See how Betty McCollum's votes line up with your values.
DeepSyte scores Betty McCollum's record on the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your personal alignment.
Sign in and take the values quiz to see how Betty McCollum's votes line up with your views.
Prediction track record
How often we called Betty McCollum's passage votes correctly, from their stated positions on each bill's tagged topics. Excludes “unclear” calls and abstentions.
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
To prohibit the disclosure of records by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development of individuals for the purposes of immigration enforcement, and for other purposes.
Based on 6 data points across public statements and recorded votes · AI analysis of public records
118-hr-7217·Consistent
Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024
85/100
What they said
Apr 1, 2026
The release opposes President Trump's military action in Iran, characterizing it as a strategic and diplomatic failure that has destabilized the Middle East, caused civilian casualties, and lacked congressional consultation or allied coordination. The statement also opposes the requested $200 billion in additional defense funding for the conflict without clear justification.
Rep. McCollum's statement opposes military action in Iran and requests for additional defense funding without clear justification. The bill provides supplemental appropriations for DOD and State Department activities related to the Middle East conflict, including military operations and defense articles. Her NO vote on passage is consistent with her stated opposition to funding military operations in the region without adequate explanation or diplomatic alternatives.
Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024
85/100
What they said
Apr 1, 2026
The release opposes President Trump's military action in Iran, characterizing it as a strategic and diplomatic failure that has destabilized the Middle East, caused civilian casualties, and lacked congressional consultation or allied coordination. The statement also opposes the requested $200 billion in additional defense funding for the conflict without clear justification.
Rep. McCollum's statement opposes military action in Iran and criticizes additional defense spending for that conflict without clear justification. The bill provides supplemental appropriations for Israel-related defense activities in response to attacks on Israel, not for a U.S. war in Iran. While both involve defense spending in the Middle East region, they address distinct military operations and funding requests. McCollum's NO vote on Israel-focused defense supplemental appropriations is generally consistent with her stated opposition to open-ended Middle East military spending and her emphasis on the need for clear justification—though the bill's specific focus on Israel defense systems rather than Iran operations creates some granularity mismatch.
The release opposes President Trump's military action in Iran, characterizing it as a strategic and diplomatic failure that has destabilized the Middle East, caused civilian casualties, and lacked congressional consultation or allied coordination. The statement also opposes the requested $200 billion in additional defense funding for the conflict without clear justification.
The statement opposes Trump's military action in Iran and specifically criticizes a request for $200 billion in additional defense funding without clear justification. The bill is a routine FY2025 DOD appropriations measure that funds standard military operations and personnel. McCollum's NO vote on the passage of a general defense appropriations bill is consistent with her stated opposition to funding the Iran conflict, though the bill itself does not appear to be specifically about Iran war funding—it is a baseline DOD budget. The vote direction aligns with her stated fiscal skepticism toward defense spending for this conflict, but the bill's scope is broader than the specific $200 billion supplemental request she criticized.
The release opposes President Trump's military action in Iran, characterizing it as a strategic and diplomatic failure that has destabilized the Middle East, caused civilian casualties, and lacked congressional consultation or allied coordination. The statement also opposes the requested $200 billion in additional defense funding for the conflict without clear justification.
The statement opposes Trump's military action in Iran and specifically objects to a $200 billion additional defense funding request without justification. The bill is a routine FY2024 DOD appropriations measure that funds baseline military operations, personnel, and maintenance—not a supplemental for the Iran conflict. McCollum's NO vote on the standard defense appropriations is consistent with her stated opposition to the Iran war and skepticism of defense spending justification, though the bill itself does not directly address the Iran-specific supplemental funding she criticized.
The release opposes President Trump's military action in Iran, characterizing it as a strategic and diplomatic failure that has destabilized the Middle East, caused civilian casualties, and lacked congressional consultation or allied coordination. The statement also opposes the requested $200 billion in additional defense funding for the conflict without clear justification.
The statement opposes Trump's military actions in Iran and criticizes the $200 billion defense funding request without clear justification. The bill mandates defense assistance to Israel and prevents withholding of defense articles. McCollum's NO vote is consistent with her stated skepticism of large defense expenditures and military escalation in the Middle East region, though the bill addresses Israeli defense assistance specifically rather than the Iran conflict directly. The vote aligns with her broader opposition to military spending and regional escalation, though the specific policy mechanisms differ.
The release opposes President Trump's military action in Iran, characterizing it as a strategic and diplomatic failure that has destabilized the Middle East, caused civilian casualties, and lacked congressional consultation or allied coordination. The statement also opposes the requested $200 billion in additional defense funding for the conflict without clear justification.
McCollum's statement opposes Trump's military action in Iran and criticizes the lack of strategic planning and diplomatic effort. Her yes vote on the No Technology for Terror Act, which restricts technology exports to Iran, is directionally consistent with opposing Trump's Iran policy—both reflect concern about Iran as a threat and a desire to constrain Iranian capabilities. However, the bill addresses a narrow regulatory mechanism (export controls) rather than the broader strategic and diplomatic failures McCollum emphasized in her statement. The vote does not directly address her core criticisms about military escalation, civilian casualties, or the need for diplomacy.
Pairs with ambiguous language and high uncertainty are withheld until more data is available. Procedural, cloture, and amendment votes are excluded — they don't cleanly signal substantive support or opposition.
Pro analysis
AI rep analysis — Pro
Get an AI-narrated read on Betty McCollum's full voting record against your stated values — aligned themes, conflicts, notable votes, and what to watch for.
We haven't extracted campaign positions for Betty McCollum yet. Once their campaign website or position pages are processed, this card will track what they said vs how they voted.
Crossing the aisle
Passage votes where Betty McCollum broke ranks with ≥75% of Democrats. Threshold catches substantively partisan splits; unanimous-ish or close votes are excluded.
2
Cross-aisle votes
118-hr-7024·Feb 1, 2024·89% of D voted YES
Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act of 2024
McCollum Condemns President Trump’s Failure to End His Spiraling Iran War
Position: Opposes the continuation of the U.S. military conflict with Iran, criticizes the lack of Congressional authorization and clear objectives, and calls on the President to present a plan to end the war.
“The deadly attack on Saudi Arabia’s Riyadh Airport shows that President Trump’s war of choice in Iran is now dangerously spiraling throughout the region. Our U.S. servicemembers and our regional allies face increased attacks by Iranian-backed militias, because he has failed to present clear objectives and a plan to end this war.
“When Trump took our nation to war eight months ago, he did so despite any imminent threat posed by Iran to the United States, and lacking necessary Congressional authorization. Since then, a bipartisan House of Representatives has passed three resolutions rebuking the president for unlawful war with Iran.
“Just yesterday, the Pentagon reported that that the number of U.S. service members killed has risen to 21, with 865 wounded. Americans are paying skyrocketing fuel prices, which is raising the cost of everything we have to buy. The American people and our allies deserve clear answers from President Trump about his plan to end this war and prevent a growing, prolonged regional war.
“No one deserves answers more than our U.S. servicemembers and their families.”
Issues:
Defense & National Security
Foreign Affairs
Ranking Member McCollum Statement on U.S. Withdrawal from Iraq
Position: The release states that the 2002 Iraq war authorization was a mistake, that the Iraq War was a catastrophe, and that the President should negotiate an end to the Iran conflict and bring U.S. troops home.
SAINT PAUL, Minn. — Congresswoman McCollum, ranking member of the House Appropriations Defense Subcommittee released the following statement after U.S. forces formally withdrew from Iraq after two decades:
“Today marks the end of America’s military mission in Iraq with the conclusion of Operation Inherent Resolve and withdrawal of the last remaining U.S. forces from Iraqi territory. More than 23 years ago, America began the war in Iraq based on lies. In 2002, I was one of 133 members of the House of Representatives to vote against the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution,” said Rep. McCollum. “At the time I believed that President Bush’s decision to take America to war was terribly wrong. I stand by my vote and believe that history has vindicated it. The Iraq War was a catastrophe that cost the lives of thousands of U.S. service members and well over 100,000 Iraqis. It unleashed a torrent of conflict across the Middle East, including the rise of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. We continue to live with the consequences. To every American who served in Iraq, our nation owes you a debt of gratitude, especially to those who made the ultimate sacrifice on behalf of our nation and those who returned with wounds both seen and unseen. Your families deserve our thanks and our support. We acknowledge and appreciate the many contributions of our international allies.
“As we reflect on the end of America’s mission in Iraq, our leaders in Washington must heed the lessons of the Iraq War. Once again, our nation is mired in another destructive war of choice in the Middle East launched by a Republican President. President Trump must understand that there is no military solution to our conflict with Iran. Mr. President, negotiate an end to the Iran War and bring our troops home safely.”
Issues:
Defense & National Security
Congresswoman McCollum Condemns Trump Administration’s Unconstitutional Action to Take Back $810 Million That Congress Invested in Health Care and Housing
Position: Opposes the administration's pocket rescission of Fiscal Year 2026 funds and prior impoundment of Fiscal Year 2025 funds, arguing that spending power rests with Congress under Article I. Calls on the Speaker to reconvene the House to address the rescission.
SAINT PAUL, Minn. — On Friday night, OMB Director Vought filed an illegal pocket rescission of Fiscal Year 2026 funds. This action follows the Trump administration’s illegal impoundment of nearly $5 billion in taxpayer dollars from Fiscal Year 2025. Congresswoman Betty McCollum, Ranking Member of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, released the following statement:
“The Trump administration is again unlawfully taking funding away from Americans that was passed by a bipartisan vote in Congress and signed into law by President Trump. Their illegal budgetary manipulations are targeting our communities that are already struggling with increased costs because of Trump’s policies. Just last year, the Republican Big Beautiful Bill Act took away health care and food assistance for millions of Americans to pay in part for massive, permanent tax giveaways for their millionaire and billionaire donors. Trump’s reckless tariffs and unauthorized war with Iran are raising the cost of health care, housing, gas, groceries and more. The Trump administration is now illegally reversing a bipartisan vote to invest funding into communities across our country for better patients’ health care outcomes, provide housing counseling to Minnesotans, and support resettlement support for refugee families.
“The power to spend taxpayer funding comes from the Constitution’s Article 1, empowering Congress, not the President. In a cruel trick, the Trump administration waited until Speaker Johnson sent the U.S. House of Representatives home in order to attempt an end run around Congress. It is clear that Trump cannot be trusted to honor the Constitution and follow the law. Speaker Johnson must immediately bring back Congress to stop the administration’s meddling with American taxpayer funding.”
Issues:
Appropriations & Budget
Congresswoman McCollum, Senator Tina Smith Secure Funding for Local Water Infrastructure
Position: The release announces $1,092,000 in federal EPA funding for construction of a new municipal water supply system in Gem Lake, Minnesota, after prior design funding, and states that clean drinking water should be a basic standard.
On Thursday, the EPA awarded $1,092,000 to the City of Gem Lake. Congresswoman McCollum and Senator Tina Smith secured the funding for the Municipal Water Supply Community Project through the FY 2026 Consolidated Appropriations Act. Following the grant award, Congresswoman McCollum released the following statement:
“In the East Metro, we understand just how vital safe drinking water is to the health of our community,” Congresswoman McCollum said. “This federal investment will help protect the health of Gem Lake residents by providing them with safe drinking water.”
“Clean drinking water should be a basic standard in this country,” said Senator Tina Smith. “Gem Lake citizens have been rightfully concerned about carcinogens in their water supply, and this new system will give residents some peace of mind. I’m glad Rep. McCollum and I were able to secure this funding.”
“Betty McCollum’s office was instrumental in helping us in all phases of grant application and processing. We are very grateful for the help and on-going professionalism” Gem Lake Mayor Gretchen Artig-Swomley
This funding would be used for the construction phase of a new water supply system to provide safe drinking water to residents. In FY 2024, Congresswoman McCollum secured $959,757 which was used to fund the design of the new water supply system.
Sampling performed by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) detected 1,4-dioxane, a likely human carcinogen, in several private wells in Gem Lake. While the cause of the contamination has not been narrowed to one source, the residents of Gem Lake are not responsible for it, nor did they contribute to the issue. The MPCA has been providing residents with bottled water, a short-term solution.
Issues:
Environment & Energy
Congresswoman McCollum Votes Against Expanded Presidential Tariff Powers
Position: Opposes the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act, citing its expanded presidential tariff authority and its discretionary rather than mandatory Russia sanctions. Calls for enforceable sanctions on Russia and immediate release of $400 million in appropriated Ukraine aid.
WASHINGTON, D.C.— Today, the House of Representatives voted on The Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act. Congresswoman McCollum voted against the legislation that would hand expanded tariff powers to President Trump. Following the vote, Congresswoman McCollum released the following statement:
“This bill is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. While purporting to be a bill to sanction Russia, this bill is so broad that it passes tariff authority into law that could hit the majority of our trading partners. I refuse to give expanded tariff authority to a president that routinely wages reckless trade wars with our closest allies.
“The U.S. must implement enforceable sanctions against Russia to bring an end to their illegal and devasting war against Ukraine. This bill fails to mandate those penalties for Russia’s aggression. Instead, this legislation only directs the president to put sanctions on Russia if he chooses. I want sanctions on Russia, period, and President Trump already has the power to do so without this bill.
“For a president who says he supports Ukraine, he has inexplicably delayed release the $400 million dollars that Congress appropriated last spring to support Ukraine. President Trump must immediately release these funds that are so desperately needed to defend Ukraine from Russia’s aggression.”
Issues:
Defense & National Security
Foreign Affairs
Representatives McCollum and Van Epps Introduce Bipartisan Critical Materials Future Act
Position: The release supports establishing a Department of Energy pilot program to financially support domestic critical material processing projects, citing national security and supply chain dependence on China.
WASHINGTON, D.C.—Today, Congresswoman Betty McCollum and Congressman Matt Van Epps (R-TN), introduced the Critical Materials Future Act. This bipartisan, bicameral legislation would establish a pilot program at the Department of Energy to financially support domestic critical material processing projects.
“Securing a domestic critical mineral supply chain is essential for manufacturing clean energy technologies,” said Rep. McCollum. “For far too long, critical minerals extracted from our public lands have been shipped overseas for processing to be sold on the global market or bought back by American companies. That is not good stewardship of our natural resources, nor is it a good national security strategy. The Critical Materials Future Act will ensure that when we extract these resources, we also have the capacity to process them here at home.”
"Continuing to rely on foreign sources for our critical mineral supply is gambling with both our economic and national security. Today, China leads global processing of key critical minerals, refining more than 90% of graphite and nearly all gallium, which are essential to semiconductors and batteries. China also refines more than 90% of rare earth elements used in magnets for advanced defense technologies,” said Rep. Van Epps. “It is far past time for the United States to end this dangerous dependence. We can do this by paving the way for more critical mineral processing right here at home. That’s why I’m proud to co-lead the Critical Materials Future Act alongside Congresswoman McCollum. This bipartisan legislation establishes a pilot program to support companies committed to building critical mineral processing operations here in the United States. By strengthening our domestic supply chains, this legislation will reduce our dependence on foreign adversaries and move us one step closer to rebuilding the American defense industrial base."
The U.S. critical minerals list contains 50 minerals – including graphite, nickel, and cobalt – that are essential to our economy, infrastructure, and military capability. Critical minerals are used in smartphones, electric vehicle batteries, solar panels, wind turbines, and more.
In December 2024, China announced that it would immediately block the export of three critical minerals — gallium, germanium, and antimony — to the U.S. China currently controls 90% of the global processing capacity for rare earth elements and over 80% of the processing for other critical minerals like cobalt, gallium, and graphite. Experts have become increasingly concerned with U.S. dependence on China for critical materials, arguing it poses a significant risk to national security.
The Critical Materials Future Act supports critical material processing projects in the United States by granting the Secretary of Energy the authority and funding to deploy innovative financial mechanisms, such as contracts for differences and advanced market commitments, within this sector.
The bill also requires the Secretary of Energy to conduct a comprehensive study on the impact of these financial tools on market dynamics and processing projects within the critical materials sector, and to provide recommendations for expanding their use to strengthen America's processing capabilities.
The Senate companion, S. 596, was introduced by Sen. John Hickenlooper (D-CO) with Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Chris Coons (D-DE), and Todd Young (R-IN), and referred to the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
In the 118th Congress, Congresswoman McCollum introduced H.R. 5021, the Securing American Critical Minerals Act, a bill to prohibit the sale or transfer of critical minerals to our adversaries.
The full text of the Critical Materials Future Act can be found here.
###
Issues:
Defense & National Security
Environment & Energy
Congresswoman McCollum Votes Present on Motion to Table Trump Impeachment
Position: The congresswoman voted present on a motion to table an impeachment resolution against President Trump, stating the resolution does not meet the standard required for impeachment and that a transparent process of hearings and investigations should come first.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Congresswoman Betty McCollum, Dean of the Minnesota Congressional Delegation, issued the following statement after voting present on the motion to table an impeachment resolution introduced by Congressman Al Green (D-TX).
“Impeaching a president elected by the American people is the most consequential action that Congress can take to defend the Constitution and protect the American people from a president who has betrayed his oath and engaged in illegal conduct. Today, I voted present because this resolution to impeach President Trump does not meet the high standard required by this responsibility. During the 116th Congress, the House followed a deliberate and methodical process to make the case to the American people of Trump’s high crimes and misdemeanors. I voted to impeach Trump twice, presiding over the impeachment for inciting an insurrection on January 6th, 2021. I believed he was unfit to serve in office then, as I still do now.
“The House of Representatives has a duty under the Constitution to hold a president accountable for illegal conduct. This obligation begins with a transparent process of Congressional hearings, investigations, and subpoenas. However, the Republican majority controlling this Congress will not allow that work to move forward. A premature and poorly reasoned resolution like this hurts our ability to hold President Trump accountable. I will continue to hold Mr. Trump accountable in a manner that is fully transparent and clearly documents his malfeasance as the President of the United States.”
###
Congresswoman Betty McCollum to Highlight High Costs, Reduced Coverage for Minnesotans at Gillette Children’s Health Care Discussion
Position: The release announces a roundtable to highlight high health care costs and reduced coverage for Minnesotans, which it attributes to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, and criticizes that law as a Republican budget measure.
SAINT PAUL, Minn. — Congresswoman Betty McCollum (D, MN-04) will host a health care roundtable at Gillette Children’s on Wednesday, bringing together patients, providers, and state health care leaders to highlight the high cost of care and reduced coverage Minnesotans are experiencing as a result of the Republican budget law known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
WHO: Congresswoman Betty McCollum; Gillette Children’s President & CEO Barbara Joers; Minnesota Senate Majority Leader Erin Murphy, Minnesota Medical Association President Dr. Lisa Mattson, Minnesota Hospital Association Director of State Government Relations Danny Ackert, MNsure CEO Libby Caulum, Metropolitan Area Agency on Aging Executive Director Dawn Simonson, State Medicaid Director & Minnesota Department of Human Services Temporary Commissioner John Connolly, an SEIU health care worker, and a Gillette Children’s patient and parent.
WHAT: Health Care Roundtable
WHERE: Gillette Children’s, 200 University Ave E, Saint Paul, MN 55101
WHEN: Wednesday, August 26th at 10:30-11:30 AM
RSVP: Credentialed members of the press may RSVP by emailing mccollumpress@mail.house.gov.
Issues:
Appropriations & Budget
Health Care
Human Services
Ranking Member McCollum Commends House Passage of Resolution Directing Removal of U.S. Forces from Iran War
Position: McCollum supports congressional direction to withdraw U.S. Armed Forces from direct hostilities with Iran, asserting Congress's constitutional War Powers authority and calling for diplomatic resolution of the nuclear materials issue.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Congresswoman Betty McCollum, the Ranking Member of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, issued the following statement on Thursday evening following House passage of H.Con.Res. 86, directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran:
“This evening, I voted to stop President Trump’s unconstitutional Iran War for the fourth time. Democrats were finally joined by enough Republicans to assert Congress’s constitutional War Powers authority and direct President Trump to withdraw U.S. forces from direct conflict with Iran. The American people have made clear that they oppose the war with Iran. The President should work with the international community to negotiate a peaceful resolution to the Iran nuclear materials issue and open up the Strait of Hormuz. I call on the Senate to immediately take up and pass this resolution.”
Issues:
Defense & National Security
Foreign Affairs
Cleaver, McCollum Introduce Celiac Safety Act to Protect Americans with Celiac Disease
Position: Representatives Cleaver and McCollum introduced legislation requiring the FDA to mandate that food manufacturers label all gluten-containing grains as a major food allergen, strengthening food safety protections for Americans with celiac disease.
(Washington, D.C.) – Today, during Celiac Disease Awareness Month, U.S. Representatives Emanuel Cleaver, II (D-MO) and Betty McCollum (D-MN) introduced the Celiac Safety Act to strengthen food labeling law and protect the roughly 3 million Americans with Celiac Disease. The legislation is the first proposal in Congress to require the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to mandate the inclusion of “gluten-containing grains” as a major food allergen, ensuring manufacturers label the inclusion of all gluten-containing ingredients in products made available to the public.
“More than three million Americans are impacted by Celiac Disease in the United States, forcing them to maintain a careful diet or face serious health challenges that come with the disease,” said Congressman Cleaver. “Current food labeling law does not account for all gluten-containing ingredients, like barley and rye, making the tedious task of avoiding these ingredients in public products extremely and unnecessarily challenging for many of our neighbors. By taking the simple step of requiring the FDA to include all gluten-containing grains as a major food allergen, we can help prevent unnecessary health struggles for millions across the country.”
“All of us know someone with Celiac disease, and all of us have seen the suffering that can come with it. As co-chair of the Celiac Disease Caucus, I’m glad to co-lead the Celiac Safety Act with Congressman Cleaver. The United States is one of the only developed nations that doesn't require food manufacturers to list gluten as a major allergen. Our bill would change that, helping the nearly three million Americans with the disease to avoid gluten exposure and make informed choices about the food they consume,” said Congresswoman McCollum.
"Gluten-containing grains trigger a serious autoimmune response in celiac disease patients, yet current labeling laws fail to recognize that risk with the same clarity afforded to other ingredients listed as major allergens. Recategorizing gluten-containing grains as a major food allergen would strengthen transparency, reduce preventable medical harm, and help millions of Americans make safe food choices with confidence. The Celiac Disease Foundation applauds Representatives Cleaver and McCollum for introducing the Celiac Safety Act, and we urge members of Congress to pass this important legislation," said Marilyn G. Geller, CEO of Celiac Disease Foundation.
Celiac Disease is an autoimmune disease that causes the immune system to attack the lining of the small intestine when individuals consume the protein gluten, which can be found in wheat, barley, and rye. There is no cure, and the only treatment is adherence to a strict gluten-free diet.
While Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the United Kingdom, and all 27 member states of the European Union require manufacturers to list gluten as a major allergen, the United States only requires manufacturers to list wheat as a major allergen, which does not account for other gluten-containing grains like barley and rye. This makes it difficult for individuals with Celiac Disease to assess the risk of individual food products while managing their condition.
The Celiac Safety Act will protect individuals with Celiac Disease by:
Requiring any product containing wheat, barley, or rye to list “gluten-containing grains” as a major allergen.
Provide an 18-month implementation window for the FDA and manufacturers.
The Celiac Safety Act is endorsed by the Celiac Disease Foundation, American Gastroenterological Association, and Society for the Study of Celiac Disease.
A one-pager for the Celiac Safety Act is available here.
Official text of the Celiac Safety Act is available here.
Issues:
Health Care
Source: GDELT 2.0 GKG, filtered to a curated list of national outlets. Inclusion is not endorsement; opinion pieces and reported news are mixed.
Recent stock activity
Periodic transaction reports filed under the STOCK Act — disclosed by the rep, sourced from public filings.
No disclosed trades on record.
Source: open-data mirrors of the Senate eFD and House Clerk financial-disclosure systems. Disclosure within 30 days of trade is required by law (45 for spouse/dependent trades).
Top PAC donors · 2026 cycle
Political action committees that gave the most to this rep's principal campaign committee this cycle. PAC giving is direct organizational support — industry, ideological, or leadership.
1.L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. PAC2 contributions$10,000
2.AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, AFL-CIO COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATIONLabor2 contributionsTrade-union PAC for teachers — backs candidates supporting public education funding, collective bargaining rights, and worker protections.AI$10,000
3.TEXTRON INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE4 contributions$10,000
4.NIRON MAGNETICS PAC2 contributions$10,000
5.NATIONAL AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATION PAC2 contributions$10,000
6.HOLLAND & KNIGHT COMMITTEE FOR EFFECTIVE GOVERNMENT2 contributions$10,000
7.GENERAL ATOMICS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE3 contributions$10,000
8.CARPENTERS LEGISLATIVE IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERSLabor2 contributionsTrade-union PAC for the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners — backs prevailing-wage protections, federal infrastructure funding, project labor agreements, and worker safety standards.AI$10,000
9.APPLIED RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ARAPAC)2 contributions$10,000
10.AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIOLOGISTS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEHealth2 contributionsMedical-specialty PAC representing anesthesiologists — backs candidates supporting physician practice autonomy, healthcare reimbursement rates, and medical liability protections.AI$10,000
Source: OpenFEC (api.open.fec.gov) Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “committee.” Aggregated by contributing committee. Self-transfers from joint-fundraising / victory committees are excluded.
Top individual contributors · 2026 cycle
Itemized individual contributions over $200 to this rep's campaign committee, aggregated by donor employer. PAC giving is shown above; this section is people, not organizations.
1.EO SOLUTIONS$28,000
2.COLLABORATION.AI$21,000
3.HOLLAND & KNIGHT$14,000
4.CZINGER VEHICLES$14,000
5.STARKEY$14,000
6.MISCO$14,000
7.RION INC.$14,000
8.NORTH WIND$11,500
9.HEARTLAND REALTY INVESTORS$10,500
10.INKIT$9,000
Source: OpenFEC Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “individual,” aggregated by the donor's self-reported employer. This is a geographic / industry correlation, not a corporate endorsement.
