DeepSyte™
Bill FeedAll repsScoreboardsPrimariesProAboutSign inGet started
DeepSyte™™

A nonpartisan civic accountability tool. We match federal legislation to your stated values — without partisan bias.

Learn

  • About
  • About the name
  • Methodology
  • Glossary

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Refund Policy
  • Contact

Sources

Bill data from Congress.gov. Summaries from the Congressional Research Service where available.

Follow

  • Bluesky — @deepsyte.app
  • X — @deepsyteapp
All content is for informational purposes only. Always verify against primary sources.
Back to bill feed
Greg Landsman official portrait

Greg Landsman

D

house · OH-1

CompareSign in to get alerts
Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See how Greg Landsman actually votes — against your values.

DeepSyte scores Greg Landsman's record on the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your personal alignment.

Get started freeTake the values quiz
Official websiteSee this seat's 2026 race

Alignment with your views

Sign in and take the values quiz to see how Greg Landsman's votes line up with your views.

Prediction track record

We haven't made any vote predictions for Greg Landsman yet. Predictions are generated for bills with tagged effects; they show up here as soon as the predict-votes job covers this rep's upcoming docket.

Consistency insights

No paired statements and votes yet for Greg Landsman

We haven't yet found statement/vote pairs on the same topic for Greg Landsman. This usually means either the rep hasn't taken public positions on bills that have come to a passage vote, or those bills haven't been tagged yet. The checker runs as new press releases and votes come in.

Pro analysis

AI rep analysis — Pro

Get an AI-narrated read on Greg Landsman's full voting record against your stated values — aligned themes, conflicts, notable votes, and what to watch for.

Sign in to use AI analysis

Campaign promises

We haven't extracted campaign positions for Greg Landsman yet. Once their campaign website or position pages are processed, this card will track what they said vs how they voted.

Crossing the aisle

Passage votes where Greg Landsman broke ranks with ≥75% of Democrats. Threshold catches substantively partisan splits; unanimous-ish or close votes are excluded.

13
Cross-aisle votes
  1. 119-hres-1335·Jun 11, 2026·89% of D voted NO

    Condemning actors seeking to defraud the United States Government, and expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that governmentwide fraud and improper payment prevention reforms will meaningfully improve the financial prosperity of the United States, and that Federal program eligibility should be verified before payment.

    Rep voted YES
    Bill
  2. 119-s-1318·Apr 29, 2026·80% of D voted NO

    Fallen Servicemembers Religious Heritage Restoration Act

    Rep voted YES
    Bill
  3. 118-hres-1469·Sep 25, 2024·96% of D voted NO

    Ensuring accountability for key officials in the Biden-Harris administration responsible for decisionmaking and execution failures throughout the withdrawal from Afghanistan.

    Rep voted YES
    Bill
  4. 118-hr-8314·Sep 17, 2024·93% of D voted NO

    No Foreign Election Interference Act

    Rep voted YES
    Bill
  5. 118-hr-1516·Sep 10, 2024·82% of D voted NO

    DHS Restrictions on Confucius Institutes and Chinese Entities of Concern Act

    Rep voted YES
    Bill
  6. 118-hr-8369·May 16, 2024·92% of D voted NO

    Israel Security Assistance Support Act

    Rep voted YES
    Bill

+ 7 more in the record

Recent votes

  • Yea
    Condemning actors seeking to defraud the United States Government, and expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that governmentwide fraud and improper payment prevention reforms will meaningfully improve the financial prosperity of the United States, and that Federal program eligibility should be verified before payment.
    119-hres-1335··June 11, 2026
  • Nay
    To amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes.
    119-hr-9238··June 11, 2026
  • Nay
    To amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes.
    119-hr-9238··June 11, 2026
  • Yea
    No Aid for Ghost Students Act of 2026
    119-hr-7892··June 10, 2026
  • Yea
    Fraud Prevention and Accountability Act
    119-hr-8312··June 10, 2026
  • Yea
    Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5408) to accelerate workplace time-to-contract under the National Labor Relations Act.
    119-hres-1140··June 9, 2026
  • Yea
    Faster Labor Contracts Act
    119-hr-5408··June 9, 2026
  • Yea
    Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5408) to accelerate workplace time-to-contract under the National Labor Relations Act.
    119-hres-1140··June 9, 2026
  • Yea
    Federal Fraud Prevention Workforce Training Act
    119-hr-8428··June 8, 2026
  • Yea
    Ukraine Support Act
    119-hr-2913··June 5, 2026
  • Nay
    Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.
    119-hres-1336··June 4, 2026
  • Nay
    Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agency Appropriations Act, 2027
    119-hr-8646··June 4, 2026
  • Yea
    Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agency Appropriations Act, 2027
    119-hr-8646··June 4, 2026
  • Nay
    Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.
    119-hres-1336··June 4, 2026
  • Yea
    Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
    119-hconres-86··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2913) to authorize support for Ukraine, and for other purposes.
    119-hres-518··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    Northwest Straits Marine Conservation Initiative Reauthorization Act of 2025
    119-hr-2860··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    Stop Child Care Scams Act of 2026
    119-hr-7726··June 3, 2026
  • Nay
    Stop Child Care Scams Act of 2026
    119-hr-7726··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    ARTIST Act
    119-s-254··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    Fiscal Year 2025 Veterans Affairs Major Medical Facility Authorization Act
    119-s-2393··May 20, 2026
  • Yea
    Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
    119-hr-2853··May 12, 2026
  • Nay
    Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026
    119-hr-7567··April 30, 2026
  • Yea
    A bill to amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes.
    119-s-4465··April 30, 2026
  • Yea
    Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026
    119-hr-7567··April 30, 2026

Recent statements

May 20, 2026press_release_house

Landsman, DelBene Lead Fight to Overturn AI Model Delaying and Denying Care for Seniors

Position: Representatives Landsman and DelBene are leading a Congressional Review Act resolution to overturn the WISeR AI model used by CMS for prior authorization decisions in Medicare, arguing it delays and denies necessary care to seniors.

READ: Our Great American Moment Cincinnati, OH – Today, Congressman Greg Landsman (D-OH-01) and Congresswoman Suzan DelBene (D-WA-01) announced they are leading a Congressional Review Act resolution to end the use of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) model for prior authorization decisions for seniors. In January 2026, The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) started using an Artificial Intelligence (AI) model to handle prior authorization for certain procedures under traditional Medicare – a move that led to unnecessary delays and denials of care for seniors. The WISeR (Wasteful and Inappropriate Service Reduction) Model was launched in six states: Ohio, New Jersey, Oklahoma, Texas, Arizona, and Washington. This month, the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office (GAO) determined the WISeR Model is subject to a Congressional Review Act, meaning the Trump Administration should have submitted the model to Congress before implementation. In response, Reps. Landsman and DelBene are leading a Congressional Review Act resolution, which allows Congress a short period of time to force a vote on overturning the WISeR Model. “Instead of letting doctors decide what’s best for their patients, the Trump Administration is experimenting with a dangerous AI model that’s delaying and even denying critical care for seniors. Congress needs to act. “WISeR is a dangerous program that is denying care to Medicare patients so companies can profit. In just the first few months of the program, we’ve seen stories from across Washington state of seniors suffering while conditions worsen as they await approval for treatments their doctor prescribed. This program implements the same flawed prior authorization scheme from Medicare Advantage into traditional Medicare. If scaled up, it would be a back door to privatizing Medicare. It is causing needless delays, worsening conditions, and costing us more in the long-run. Congress needs to step up and put an end to WISeR.” Congressman Frank Pallone, Ranking Member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee: “Prior authorization has become an enormous red tape barrier for Americans across the country. Now the Trump Administration wants to make it worse by allowing health insurance companies to use AI to make it even harder for people to get the care they need. I’m grateful to Congressman Landsman for leading the charge to block this harmful policy from going into effect. We should be making it easier for Seniors on Medicare to get the care they need, not harder.” Read the resolution text here. Cincinnati, OH – This week, Congressman Greg Landsman (D-OH-01) and Congresswoman Debbie Dingell (D-MI-06) introduced a bill to ensure low-income women can access comprehensive breast examinations at no cost. Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer for women in the United States. About 1 in 8 women will develop breast cancer in their lifetime. For […] Cincinnati, OH – Today, Congressman Greg Landsman (D-OH-01) released the following statement after voting against the Farm Bill in the U.S. House of Representatives: The farmers in my district deserve a representative who will fight like hell for all farm policy, and I’m using every tool I have to do exactly that. I’m working with a […] Cincinnati, OH – Today, Congressman Greg Landsman announced the winner for the 2026 OH-01 Congressional Art Competition. Each spring, the Congressional Institute sponsors a nationwide high school visual art competition to recognize and encourage artistic talent in each congressional district. Since it began in 1982, more than 650,000 high school students have participated. This year, Ankita, […]

healthcare
Source

Recent news mentions

Articles from a curated list of national outlets that mention Greg Landsman.

  • NBC News·June 3, 2026
    Where the redistricting fight stands heading into the midterms
  • The Baltimore Sun·May 25, 2026
    Maryland Matters: Data center battles started in the states. Now it’s Congress under siege

Source: GDELT 2.0 GKG, filtered to a curated list of national outlets. Inclusion is not endorsement; opinion pieces and reported news are mixed.

Recent stock activity

Periodic transaction reports filed under the STOCK Act — disclosed by the rep, sourced from public filings.

No disclosed trades on record.

Source: open-data mirrors of the Senate eFD and House Clerk financial-disclosure systems. Disclosure within 30 days of trade is required by law (45 for spouse/dependent trades).

Top PAC donors · 2026 cycle

Political action committees that gave the most to this rep's principal campaign committee this cycle. PAC giving is direct organizational support — industry, ideological, or leadership.

  1. 1.DEMOCRACY SUMMER 2026Ideological5 contributionsProgressive grassroots advocacy PAC — supports voter engagement, democratic participation, and candidates aligned with progressive causes.AI$47,962
  2. 2.UNITED STEELWORKERS POLITICAL ACTION FUNDLabor4 contributionsTrade-union PAC for the United Steelworkers — backs candidates supporting union organizing, prevailing wages, workplace safety, and manufacturing job protection.AI$20,000
  3. 3.UA UNION PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS VOTE! PACLabor4 contributionsTrade-union PAC for United Association plumbers and pipefitters — backs prevailing-wage protections, infrastructure funding, project labor agreements, and pro-union labor policies.AI$20,000
  4. 4.AMERIPAC: THE FUND FOR A GREATER AMERICAIdeological4 contributionsIdeological PAC with a nationalist or patriotic framing — specific policy positions not clearly signaled by the name.AI · low$20,000
  5. 5.POLITICAL EDUCATION PATTERNS POLITICAL ARM INTL UNION OPERATING ENG LOCAL 184 contributions$20,000
  6. 6.END CITIZENS UNITED - PRIORITY 20241 contribution$15,000
  7. 7.MANUFACTURED HOUSING INSTITUTE PAC3 contributions$15,000
  8. 8.MACHINISTS NON-PARTISAN POLITICAL LEAGUE OF THE IAMAW3 contributions$15,000
  9. 9.AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, AFL-CIO COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATIONLabor3 contributionsTrade-union PAC for teachers — backs candidates supporting public education funding, collective bargaining rights, and worker protections.AI$15,000
  10. 10.INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEELabor3 contributionsTrade-union PAC for the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW). Backs candidates supporting prevailing-wage standards, infrastructure investment, apprenticeship programs, and union organizing rights.AI$15,000

Source: OpenFEC (api.open.fec.gov) Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “committee.” Aggregated by contributing committee. Self-transfers from joint-fundraising / victory committees are excluded.

Top individual contributors · 2026 cycle

Itemized individual contributions over $200 to this rep's campaign committee, aggregated by donor employer. PAC giving is shown above; this section is people, not organizations.

  1. 1.INSIGHT PARTNERS$21,000
  2. 2.UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI$14,193
  3. 3.REMINGTON ROAD GROUP$14,007
  4. 4.DE SHAW & CO$14,000
  5. 5.LAUDER PARTNERS LLC$14,000
  6. 6.CHAVEZ PROPERTIES$14,000
  7. 7.EVERCORE PARTNERS LLC$14,000
  8. 8.CENTERVIEW PARTNERS$14,000
  9. 9.BESSEMER VENTURE PARTNERS$14,000
  10. 10.THE UROLOGY GROUP$13,500

Source: OpenFEC Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “individual,” aggregated by the donor's self-reported employer. This is a geographic / industry correlation, not a corporate endorsement.