See how Betty McCollum actually votes — against your values.
DeepSyte scores Betty McCollum's record on the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your personal alignment.
Sign in and take the values quiz to see how Betty McCollum's votes line up with your views.
Prediction track record
How often we called Betty McCollum's passage votes correctly, from their stated positions on each bill's tagged topics. Excludes “unclear” calls and abstentions.
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
To prohibit the disclosure of records by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development of individuals for the purposes of immigration enforcement, and for other purposes.
Based on 8 data points across public statements and recorded votes · AI analysis of public records
118-hr-7217·Consistent
Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024
85/100
What they said
Apr 1, 2026
The release opposes President Trump's military action in Iran, characterizing it as a strategic and diplomatic failure that has destabilized the Middle East, caused civilian casualties, and lacked congressional consultation or allied coordination. The statement also opposes the requested $200 billion in additional defense funding for the conflict without clear justification.
Rep. McCollum's statement opposes military action in Iran and requests for additional defense funding without clear justification. The bill provides supplemental appropriations for DOD and State Department activities related to the Middle East conflict, including military operations and defense articles. Her NO vote on passage is consistent with her stated opposition to funding military operations in the region without adequate explanation or diplomatic alternatives.
Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024
85/100
What they said
Apr 1, 2026
The release opposes President Trump's military action in Iran, characterizing it as a strategic and diplomatic failure that has destabilized the Middle East, caused civilian casualties, and lacked congressional consultation or allied coordination. The statement also opposes the requested $200 billion in additional defense funding for the conflict without clear justification.
Rep. McCollum's statement opposes military action in Iran and criticizes additional defense spending for that conflict without clear justification. The bill provides supplemental appropriations for Israel-related defense activities in response to attacks on Israel, not for a U.S. war in Iran. While both involve defense spending in the Middle East region, they address distinct military operations and funding requests. McCollum's NO vote on Israel-focused defense supplemental appropriations is generally consistent with her stated opposition to open-ended Middle East military spending and her emphasis on the need for clear justification—though the bill's specific focus on Israel defense systems rather than Iran operations creates some granularity mismatch.
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024
25/100
What they said
Apr 1, 2026
The release opposes President Trump's military action in Iran, characterizing it as a strategic and diplomatic failure that has destabilized the Middle East, caused civilian casualties, and lacked congressional consultation or allied coordination. The statement also opposes the requested $200 billion in additional defense funding for the conflict without clear justification.
McCollum's statement strongly opposes military action in Iran and criticizes a $200 billion defense funding request for that conflict, characterizing it as unjustified and strategically flawed. However, she voted yes on the FY2024 National Defense Authorization Act, a broad defense authorization bill that funds general military procurement and operations. While the NDAA does not appear to specifically authorize the Iran conflict or the $200 billion supplemental she opposed, her affirmative vote on defense authorization is directionally misaligned with her stated opposition to defense spending for the Iran war without justification.
The release opposes President Trump's military action in Iran, characterizing it as a strategic and diplomatic failure that has destabilized the Middle East, caused civilian casualties, and lacked congressional consultation or allied coordination. The statement also opposes the requested $200 billion in additional defense funding for the conflict without clear justification.
The statement opposes Trump's military action in Iran and specifically criticizes a request for $200 billion in additional defense funding without clear justification. The bill is a routine FY2025 DOD appropriations measure that funds standard military operations and personnel. McCollum's NO vote on the passage of a general defense appropriations bill is consistent with her stated opposition to funding the Iran conflict, though the bill itself does not appear to be specifically about Iran war funding—it is a baseline DOD budget. The vote direction aligns with her stated fiscal skepticism toward defense spending for this conflict, but the bill's scope is broader than the specific $200 billion supplemental request she criticized.
The release opposes President Trump's military action in Iran, characterizing it as a strategic and diplomatic failure that has destabilized the Middle East, caused civilian casualties, and lacked congressional consultation or allied coordination. The statement also opposes the requested $200 billion in additional defense funding for the conflict without clear justification.
The statement opposes Trump's military action in Iran and specifically objects to a $200 billion additional defense funding request without justification. The bill is a routine FY2024 DOD appropriations measure that funds baseline military operations, personnel, and maintenance—not a supplemental for the Iran conflict. McCollum's NO vote on the standard defense appropriations is consistent with her stated opposition to the Iran war and skepticism of defense spending justification, though the bill itself does not directly address the Iran-specific supplemental funding she criticized.
Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024
75/100
What they said
Apr 1, 2026
The release opposes President Trump's military action in Iran, characterizing it as a strategic and diplomatic failure that has destabilized the Middle East, caused civilian casualties, and lacked congressional consultation or allied coordination. The statement also opposes the requested $200 billion in additional defense funding for the conflict without clear justification.
The statement opposes military spending for Middle East conflicts without clear justification and criticizes the lack of congressional consultation. The bill provides supplemental defense appropriations for operations in the region. McCollum's NO vote on this procedural motion aligns with her stated opposition to the funding request, though the procedural nature of the vote and the bill's focus on Israel security (rather than the Iran war specifically mentioned in the statement) creates some ambiguity about whether the vote directly reflects opposition to the bill's substance or to the procedural mechanism.
The release opposes President Trump's military action in Iran, characterizing it as a strategic and diplomatic failure that has destabilized the Middle East, caused civilian casualties, and lacked congressional consultation or allied coordination. The statement also opposes the requested $200 billion in additional defense funding for the conflict without clear justification.
The statement opposes Trump's military actions in Iran and criticizes the $200 billion defense funding request without clear justification. The bill mandates defense assistance to Israel and prevents withholding of defense articles. McCollum's NO vote is consistent with her stated skepticism of large defense expenditures and military escalation in the Middle East region, though the bill addresses Israeli defense assistance specifically rather than the Iran conflict directly. The vote aligns with her broader opposition to military spending and regional escalation, though the specific policy mechanisms differ.
The release opposes President Trump's military action in Iran, characterizing it as a strategic and diplomatic failure that has destabilized the Middle East, caused civilian casualties, and lacked congressional consultation or allied coordination. The statement also opposes the requested $200 billion in additional defense funding for the conflict without clear justification.
McCollum's statement opposes Trump's military action in Iran and criticizes the lack of strategic planning and diplomatic effort. Her yes vote on the No Technology for Terror Act, which restricts technology exports to Iran, is directionally consistent with opposing Trump's Iran policy—both reflect concern about Iran as a threat and a desire to constrain Iranian capabilities. However, the bill addresses a narrow regulatory mechanism (export controls) rather than the broader strategic and diplomatic failures McCollum emphasized in her statement. The vote does not directly address her core criticisms about military escalation, civilian casualties, or the need for diplomacy.
Pairs with ambiguous language and high uncertainty are withheld until more data is available. Procedural, cloture, and amendment votes are excluded — they don't cleanly signal substantive support or opposition.
Pro analysis
AI rep analysis — Pro
Get an AI-narrated read on Betty McCollum's full voting record against your stated values — aligned themes, conflicts, notable votes, and what to watch for.
We haven't extracted campaign positions for Betty McCollum yet. Once their campaign website or position pages are processed, this card will track what they said vs how they voted.
Crossing the aisle
Passage votes where Betty McCollum broke ranks with ≥75% of Democrats. Threshold catches substantively partisan splits; unanimous-ish or close votes are excluded.
2
Cross-aisle votes
118-hr-7024·Feb 1, 2024·89% of D voted YES
Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act of 2024
Ranking Member McCollum Commends House Passage of Resolution Directing Removal of U.S. Forces from Iran War
Position: McCollum supports congressional direction to withdraw U.S. Armed Forces from direct hostilities with Iran, asserting Congress's constitutional War Powers authority and calling for diplomatic resolution of the nuclear materials issue.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Congresswoman Betty McCollum, the Ranking Member of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, issued the following statement on Thursday evening following House passage of H.Con.Res. 86, directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran:
“This evening, I voted to stop President Trump’s unconstitutional Iran War for the fourth time. Democrats were finally joined by enough Republicans to assert Congress’s constitutional War Powers authority and direct President Trump to withdraw U.S. forces from direct conflict with Iran. The American people have made clear that they oppose the war with Iran. The President should work with the international community to negotiate a peaceful resolution to the Iran nuclear materials issue and open up the Strait of Hormuz. I call on the Senate to immediately take up and pass this resolution.”
Issues:
Defense & National Security
Foreign Affairs
Cleaver, McCollum Introduce Celiac Safety Act to Protect Americans with Celiac Disease
Position: Representatives Cleaver and McCollum introduced legislation requiring the FDA to mandate that food manufacturers label all gluten-containing grains as a major food allergen, strengthening food safety protections for Americans with celiac disease.
(Washington, D.C.) – Today, during Celiac Disease Awareness Month, U.S. Representatives Emanuel Cleaver, II (D-MO) and Betty McCollum (D-MN) introduced the Celiac Safety Act to strengthen food labeling law and protect the roughly 3 million Americans with Celiac Disease. The legislation is the first proposal in Congress to require the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to mandate the inclusion of “gluten-containing grains” as a major food allergen, ensuring manufacturers label the inclusion of all gluten-containing ingredients in products made available to the public.
“More than three million Americans are impacted by Celiac Disease in the United States, forcing them to maintain a careful diet or face serious health challenges that come with the disease,” said Congressman Cleaver. “Current food labeling law does not account for all gluten-containing ingredients, like barley and rye, making the tedious task of avoiding these ingredients in public products extremely and unnecessarily challenging for many of our neighbors. By taking the simple step of requiring the FDA to include all gluten-containing grains as a major food allergen, we can help prevent unnecessary health struggles for millions across the country.”
“All of us know someone with Celiac disease, and all of us have seen the suffering that can come with it. As co-chair of the Celiac Disease Caucus, I’m glad to co-lead the Celiac Safety Act with Congressman Cleaver. The United States is one of the only developed nations that doesn't require food manufacturers to list gluten as a major allergen. Our bill would change that, helping the nearly three million Americans with the disease to avoid gluten exposure and make informed choices about the food they consume,” said Congresswoman McCollum.
"Gluten-containing grains trigger a serious autoimmune response in celiac disease patients, yet current labeling laws fail to recognize that risk with the same clarity afforded to other ingredients listed as major allergens. Recategorizing gluten-containing grains as a major food allergen would strengthen transparency, reduce preventable medical harm, and help millions of Americans make safe food choices with confidence. The Celiac Disease Foundation applauds Representatives Cleaver and McCollum for introducing the Celiac Safety Act, and we urge members of Congress to pass this important legislation," said Marilyn G. Geller, CEO of Celiac Disease Foundation.
Celiac Disease is an autoimmune disease that causes the immune system to attack the lining of the small intestine when individuals consume the protein gluten, which can be found in wheat, barley, and rye. There is no cure, and the only treatment is adherence to a strict gluten-free diet.
While Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the United Kingdom, and all 27 member states of the European Union require manufacturers to list gluten as a major allergen, the United States only requires manufacturers to list wheat as a major allergen, which does not account for other gluten-containing grains like barley and rye. This makes it difficult for individuals with Celiac Disease to assess the risk of individual food products while managing their condition.
The Celiac Safety Act will protect individuals with Celiac Disease by:
Requiring any product containing wheat, barley, or rye to list “gluten-containing grains” as a major allergen.
Provide an 18-month implementation window for the FDA and manufacturers.
The Celiac Safety Act is endorsed by the Celiac Disease Foundation, American Gastroenterological Association, and Society for the Study of Celiac Disease.
A one-pager for the Celiac Safety Act is available here.
Official text of the Celiac Safety Act is available here.
Issues:
Health Care
Position: Congresswoman McCollum opposed the 2026 Farm Bill because it continues SNAP cuts enacted in prior Republican budget legislation, includes provisions preempting state animal welfare regulations, and endorses tariff policies she characterizes as harmful to farmers.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, the House of Representatives passed the Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026 by a vote of 224-200. Congresswoman McCollum voted against the legislation as it codifies cuts to SNAP nutrition assistance that Republicans first made in their budget law known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Following the vote, Congresswoman McCollum issued the following statement:
“This farm bill is three years late and still falls short for farmers and the American people. Last year the Republicans forced through their incredibly unpopular Big Ugly Bill, which has so far kicked 3.4 million people off SNAP. This farm bill could have restored those cuts to SNAP but instead continued them.
“I’m also disappointed that the Republicans decided to advance legislation filled with partisan poison pills, like the Save Our Bacon Act, which preempts state level animal welfare regulations. Furthermore, this farm bill rubberstamps Trump’s illegal trade war, which is driving up fertilizer, machinery, and gas costs for all American farmers.
“In 2018, the House of Representatives passed the farm bill with an overwhelming bipartisan vote of 369-47. Today, we came together in a bipartisan fashion to attempt to pass some important amendments, like Rep. Luna’s amendment which removed a liability shield for pesticide companies. In the end, this farm bill does not meet the moment. I hope we can continue working towards a farm bill that supports everyone.”
Issues:
Agriculture & Nutrition
Animal Rights
U.S. Rep. Betty McCollum: Republican National Security & State Department Funding Bill "Continues Trump's Retreat from American Diplomacy"
Position: Rep. McCollum opposes the FY2027 National Security & State Department funding bill, arguing it cuts global health and development assistance, undermines U.S. diplomatic credibility, and creates national security risks by ceding influence to Russia and China.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The House Appropriations Committee passed the Fiscal Year 2027 National Security & Department of State funding bill on Tuesday by a vote of 35-27. Congresswoman Betty McCollum (D), the Ranking Member of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, voted no on the bill and spoke against what she called a “retreat from American diplomacy” during the committee hearing. Following the committee’s approval of the bill, Congresswoman McCollum issued the following statement:
“It’s deeply unfortunate that this bill continues President Trump’s retreat from strong American diplomacy and support for development assistance. We know what happens when America retreats from the developing world: poverty, malnutrition, and disease take hold, transnational terrorism spreads, and our adversaries like Russia and China fill the void. This is a national security threat and a dark outlook for the world, and unfortunately Republicans’ bill embraces it.
“Democrats and Republicans used to stand together and say: America saves lives, and we do it because it reflects our values. But this bill cuts $532 million from global health programs. Fewer mothers will survive childbirth in sub-Saharan Africa. Fewer children will be vaccinated against dangerous diseases like tuberculosis. HIV clinics in Zambia, Uganda, and the Philippines shut their doors. COVID-19 didn’t knock on our door and ask permission to enter the United States. The next pandemic won't either.
“American diplomats used to walk into negotiations with credibility because the United States had a track record of showing up and keeping its word. Sadly, that has changed. This bill not only reflects that reality, it endorses it.”
Issues:
Appropriations & Budget
Defense & National Security
Foreign Affairs
CONGRESSWOMAN McCOLLUM OFFERS AMENDMENT TO STUDY FINANCIAL IMPACTS OF OPERATION METRO SURGE ON MINNESOTA’S SMALL BUSINESSES
Position: Congresswoman McCollum opposed the FY2027 FSGG appropriations bill because it cuts Small Business Administration funding and eliminates the IRS free file program, and she advocated for a study of the financial impacts of increased federal immigration enforcement on Minnesota small businesses.
This week, the U.S. House Appropriations Committee marked up the Fiscal Year 2027 Financial Services and General Government (FSGG) funding bill, ultimately passing the legislation by a party-line vote of 34-28. Congresswoman McCollum voted no on the bill because it cuts funding for the Small Business Administration and ends the IRS direct free file program – benefitting billionaires and large corporations at the expense of working families and small businesses struggling to keep up with rising costs. Republicans even rejected opportunities to improve the bill, voting down provisions to protect vote by mail, protect the free file program, and curtail the President’s demolition of history like the Wilbur J. Cohen building in Washington, D.C. — known as the Sistine Chapel of the New Deal.
During the markup on Tuesday evening, the committee considered an amendment offered by Congresswoman McCollum that would study the financial impact of increased federal immigration enforcement on Minnesota’s small businesses. The amendment was defeated by a vote of 31-26. Visit Congresswoman McCollum’s YouTube Channel to watch her remarks on the amendment.
Congresswoman Betty McCollum issued the following statement:
“In Saint Paul, it’s estimated that businesses lost more than $16 million during each week of Operation Metro Surge. That’s a total of over $128 million in losses for the two months of Operation Metro Surge—just in the City of Saint Paul. In the Fourth District, small businesses anchor our main streets from Saint Paul to White Bear Lake and Stillwater. Small business owners and workers I’ve spoken to are seeking help to rebuild after Operation Metro Surge. Sadly, majority Republicans are choosing to ignore the lasting damage caused to our communities by the administration’s months-long invasion and occupation of our state.”
Issues:
Appropriations & Budget
U.S. REP. BETTY McCOLLUM CONDEMNS SENATE VOTE TO ALLOW FOREIGN MINING COMPANY TO POLLUTE THE BWCA
Position: McCollum opposes Senate passage of H.J. Res. 140, which would allow foreign mining companies to extract minerals in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. She argues that sulfide mining would cause permanent toxic pollution to the watershed and that mineral withdrawal protections should be maintained.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Congresswoman Betty McCollum (D), Dean of the Minnesota Congressional Delegation, issued the following statement on Thursday upon Senate passage of H.J. Res. 140, which would allow foreign mining companies to begin toxic mineral extraction which would permanently pollute the headwaters of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCA):
“The Boundary Waters are a national treasure, and its pristine lakes and rivers must be protected for the benefit of future generations of Americans. The Republican Majority in the U.S. Senate voted today to strip away protections for the BWCA, allowing a foreign-owned mining company and serial polluter to begin a sulfide acid mine in the headwaters of the Boundary Waters. We don’t allow mining in Yellowstone, Yosemite, Zion, Acadia, Glacier, or any of our nation’s revered national parks – and we shouldn’t allow it in the watershed of the Boundary Waters, either.
“One hundred percent of copper mines have failed, leading to polluted waters. This case will be no different. Because of this extremely short-sighted vote, our nation’s most-visited wilderness area faces the threat of permanent toxic pollution. Why? So Antofagasta, a Chilean corporation that owns Twin Metals, can mine American copper and ship it to China to be smelted and sold on the global market. Twin Metals has been lobbying President Trump and Republicans in Congress for over ten years to remove the protections from this watershed and renew their mine plans to extract American minerals at the expense of freshwater for future generations.
“The science-based evidence is overwhelming: The mineral withdrawal is the only way to protect this wilderness, which is home to some of the cleanest water in the entire world.”
Congresswoman McCollum has been a champion for protecting the Boundary Waters throughout her tenure in Congress. Since 2020, Congresswoman McCollum has carried the Boundary Waters Wilderness Protection and Pollution Prevention Act (H.R. 588), which would permanently protect the Boundary Waters from toxic sulfide ore mining.
Issues:
Environment & Energy
Congresswoman McCollum Statement on Accusations Against Rep. Eric Swalwell and Other Members of Congress
Position: Congresswoman McCollum states that allegations of sexual assault, domestic abuse, and harassment against members of Congress must be taken seriously, victims should be supported, and accused members should resign or be expelled.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Congresswoman Betty McCollum issued the following statement on Monday:
“The allegations reported late last week against Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) are deeply disturbing. Sexual assault, domestic abuse, and harassment allegations must always be taken seriously. Victims who step forward to share these stories show great courage. Perpetrators of this misconduct must be held accountable. Sadly, Rep. Swalwell isn’t the only member of Congress facing such allegations. Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-TX) and Rep. Cory Mills (R-FL) are also accused of serious misconduct, and like Rep. Swalwell, they must resign or be expelled,” said Congresswoman McCollum.
Issues:
Civil Rights & Justice
Women
Ranking Member McCollum Statement on President Trump’s Declaration that ‘An Entire Civilization Will Die Tonight’
Position: The release expresses opposition to President Trump's stated intention to carry out actions the congresswoman characterizes as genocide and war crimes, and calls for Congress to intervene to prevent such actions.
SAINT PAUL, Minn. — Congresswoman Betty McCollum, Ranking Member of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, issued the following statement on Tuesday morning:
“President Trump’s statement that a ‘whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again’ speaks to genocide. Should the President carry out his threats, he will be committing war crimes on a mass scale. Listening to the President these last few days should make all Americans deeply concerned about his state of mind. The President’s cabinet should take notice. The Speaker of the House must immediately call the House back into session. Congress must stop this President from committing these atrocities.”
###
Issues:
Foreign Affairs
U.S. Rep. McCollum Statement on Firing of Attorney General Pam Bondi
Position: Rep. McCollum criticizes Attorney General Bondi's tenure, alleging constitutional violations, obstruction of justice, and misuse of the Department of Justice to target political opponents, and expresses concern that her successor will continue similar practices.
SAINT PAUL, Minn. — Congresswoman Betty McCollum, the Dean of the Minnesota Congressional delegation, issued the following statement upon reports that President Trump fired Attorney General Pam Bondi:
“When Pam Bondi is remembered by history, it will be as President Trump’s blindly loyal coconspirator who was completely incompetent,” said Congresswoman McCollum. “Attorney General Bondi has willfully and actively violated the Constitution, federal law, and judicial orders. She not only fired the director of the Departmental Ethics Office, but also oversaw the mass resignation of thousands of attorneys dedicated to defending the Constitution and the American people. These brave public servants refused to obey her direction to weaponize the department against Trump’s political enemies. Bondi will always be remembered for her massive cover-up to protect Trump by hiding millions of documents linked to the Epstein files and her refusal to acknowledge the suffering of the victims.
“One thing we can be confident of: Whoever Trump chooses to replace her will unfortunately continue the cover-up of Trump’s corruption and the trampling of Americans’ rights.”
Issues:
Civil Rights & Justice
Ranking Member McCollum Statement on President Trump’s Fiscal Year 2027 Budget Request
Position: McCollum opposes President Trump's FY2027 budget request, arguing that the $1.15 trillion defense spending request is excessive and that further cuts to domestic services are unacceptable. She contends the Pentagon has spending and accounting problems rather than a funding shortage, and criticizes the administration's tariffs, tax cuts for high earners, and foreign policy decisions for worsening the cost-of-living crisis.
SAINT PAUL, Minn. — Congresswoman Betty McCollum, Ranking Member of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, issued the following statement on President Trump’s Fiscal Year 2027 budget request outline, which was delivered to Congress over two months late:
“Since taking office, President Trump and Congressional Republicans have created a cost-of-living crisis for the American people. President Trump’s illegal tariffs have raised prices for consumers. Their Big Ugly billionaire tax cut and spending law has taken away health care and food assistance away from millions of Americans to give permanent tax breaks to millionaires and billionaires. Fuel prices are skyrocketing as a result of his dangerous and unlawful war in Iran. It is not a surprise that President Trump’s Fiscal Year 2027 budget utterly fails to address the needs of the public he serves.
“The President’s request for $1.15 trillion in defense spending is outrageous and unacceptable, especially when President Trump and Congressional Republicans intend to make further cuts to critical services that Americans rely on at home. Our nation cannot be secure without investments in our country’s critical health care, education, nutrition, and infrastructure.
“As the Ranking Member of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, I will always work to provide our service members with the resources they need to perform their missions and come home safe. But I refuse to provide a blank check to the Pentagon.
“The Pentagon does not have a funding problem. It has a problem with efficiently spending the funding that Congress has provided them – and accounting for it. That includes the recent $150 billion in defense spending included in Republicans’ Big Ugly Law, the vast majority of which has not been spent by the administration. The White House will reportedly ask Republicans for another $350 billion in defense spending through a second reconciliation bill this year – all while the Pentagon has failed for years to pass an audit.
“President Trump ran on a promise to bring inflation under control and keep America out of wars overseas. Again and again, he has broken his word to the American people and is now asking them to pay for the costs of his disastrous mistakes. President Trump and Congressional Republicans are dangerously out of touch with Americans. We simply cannot afford their agenda.”
###
Issues:
Appropriations & Budget
Source: GDELT 2.0 GKG, filtered to a curated list of national outlets. Inclusion is not endorsement; opinion pieces and reported news are mixed.
Recent stock activity
Periodic transaction reports filed under the STOCK Act — disclosed by the rep, sourced from public filings.
No disclosed trades on record.
Source: open-data mirrors of the Senate eFD and House Clerk financial-disclosure systems. Disclosure within 30 days of trade is required by law (45 for spouse/dependent trades).
Top PAC donors · 2026 cycle
Political action committees that gave the most to this rep's principal campaign committee this cycle. PAC giving is direct organizational support — industry, ideological, or leadership.
1.MACHINISTS NON PARTISAN POLITICAL LEAGUE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPACE WORKERSLabor6 contributionsTrade-union PAC of the International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers — backs candidates supporting union organizing, prevailing wages, and aerospace manufacturing jobs.AI$30,000
2.NEA FUND FOR CHILDREN AND PUBLIC EDUCATIONLabor5 contributionsPAC of the National Education Association, the largest U.S. teachers' union. Backs candidates supporting public education funding, teacher compensation, and collective bargaining rights.AI$25,000
3.SEIU COPE (SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION)Labor4 contributionsTrade-union PAC for the Service Employees International Union — backs candidates supporting union organizing, collective bargaining, prevailing wages, and worker protections.AI$20,000
4.NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEReal Estate4 contributionsTrade association PAC for U.S. real estate agents and brokers — backs candidates supporting property-rights protections, mortgage-lending access, and tax incentives for homeownership.AI$20,000
5.EMPLOYEES OF NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION PAC4 contributions$20,000
6.UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA PAC4 contributions$20,000
7.D.R.I.V.E. - DEMOCRAT, REPUBLICAN, INDEPENDENT VOTER EDUCATION (THE PAC OF THE INTERNATIONLabor3 contributionsTrade-union PAC of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters — supports candidates backing union organizing rights, prevailing wages, and worker protections.AI$15,000
8.AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEAgriculture3 contributionsAgricultural processing PAC for American Crystal Sugar — backs candidates supporting farm subsidies, sugar price supports, and agricultural trade policies.AI$15,000
9.OSHKOSH CORPORATION EMPLOYEES PAC (OCEPAC)Defense3 contributionsDefense contractor employee PAC — Oshkosh Corporation manufactures military vehicles, tactical trucks, and defense systems; the PAC backs candidates supporting defense spending and procurement.AI$15,000
10.LABORERS' POLITICAL LEAGUE-LABORERS' INTL UNIONLabor3 contributionsTrade-union PAC for the International Union of Operating Engineers — backs prevailing-wage standards, infrastructure investment, and worker organizing rights.AI$15,000
Source: OpenFEC (api.open.fec.gov) Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “committee.” Aggregated by contributing committee. Self-transfers from joint-fundraising / victory committees are excluded.
Top individual contributors · 2026 cycle
Itemized individual contributions over $200 to this rep's campaign committee, aggregated by donor employer. PAC giving is shown above; this section is people, not organizations.
1.EO SOLUTIONS$28,000
2.COLLABORATION.AI$21,000
3.HOLLAND & KNIGHT$14,000
4.STARKEY$14,000
5.MISCO$14,000
6.HEARTLAND REALTY INVESTORS$10,500
7.INKIT$9,000
8.NORTH WIND$8,000
9.SMI$7,750
10.ANZU PARTNERS$7,500
Source: OpenFEC Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “individual,” aggregated by the donor's self-reported employer. This is a geographic / industry correlation, not a corporate endorsement.
