Raul Ruiz

Ruiz Introduces Bipartisan Bill to Fix Medicare Advantage Payments in Puerto Rico

Position: The release supports introducing the bipartisan Puerto Rico Medicare Advantage Fairness Act to set Puerto Rico's average geographic adjustment equal to that of the U.S. Virgin Islands, arguing the current formula underpays Medicare Advantage plans on the island.

WASHINGTON, D.C. Today, Congressman Raul Ruiz, M.D. (CA-25), joined by Congressman Gus Bilirakis (R-FL), Congressman Darren Soto (D-FL), and Resident Commissioner Pablo José Hernández (D-PR), introduced the Puerto Rico Medicare Advantage Fairness Act. This bipartisan bill would correct a long-standing formula gap that underpays Medicare Advantage in Puerto Rico. How it works Medicare Advantage plans receive a fixed monthly payment from the federal government for each senior they enroll. Part of that payment is based on the local cost of care, which is measured by the average geographic adjustment (AGA). Puerto Rico's AGA is much lower than it should be. The formula relies on spending in traditional Medicare (fee-for-service), but very few beneficiaries in Puerto Rico use fee-for-service, since most are enrolled in MA. Basing the AGA on such a small population understates what care actually costs on the island, and MA plans receive a lower benchmark payment for each senior as a result. This bill would set Puerto Rico's AGA equal to that of the U.S. Virgin Islands, a territory with similar socioeconomic circumstances, so that payments reflect the true cost of delivering care. The problem Over 650,000 Puerto Rico beneficiaries rely on Medicare Advantage, over 90 percent of all Medicare beneficiaries on the island. Puerto Rico receives about 40 percent less per beneficiary than the U.S. average. Benchmark rates run roughly 20 percent below those in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The payment gap has led to smaller provider networks and reduced benefits, and doctors and hospitals absorb lower reimbursements. This threatens the quality and availability of healthcare services in Puerto Rico. "As an emergency physician, I know that when care is out of reach, seniors pay the price," said Congressman Raul Ruiz, M.D. "Puerto Ricans pay into Medicare on the same terms as every American, yet their Medicare Advantage plans are paid about 40 percent less. That gap has shrunk provider networks, cut benefits, and strained doctors and hospitals. This bill is a targeted, common-sense fix. I thank Representatives Bilirakis and Soto and Resident Commissioner Hernández for working with me to give seniors the fair coverage they have earned." "Seniors deserve reliable access to the high-quality health care they have earned through Medicare, regardless of where they live," said Congressman Gus Bilirakis. "Medicare Advantage plays an important role in delivering care to beneficiaries across Puerto Rico, and we must ensure the program is funded fairly and sustainably so seniors can continue accessing the doctors, treatments, and benefits they rely upon. I'm proud to join Representatives Ruiz and Soto in introducing the bipartisan Puerto Rico Medicare Advantage Fairness Act to address longstanding disparities, strengthen access to care and provide greater stability for patients and providers."

DISCHARGE PETITION HITS 218 SIGNATURES ON MAJOR RICHARD STAR ACT, VOTE NOW AWAITS HOUSE'S RETURN IN NOVEMBER

Position: The release supports eliminating the offset that reduces combat-injured military retirees' disability compensation when they also receive retirement pay, and calls for a House floor vote on the Major Richard Star Act.

Washington, D.C. — On May 21, 2026, Reps. Raul Ruiz, M.D. (CA-25) and Ranking Member Mark Takano (CA-39) filed a discharge petition forcing a vote on the Major Richard Star Act. After months of work to build majority support in the House, the petition reached the 218 signatures needed to guarantee a floor vote, a milestone made possible by sustained pressure from veteran service organizations, combat-injured veterans, and lawmakers who refused to give up on the legislation.c "It's official, we did it! We reached 218 signatures, and veterans just won a floor vote on my bipartisan Major Richard Star Act. I want to congratulate my partner in this fight, Ranking Member Mark Takano, for his tireless leadership in getting us here," said Rep. Raul Ruiz, M.D. (CA-25). Reaching 218 signatures freezes the petition and places the discharge motion on the House Calendar, where it must sit for seven legislative days before it can be called up. But with the House now in recess, that window will not open until Members return in November. When it does, a signer can bring the motion to the floor, and if adopted, the House proceeds directly to a vote on the Major Richard Star Act. "While this is a victory worth celebrating, the fight continues to deliver justice for our veterans, who for years have lived with the injustice of being forced to medically retire due to combat-related injuries, penalized and unable to receive both their disability compensation and their retirement pay in full. With this bipartisan bill, it is time for Congress to show our veterans that their sacrifice was not in vain and that we are here to support them." said Rep. Raul Ruiz, M.D. (CA-25). "218 signatures mean the House has spoken. A majority of Members, Democrats and Republicans, said enough is enough," said Ranking Member Takano (CA-39). "Combat-injured veterans shouldn't have to choose between the retirement they earned and the disability compensation they're owed. The time for that debate is over." "It's past time to eliminate the 'wounded veteran tax' that reduces the benefits that our veterans earn with their service and sacrifice," said Rep. Chris Pappas (NH-01), a resolution cosponsor and Ranking Member of the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity. "We're working hard to get this across the finish line and see it become law before the end of the year, and I'm thrilled to see our discharge petition reach 218 signatures. I thank our veterans for speaking out and for their leadership on this issue. We're making sure Congress steps up and does our part by forcing a vote in the House, and we'll keep fighting until this bill finally becomes law." Veteran service organizations have pushed for years for the bill's passage, calling the current offset an injustice that punishes veterans for the severity of their combat injuries. "This milestone is the result of veterans and their advocates refusing to let this issue fade away," said VFW National Commander-in-Chief Cory Geisler. "The VFW thanks Ranking Member Mark Takano for introducing this petition, every Member who signed this bipartisan effort, and Representative Nancy Mace for providing the 218th signature. The VFW will continue working with Congress until the Major Richard Star Act reaches the finish line." "This is what veterans' advocacy looks like, not a bill developed behind closed doors, with harmful and unacceptable trade-offs," said Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America CEO Dr. Kyleanne Hunter. "We are looking forward to the House bringing the Major Richard Star Act to the floor as a clean stand-alone bill that will provide long-overdue benefits to tens of thousands of veterans." "With 340 bipartisan cosponsors, it's clear the bill has enough support to pass," said DAV (Disabled American Veterans). "No more delays. It's time for action." Background: The Major Richard Star Act H.R. 2102 was introduced on March 14, 2025, by Rep. Raul Ruiz, M.D. (CA-25) and Rep. Gus Bilirakis (R-FL). The bill now has 340 cosponsors in the House and 80 in the Senate. The bill amends federal law to eliminate the dollar-for-dollar offset for Chapter 61 disability retirees with combat-related disabilities, allowing them to receive both their military retired pay and VA disability compensation in full, just as all other retired veterans do. Tens of thousands of combat-injured veterans who were medically retired before completing 20 years of service currently forfeit part of their retirement pay to receive VA disability compensation under this offset. The bill is named for Major Richard A. Star, a decorated Army combat veteran who served in Iraq and Afghanistan and was medically retired due to combat-related injuries. When Major Star was diagnosed with Stage 4 colon cancer, he devoted his remaining time to fighting for the tens of thousands of veterans impacted by this offset. Before he passed on February 13, 2021, he asked his wife Tonya to carry on that fight alongside Congress. This legislation honors his courage, his family's sacrifice, and his enduring commitment to his fellow veterans. The bill is endorsed by a broad coalition of veteran service organizations, including the Wounded Warrior Project, Disabled American Veterans, Military Officers Association of America, the VFW, The American Legion, Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, and The Military Coalition. ### Issues:Veterans

Congressman Dr. Raul Ruiz and Congressman Troy Carter Demand Answers From HHS, ICE, CBP, and ORR On Plans To Expand Child Detention Capacity and House Unaccompanied Children at Contaminated Former Air Force Base

Position: The release opposes housing unaccompanied children at a former Louisiana military base with documented PFAS and solvent contamination until HHS provides a complete, independent environmental health assessment and answers about detention capacity expansion plans. It calls for children in federal custody to have safe sleeping conditions, medical care, and dignified treatment.

Washington, D.C. — Congressman Dr. Raul Ruiz (CA-25) and Congressman Troy Carter (LA-02), joined by 75 additional Members of Congress, today led a formal letter to Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Commissioner Rodney Scott, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Acting Director David Venturella, and Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) Acting Director Angie Salazar, demanding immediate answers on reports that the Administration is preparing to dramatically expand federal detention capacity for unaccompanied children, including at a former Louisiana military installation with a documented history of environmental contamination. The letter cites a federal solicitation seeking a contractor capable of housing up to 3,000 unaccompanied children per facility, with capacity for at least 400 children within 30 days of contract award, and reports that the former England Air Force Base in Louisiana is under consideration as a detention site. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, portions of the former base have tested for the "forever chemical" (PFAS) contamination at levels among the worst of any military site in the country, with groundwater still being remediated for chlorinated solvents. No cleanup plan for the PFAS contamination has been completed. "When the federal government takes custody of a child, it takes on full responsibility for that child's safety," said Rep. Ruiz. "As an emergency physician, I know exactly what chronic exposure to these chemicals can do to a developing child. PFAS chemicals do not break down and they do not leave the body quickly, they bioaccumulate. In a growing child, that can mean weakened immune systems, developmental delays, a lifetime of elevated cancer risk, thyroid and liver problems, and a weaker response to routine childhood vaccines. Children breathe, drink, and eat more relative to their body weight than adults, and their organ systems are still developing, so these risks compound. Layer in the solvents still being cleaned up in the groundwater, and you have a facility where the water and soil themselves could be a health hazard, in addition to the psychological trauma of detention itself. Before a single child is sent to a site with this kind of contamination history, HHS owes Congress and the American people real answers. No physician would sign off on housing a healthy child there without a complete, independent environmental health assessment. Right now, we don't have those answers, and neither does the public." "Everyone, but especially children, deserves to be treated with dignity and respect as they pursue immigration to America. Legally, we recognize that unaccompanied minors are uniquely vulnerable and require special care when in federal custody. It's imperative that the administration guarantees these children have a safe place to sleep, access to medical care, and safe living conditions," said Congressman Troy A. Carter, Sr. (LA-02). "This is not a routine capacity planning, it is a rapid, large-scale expansion of child detention, and it demands real oversight," Ruiz continued. "Congress passed the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act because unaccompanied children are among the most vulnerable people in our custody. That law is clear: children must be cared for in child-appropriate settings and released to qualified sponsors without unnecessary delay. I am going to make sure HHS, ICE, and CBP are held to that standard." The letter comes amid a broader pattern of preventable deaths in federal immigration custody. According to a July 2026 report by Physicians for Human Rights, at least 52 people died in ICE custody in the first 500 days of the current administration, a mortality rate more than double that of the first Trump Administration and nearly four times the rate under the Biden Administration. Reps. Ruiz and Carter warned that expanding detention capacity for children, at facilities with unresolved environmental and safety questions, risks repeating and compounding that pattern. In the letter, Reps. Ruiz and Carter request written responses within 30 days to a series of questions, including: What factors led HHS to determine that capacity for up to 3,000 additional beds per facility is necessary, and what the agency's current shelter capacity and occupancy rates are; What alternatives HHS considered before selecting the former England Air Force Base, and what environmental and public health reviews were conducted; What short- and long-term health effects children could face from exposure to site contaminants, and whether personnel previously stationed there have experienced adverse health effects; What steps HHS is taking to prioritize licensed, child-appropriate placements and timely release to qualified sponsors, consistent with the TVPRA; and How HHS, ICE, and CBP are coordinating to minimize the time children spend in federal custody. Reps. Ruiz and Carter also request a staff briefing within 30 days on the Administration's plans for the care of unaccompanied children and the standards that will govern any expansion of detention capacity. A copy of the full letter is available here. Issues:Immigration

El Dr. Raul Ruiz Obtiene Compromisos Federales para el Río Nuevo Durante Recorrido y Mesa Redonda en Calexico con la EPA y la USIBWC

Position: The congressman states that federal action and investment are needed to address the public health and environmental crisis on the New River, and that he will continue pressing for immediate and long-term solutions.

CALEXICO, Calif. — El congresista Dr. Raul Ruiz (CA-25) recorrió hoy el Río Nuevo junto al Administrador Regional de la Región 9 de la Agencia de Protección Ambiental (EPA), Mike Martucci, y al Comisionado de la Sección de Estados Unidos de la Comisión Internacional de Límites y Aguas (USIBWC), Chad McIntosh, antes de unirse a socios federales, estatales y locales para una mesa redonda pública sobre la crisis ambiental y de salud pública que enfrenta el río. Durante el recorrido, los funcionarios observaron de primera mano las condiciones que impulsan la crisis de salud pública y ambiental del Río Nuevo: un fuerte olor, agua con una coloración verde visible, y tramos con basura acumulada que generan un riesgo ambiental a lo largo de las riberas. Estas observaciones coinciden con los resultados preliminares del estudio binacional de calidad del agua de la USIBWC, que muestran niveles elevados de bacterias, nutrientes, elementos traza y químicos orgánicos en el río. Después del recorrido, el congresista Ruiz continuó la conversación con la USIBWC, la EPA y socios locales, estatales y federales sobre la responsabilidad binacional de financiamiento para la infraestructura del Río Nuevo, un mayor control de los proyectos en curso, y el papel del río en la restauración del Mar de Salton. Los participantes señalaron la cooperación binacional en el Río Tijuana como un modelo del tipo de participación de alto nivel que se necesita en el Río Nuevo. Estas conversaciones continuaron durante la mesa redonda pública en la Cámara del Concejo Fernando "Nene" Torres de la Ciudad de Calexico, donde la USIBWC, la EPA y funcionarios locales brindaron actualizaciones sobre el estado de las mejoras del Río Nuevo a ambos lados de la frontera, la colaboración entre agencias y el estudio binacional de muestreo de agua. "El recorrido y la presentación de la mesa redonda de hoy, con comentarios del público sobre el Río Nuevo, son una acción demostrable y una parte necesaria del proceso para limpiar el Río Nuevo. Estoy muy agradecido con el Comisionado de la USIBWC, Chad McIntosh, y el Administrador Regional de la EPA, Mike Martucci, por organizar este encuentro. Es vital que se considere la participación y las aportaciones de la comunidad local. Voy a seguir presionando para lograr acción e inversión federal que proteja la salud de la gente del Valle Imperial, y quiero que mis constituyentes sepan que no voy a dejar pasar esto hasta que se implemente una solución inmediata y a largo plazo," dijo el congresista Dr. Raul Ruiz (CA-25). "Agradecemos la participación y el apoyo del representante estadounidense Raul Ruiz, M.D., y de otras partes interesadas mientras continuamos trabajando juntos para abordar los desafíos binacionales del Río Nuevo", declararon la USIBWC y la EPA en un comunicado conjunto emitido hoy. A lo largo del día, las partes interesadas identificaron tres acciones prioritarias para guiar el esfuerzo del Río Nuevo de aquí en adelante. Primero, desarrollar un plan de acción claro y un cronograma entre la EPA y la USIBWC, incluyendo avances en una Minuta y un Memorando de Entendimiento binacional modernizado entre EE. UU. y México, plazos firmes para los proyectos de infraestructura en Mexicali, y la publicación del estudio binacional de calidad del agua. Segundo, identificar financiamiento federal y estatal recurrente para operación, mantenimiento y monitoreo, incluyendo oportunidades de la Proposición 4, y evaluar si las facultades del Programa Federal de Infraestructura de Agua Fronteriza deben ampliarse para atender aguas pluviales, basura y otros usos actualmente restringidos. Tercero, establecer un rol formal para el Condado de Imperial, la Ciudad de Calexico, funcionarios de salud pública, organizaciones ambientales y residentes en el proceso binacional, con reportes públicos periódicos que den seguimiento a los resultados de calidad del agua, avances de infraestructura, notificaciones de derrames y resultados de salud pública. Los participantes también obtuvieron el compromiso de que el Administrador de la EPA, Lee Zeldin, visite el Río Nuevo, y acordaron reunirse nuevamente en Washington, D.C. para formalizar los siguientes pasos. Antecedentes: La crisis del Río Nuevo El Río Nuevo nace aproximadamente 20 millas al sur de Mexicali, México, y recorre 65 millas a través del Condado de Imperial hasta el Mar de Salton, arrastrando aguas residuales crudas, desechos industriales, pesticidas y escurrimientos agrícolas a través de la frontera. Es considerado uno de los ríos más contaminados de Norteamérica, y los residentes cercanos al río han reportado durante mucho tiempo tasas elevadas de asma, cáncer y otras afecciones de salud. La USIBWC y la EPA trabajan con México para monitorear la calidad del agua y abordar problemas de saneamiento bajo acuerdos binacionales como la Minuta 264, con la Oficina de Campo de Yuma de la USIBWC supervisando el monitoreo continuo. Las secciones estadounidense y mexicana de la USIBWC recolectan muestras de agua dos veces al mes, y un Comité Técnico Binacional, que incluye a la EPA, la USIBWC, la Ciudad de Calexico, el Condado de Imperial, la Junta Regional de Control de Calidad del Agua de California, agencias mexicanas y el Banco de Desarrollo de América del Norte, se reúne cada dos meses para revisar proyectos de infraestructura y datos de calidad del agua. Las prioridades actuales en Mexicali incluyen la rehabilitación y expansión de las plantas de tratamiento de aguas residuales Las Arenitas y Zaragoza; Estados Unidos y México han invertido aproximadamente $100 millones en el sistema de recolección de Mexicali desde 2007. Un protocolo de notificación formalizado en 2023 alerta a las agencias locales de ambos lados de la frontera sobre descargas de aguas residuales sin tratar. La USIBWC realizó un Estudio Binacional de Calidad del Agua de noviembre de 2024 a diciembre de 2025 con la CONAGUA de México; los resultados preliminares muestran niveles elevados de bacterias, nutrientes, elementos traza y químicos orgánicos, y se espera que un resumen del estudio completo se publique próximamente. A través del Programa Federal de Infraestructura de Agua Fronteriza de la EPA, que exige que México aporte un financiamiento igualitario, Estados Unidos ha invertido aproximadamente $44 millones en siete proyectos de infraestructura en Mexicali desde 2007, con una contraparte de aproximadamente $65 millones por parte de México. Actualmente está en desarrollo una expansión de $50 millones de la Planta de Tratamiento de Aguas Residuales Las Arenitas, con el objetivo de proteger al Río Nuevo de derrames de aguas residuales sin tratar mediante el aumento de la capacidad de tratamiento de la planta. Antecedentes: La lucha continua del congresista Ruiz por el Río Nuevo La visita de hoy se suma a años de defensa constante por parte del congresista Ruiz para atraer recursos y urgencia federal al Río Nuevo: El congresista Ruiz ha presentado y copatrocinado en repetidas ocasiones legislación federal, incluida la Ley de Restauración y Protección de la Calidad del Agua Fronteriza (Border Water Quality Restoration and Protection Act), una iniciativa bipartidista y bicameral del Congreso para combatir la contaminación transfronteriza continua de aguas residuales, basura y químicos en las cuencas del Río Tijuana y el Río Nuevo a lo largo de la frontera entre EE. UU. y México. En abril de 2026, el congresista Ruiz cuestionó al Administrador de la EPA, Lee Zeldin, durante una audiencia del Subcomité de Medio Ambiente de Energía y Comercio de la Cámara sobre el presupuesto de la EPA para el año fiscal 2027, obteniendo el compromiso del Administrador de visitar el Río Nuevo, participar en el estudio binacional de calidad del agua y aplicar el mismo modelo de respuesta federal utilizado para la crisis del Río Tijuana al Río Nuevo. El congresista Ruiz ha impulsado un acuerdo binacional "Minuta" modernizado para reemplazar la Minuta 264, que no se ha actualizado desde 1980 a pesar del deterioro continuo del río, y ha criticado los recortes federales propuestos al Fondo Estatal Renovable para Agua Limpia que socavarían los esfuerzos de limpieza. El 11 de mayo de 2026, el congresista Ruiz convocó una mesa redonda federal en el Edificio Hector Mario Esquer en Calexico con líderes de la Región 9 de la EPA, agencias federales y estatales, y residentes del Condado de Imperial, quienes compartieron testimonios de primera mano sobre dificultades respiratorias, irritación ocular y cáncer relacionados con el río. El 10 de agosto de 2026, la oficina participó en una Mesa Redonda del Río Nuevo organizada por las oficinas del senador estadounidense Alex Padilla y el senador estatal de California Steve Padilla en el Ayuntamiento de Calexico, junto con la Ciudad de Calexico, el Comité Cívico del Valle, el Distrito de Riego Imperial y el Condado de Imperial, para discutir los impactos ambientales y de salud pública del río, los desafíos transfronterizos de calidad del agua, y oportunidades de continuar la colaboración binacional y federal. Los votantes de California aprobaron $50 millones para la limpieza de ríos fronterizos a través de la Proposición 4 en noviembre de 2024; la Junta Estatal de Aguas finalizó las reglas para distribuir esos fondos el 22 de abril de 2026. El congresista Ruiz continúa apoyando el Proyecto de Restauración/Rehabilitación de la Planta de Tratamiento de Aguas Residuales de Calexico del año fiscal 2027 y otras prioridades de infraestructura local como parte de un esfuerzo más amplio por la inversión binacional en el Río Nuevo. ### Issues:Energía y medio ambiente

Congressman Dr. Raul Ruiz Secures Federal Commitments on New River During Calexico Tour, Roundtable with EPA, USIBWC

Position: Congressman Ruiz calls for federal action and investment to clean the New River and protect public health in the Imperial Valley, and urges firm timelines, binational funding responsibility, and recurring operations and monitoring funding for New River infrastructure.

CALEXICO, Calif. — Congressman Dr. Raul Ruiz (CA-25) today toured the New River alongside U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 9 Regional Administrator Mike Martucci and U.S. Section of the International Boundary and Water Commission (USIBWC) Commissioner Chad McIntosh, before joining federal, state, and local partners for a public roundtable on the river's ongoing environmental and public health crisis. During the tour, officials observed firsthand the conditions driving the New River's public health and environmental crisis: a strong odor, water discolored a visible green and stretches of accumulated trash creating an environmental hazard along the riverbanks. The observations align with preliminary results from USIBWC's binational water quality study, which show elevated bacteria, nutrients, trace elements, and organic chemicals in the river. Following the tour, Congressman Ruiz continued the conversation with USIBWC, EPA, and local, state, and federal partners on binational funding responsibility for New River infrastructure, stronger oversight of ongoing projects, and the river's role in restoring the Salton Sea. Participants pointed to binational cooperation on the Tijuana River as a model for the kind of high-level engagement needed on the New River. These discussions carried into the public roundtable at the City of Calexico's Fernando "Nene" Torres Council Chambers, where USIBWC, EPA, and local officials provided updates on the status of New River improvements on both sides of the border, agency collaboration, and the binational water sampling study. "Today's tour and roundtable presentation with public comment about the New River is a demonstrable action and necessary part of the process to clean the New River. I am very thankful to USIBWC Commissioner Chad McIntosh and EPA Regional Administrator Mike Martucci for hosting this gathering. It is vital that local participation and input be considered. I'm going to keep pushing for federal action and investments to protect the health of people in the Imperial Valley, and I want my constituents to know I'm not letting this go until an immediate and long-term solution is implemented," said Congressman Dr. Raul Ruiz (CA-25). "We appreciate the involvement and support of U.S. Representative Raul Ruiz, M.D., and other stakeholders as we continue to work together to address the New River's binational challenges," USIBWC and EPA said in a joint statement released today. During the meeting, stakeholders identified three priority action items to guide the New River effort going forward. First, developing a clear EPA-USIBWC action plan and timeline, including progress on a modernized U.S.-Mexico Minute and Memorandum of Understanding, firm deadlines for Mexicali infrastructure projects, and public release of the binational water quality study. Second, identifying recurring federal and state funding for operations, maintenance, and monitoring, including Proposition 4 opportunities, and evaluating whether the federal Border Water Infrastructure Program should be expanded to address stormwater, trash, and other currently restricted needs. Third, establishing a formal role for Imperial County, the City of Calexico, public health officials, environmental organizations, and residents in the binational process, with regular public reporting on water quality results, infrastructure milestones, spill notifications, and public health outcomes. Participants also secured a commitment for EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin to visit the New River and agreed to reconvene in Washington, D.C. to formalize next steps. Background: The New River Crisis The New River originates roughly 20 miles south of Mexicali, Mexico and flows 65 miles through Imperial County into the Salton Sea, carrying raw sewage, industrial waste, pesticides, and agricultural runoff across the border. It is widely regarded as one of the most polluted rivers in North America, and residents near the river have long reported elevated rates of asthma, cancer, and other health conditions. USIBWC and EPA work with Mexico to monitor water quality and address sanitation issues under binational agreements including Minute 264, with the USIBWC Yuma Field Office overseeing ongoing monitoring. The U.S. and Mexican Sections of IBWC collect water samples twice monthly, and a Binational Technical Committee, including EPA, USIBWC, the City of Calexico, Imperial County, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Mexican agencies, and the North American Development Bank, meets every other month to review infrastructure projects and water quality data. Current priorities in Mexicali include rehabilitating and expanding the Las Arenitas and Zaragoza wastewater treatment plants; roughly $100 million has been invested by the U.S. and Mexico in Mexicali's collection system since 2007. A notification protocol formalized in 2023 alerts local agencies on both sides of the border to untreated wastewater spills. USIBWC conducted a Binational Water Quality Study from November 2024 to December 2025 with Mexico's CONAGUA; preliminary results show elevated bacteria, nutrients, trace elements, and organic chemicals, and a summary of the full study is expected to be released soon. Through EPA's Border Water Infrastructure Program, which requires a full funding match from Mexico, the U.S. has invested roughly $44 million across seven Mexicali infrastructure projects since 2007, matched by approximately $65 million from Mexico. A $50 million expansion of the Las Arenitas Wastewater Treatment Plant is currently in development, intended to protect the New River from raw sewage spills by increasing the plant's treatment capacity. Background: Congressman Ruiz's Continued Fight for the New River Today's visit builds on years of sustained advocacy by Congressman Ruiz to bring federal resources and urgency to the New River: Congressman Ruiz has repeatedly introduced and co-sponsored federal legislation, including the Border Water Quality Restoration and Protection Act, a bipartisan and bicameral congressional initiative to combat severe, ongoing transboundary sewage, trash, and chemical pollution within the Tijuana River and New River watersheds along the U.S.–Mexico border. In April 2026, Congressman Ruiz pressed EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin at a House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Environment hearing on the FY2027 EPA budget, securing a commitment from the Administrator to visit the New River, engage with the binational water quality study, and apply the same federal response model used for the Tijuana River crisis to the New River. Congressman Ruiz has pushed for a modernized binational "Minute" agreement to replace Minute 264, which has not been updated since 1980 despite the river's continued decline, and has criticized proposed federal cuts to the Clean Water State Revolving Fund that would undercut cleanup efforts. On May 11, 2026, Congressman Ruiz convened a federal roundtable at the Hector Mario Esquer Building in Calexico with EPA Region 9 leadership, federal and state agencies, and Imperial County residents, who shared firsthand accounts of breathing difficulties, eye irritation, and cancer linked to the river. On August 10, 2026, the office joined a New River Roundtable hosted by the offices of U.S. Senator Alex Padilla and California State Senator Steve Padilla at Calexico City Hall, alongside the City of Calexico, Comité Cívico del Valle, Imperial Irrigation District, and Imperial County, to discuss the river's environmental and public health impacts, cross-border water quality challenges, and opportunities for continued binational and federal collaboration. California voters approved $50 million for border river cleanup through Proposition 4 in November 2024; the State Water Board finalized the rules for distributing that funding on April 22, 2026. Congressman Ruiz continues to support the FY27 Calexico Wastewater Treatment Plant Restoration/Rehabilitation Project and other local infrastructure priorities as part of a broader push for binational investment in the New River. #### Issues:Energy and Environment

Rep. Dr. Raul Ruiz, Lawmakers, and Veterans Groups Oppose H.R. 9237, the "Take Care of America's Veterans Act," Demand for Clean Major Richard Star Act

Position: The release opposes H.R. 9237, the Take Care of America's Veterans Act, which would cut VA benefits and disability compensation, and supports the Major Richard Star Act as an alternative that would protect veterans' benefits without cuts or caps.

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Today, Congressman Dr. Raul Ruiz (CA-25) joined House Veterans' Affairs Committee Ranking Member Mark Takano (CA-39), Reps. Chris Deluzio (PA-17), Pat Ryan (NY-18), Mike Thompson (CA-04), and Gil Cisneros (CA-31), alongside the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), the National Federation of Federal Employees (NFFE), Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA), and the Union Veterans Council (AFL-CIO), to oppose H.R. 9237, the Take Care of America's Veterans Act, ahead of its scheduled vote on the House floor tomorrow. H.R. 9237 would strip the Veterans Health Administration of its care-coordination role, increase fees on VA home loan benefits during a housing affordability crisis, and pay for new benefits by cutting VA disability for hearing loss and severed difficulty sleeping, two of the most common service-connected conditions among combat veterans. According to the House Veterans' Affairs Committee, the package would cut at least $60 billion from veterans' benefits over the next ten years. "When Americans answer the call to serve, we make them a promise that their sacrifice will be honored in full,"said Congressman Dr. Raul Ruiz (CA-25)."The Take Care of America's Veterans Act breaks that promise. It claims to fix the wounded veteran's tax, but it caps their benefits and takes PACT Act benefits away from 1.5 million veterans to pay for it. The solution is the Major Richard Star Act. No shortchanging. No caps. No cuts." "Veterans' benefits are not offsets. When servicemembers take their oath to protect and defend our country, we thank them with a promise to take care of them when they take off their uniform. It is reprehensible that Republicans are considering breaking that promise to one generation of veterans to pay for benefits for another,"said Ranking Member Mark Takano. "That is why I oppose the Taking Benefits from America's Veterans Act and urge my Republican colleagues to support my discharge petition for the Major Richard Star Act instead." "The Take Care of American's Veterans Act breaks America's sacred promise to our veterans: serve your country, then your country delivers the care and benefits you've earned and need," said Congressman Chris Deluzio (PA-17). "If this bill passes, servicemembers would return from Trump's reckless Iran War to a weaker VA with poorer healthcare and fewer benefits. Our message here is clear: don't cut veterans benefits, not now, not ever. Republicans should join me in supporting the discharge petition to pass the Major Richard Star Act" The Major Richard Star Act, introduced with Rep. Dr. Raul Ruiz (CA-25) as lead Democratic sponsor alongside Rep. Gus Bilirakis (FL-12) as lead Republican sponsor, has 330 cosponsors, but a discharge petition, co-filed by Rep. Dr. Raul Ruiz (CA-25) and House Veterans' Affairs Committee Ranking Member Mark Takano (CA-39), is needed to force a vote on the House floor. The petition currently needs five more Republican House Members to sign to reach the 218 signatures required. Congressman Dr. Ruiz will continue urging his colleagues to sign the petition and bring the Major Richard Star Act to a clean, standalone vote. Click here to watch the Press Conference ### Issues:Veterans

Rep. Ruiz Highlights Concerns with Cadiz Water Project, Calls on Bureau of Land Management for a Full Review

Position: Rep. Ruiz opposes the Cadiz Inc. groundwater extraction and export proposal in the Mojave Desert and urges the Bureau of Land Management to conduct a full environmental and historic resource review under NEPA, NHPA, and ESA before deciding on the right-of-way application.

Washington, D.C. — Congressman Raul Ruiz, M.D. (CA-25) today highlighted his deep concerns with a proposal by Cadiz, Inc. — a company backed by foreign investors — to extract and sell groundwater from the heart of the Mojave Desert. Congressman Ruiz sent a formal letter to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum urging the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to conduct a full and rigorous environmental and historic resource review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and the Endangered Species Act (ESA) before rendering any decision on the right-of-way application for the Cadiz water conveyance pipeline. “The California desert is a national treasure,” said Congressman Ruiz. “I am deeply concerned by Cadiz Inc.’s longstanding effort to extract groundwater from this region for commercial export. This would have far-reaching consequences for local economies that depend on public lands and beloved places like Joshua Tree National Park, the Mojave National Preserve, and Mojave Trails National Monument. The Cadiz proposal is also dangerously inconsistent with efforts to develop reliable and sustainable water supplies for communities.” Cadiz Inc. is a company backed by foreign investors that has tried for more than 40 years to extract and sell water from the heart of the Mojave Desert. The proposal calls for the extraction of 16 billion gallons of water per year for 50 years, pumped from an ancient aquifer that sustains life in one of the driest, hottest places in the world. The project area encompasses the ancestral and traditional homelands of the Chemehuevi and Mojave peoples. The Fort Mojave Indian Tribe and the Chemehuevi Indian Tribe have fought the proposed project for decades, citing its potential to cause irreparable harm to culturally significant sites, sacred landscapes, and water resources central to their cultural identity and sovereignty. Efforts to defend desert water from commercial exploitation include state law championed by Governor Gavin Newsom, oversight by federal and state legislators, and advocacy by organizations and civil rights leader Dolores Huerta. In the letter to the Department of the Interior, Congressman Ruiz also highlights his concern with how the Cadiz Project (also known as the Mojave Groundwater Bank) would impact communities that he represents. “Groundwater depletion at the scale proposed by Cadiz could lower regional water tables, threaten desert springs and seeps that sustain both ecosystems and communities, and reduce the availability of water resources that agricultural producers, rural households, and Tribal nations depend upon,” continued Congressman Ruiz. “In a region already strained by the effects of prolonged drought, the Colorado River crisis, and heat, this is not acceptable. The area I represent cannot afford to absorb the long-term costs of a commercially driven groundwater export scheme designed to benefit distant markets at the expense of local communities and irreplaceable natural resources.” The Congressman’s letter has drawn broad support from tribal nations, civil rights leaders, and community organizations across the California Desert. “This is the Mojave Desert, and we are the Mojave people, the caretakers of this land, water and wildlife since time immemorial. Our Tribe has a solemn, sacred relationship with these resources that Cadiz, Inc., a foreign investor-backed company, is targeting for exploitation and profit. Their plan to pump and sell 25 times more groundwater each year than the aquifer can replenish would desecrate our traditional territories and any community sold this water would be left with an unreliable, unsustainable supply. Science and commonsense makes clear that pumping more groundwater than is sustainably replenished is not only negligent, but dangerous to the American Desert Southwest. This is why stopping Cadiz is crucial for all those who need real, reliable water solutions. Thank you, Congressman Ruiz, for speaking out on a project that threatens our way of life and traditions and puts people and communities at risk.”- Timothy Williams, Chairman, Fort Mojave Indian Tribe “Our people have been here since time immemorial, and we will not allow the Cadiz Corporation to destroy the living landscapes that preserve and teach our traditional ways. Our people, neighboring communities, desert plants, and wildlife depend on the water that Cadiz wants to take and sell. The desert has provided these resources since its inception for our traditional homelands, and we all have responsibility for its care and safekeeping. Within our hearts, we carry the hopes and dreams of our ancestors in all we do, we move forth with purpose, like Uttsu – Roadrunner. We honor and thank Congressman Raul Ruiz for standing with us in this fight for indigenous rights and cultural survival." - Daniel Leivas, Chairman, Chemehuevi Indian Tribe “I thank Congressman Ruiz for working to protect our communities, Tribal lands, and scarce water resources from Cadiz. I have been involved in this multi-generational effort to prevent the long-term environmental injustice and disaster that Cadiz proposes and to stop Cadiz's deceitful, shameless efforts to exploit California’s precious resources. For decades, federal and state scientists have stated that water in this region is scarce, but Cadiz continues to promise it can supply water to communities. I have long advocated for real water solutions that prioritize people, especially disadvantaged communities, and the environment. That is why I strongly oppose Cadiz.” - Dolores Huerta, President of the Dolores Huerta Foundation Congressman Ruiz has called on the Department of the Interior to fulfill its legal obligations and complete a comprehensive environmental and historic resource review of the groundwater extraction and conveyance project before rendering any decision on the right-of-way application for the Cadiz Project. He has also called for robust government-to-government consultation with all affected Tribal nations, ensuring that Tribal voices are meaningfully integrated into the environmental review process. Issues:Energy and Environment

Rep. Raul Ruiz Introduces Legislation to Strengthen U.S. Battery Manufacturing, Secure Critical Mineral Supply Chains

Position: Rep. Ruiz and Rep. Evans support legislation to expand domestic battery manufacturing, increase tax credits for U.S. battery producers, and reduce reliance on foreign sources for critical minerals used in clean energy and national security applications.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, Congressman Raul Ruiz (D-CA) and Congressman Gabe Evans (R-CO) introduced the Critical Minerals and Manufacturing Support Act 2.0, bipartisan legislation to expand domestic battery manufacturing, reduce reliance on foreign adversaries, and strengthen America’s clean energy and advanced manufacturing supply chains. The bill updates and strengthens the Advanced Manufacturing Production Credit to better support U.S.-based production across the full battery manufacturing supply chain—particularly electrode active materials critical to electric vehicles, grid storage, and national security technologies. The legislation directly supports regions like California’s Lithium Valley, where domestic lithium extraction, processing, and battery-material manufacturing are advancing. By recognizing and incentivizing every step of the battery manufacturing supply chain—from critical mineral production to advanced materials manufacturing—the bill will position Lithium Valley as a fully integrated, end-to-end battery hub, driving job creation, lowering manufacturing costs, and strengthening domestic supply chains. “America cannot lead the clean energy economy if we continue to outsource the materials that power it,” said Rep. Ruiz. “This bipartisan legislation makes a strategic investment in American manufacturing and American workers, especially in regions like Lithium Valley, where we have the opportunity to build a fully integrated regional battery supply chain. By strengthening domestic production, we can lower costs, create good-paying jobs, and ensure we are not dependent on prohibited foreign entities for the critical minerals that power our future.” “America should never be dependent on foreign adversaries for the materials that power our vehicles, our grid, or our national security. I’m proud to co-lead the Critical Minerals and Manufacturing Support Act 2.0, bipartisan legislation that expands domestic battery manufacturing, strengthens supply chains, and ensures federal incentives support U.S.-made components. This bill creates certainty for manufacturers, supports American workers, and puts our nation's economic and energy security first.” — Congressman Gabe Evans (CO-08) Key Provisions of the Enhanced Critical Minerals and Manufacturing Support Act Include: Boosts tax credits for U.S. battery makers by increasing support from 10% to 25%, making domestic production more affordable and competitive across the battery supply chain. Protects U.S. national security by ensuring batteries cannot receive federal support if they rely on critical minerals sourced from prohibited foreign countries after 2026. Updates outdated rules so federal incentives apply to modern and next-generation battery materials used in today’s electric vehicles and energy storage. Includes silicon as a supported battery material, helping American manufacturers develop more advanced and longer-lasting batteries. Gives manufacturers long-term certainty by extending tax credits through 2041, encouraging companies to invest, expand, and create good-paying jobs in the United States. The legislation applies to battery components produced and sold after December 31, 2025. This legislation is supported by EnergySource Minerals, the Battery Advocacy for Technology Transformation (BATT) Coalition, and Forge Nano, reflecting broad industry backing for domestic battery manufacturing and workforce development. “CMMSA 2.0 strengthens U.S. energy security by supporting domestic production of critical battery materials essential to American manufacturing and infrastructure. By reinforcing incentives for U.S.-based supply chains and trusted sourcing, the bill helps reduce reliance on foreign producers. EnergySource Minerals supports this legislation because long-term energy leadership depends on producing essential materials responsibly here at home.” — Carmen Rene, Chief Financial Officer, EnergySource Minerals “It is essential to our national security to enable a domestic supply chain for battery materials, something Forge Nano has made a priority for many years. Forge Nano is excited to work with Rep. Evans on helping incentivize this critical industry and protect it from adversarial nations.” — James Trevey, Chief Technology Officer, Forge Nano

Congressman Raul Ruiz Introduces the Humanitarian Standards for Individuals in ICE and CBP Custody Act

Position: Rep. Ruiz advocates for legislation establishing mandatory health screenings, medical care standards, and humane conditions for individuals detained by ICE and CBP, citing preventable deaths and inhumane conditions in immigration facilities.

Washington, D.C. — Today, Congressman Raul Ruiz, M.D. (CA-25) introduced the Humanitarian Standards for Individuals in ICE and CBP Custody Act, legislation to require U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). The legislation ensures health screenings and identifies and treats emergencies for individuals held in federal custody. Last year marked the deadliest period in more than 20 years, with over 56 people dying in ICE and CBP custody combined. These deaths underscore the urgent need for clear, enforceable standards to protect human life when individuals are in the custody of ICE and CBP. These preventable tragedies have occurred amid record levels of detention and mounting concerns about delayed medical care, overcrowding, and inhumane conditions within immigration facilities. The bill establishes medically sound, enforceable requirements to protect the health, safety, and dignity of individuals detained by ICE and CBP, including children, pregnant women, older adults, and people with disabilities or acute medical needs. “There is an alarming rise in deaths of people in ICE and CBP custody and reports of inhumane conditions inside detention centers. The violence and brutality against non-violent criminal immigrants is wrong. I introduced the Humanitarian Standards for Individuals in ICE and CBP Custody Act to prevent deaths and protect human dignity,” said Rep. Raul Ruiz. The Humanitarian Standards for Individuals in ICE and CBP Custody Act requires: Mandatory initial health screenings Conducted by licensed medical professionals within 12 hours of arrival Within 6 hours for high-risk individuals (children, pregnant people, elderly, acute medical conditions) Screening for violent and sexual trauma to ensure safety inside facilities Continuity of prescribed medications Guaranteed access to basic necessities Drinking water Age-appropriate food to meet daily needs Toilets, hand-washing stations, showers Diapers and essential hygiene products Humane conditions for living Sleep accommodations and blankets Family unity protections Disability accommodations Access to outdoor time Safeguards for vulnerable populations Access to trauma-informed care and support services For individuals who have experienced violence, rape, sexual abuse, or severe trauma Interpreter services to ensure informed medical care Mandatory training for ICE and CBP personnel Humanitarian standards Identifying and responding to life-threatening medical emergencies Trauma-informed care Child welfare protections Oversight and accountability measures Unannounced inspections by DHS Inspector General GAO report to Congress Public reporting of aggregate data on complaints of sexual abuse Clear implementation timelines DHS must submit an implementation plan within 60 days Full implementation within six months of enactment The legislation has been supported by 69 Members of Congress: Reps. Wilson, Moulton, Elfreth, Matsui, Norton, Barragan, Simon, Sylvia Garcia, Watson Coleman, Garamendi, Ansari, Morrison, Craig, Thanedar, Tonko, CHC Chair Espaillat, DWS, Schrier, Tokuda, Krishnamoorthi, Hank Johnson, Grijalva, Deborah Ross, Correa, Jacobs, Bell, Neguse, Salinas, Min, Liccardo, Kamlager-Dove, Ro Khanna, Quigley, Soto, Bobby Scott, Mullin, Davis, Goodlander, Goldman, Robin Kelly, Kaptur, Hoyle, Garcia, Cleaver, Morelle, Walkinshaw, Mfume, McClain Delaney, Bonamici, Pettersen, Brown, Castor, Vargas, Levin, Gomez, Nydia Velázquez, McBride, Steve Cohen, Stephen Lynch, Nadler, Lieu, Tim Kennedy, Rick Larsen, Brownley, Titus, Veasey, DeGette, Cherfilus-McCormick, Ritchie Torres, Sewell, Pocan, Lofgren, Subramanyam, and Frankel. The bill has been endorsed by: LULAC; United Farm Workers (UFW); College of the Desert; Michael VanRooyen, MD, MPH, Director: Harvard Humanitarian Initiative and MGB Chair of Emergency Medicine; the American Psychological Association Services, Inc.; and, Alianza Nacional De Campesinas, Inc. “It is crucial for the wellbeing of the people in detention to receive attentive and continuous medical treatment and be provided with living conditions that are not detrimental to their health,” said Mily Trevino-Sauceda, Executive Director of Alianza Nacional de Campesinas. “There is no justifiable reasoning for such punitive and inhumane treatment of detained persons, regardless of a person’s status. Congress can not accept further suffering of both adults and children and needs to support changes to current ICE and CBP practices, which currently deprives thousands of basic human dignity.” – Mily Trevino-Sauceda, Executive Director “It is an important safeguard for the health of detainees and promotes basic standards for the health and well being of those in ICE and CBP custody. As an emergency physician and humanitarian leader, I endorse this approach to providing basic screening and protection to detainees. If I can be of further assistance in supporting the safe and humane treatment of those who are in ICE and CBP custody, I would be happy to speak to anyone.” - Michael VanRooyen, MD, MPH, Director: Harvard Humanitarian Initiative and MGB Chair of Emergency Medicine

Court Sides With Ruiz and Colleagues, Reinstates Real-Time Oversight of Immigration Detention

Washington, D.C. –The decision was made in the case brought forth by 12 Members of Congress in Neguse et al. v. U.S. ICE et al. Just now, a federal court temporarily stopped the Trump-Vance administration’s policy blocking Members of Congress from unannounced oversight visits to federal immigration detention facilities. The decision restores Congress’s ability to conduct real-time oversight of how the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detain individuals — including U.S. citizens — and spend billions in taxpayer dollars, while the case continues. The lawsuit, Neguse et al. v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al., was brought by a dozen members of the U.S. House of Representatives after the administration imposed a seven-day waiting period and barred access to certain field offices, in violation of a longstanding federal law that guarantees congressional oversight. The plaintiffs include Assistant Democratic Leader Joe Neguse; Congressional Hispanic Caucus Chair Rep. Adriano Espaillat; Homeland Security Committee Ranking Member Rep. Bennie G. Thompson; Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Rep. Jamie Raskin; House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Ranking Member Rep. Robert Garcia; House Homeland Security Committee Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement Ranking Member Rep. J. Luis Correa; Rep. Jason Crow; Rep. Veronica Escobar; Rep. Dan Goldman; Rep. Jimmy Gomez; Rep. Raul Ruiz; and Rep. Norma Torres. In a joint statement, the plaintiffs said: “Today’s decision is a critical victory toward restoring our ability to conduct essential congressional oversight on behalf of the American people. It reinforces the rule of law and reminds the administration that oversight is not optional. Real-time, on-the-ground visits to immigration detention facilities help prevent abuses and ensure transparency. Oversight is a core responsibility of Members of Congress—and a constitutional duty we do not take lightly. We’ll continue standing up for the rule of law.” The Members of Congress are represented in this suit by Democracy Forward Foundation and American Oversight. “This ruling is a victory for the American people and their elected representatives,” said Skye Perryman, President and CEO of Democracy Forward. “This decision makes clear that no president can hide the truth about how people are treated in federal immigration custody. We’re honored to represent these individual Members of Congress in defending accountability, transparency, the rule of law, and human dignity.” “Today’s ruling is a clear victory for the rule of law and a clear affirmation that no administration is above it,” said Chioma Chukwu, Executive Director of American Oversight. “Members of Congress have an unquestioned right to conduct real-time oversight of immigration detention facilities, and the American people have a right to know what is happening in their name. By blocking those visits, the administration wasn’t simply breaking the law, it was trying to conceal the reality inside these facilities from the public: people in overcrowded, inhumane conditions without adequate beds, showers, or medical care. This order restores a critical check on executive power and sends a clear message that abuse cannot be hidden.” With this decision, the court reaffirms Members of Congress’s right to access federal immigration detention facilities without prior notice — a safeguard meant to prevent abuse, protect human rights, and ensure that taxpayer funds are not used to support unlawful or inhumane practices. The ruling sends a strong message that oversight is essential to democracy and that no administration is above the law. How did we get here? Federal law (Sec. 527, FY2024 DHS Appropriations Act) allows Members of Congress to visit U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) sites where noncitizens are detained without prior notice. But increasingly, these representatives have been stopped at the door. In response to questions about this, ICE officials announced a new policy requiring a seven-day waiting period and preventing entry to ICE field offices. On July 30, a dozen individual Members of the U.S. House of Representatives sued the Trump-Vance administration, challenging the policy as an unlawful obstruction of congressional oversight. Subsequently, the plaintiffs sought a court order requiring DHS and its Secretary Kristi Noem, as well as ICE and its Acting Director Todd Lyons to comply with the federal law granting Members of Congress the right to visit immigration detention facilities without prior notice during the course of their lawsuit.