),12 U.S.C. §§ 4001–4010, to expedite check clearing and make Direct Deposit speeds faster. As you may know, EFAA delegated responsibility to the Federal Reserve (Fed) to reduce the time banks can hold onto customers’ funds before making them available. Despite enormous technological innovation since the passage of EFAA and subsequent implementing regulation (Reg CC), the permitted hold times for banks have never been updated,” wrote Senator Fetterman. Slow access to checks and paychecks creates financial difficulties for working families and small businesses, causing delays in paying bills on time, overdraft fees, and lost interest. In the letter, Senator Fetterman urged Chairman Warsh to make updates to the rules for payment speeds and ensure regulations are keeping pace with improvements in technology, to decrease the time banks need to hold electronic payment funds, and to get money to Americans faster. “The Federal Reserve has a clear mandate from Congress to fix this problem. The 1987 Expedited Funds Availability Act said that the Fed (and later the CFPB) ‘shall, by regulation, reduce the time periods…to as short a time as possible and equal to the period of time achievable under the improved check clearing system…’ The Fed’s implementing regulation, Reg CC, made this time two business days for local checks. However, the Fed’s regulations have not kept pace with the astonishing innovation in payment technology in recent decades,” continued the senator. Read the full text of the letter below and here. I write to urge you to begin rulemaking pursuant to the directives of the Expedited Funds Availability Act (EFAA),12 U.S.C. §§ 4001–4010, to expedite check clearing and make Direct Deposit speeds faster. As you may know, EFAA delegated responsibility to the Federal Reserve (Fed) to reduce the time banks can hold onto customers’ funds before making them available. Despite enormous technological innovation since the passage of EFAA and subsequent implementing regulation (Reg CC), the permitted hold times for banks have never been updated.1 The language of EFAA makes it clear that the Fed has a mandate and a statutory obligation to reduce time periods to “as short a time as possible.” Slow payments create major costs for workers, retirees, and small business owners. For example, most Americans say they would need to use debt to cover a $500 emergency2 and 78% of Americans say they would face financial hardship if their next paycheck was delayed by just one week.3 When family budgets are tight, earlier access to paychecks allows people to avoid late fees, steer clear of overdrafts, and earn more interest on their savings. Speeding up checks and Direct Deposit through the Fed’s EFAA mandate would be a lifeline to millions of American hard-working families, seniors, and small business owners. The United States is embarrassingly far behind the rest of the world on payments. Only 3% of U.S. businesses use instant payments technology for payroll, standing in stark contrast to the rest of the world. The United Kingdom’s Faster Payments Service and the European Union’s SEPA Instant Credit Transfer systems have far higher shares of adoption and facilitate faster payments to workers and businesses.4 Innovation in instant payments technologies have the capacity to drastically increase the speed of payroll and peer-to-peer payments. However, hard-working Americans, seniors, and small businesses still have to wait several days to access the money they have earned. The Federal Reserve has a clear mandate from Congress to fix this problem. The 1987 Expedited Funds Availability Act said that the Fed (and later the CFPB) “shall, by regulation, reduce the time periods…to as short a time as possible and equal to the period of time achievable under the improved check clearing system…”5 The Fed’s implementing regulation, Reg CC, made this time two business days for local checks.6 However, the Fed’s regulations have not kept pace with the astonishing innovation in payment technology in recent decades. The Check 21 Act, passed in 2003, permitted the use of electronic checks, vastly improving efficiency in check processing. Now most Americans deposit funds electronically, with only 3% getting paid with paper checks.7 Payment technology has advanced as well, enabling payments to be cleared and settled in real time. During your confirmation hearing, you spoke often about how the “Fed must stay in its lane” and stick to its mandate. The Fed has a clear mandate from Congress to lower hold times to ensure working families, seniors, and small businesses get paid faster. The Fed and CFPB previously received a petition asking them to take action on check clearing.8 The CFPB responded to that petition as required by the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) within three months, stating that the Director “agrees with the petition that the time has come” to start the process to speed up funds availability. The Fed has still not responded to the petition, despite the requirements of the APA. I urge the Fed to provide a detailed response to that petition and to begin the mandated rulemaking process to lower check and Direct Deposit times, in order to give working families, seniors, and small businesses access to their hard-earned money more quickly.

economy
Source
May 14, 2026press_release_senate

Fetterman, Cornyn Introduce Bill to Give American Energy Producers Certainty, Safeguard Against Anti-LNG Policies - U.S. Senator John Fetterman

Position: Senators Fetterman and Cornyn introduced legislation to amend the Natural Gas Act to clarify the definition of 'public interest' in LNG export decisions, providing regulatory certainty to energy producers and preventing future administrations from restricting LNG production and exports through ambiguous statutory language.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senators John Fetterman (D-PA) and John Cornyn (R-TX) introduced the LNG Export Security Act, which would amend current law to provide certainty to American energy producers and ensure administrations regardless of party cannot take advantage of vague language to enact policies that stifle liquified natural gas (LNG) production and exports or harm American ratepayers. “LNG has played a critical role in promoting America’s energy independence and global leadership. That kind of energy dominance starts in Pennsylvania,” said Senator Fetterman. “I’ve been proud to advocate for solutions that put American jobs first and fully recognize we need guardrails in place to protect this industry and the workers. This bill makes sure decisions are made objectively while protecting the millions of jobs that power communities across Pennsylvania and our great nation.” “America’s energy producers shouldn’t work in fear that a future administration could kneecap them with burdensome restrictions at a moment’s notice due to ambiguous laws,” said Senator Cornyn. “Our commonsense legislation would clarify the Natural Gas Act to give LNG producers the certainty they need and deserve to continue powering the world.” The LNG Export Security Act amends the Natural Gas Act by defining “public interest” with the consideration of: The LNG Export Security Act is endorsed by the American Exploration & Production Council (AXPC) and the Center for LNG. In response to the Biden Administration’s pause on LNG exports in 2024, Senator Fetterman raised concerns over the decision and the potential long-term impacts it would have on the jobs of hardworking Pennsylvanians. He highlighted the history of Pennsylvania as a leading energy state and second largest natural gas-producing state, and vowed to push back against the administration if energy jobs in the commonwealth were threatened. Senator Fetterman continues to push for all-of-the-above energy policies that put Pennsylvania at the forefront, protects the jobs of those who keep our country running, and secures the U.S. energy supply.

economy
Source

Recent news mentions

Articles from a curated list of national outlets that mention John Fetterman.

  • Fox News·August 5, 2026
    Fetterman gives Dems a stinging reality check as Mao-praising communists seize the spotlight
  • New York Daily News·August 4, 2026
    Readers sound off on U.S. support for Israel, Founders’ signatures and subway fares
  • Roll Call·August 3, 2026
    The not-so-secret filibuster society
  • CNN·August 3, 2026
    Democrats midterms senate
  • New York Post·August 2, 2026
    Senate hopeful Abdul El-Sayed claims Dems are attacking his electability because he’s Muslim — a new poll suggests a different reason
  • Deseret News·July 31, 2026
    COVID-19 and Anthony Fauci: Why we can’t seem to get to the truth
  • CBS News·July 31, 2026
    Live Updates: Iran claims strikes on 2 ships in Strait of Hormuz and drone attack on U.S. base in Kuwait
  • Roll Call·July 31, 2026
    Iran war powers resolution blocked in Senate as conflict heats up
  • The Baltimore Sun·July 30, 2026
    Fetterman’s flip on the filibuster harming GOP’s attempts to appease Trump
  • New York Post·July 30, 2026
    Fetterman says he’s ‘proud’ to be ‘conscience of the Democratic Party’ on Israel during Netanyahu meeting
  • Fox News·July 30, 2026
    John Fetterman makes it 'very clear' that he's 'not going to be a Republican' despite Dem backlash
  • The Atlantic·July 30, 2026
    Abdul El-Sayed Fuses Together Two Toxic Ideologies
  • Arkansas Democrat-Gazette·July 30, 2026
    COLUMNIST: What John Fetterman forgot about his Senate seat | Arkansas Democrat Gazette
  • Fox News·July 29, 2026
    Fetterman brands new socialist favorite 'Pontiac Platner' after 'ogre' dig
  • Fox News·July 29, 2026
    WATCH: Fetterman reveals his ‘one regret’ from COVID era after Fauci testimony

Source: GDELT 2.0 GKG, filtered to a curated list of national outlets. Inclusion is not endorsement; opinion pieces and reported news are mixed.

Recent stock activity

Periodic transaction reports filed under the STOCK Act — disclosed by the rep, sourced from public filings.

No disclosed trades on record.

Source: open-data mirrors of the Senate eFD and House Clerk financial-disclosure systems. Disclosure within 30 days of trade is required by law (45 for spouse/dependent trades).

Top PAC donors · 2026 cycle

Political action committees that gave the most to this rep's principal campaign committee this cycle. PAC giving is direct organizational support — industry, ideological, or leadership.

  1. 1.NAMES IN THE NEWS CALIFORNIA, INC.8 contributions$176,979
  2. 2.PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE2 contributions$65,679
  3. 3.MAJORITY 20222 contributions$42,500
  4. 4.END CITIZENS UNITED: SENATE FUND2 contributions$39,652
  5. 5.THE FIGHT TO 51 FUND2 contributions$39,000
  6. 6.NAMES IN THE NEWS CALIFORNIA INC3 contributions$29,961
  7. 7.BLUE SENATE 2022Leadership2 contributionsDemocratic Senate leadership PAC — supports Democratic Senate candidates and coordinates party fundraising for federal races.AI$28,335
  8. 8.JUSTICE 2022 - UNITEMIZED1 contribution$25,743
  9. 9.MIDDLE SEAT CONSULTING1 contribution$21,620
  10. 10.WHEN DEMOCRATS TURN OUT PAC1 contribution$10,000

Source: OpenFEC (api.open.fec.gov) Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “committee.” Aggregated by contributing committee. Self-transfers from joint-fundraising / victory committees are excluded.

Top individual contributors · 2026 cycle

Itemized individual contributions over $200 to this rep's campaign committee, aggregated by donor employer. PAC giving is shown above; this section is people, not organizations.

  1. 1.ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN AND DOWD LLP$24,000
  2. 2.TILEBAR$11,600
  3. 3.DCVC$7,000
  4. 4.ADIRVENTURES$7,000
  5. 5.STYLEDBYALV$7,000
  6. 6.OPCO$7,000
  7. 7.GROCH ENTERPRISES LLC$7,000
  8. 8.RADICAL VENTURES$7,000
  9. 9.PARKVEST$7,000
  10. 10.TWIN DOVS CAPITAL MGMT$7,000

Source: OpenFEC Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “individual,” aggregated by the donor's self-reported employer. This is a geographic / industry correlation, not a corporate endorsement.