See how Glenn Ivey's votes line up with your values.
DeepSyte scores Glenn Ivey's record on the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your personal alignment.
Sign in and take the values quiz to see how Glenn Ivey's votes line up with your views.
Prediction track record
How often we called Glenn Ivey's passage votes correctly, from their stated positions on each bill's tagged topics. Excludes “unclear” calls and abstentions.
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
To prohibit the disclosure of records by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development of individuals for the purposes of immigration enforcement, and for other purposes.
Based on 8 data points across public statements and recorded votes · AI analysis of public records
118-hr-2·Consistent
Secure the Border Act of 2023
85/100
What they said
Dec 11, 2025
Congressman Ivey criticizes the federal government's immigration enforcement priorities, arguing that the detention of Kilmar Abrego Garcia—a non-violent apprentice—contradicts stated commitments to target serious criminals and drug traffickers, while resources are diverted from actual threats to public safety.
Congressman Ivey's statement criticizes immigration enforcement that prioritizes detaining non-violent individuals over targeting serious criminals and drug traffickers, arguing resources are misdirected. The Secure the Border Act focuses on border wall construction, asylum limits, and employment verification—enforcement mechanisms that do not directly address the prosecutorial prioritization or resource allocation concerns Ivey raises. His NO vote on a bill emphasizing physical barriers and broad enforcement tools is generally consistent with his stated preference for enforcement focused on actual threats rather than non-violent workers, though the bill does not explicitly contradict his position on prosecutorial priorities.
Congressman Ivey criticizes the federal government's immigration enforcement priorities, arguing that the detention of Kilmar Abrego Garcia—a non-violent apprentice—contradicts stated commitments to target serious criminals and drug traffickers, while resources are diverted from actual threats to public safety.
Congressman Ivey's statement criticizes the detention of a non-violent individual and argues that immigration enforcement should prioritize serious criminals and drug traffickers over low-level offenders. The Laken Riley Act mandates detention of individuals arrested for property crimes (burglary, theft, larceny, shoplifting) regardless of threat level. Ivey's NO vote aligns with his stated position that enforcement resources should not be diverted to detain non-violent individuals; the bill's mandatory detention scheme for property-crime arrests contradicts his argument that enforcement should focus on actual public safety threats. The statement and vote point in the same direction on the specific question of whether property-crime arrests should trigger mandatory detention.
Detain and Deport Illegal Aliens Who Assault Cops Act
82/100
What they said
Dec 11, 2025
Congressman Ivey criticizes the federal government's immigration enforcement priorities, arguing that the detention of Kilmar Abrego Garcia—a non-violent apprentice—contradicts stated commitments to target serious criminals and drug traffickers, while resources are diverted from actual threats to public safety.
Congressman Ivey's statement criticizes the detention of a non-violent individual and argues that immigration enforcement should prioritize serious criminals and threats to public safety. The bill mandates detention and deportation for non-U.S. nationals who assault law enforcement—a category of serious criminal conduct. Ivey's NO vote aligns with his stated position that enforcement resources should target genuine threats rather than non-violent individuals; the bill's focus on assaults against officers represents a legitimate enforcement priority that does not contradict his criticism of misallocated resources toward non-threatening individuals. The vote reflects his broader principle that enforcement should be proportionate and focused on actual public safety threats.
Congressman Ivey criticizes the federal government's immigration enforcement priorities, arguing that the detention of Kilmar Abrego Garcia—a non-violent apprentice—contradicts stated commitments to target serious criminals and drug traffickers, while resources are diverted from actual threats to public safety.
Congressman Ivey's statement criticizes federal immigration enforcement for misallocating resources—detaining non-threatening individuals like Abrego Garcia while neglecting serious criminals and drug traffickers. The No Bailout for Sanctuary Cities Act penalizes jurisdictions that limit cooperation with immigration detainers and information-sharing with DHS. Ivey's NO vote aligns with his stated concern that current enforcement priorities are misdirected; he opposes measures that would compel stricter cooperation with federal immigration enforcement when he believes resources should target actual threats, not working immigrants. However, the statement does not explicitly address sanctuary city policies or federal funding conditions, creating some granularity mismatch between the specific policy mechanism (funding restrictions on non-cooperating jurisdictions) and the rep's stated concern (misallocation of enforcement resources).
Congressman Ivey criticizes the federal government's immigration enforcement priorities, arguing that the detention of Kilmar Abrego Garcia—a non-violent apprentice—contradicts stated commitments to target serious criminals and drug traffickers, while resources are diverted from actual threats to public safety.
Congressman Ivey's statement criticizes the federal government's immigration enforcement priorities as misaligned—focusing on non-threats like Kilmar Abrego Garcia while neglecting serious criminals and drug traffickers. The Police Our Border Act requires reporting on how Biden's border policies have impacted law enforcement. Ivey's NO vote is consistent with his stated position: he opposes the current enforcement approach as ineffective and misdirected. A bill that documents the impact of those policies without proposing corrective action may not address his core concern—that enforcement priorities need to be reoriented toward actual threats. The vote reflects skepticism of the status quo, aligning with his criticism, though the bill's narrow scope (reporting requirement rather than policy reform) leaves some ambiguity about whether it would advance his stated goals.
Congressman Ivey criticizes the federal government's immigration enforcement priorities, arguing that the detention of Kilmar Abrego Garcia—a non-violent apprentice—contradicts stated commitments to target serious criminals and drug traffickers, while resources are diverted from actual threats to public safety.
Congressman Ivey's statement criticizes immigration enforcement that targets non-violent individuals while neglecting serious criminals and drug traffickers. The bill expands deportation grounds for Social Security and identity document fraud. Ivey's NO vote aligns with his stated concern that enforcement resources should focus on genuine public safety threats rather than non-violent offenses; however, the bill does not directly address the specific case or the broader resource-allocation critique in his statement, creating some granularity mismatch between the narrow bill provision and his broader systemic argument.
Transnational Criminal Organization Illicit Spotter Prevention and Elimination Act
75/100
What they said
Dec 11, 2025
Congressman Ivey criticizes the federal government's immigration enforcement priorities, arguing that the detention of Kilmar Abrego Garcia—a non-violent apprentice—contradicts stated commitments to target serious criminals and drug traffickers, while resources are diverted from actual threats to public safety.
Congressman Ivey's statement criticizes immigration enforcement that targets non-violent individuals while neglecting serious criminals and drug traffickers. The bill criminalizes conduct that aids transnational criminal organizations and drug trafficking (spotting for law enforcement, damaging border devices, assisting inadmissible aliens). Ivey's NO vote aligns with his stated concern that enforcement resources should focus on actual threats rather than peripheral conduct; the bill's broad criminalization of spotting and device damage may capture conduct far removed from serious trafficking, potentially diverting enforcement attention from the violent criminals and major traffickers Ivey emphasizes. However, the bill does target transnational criminal organizations and drug trafficking networks, which Ivey supports targeting, creating some directional tension.
Congressman Ivey criticizes the federal government's immigration enforcement priorities, arguing that the detention of Kilmar Abrego Garcia—a non-violent apprentice—contradicts stated commitments to target serious criminals and drug traffickers, while resources are diverted from actual threats to public safety.
Congressman Ivey's statement criticizes immigration enforcement that targets non-violent individuals while neglecting serious criminals and drug traffickers. The bill creates criminal penalties for fleeing law enforcement near the border, which targets a specific category of conduct rather than distinguishing between violent and non-violent offenders. Ivey's NO vote aligns with his stated concern that enforcement resources should focus on serious threats; a bill that criminalizes border-area vehicle flight could expand enforcement against individuals whose primary offense is evasion rather than violence or trafficking. However, the bill does not directly address the core tension in his statement—whether enforcement priorities properly distinguish serious criminals from non-threatening individuals—making the alignment directional but not precisely targeted.
Pairs with ambiguous language and high uncertainty are withheld until more data is available. Procedural, cloture, and amendment votes are excluded — they don't cleanly signal substantive support or opposition.
Pro analysis
AI rep analysis — Pro
Get an AI-narrated read on Glenn Ivey's full voting record against your stated values — aligned themes, conflicts, notable votes, and what to watch for.
We haven't extracted campaign positions for Glenn Ivey yet. Once their campaign website or position pages are processed, this card will track what they said vs how they voted.
Crossing the aisle
Passage votes where Glenn Ivey broke ranks with ≥75% of Democrats. Threshold catches substantively partisan splits; unanimous-ish or close votes are excluded.
1
Cross-aisle vote
118-hr-340·Nov 1, 2023·77% of D voted YES
Hamas and Other Palestinian Terrorist Groups International Financing Prevention Act
Maryland Delegation Members Release Statement on Judge Ruling Halting Trump Administration Efforts to Close BARC in Beltsville, Maryland
Position: The Maryland Democratic delegation opposes the Trump Administration's efforts to close the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center and calls the closure attempts illegal and contrary to Congressional intent.
For Immediate Release
October 14, 2026
Contact: Aaron Harawa / Ramon Korionoff
WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senators Chris Van Hollen and Angela Alsobrooks and Representatives Glenn Ivey, Steny Hoyer, Kweisi Mfume, Jamie Raskin, Sarah Elfreth, April McClain Delaney, and Johnny Olszewski (all D-Md.) released the following statement regarding last night’s ruling by a federal judge, temporarily halting the Trump Administration’s efforts to close the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (BARC) in Beltsville, Maryland.
“As we’ve said time and again, this Administration’s attempts to shutter BARC are not only unwise – they’re illegal. BARC conducts critical research that helps farmers across our nation put food on the table for American families – including combatting serious threats to our agriculture, like cyclospora and avian flu. Last night’s ruling from a federal judge made plain: the Administration’s efforts are in clear violation of Congressional intent. We will continue fighting back against the Trump Administration’s lawless attempts to close this facility, undermining its crucial research on behalf of American farmers and families.”
The lawmakers have repeatedly stressed the importance of maintaining BARC, including, most recently pushing Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins on this matter in April. Additionally, they have raised this issue in Committee hearings with Administration officials and fought for language in Congressional Appropriations and the most recent Continuing Resolution.
###
Issues:
Congress
Federal Workers
Maryland Delegation Members Push for Funding for Mental Health at U.S. Cyber Command at Fort Meade
Position: The Maryland congressional delegation urges appropriators to retain $11 million for U.S. Cyber Command's high-performance team training to improve mental health and resilience care for service members and civilian personnel at Fort Meade. The letter cites recent suicides among cyber personnel as justification for the funding.
For Immediate Release
October 7, 2026
Contact: Aaron Harawa / Ramon Korionoff
WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senator Chris Van Hollen and U.S. Representative Sarah Elfreth were joined by Senator Angela Alsobrooks and Representatives Steny Hoyer, Kweisi Mfume, Jamie Raskin, Glenn Ivey, April McClain Delaney, and Johnny Olszewski (all D-Md.) in requesting $11 million for U.S. Cyber Command as Congress works to complete the Fiscal Year 2027 Department of Defense appropriations. In the letter to Appropriations Committee leadership, the lawmakers stressed the importance of the health and wellbeing of the service members and civilian employees of U.S. Cyber Command, as well as the importance of their work to our national security. The $11 million program increase would fund U.S. Cyber Command’s high-performance team training, an operation aimed at improving care for service members, including helping commanders establish sustainable training, recovery, care, and resilience practices.
The lawmakers begin, “We respectfully urge you to retain the $11 million program increase for U.S. Cyber Command high-performance team training under Budget Activity 12D, Cyberspace Operations, as Congress completes the Fiscal Year 2027 Department of Defense Appropriations Act. Headquartered at Fort George G. Meade, U.S. Cyber Command is central to Maryland’s national security community and relies on service members, civilian employees, and families throughout our state to conduct some of the Nation’s most demanding and persistent military operations missions.”
“As the Congressional Delegation of Maryland, we are troubled by recent public reporting describing several deaths by suicide among personnel in cyber operations and the Fort Meade community over a short period. These deaths have a severe impact on the family, friends, and wider community. The concentration of these tragedies within a small, highly specialized workforce demands sustained attention and an institutional response proportionate to the operational strain these personnel bear,” they continue.
On the need for funding for High Performance Team Training at Cyber Command, the lawmakers note, “The requested $11 million would help U.S. Cyber Command close this gap by funding the FY26 NDAA provision. Embedded support would improve access to care for service members inside secure facilities, give providers a better understanding of the mission and its operational tempo, identify concerns earlier, and help commanders establish sustainable training, recovery, and resilience practices. Models used in other high-demand military communities, including special operations and remotely piloted aircraft units, and dedicated intelligence commands demonstrate the value of treating psychological health and human performance as readiness requirements. Cyber Command noted that without this funding, burnout and force degradation will increase.”
“Preserving this funding would demonstrate Congress’s commitment to the health and readiness of the cyber workforce at Fort Meade, Maryland, and across the Nation. It would also help ensure that the Department establishes an enduring system of prevention, care, and operational resilience rather than relying solely on short-term interventions following a tragedy. One loss of life is one too many. We must do everything we can to make sure our servicemembers and everyone at the Fort has the full mental health support and resources they need, so that a tragedy like this does not occur again. We appreciate your continued leadership and support of Maryland’s servicemembers, federal employees, and families,” the lawmakers conclude.
The full text of the letter is available here.
###
Issues:
Congress
Veterans
Maryland Delegation Members Press USDA, USFS to Make Good on Commitment to Keep Baltimore Urban Forestry Office in Baltimore
Position: Maryland members of Congress call on USDA and the U.S. Forest Service to reverse the decision to close the Baltimore Urban Field Station and relocate its staff outside Baltimore, citing a prior commitment to keep employees in the Baltimore area and the office's local partnerships and research.
Today, U.S. Representative Glenn Ivey, alongside U.S. Senators Chris Van Hollen and Angela Alsobrooks and U.S. Representative Kweisi Mfume, joined Representatives Steny Hoyer, Jamie Raskin, Sarah Elfreth, April McClain Delaney, and Johnny Olszewski (all D-Md.), in calling for United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Deputy Secretary Stephen Vaden and United States Forest Service (USFS) Chief Tom Schultz to reverse course on the decision to close the USFS Baltimore Field Office and relocate staff outside of Baltimore. The USFS Baltimore Urban Field Station leads forestry-related projects that benefit the local Baltimore community and conducts important forestry and urban ecology research that informs land use decision-making throughout the Chesapeake Bay watershed and beyond. The lawmakers pose several questions to USDA and USFS around the decision, which comes after Senator Van Hollen questioned Chief Tom Schultz in the Senate Appropriations Committee and received commitment to maintain presence in Baltimore.
The lawmakers begin, “On April 30, 2026, during the Senate Appropriations Committee hearing on the United States Forest Service (USFS) FY27 budget, Chief Schultz assured Senator Van Hollen that USFS would not force Baltimore Urban Field Office employees to relocate outside of the Baltimore area during the USDA reorganization. Despite this commitment, when USFS announced earlier this month that the Baltimore Urban Field Office will close, we learned that USFS intends to relocate Baltimore employees to Beltsville, Maryland – a location that is decidedly outside of the broader Baltimore area. USFS must make good on its word and keep Baltimore Urban Field Office employees in Baltimore so they can effectively continue their place-based and partnership-dependent work in the Baltimore area.”
On the critical benefits for keeping the Baltimore Urban Field Office in the Baltimore area, the lawmakers write, “When Secretary Rollins announced the USDA reorganization, one of the stated pillars of the plan was to ‘bring USDA closer to its customers.’ Closing the Baltimore Field Office and relocating employees away from Baltimore violates this core principle, since the primary ‘customers’ of the USFS Baltimore Urban Field Office are in Baltimore; they are the community groups, local government, and academics with whom the Field Office has developed partnerships and collaborations during its nearly 40-year tenure on the campus of the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. These relationships have enabled important research projects that benefit the Chesapeake Bay watershed and regional forests, as well as urban forestry projects in the Baltimore community. For example, the Office supports community-led restoration and urban revitalization efforts in Baltimore by leading the Baltimore Urban Waters Partnership. It delivers professional skill building and workforce training to urban youth in Baltimore by supporting youth forestry projects at the Stillmeadow Church and Peace Park. And it started an urban wood reuse project that successfully spun off into a city-run urban sawmill and wood recycling center.”
Among other questions, the lawmakers go on to ask the following:
Did USDA or USFS conduct an analysis of the costs and benefits associated with closing the Baltimore Urban Field Office as compared to keeping them in the current location?
Has USDA or USFS assessed the impact that closure of the USFS Baltimore Urban Field Office and relocation of employees outside of the Baltimore area will have on the important work that the Baltimore Urban Field Office has been conducting?
“The Baltimore location is critical to the ability of the Baltimore Urban Field Office to successfully accomplish its place-based and partnership-driven work. This work not only benefits the Baltimore community but serves as a model for urban forestry work in cities across the country and the world. The Baltimore Urban Field Office is an asset to the nation and its closure serves no one. Keep your word and keep the work of the Baltimore Urban Forestry Office in Baltimore.” the lawmakers conclude.
The full text of the letter is available here and below.
Maryland Delegation Members Call for Answers, Investigation Following Alarming ICE Operation in Frederick
Position: The lawmakers call for an immediate, independent, and transparent investigation of ICE enforcement tactics in Maryland, including a February-to-September operation in Frederick, and request detailed answers from DHS and ICE by September 30, 2026.
Today, U.S. Representative Glenn Ivey joined U.S. Senators Chris Van Hollen and Angela Alsobrooks and Representatives April McClain Delaney, Steny Hoyer, Kweisi Mfume, Jamie Raskin, Sarah Elfreth, and Johnny Olszewski (all Md.) in pressing Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Markwayne Mullin and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Acting Director David Venturella for answers around Trump’s ICE operations in Frederick, Maryland on Thursday, September 3 and Friday, September 4. In their letter, the lawmakers additionally called on DHS Inspector General Joseph Cuffari to initiate an independent and transparent investigation of the tactics ICE is deploying in Maryland.
The lawmakers begin, “As members of Maryland’s Congressional Delegation, we write to express our serious concerns with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) recent operation in Frederick, Maryland. The tactics used by ICE officers detailed by eyewitnesses and exposed in videos circulating online are alarming and necessitate more information as to how the recently-merged Washington-Baltimore field office and the agency are enforcing our immigration laws. We request an immediate, independent, and transparent investigation of the tactics ICE is deploying in our state.”
They continued, “Recently, ICE reportedly conducted an approximately 40-hour immigration enforcement operation in one neighborhood of Frederick, Maryland. Videos released by observers revealed that on Friday evening the operation turned violent as a dark law enforcement vehicle with flashing lights drove down the sidewalk toward observers, hitting one of them. Another video depicted ICE officers using a baton to beat a protestor and dragging another from the front steps of a home that ICE was attempting to enter. Additionally, during the operation, an ICE officer reportedly approached a local elected official and told her that ICE knew her name, license plate, and where she lived. If true, this is deeply disturbing and appears to be an attempt to intimidate local elected officials.”
“On behalf of our constituents, we request an immediate, independent, and transparent investigation of the tactics ICE has been and is currently deploying in our state, and we request responses to the following by no later than September 30, 2026,” the lawmakers conclude.
Among other questions, the lawmakers go on to ask the following:
Please provide a detailed description and timeline, with documented evidence such as body camera footage, of the events of the operation.
Does ICE have a policy that allows the use of vehicles to clear an area of peaceful observers?
Does that policy allow for ICE to hit observers, or threaten to hit observers, with their vehicles?
When an ICE officer informs a legal observer that they have their name, information, and know where they live – what is the purpose of the officer making that statement?
How does ICE come to have this information, and for what reasons does ICE use it?
How did ICE’s use of force in this case align with DHS’s use of force policy?
During the operation, video shows ICE entering a home, reportedly in pursuit of a target. Did ICE secure a warrant for the target’s arrest before entering the home?
The full text of the letter is available here and below.
Issues:
Immigration
Maryland Delegation Members’ Statement on Trump Administration Decision Rolling Back Federal Coordination of Chesapeake Bay Restoration
Position: The delegation opposes the Trump Administration's revocation of the 2009 Executive Order on Chesapeake Bay restoration and calls for continued federal partnership and coordinated support for state-led Bay protection efforts.
Today, U.S. Representative Glenn Ivey joined the full Maryland Congressional Delegation – U.S. Senators Chris Van Hollen and Angela Alsobrooks and U.S. Representatives Steny Hoyer, Kweisi Mfume, Andy Harris, Jamie Raskin, Sarah Elfreth, April McClain Delaney, and Johnny Olszewski (all Md.) – in releasing the following statement regarding the Trump Administration’s decision to revoke an Executive Order declaring the Chesapeake Bay a national treasure and establishing a coordinated federal strategy for the protection and restoration of the Bay and its watershed, including by supporting state-led efforts on water quality goals, pollution limits, agricultural preservation, stormwater management, and climate resiliency.
“The Chesapeake Bay and its health are vital to lives and livelihoods across our state and the greater region. Now more than ever, we need continued federal partnership and support for Chesapeake Bay restoration, not efforts to roll back all the progress we’ve made. The 2009 Executive Order that the Trump administration just revoked provided vital federal resources that support state-led efforts to improve the health and productivity of the Chesapeake Bay and its surrounding area. Removing the coordinated federal backing that advances the watershed protection and restoration goals of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement risks undermining the future health of the Bay along with the businesses and communities that depend on it. This decision is shortsighted and harmful to our communities. Make no mistake: the Chesapeake Bay is a national treasure. And we will continue to fight for it.”
Bicameral Lawmakers Demand Answers on USDA Cyclospora Research Terminations
Position: Lawmakers urge the USDA to reverse its decision to terminate Cyclospora research and to halt plans to close the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (BARC), citing an ongoing outbreak and public health and national security concerns.
Today, U.S. Representative Glenn Ivey (MD-04), alongside U.S. Representatives Rosa DeLauro (CT-03), Steny Hoyer (MD-05), Sanford Bishop (GA-02), and Chellie Pingree (ME-01) and U.S. Senators Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) and Angela Alsobrooks (D-MD), sent a letter to the United States Department of Agriculture demanding answers on the Department’s decision to shutter all research related to Cyclospora in the midst of the largest outbreak in history and plans to close BARC, the largest and most diversified agricultural research complex in the world. The lawmakers urged USDA to reverse course.
Cyclospora has sickened nearly 20,000 Americans, hospitalized over 1,000 and killed at least two – with case totals expected to continue to rise. A recent Politico story reported that three research programs, that represent nearly all of the Cyclospora research at USDA, are on hold or have been terminated entirely.
“…[T]he proposal to decommission BARC will do nothing but disrupt this important work, endanger Americans’ health and safety, and harm our national security,” the lawmakers wrote. “Therefore, we request that USDA immediately cease its efforts to close BARC and halt its reorganization before it results in any more costly mistakes.”
The full letter can be read here.
Congressman Glenn Ivey Votes For 3-Year Extension of ACA Tax Credits
Position: Rep. Ivey voted to extend enhanced ACA premium tax credits for three years, arguing that the credits prevent significant premium increases for Maryland residents and provide necessary healthcare cost relief.
WASHINGTON DC - Rep. Glenn Ivey (MD-04) just delivered on a promise to help Prince Georgians and Montgomery County residents on healthcare. His YES vote on the bipartisan ACA enhanced premium tax credit renewal, shields Marylanders from skyrocketing healthcare bills. This triumph came via Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries's discharge petition, pushing past Speaker Mike Johnson's blockade on a 2025 House vote.
Ivey's strong voice on ACA health care subsidies helps to prevent nearly 300,000 Marylanders from premium Armageddon—costs set to double or triple without these credits. The Maryland Insurance Administration warns of a brutal 13.4% statewide average hike in 2026, fueled by the credits' expiration, slashing $55 million in potential annual savings. Families could face $57–$258 more monthly, while a Beltsville couple earning $90,000 might swallow over $1,000 extra, pure Republican-fueled chaos after their $1 trillion Medicaid and $500 billion Medicare cuts ravaged Prince George's and Montgomery Counties.
"America's choking on a GOP healthcare catastrophe—kicking folks off coverage, gutting services, and jacking up prices," Congressman Glenn Ivey (MD-04), said. "These restored ACA tax credits slash premiums now, delivering real relief to everyday Marylanders crushed by costs we can't ignore. Locking this into law addresses affordability when families need it most, if the Republican-led Senate does their part by voting YES to renew the Obamacare healthcare credits,” stated Ivey.
Issues:
Congress
Healthcare
Congressman Glenn Ivey's Statement on the Deadly Minneapolis Shooting by ICE Agent
Position: Congressman Ivey calls for independent investigation, transparency, and body-camera footage release following a fatal shooting by an ICE officer, and reiterates support for the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act to establish enforceable standards and oversight of law enforcement use of deadly force.
Washington, DC – “The news out of Minneapolis today is heartbreaking. A woman is dead after being shot by an ICE officer during a federal enforcement operation, and behind every headline is a person: a life cut short, a family now living a nightmare, and a community left searching for answers.
My prayers are with her loved ones tonight. They deserve the truth and transparency from all law enforcement officials- not defamation and disparagement.
Unfortunately, President Trump and Secretary Noem’s public statements portraying this tragic incident as an act of Domestic Terrorism are beyond reckless and irresponsible. These premature comments are dangerous and designed to incite even more violence.
I spent 12 years as a prosecutor and handled many cases involving deadly force. I know accountability starts with transparency especially when law enforcement uses deadly force. All evidence must be preserved. Any and all body-camera or surveillance footage should be reviewed and released as appropriate. And there must be an independent, thorough investigation that follows the facts wherever they lead.
Minneapolis knows, in a uniquely painful way, what happens when systems fail, and accountability comes too late—and how important it is to investigate and prosecute these cases the right way. Tragically, today’s violent incident is yet another reminder of why the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act matters: to set clear, enforceable standards, strengthen oversight, and ensure that no one with a badge and a gun—local, state, or federal—is above the law.
We owe today’s victim nothing less than truth, justice, and real reform,” said Congressman Glenn Ivey, (MD-04).
Issues:
Congress
Immigration
Congressman Glenn Ivey’s Statement on Military Operations in Venezuela
Position: Congressman Ivey opposes U.S. military operations in Venezuela to depose Nicolas Maduro, arguing that deploying American troops for regime change lacks justification, risks costly entanglement, and diverts resources from domestic priorities like healthcare and food costs.
WASHINGTON – Congressman Glenn Ivey released the following statement in response to U.S. military operations to capture and depose Nicolas Maduro in Venezuela.
“I oppose the United States attempting to run another country and I am even more opposed to putting American boots on the ground in Venezuela for oil. The Trump administration has no coherent plan for Venezuela and no credible justification for taking over a sovereign country.
At home, families are already struggling with rising health care costs and higher grocery prices—clear evidence that the Trump administration is doing a bad job running America. Trying to run Venezuela at the same time is a recipe for disaster and risks dragging our country into yet another costly, open-ended quagmire. We should focus on lowering costs for American families and pursuing diplomacy, not repeating the mistakes of the past,” said Congressman Glenn Ivey, (MD-04).
Issues:
Congress
Maryland Congressional Delegation Holds Meeting to Discuss Future of NASA, Maryland’s Role in Space Innovation
Position: Maryland's congressional delegation opposes the Trump Administration's cuts to NASA and federal science agencies, arguing that these cuts undermine American space leadership and harm the scientists and engineers at Maryland-based facilities like NASA Goddard and Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory.
WASHINGTON – Yesterday, members of Maryland’s Congressional Delegation met with NASA officials and stakeholders to discuss protecting and supporting Maryland-based efforts to advance American leadership in space science and innovation. They received updates on and discussed the importance of NASA Goddard’s workforce and missions, as well as other missions being built, led, and supported across Maryland. Video of the members’ press availability following the meeting is available here.
“From NASA Goddard to the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory to nearby Wallops Flight Facility and the many additional science centers and related enterprises across the state, Maryland has been at the center of American space exploration and the forefront of technological advancements that have made our country stronger and safer. The dedicated scientists, engineers, and contractors who power these facilities are central to America’s leadership in space and innovation, but these workers – and the critical work they do – have been under attack from the Trump Administration since day one. For America to continue leading the world in space science, the Administration must start respecting the people who put us in that position. Federal Team Maryland will continue pushing to maintain our leadership in cutting-edge missions while fighting to ensure the workers who drive them have the support they need to carry out these critical missions,” said Senator Chris Van Hollen.
“The work being done every day at Goddard Space Flight Center and Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory are the reason Maryland – and our nation – is a leader in science, technology, and research. We are exceptional because of the scientists and engineers doing this incredible work - their innovation and talent is unmatched. But this Administration doesn't seem to care. They have ripped apart the federal government including our work at NASA – ceding ground to global competitors. I will continue to stand up to this Administration and keep fighting for investments that keep America at the forefront of scientific discovery,” said Senator Angela Alsobrooks.
“NASA Goddard is vital not only to our local community in Maryland but to the entire country and world. Home to one of the greatest concentrations of scientists in the world, the team at Goddard is deepening our understanding of our planet and what lies beyond. In the course of that pursuit, they are also helping America continue to stay ahead of China and other competitors when it comes to science, technology, innovation, and economic growth. I was pleased our delegation could meet today to discuss how we can best support Goddard in that important mission,” said Congressman Steny H. Hoyer.
"The research that happens at the Goddard Space Flight Center and the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory is work that cannot be reduced overnight. Unfortunately, Donald Trump and the Department of Government Evil took a chainsaw to the field of science - threatening research, innovation, and America's competitive edge," said Congressman Mfume. "We hope to have some concrete action as we continue to support our local scientists and engineers across the state of Maryland."
“Maryland remains a cornerstone of America’s scientific community, and NASA’s Goddard has long driven space science research and innovation,” said Congressman Jamie Raskin. “Team Maryland condemns the Trump Administration’s threats to cut funding at Goddard which would be a disaster for all Americans. I am grateful to the hundreds of NASA scientists and staff from the Free State who make Maryland a great home for natural discovery and scientific excellence.”
“At the worst possible moment, the Trump administration’s reckless cuts are hollowing out America’s space leadership. Driving our best scientists out of public service puts us on track for another Sputnik moment; this time with China in the lead. We must invest in NASA and protect the mission-critical work at Goddard and Johns Hopkins APL,” said Congressman Glenn Ivey.
“From working with University Affiliated Research Centers, like the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory located in the Third District, to leading our nation in space flight missions, NASA Goddard’s importance to American leadership in space science cannot be overstated,” said Congresswoman Sarah Elfreth (MD-03). “As they look to expand their mission-critical work, the Maryland Delegation will have their back even in the face of closures by the Trump Administration.”
“NASA Goddard is a national jewel with a long and storied legacy of spaceflight and discovery made possible by our state's exceptional workforce and our ability to attract world-class academic and international partnerships. It is imperative that our Congress and Team Maryland continue to push against these reckless cuts that will undermine our research, workforce, innovation, U.S. competitiveness, and national security. As Maryland's only member of the House, Science, Space, and Technology Committee, I am standing with our delegation to demand accountability, restore NASA's public service mission, and ensure Maryland continues to lead in scientific discovery. It is "mission critical" to preserve and protect our role as the world's leader on space innovation and technology policy,” said Congresswoman April McClain Delaney.
“Now more than ever, I believe in the power of evidence, facts, and science — and that we should invest in knowledge. Goddard is home to thousands of the world’s best scientists who are helping us dominate the space race and reap the economic benefits that come with that. I join my Maryland colleagues in urging the Trump Administration to honor our commitments to these civil servants and continue investing in their missions,” said Congressman Johnny Olszewski.
Issues:
Congress
Federal Workers
Source: GDELT 2.0 GKG, filtered to a curated list of national outlets. Inclusion is not endorsement; opinion pieces and reported news are mixed.
Recent stock activity
Periodic transaction reports filed under the STOCK Act — disclosed by the rep, sourced from public filings.
No disclosed trades on record.
Source: open-data mirrors of the Senate eFD and House Clerk financial-disclosure systems. Disclosure within 30 days of trade is required by law (45 for spouse/dependent trades).
Top PAC donors · 2026 cycle
Political action committees that gave the most to this rep's principal campaign committee this cycle. PAC giving is direct organizational support — industry, ideological, or leadership.
1.EMPLOYEES OF NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION PAC2 contributions$10,000
2.SHEET METAL AIR RAIL TRANSPORTATION2 contributions$10,000
3.AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, AFL-CIO COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATIONLabor2 contributionsTrade-union PAC for teachers — backs candidates supporting public education funding, collective bargaining rights, and worker protections.AI$10,000
4.AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES P E O P L E4 contributions$10,000
5.AAJ PAC4 contributions$9,000
6.EDWARD JONES PAC3 contributions$7,500
7.BOEING COMPANY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE6 contributions$7,000
8.MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL PAC3 contributions$6,000
10.MACHINISTS NON-PARTISAN POLITICAL LEAGUE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTSLabor1 contributionTrade-union PAC of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers — backs candidates supporting union organizing, prevailing wages, and aerospace and manufacturing industry jobs.AI$5,000
Source: OpenFEC (api.open.fec.gov) Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “committee.” Aggregated by contributing committee. Self-transfers from joint-fundraising / victory committees are excluded.
Top individual contributors · 2026 cycle
Itemized individual contributions over $200 to this rep's campaign committee, aggregated by donor employer. PAC giving is shown above; this section is people, not organizations.
1.SELF$8,600
2.CORDISH COMPANIES$7,000
3.ARNOLD VENTURES$7,000
4.THE DASCHLE GROUP$7,000
5.TECHNOLOGY INVESTORS, LLC$7,000
6.ACTUM LLC$6,500
7.K&L GATES$6,500
8.GEORGETOWN$5,000
9.DARCARS$5,000
10.FORETHOUGHT ADVISORS$4,200
Source: OpenFEC Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “individual,” aggregated by the donor's self-reported employer. This is a geographic / industry correlation, not a corporate endorsement.
