DeepSyte™
Bill FeedAll repsScoreboardsPrimariesProAboutSign inGet started
DeepSyte™™

A nonpartisan civic accountability tool. We match federal legislation to your stated values — without partisan bias.

Learn

  • About
  • About the name
  • Methodology
  • Glossary

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Refund Policy
  • Contact

Sources

Bill data from Congress.gov. Summaries from the Congressional Research Service where available.

Follow

  • Bluesky — @deepsyte.app
  • X — @deepsyteapp
All content is for informational purposes only. Always verify against primary sources.
Back to bill feed
Delia C. Ramirez official portrait

Delia C. Ramirez

D

house · IL-3

CompareSign in to get alerts
Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See how Delia C. Ramirez actually votes — against your values.

DeepSyte scores Delia C. Ramirez's record on the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your personal alignment.

Get started freeTake the values quiz
Official websiteSee this seat's 2026 race

Alignment with your views

Sign in and take the values quiz to see how Delia C. Ramirez's votes line up with your views.

Prediction track record

How often we called Delia C. Ramirez's passage votes correctly, from their stated positions on each bill's tagged topics. Excludes “unclear” calls and abstentions.

100%
Accuracy
2
Correct
0
Incorrect
53
Pending
  1. Right119-hr-7567

    Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026

    Predicted NO
    Actual NO
    Bill
  2. Right119-hr-5587

    HEATS Act

    Predicted NO
    Actual NO
    Bill
  3. Pending vote119-hr-7767

    Make Billionaires Pay Their Fair Share Act

    Predicted YES
    Bill
  4. Pending vote119-hr-7802

    DISCLOSE Act of 2026

    Predicted YES
    Bill
  5. Pending vote119-hjres-152

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to ensure that only citizens are eligible to vote in Federal elections.

    Predicted NO
    Bill
  6. Pending vote119-hr-5340

    To prohibit the disclosure of records by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development of individuals for the purposes of immigration enforcement, and for other purposes.

    Predicted YES
    Bill

Consistency insights

Delia C. Ramirez · statement ↔ vote record

75
Consistency score

Based on 19 data points across public statements and recorded votes · AI analysis of public records

  • 118-hr-5525·Consistent

    Continuing Appropriations and Border Security Enhancement Act, 2024

    92/100

    What they said

    Apr 22, 2026

    Congresswoman Ramirez opposes the Department of Homeland Security's expanded immigration enforcement operations and calls for accountability from White House officials Stephen Miller and Tom Homan, whom she characterizes as architects of what she describes as unlawful enforcement actions that have harmed American citizens and immigrants.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Sep 29, 2023

    Voted Nay on Continuing Appropriations and Border Security Enhancement Act, 2024

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Congresswoman Ramirez explicitly opposes expanded DHS immigration enforcement operations and criticizes funding for ICE and CBP, characterizing them as unlawful and harmful. Her no vote on the Continuing Appropriations and Border Security Enhancement Act, which provides continuing appropriations to federal agencies including DHS and makes changes to immigration law, is directly consistent with her stated opposition to these enforcement operations and the funding that supports them.

    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-2·Consistent

    Secure the Border Act of 2023

    92/100

    What they said

    Apr 22, 2026

    Congresswoman Ramirez opposes the Department of Homeland Security's expanded immigration enforcement operations and calls for accountability from White House officials Stephen Miller and Tom Homan, whom she characterizes as architects of what she describes as unlawful enforcement actions that have harmed American citizens and immigrants.

    Read statement

    What they did

    May 11, 2023

    Voted Nay on Secure the Border Act of 2023

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Congresswoman Ramirez's statement opposes expanded immigration enforcement operations and criticizes DHS's enforcement actions as unlawful and harmful. The Secure the Border Act of 2023 expands border security infrastructure, wall construction, and enforcement capabilities. Her no vote on passage is directly consistent with her stated opposition to expanded enforcement operations. The statement explicitly frames such operations as problematic, and voting against a bill that mandates expanded border security aligns with that position.

    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-5717·Consistent

    No Bailout for Sanctuary Cities Act

    92/100

    What they said

    Apr 22, 2026

    Congresswoman Ramirez opposes the Department of Homeland Security's expanded immigration enforcement operations and calls for accountability from White House officials Stephen Miller and Tom Homan, whom she characterizes as architects of what she describes as unlawful enforcement actions that have harmed American citizens and immigrants.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Sep 20, 2024

    Voted Nay on No Bailout for Sanctuary Cities Act

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Congresswoman Ramirez opposes expanded DHS immigration enforcement operations and criticizes the architects of what she characterizes as unlawful enforcement actions. The bill penalizes jurisdictions that restrict cooperation with immigration enforcement and detainers. Ramirez's vote against passage is consistent with her stated opposition to aggressive immigration enforcement policies and her call for accountability regarding enforcement operations she views as harmful and unlawful.

    Sign in to report
  • 119-hr-3486·Consistent

    Stop Illegal Entry Act of 2025

    92/100

    What they said

    Apr 22, 2026

    Congresswoman Ramirez opposes the Department of Homeland Security's expanded immigration enforcement operations and calls for accountability from White House officials Stephen Miller and Tom Homan, whom she characterizes as architects of what she describes as unlawful enforcement actions that have harmed American citizens and immigrants.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Sep 11, 2025

    Voted Nay on Stop Illegal Entry Act of 2025

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Congresswoman Ramirez explicitly opposes expanded immigration enforcement operations and characterizes them as unlawful and harmful. The Stop Illegal Entry Act establishes mandatory minimum sentences and increases criminal penalties for illegal entry and reentry. Her no vote on this amendment aligns with her stated opposition to aggressive enforcement measures. The amendment vote (rather than passage vote) introduces minor uncertainty, but the directional consistency is clear.

    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-3941·Consistent

    Schools Not Shelters Act

    92/100

    What they said

    Apr 22, 2026

    Congresswoman Ramirez opposes the Department of Homeland Security's expanded immigration enforcement operations and calls for accountability from White House officials Stephen Miller and Tom Homan, whom she characterizes as architects of what she describes as unlawful enforcement actions that have harmed American citizens and immigrants.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Jul 20, 2023

    Voted Nay on Schools Not Shelters Act

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Congresswoman Ramirez's statement opposes expanded immigration enforcement operations and criticizes DHS actions she characterizes as unlawful and harmful. The Schools Not Shelters Act restricts use of federally-funded school facilities to shelter undocumented immigrants, effectively supporting stricter immigration enforcement policies. Her no vote on passage is consistent with her stated opposition to expanded enforcement operations and her advocacy for accountability regarding immigration policies she views as harmful.

    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-8752·Consistent

    Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2025

    92/100

    What they said

    Apr 22, 2026

    Congresswoman Ramirez opposes the Department of Homeland Security's expanded immigration enforcement operations and calls for accountability from White House officials Stephen Miller and Tom Homan, whom she characterizes as architects of what she describes as unlawful enforcement actions that have harmed American citizens and immigrants.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Jun 28, 2024

    Voted Nay on Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2025

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Congresswoman Ramirez explicitly opposes DHS's expanded immigration enforcement operations and characterizes them as unlawful. The bill provides FY2025 appropriations for DHS agencies central to that enforcement, including ICE and CBP—the very agencies she identifies as implementing the harmful operations she opposes. Her no vote on passage is directly consistent with her stated position against funding these enforcement activities.

    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-4367·Consistent

    Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2024

    92/100

    What they said

    Apr 22, 2026

    Congresswoman Ramirez opposes the Department of Homeland Security's expanded immigration enforcement operations and calls for accountability from White House officials Stephen Miller and Tom Homan, whom she characterizes as architects of what she describes as unlawful enforcement actions that have harmed American citizens and immigrants.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Sep 29, 2023

    Voted Nay on Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2024

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Congresswoman Ramirez's statement explicitly opposes expanded DHS immigration enforcement operations and calls for accountability, characterizing them as unlawful and harmful. Her no vote on the FY2024 DHS Appropriations Act, which funds ICE, CBP, and other enforcement agencies, is directly consistent with her stated opposition to these operations. The statement even references Senate Republicans funding ICE and CBP for additional years, aligning her vote against the appropriations bill with her public position.

    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-7511·Consistent

    Laken Riley Act

    92/100

    What they said

    Apr 22, 2026

    Congresswoman Ramirez opposes the Department of Homeland Security's expanded immigration enforcement operations and calls for accountability from White House officials Stephen Miller and Tom Homan, whom she characterizes as architects of what she describes as unlawful enforcement actions that have harmed American citizens and immigrants.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Mar 7, 2024

    Voted Nay on Laken Riley Act

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Congresswoman Ramirez's statement explicitly opposes DHS immigration enforcement operations she characterizes as unlawful and calls for accountability from officials overseeing expanded enforcement. Her no vote on the Laken Riley Act, which mandates DHS detention of non-U.S. nationals arrested for certain property crimes and authorizes states to sue over immigration enforcement decisions, is directly consistent with her stated opposition to expanded enforcement operations. Both the statement and vote reflect opposition to strengthened immigration enforcement mechanisms.

    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-2494·Consistent

    POLICE Act of 2023

    92/100

    What they said

    Mar 24, 2026

    Ramirez opposes Mullin's confirmation as DHS Secretary and advocates for abolishing ICE, ending immigration detention, and dismantling the Department of Homeland Security.

    Read statement

    What they did

    May 17, 2023

    Voted Nay on POLICE Act of 2023

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Ramirez's statement explicitly opposes DHS operations and advocates for abolishing ICE and dismantling DHS. The POLICE Act expands DHS enforcement authority by creating a new deportable offense tied to assaults on law enforcement. Her no vote on passage is consistent with her stated position that DHS should be dismantled and its enforcement powers curtailed, not expanded.

    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-5525·Consistent

    Continuing Appropriations and Border Security Enhancement Act, 2024

    92/100

    What they said

    Mar 24, 2026

    Ramirez opposes Mullin's confirmation as DHS Secretary and advocates for abolishing ICE, ending immigration detention, and dismantling the Department of Homeland Security.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Sep 29, 2023

    Voted Nay on Continuing Appropriations and Border Security Enhancement Act, 2024

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Ramirez's statement explicitly opposes DHS leadership and advocates for abolishing ICE, ending detention, and dismantling DHS. The bill provides continuing appropriations to federal agencies including DHS and imposes limits on asylum eligibility—provisions that align with expanding DHS capacity and restrictive immigration enforcement. Her no vote on passage is consistent with her stated opposition to strengthening DHS operations and immigration enforcement.

    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-2·Notable gap

    Secure the Border Act of 2023

    15/100

    What they said

    Apr 22, 2026

    Congresswoman Ramirez opposes the Department of Homeland Security's expanded immigration enforcement operations and calls for accountability from White House officials Stephen Miller and Tom Homan, whom she characterizes as architects of what she describes as unlawful enforcement actions that have harmed American citizens and immigrants.

    Read statement

    What they did

    May 11, 2023

    Voted Yea on Secure the Border Act of 2023

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Congresswoman Ramirez's statement strongly opposes expanded immigration enforcement operations and criticizes funding for ICE and CBP, characterizing them as unlawful and harmful. However, she voted yes on a procedural motion for the Secure the Border Act of 2023, which expands border wall construction, increases barrier requirements, and strengthens border security infrastructure. These positions point in opposite directions on immigration enforcement policy.

    medium confidence
    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-9668·Notable gap

    SHIELD Against CCP Act

    15/100

    What they said

    Apr 22, 2026

    Congresswoman Ramirez opposes the Department of Homeland Security's expanded immigration enforcement operations and calls for accountability from White House officials Stephen Miller and Tom Homan, whom she characterizes as architects of what she describes as unlawful enforcement actions that have harmed American citizens and immigrants.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Dec 10, 2024

    Voted Yea on SHIELD Against CCP Act

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Congresswoman Ramirez's statement opposes DHS immigration enforcement operations and calls for accountability from officials overseeing those operations. The bill she voted for establishes a DHS working group focused on Chinese Communist Party security threats—border security, cybersecurity, terrorism, and transportation security—with no connection to the immigration enforcement practices or officials she criticized. Her yes vote on this bill does not align with her stated opposition to DHS enforcement operations or her demand for accountability from Miller and Homan.

    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-6678·Consistent

    Consequences for Social Security Fraud Act

    85/100

    What they said

    Apr 22, 2026

    Congresswoman Ramirez opposes the Department of Homeland Security's expanded immigration enforcement operations and calls for accountability from White House officials Stephen Miller and Tom Homan, whom she characterizes as architects of what she describes as unlawful enforcement actions that have harmed American citizens and immigrants.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Jan 31, 2024

    Voted Nay on Consequences for Social Security Fraud Act

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Congresswoman Ramirez opposes expanded immigration enforcement operations that she characterizes as unlawful and harmful. The bill creates new grounds for deportation based on Social Security and identity document fraud convictions. Her NO vote is consistent with her stated opposition to aggressive enforcement actions, though the bill addresses a specific fraud-related deportation ground rather than the broader enforcement operations and accountability issues her statement emphasizes. The alignment is directional—both reflect skepticism of expansive immigration enforcement—but the bill's narrow focus on fraud-based deportability grounds introduces some granularity mismatch.

    medium confidence
    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-5585·Consistent

    Agent Raul Gonzalez Officer Safety Act

    85/100

    What they said

    Apr 22, 2026

    Congresswoman Ramirez opposes the Department of Homeland Security's expanded immigration enforcement operations and calls for accountability from White House officials Stephen Miller and Tom Homan, whom she characterizes as architects of what she describes as unlawful enforcement actions that have harmed American citizens and immigrants.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Jan 30, 2024

    Voted Nay on Agent Raul Gonzalez Officer Safety Act

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Ramirez opposes DHS enforcement operations she characterizes as unlawful and calls for accountability from enforcement architects. The bill creates new criminal penalties for fleeing Border Patrol agents near the border and bars immigration relief for non-citizens convicted under it. Her NO vote aligns with her stated opposition to aggressive enforcement operations; the bill expands enforcement tools and criminal consequences in ways consistent with the enforcement regime she criticizes. The vote and statement point in the same direction on the underlying question of whether to expand immigration enforcement authority.

    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-8146·Consistent

    Police Our Border Act

    85/100

    What they said

    Mar 24, 2026

    Ramirez opposes Mullin's confirmation as DHS Secretary and advocates for abolishing ICE, ending immigration detention, and dismantling the Department of Homeland Security.

    Read statement

    What they did

    May 16, 2024

    Voted Nay on Police Our Border Act

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Ramirez's statement opposes strengthening DHS operations and advocates for dismantling the department and ending immigration enforcement. The Police Our Border Act requires DOJ reporting on how Biden's border policies affected law enforcement—a bill framed to scrutinize border enforcement outcomes. Her no vote aligns with her stated opposition to DHS-centered immigration enforcement and her advocacy for abolishing ICE and dismantling DHS. The consistency is strong, though the bill's specific focus on law enforcement impact reporting is narrower than her broader abolitionist position.

    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-2882·Notable gap

    Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024

    25/100

    What they said

    Apr 22, 2026

    Congresswoman Ramirez opposes the Department of Homeland Security's expanded immigration enforcement operations and calls for accountability from White House officials Stephen Miller and Tom Homan, whom she characterizes as architects of what she describes as unlawful enforcement actions that have harmed American citizens and immigrants.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Feb 6, 2024

    Voted Yea on Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Congresswoman Ramirez's statement strongly opposes DHS immigration enforcement operations and calls for accountability from officials she characterizes as architects of unlawful enforcement. However, she voted yes on HR-2882, a consolidated appropriations bill that includes funding for the Department of Homeland Security. While the statement criticizes the use of taxpayer dollars to fund ICE and CBP operations, her passage vote provided appropriations that would support those agencies. This represents a substantive inconsistency between her stated opposition to the enforcement operations and her vote to fund the department executing them.

    medium confidence
    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-7343·Consistent

    Detain and Deport Illegal Aliens Who Assault Cops Act

    75/100

    What they said

    Apr 22, 2026

    Congresswoman Ramirez opposes the Department of Homeland Security's expanded immigration enforcement operations and calls for accountability from White House officials Stephen Miller and Tom Homan, whom she characterizes as architects of what she describes as unlawful enforcement actions that have harmed American citizens and immigrants.

    Read statement

    What they did

    May 15, 2024

    Voted Nay on Detain and Deport Illegal Aliens Who Assault Cops Act

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Ramirez opposes expanded DHS immigration enforcement operations and calls for accountability regarding what she characterizes as unlawful enforcement actions. The bill mandates DHS custody and deportation for non-U.S. nationals arrested for assaulting law enforcement. Her NO vote aligns with her stated opposition to expanded enforcement operations, though the bill addresses a narrower subset (assault on first responders) rather than the broad enforcement operations she criticizes. The vote is consistent with her general position against aggressive immigration enforcement, though the specific policy mechanism differs from her statement's focus on accountability and unlawful operations.

    medium confidence
    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-3602·Consistent

    Transnational Criminal Organization Illicit Spotter Prevention and Elimination Act

    75/100

    What they said

    Apr 22, 2026

    Congresswoman Ramirez opposes the Department of Homeland Security's expanded immigration enforcement operations and calls for accountability from White House officials Stephen Miller and Tom Homan, whom she characterizes as architects of what she describes as unlawful enforcement actions that have harmed American citizens and immigrants.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Apr 20, 2024

    Voted Nay on Transnational Criminal Organization Illicit Spotter Prevention and Elimination Act

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Ramirez opposes expanded immigration enforcement operations and calls for accountability from DHS officials. The bill criminalizes interference with border control and enhances penalties for immigration-related crimes. Her NO vote aligns with her stated opposition to aggressive enforcement—she views the bill as part of a broader enforcement apparatus she characterizes as unlawful and harmful. However, the bill's specific focus (criminal penalties for spotters and border interference) differs from her statement's focus (accountability for DHS leadership and enforcement operations). The vote is consistent with her general enforcement-skeptical position, though the bill does not directly address the accountability mechanisms or operational practices she emphasizes.

    medium confidence
    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-3602·Mixed signal

    Transnational Criminal Organization Illicit Spotter Prevention and Elimination Act

    45/100

    What they said

    Apr 22, 2026

    Congresswoman Ramirez opposes the Department of Homeland Security's expanded immigration enforcement operations and calls for accountability from White House officials Stephen Miller and Tom Homan, whom she characterizes as architects of what she describes as unlawful enforcement actions that have harmed American citizens and immigrants.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Apr 20, 2024

    Voted Nay on Transnational Criminal Organization Illicit Spotter Prevention and Elimination Act

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    The statement opposes DHS immigration enforcement operations and calls for accountability from officials directing them. The bill criminalizes conduct that interferes with border control and enhances penalties for immigration-related crimes. While both address immigration enforcement, they approach it from opposite directions: the statement criticizes enforcement as unlawful and harmful; the bill strengthens enforcement tools and penalties. However, the vote is procedural rather than on passage, making the rep's substantive intent unclear—a procedural 'no' could reflect opposition to the bill's substance, objections to bundled provisions, or party-line strategy rather than a direct statement on enforcement policy.

    medium confidence
    Sign in to report

Pairs with ambiguous language and high uncertainty are withheld until more data is available. Procedural, cloture, and amendment votes are excluded — they don't cleanly signal substantive support or opposition.

Pro analysis

AI rep analysis — Pro

Get an AI-narrated read on Delia C. Ramirez's full voting record against your stated values — aligned themes, conflicts, notable votes, and what to watch for.

Sign in to use AI analysis

Campaign promises

We haven't extracted campaign positions for Delia C. Ramirez yet. Once their campaign website or position pages are processed, this card will track what they said vs how they voted.

Crossing the aisle

Passage votes where Delia C. Ramirez broke ranks with ≥75% of Democrats. Threshold catches substantively partisan splits; unanimous-ish or close votes are excluded.

19
Cross-aisle votes
  1. 119-hr-4216·Sep 2, 2025·91% of D voted YES

    Made-in-America Defense Act

    Rep voted NO
    Bill
  2. 118-hr-5349·Dec 6, 2024·81% of D voted YES

    Crucial Communism Teaching Act

    Rep voted NO
    Bill
  3. 118-hr-7073·Sep 24, 2024·90% of D voted YES

    Next Generation Pipelines Research and Development Act

    Rep voted NO
    Bill
  4. 118-hr-1157·Sep 9, 2024·94% of D voted YES

    Countering the PRC Malign Influence Fund Authorization Act of 2023

    Rep voted NO
    Bill
  5. 118-hr-2789·Jun 25, 2024·96% of D voted YES

    American Cooperation with Our Neighbors Act

    Rep voted NO
    Bill
  6. 118-hr-6572·May 15, 2024·78% of D voted YES

    Deploying American Blockchains Act of 2023

    Rep voted NO
    Bill

+ 13 more in the record

Recent votes

  • Nay
    To amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes.
    119-hr-9238··June 11, 2026
  • Nay
    Condemning actors seeking to defraud the United States Government, and expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that governmentwide fraud and improper payment prevention reforms will meaningfully improve the financial prosperity of the United States, and that Federal program eligibility should be verified before payment.
    119-hres-1335··June 11, 2026
  • Nay
    To amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes.
    119-hr-9238··June 11, 2026
  • Nay
    No Aid for Ghost Students Act of 2026
    119-hr-7892··June 10, 2026
  • Nay
    Fraud Prevention and Accountability Act
    119-hr-8312··June 10, 2026
  • Yea
    Faster Labor Contracts Act
    119-hr-5408··June 9, 2026
  • Yea
    Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5408) to accelerate workplace time-to-contract under the National Labor Relations Act.
    119-hres-1140·2 votes·Jun 9, 2026
    • ·June 9, 2026
    • ·June 9, 2026
  • Yea
    Federal Fraud Prevention Workforce Training Act
    119-hr-8428··June 8, 2026
  • Yea
    Ukraine Support Act
    119-hr-2913··June 5, 2026
  • Nay
    Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.
    119-hres-1336··June 4, 2026
  • Yea
    Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agency Appropriations Act, 2027
    119-hr-8646··June 4, 2026
  • Nay
    Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agency Appropriations Act, 2027
    119-hr-8646··June 4, 2026
  • Nay
    Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.
    119-hres-1336··June 4, 2026
  • Yea
    Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2913) to authorize support for Ukraine, and for other purposes.
    119-hres-518··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
    119-hconres-86··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    Northwest Straits Marine Conservation Initiative Reauthorization Act of 2025
    119-hr-2860··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    ARTIST Act
    119-s-254··June 3, 2026
  • Nay
    Stop Child Care Scams Act of 2026
    119-hr-7726··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    Stop Child Care Scams Act of 2026
    119-hr-7726··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    Fiscal Year 2025 Veterans Affairs Major Medical Facility Authorization Act
    119-s-2393··May 20, 2026
  • Nay
    Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
    119-hr-2853··May 12, 2026
  • Yea
    Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026
    119-hr-7567··April 30, 2026
  • Nay
    Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026
    119-hr-7567··April 30, 2026
  • Not voting
    A bill to amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes.
    119-s-4465··April 30, 2026

Recent statements

May 14, 2026press_release_house

Congresswoman Ramirez on Republican Targeting of Trans Youth, Subpoena of Chicago Public School Leadership

Position: Congresswoman Ramirez opposes Republican efforts to target Chicago Public Schools and trans youth through congressional subpoenas and hearings. She argues that schools should be sanctuary spaces that affirm and protect LGBTQI+ students.

Washington, DC — Today, Congresswoman Delia C. Ramirez (IL-03) released the following statement after Republicans in the House Education and Workforce Committee subpoenaed the CEO of Chicago Public Schools to testify at a hearing targeting trans youth. “I often say that fascism requires a public enemy. Whether it is immigrants, Black voters, Palestinian activists, or trans youth, the Trump administration and Republicans in Congress consistently employ scapegoating and persecution to stoke fear, consolidate power, and divert focus from their unpopular, destructive, and dangerous agenda. Any place or space that welcomes, protects, loves, and affirms those Trump’s white Christian nationalist, authoritarian government would deem ‘enemy,’ becomes a target of the regime’s attacks. Yesterday, with their subpoena of Chicago Public School leadership, Republicans have set their sights on our schools. Schools are meant to be sanctuary spaces for our young people– including those of the LGBTQI+ community – to dream, grow, and realize their full potential. Parents, teachers, mentors, advocates, and neighbors across Chicago work together every day to realize the safe, loving, and affirming school environments EVERY child deserves. The targeting of the Chicago Public Schools– and school districts that prioritize the well-being of and care for diverse children – is just another tactic to punish and persecute the communities resisting authoritarianism and standing against bigotry. Our communities won’t be bullied, and we won’t bend a knee. We won’t betray the fundamental belief that every child is precious and deserving of dignity, love, care, and opportunity. On June 10, we will continue to defend our LGBTQI+ children.” Issues: Education

education
Source
May 13, 2026press_release_house

Congresswoman Ramirez, Human Rights Organizations Call for Recommitment to Human Rights, Dismantling of Systems of Oppression, including DHS and Defense

Position: Congresswoman Ramirez introduced a resolution calling for a U.S. Human Rights Commission and outlining policy commitments including affordable housing, universal healthcare, climate resilience, humane immigration policies, abolition of detention, dismantling of the Department of Homeland Security, and redirection of Defense Department funding.

Washington, DC — Today, Congresswoman Delia C. Ramirez (IL-03) and national human rights leaders introduced the Renewed Mandate for Human Rights, a resolution to designate a United States Human Rights Commission. The resolution also serves as a comprehensive roadmap outlining the policies members of Congress must commit to, including affordable housing, universal health care, climate resilience, humane immigration, the abolition of detention, the dismantling of the Department of Homeland Security, the redirecting of the Department of Defense’s funding, and more. Image

immigrationhousinghealthcareenvironment
Source
May 7, 2026press_release_house

Ramirez Demands CBP End Detainment and Return Parents of US Citizen Teen with Terminal Cancer

Position: Congresswoman Ramirez opposes immigration enforcement practices including detention, visa denials, and border enforcement operations. She advocates for ending all detention, abolishing ICE, and dismantling DHS as necessary steps to protect immigrant families.

Chicago, IL — Today, Congresswoman Delia C. Ramirez (IL-03) released the following statement on the case of Kevin Gonzalez, her 18-year-old constituent with stage 4 colon cancer, whose parents were detained by CBP in Arizona after trying to cross the border to reunite with their son and say goodbye. The statement comes after Congresswoman Ramirez worked to ensure the expedited return of Kevin’s parents. Kevin – who is currently in México – is expected to reunite with his parents. “We don’t have to look far to find the disastrous, painful effect of the Trump administration's anti-immigrant campaign. This week, we were witnesses to the story of Kevin Gonzalez, a young man – my constituent – dying of colon cancer whose only wish was to see his parents one last time. We heard his plea for CBP to release his parents before it was too late. After a month of uncertainty, I am relieved to say that today, a judge has ordered the expedited return of his parents. The ruling is a sign that when we fight, we win. But the work is not done. My office, with the support of the Mexican consulate in Chicago and Arizona and their legal team, continues tirelessly to ensure the Gonzalez family is reunited without delay. I am proud to be part of a coalition fighting to ensure that families remain together and the rule of law is upheld. The Gonzalez family belongs together, safe and united as they face Kevin’s illness together. Rejecting visas to Kevin’s family did not protect our communities. Putting families through the pain, stress, and fear of separation is not making our loved ones safer. Detaining immigrants for months in for-profit, inhumane detentions is not securing our nation. But the cruelty and the pain are the point. So we must be clear that the only way our families will be safe, protected, and secure is by ending all detention, abolishing ICE, and dismantling DHS. Anything short of that will be a disservice to the families impacted by the Department of Terror.” Issues: Immigration

immigration
Source
May 6, 2026press_release_house

Ramirez Statement on Illinois State Police Launching an Investigation Into the Murder of Silverio Villegas González

Position: Congresswoman Ramirez expresses support for the Illinois State Police investigation into the death of Silverio Villegas González and calls for accountability for federal agents involved. She advocates for abolishing ICE and dismantling DHS, and demands justice for families affected by Department of Homeland Security enforcement actions.

Chicago, IL — Today, Congresswoman Delia C. Ramirez (IL-03) released the following statement on the Illinois State Police investigation that was launched into the murder of Silverio Villegas González: “The recently announced investigation by the Illinois State Police into the murder of Silverio Villegas González by federal agents is a needed step towards accountability and justice. I am clear: the investigation is the direct result of unrelenting pressure from our coalition. For months, organizers, rapid responders, and public officials at every level of government have been fighting and demanding an independent investigation into the murder of Silverio Villegas. Those same community leaders have been on the ground, documenting the Trump administration’s abuses of power and demanding accountability – not just for Silverio, but for every family harmed by the violence of DHS. While the opening of an investigation is an important step, it is only the beginning. We must keep fighting to ensure that every single family that has been terrorized by DHS sees the justice they deserve. Together, we will hold those who have perpetrated violence accountable, abolish ICE, and dismantle DHS.” Issues: Peace Building and Security Immigration

immigrationcriminal_justice
Source
May 4, 2026press_release_house

Ramirez, García, Jackson, Local Officials Hold Field Hearing on Urgency of Raising Minimum Wage

Position: The representatives support raising the federal minimum wage and highlight the urgency of this policy through a field hearing featuring testimony from affected workers and local officials.

Chicago, IL — Today, Congressmembers Delia C. Ramirez (IL-03) and Jesús “Chuy” García (IL-04), co-leads of the Living Wage for All Act, joined by original co-sponsor Congressman Jonathan Jackson (IL-01) and local public officials, held a field hearing on the urgent need to raise wages. The field hearing served as a forum to elevate the testimonies of impacted individuals and elevate the case for raising the minimum wage in Congress. State Senator Graciela Guzman, State Representative Norma Hernandez, the latter serving as the lead sponsor to raise the minimum wage to $27 an hour in the state of Illinois, and Alderwoman Rosanna Rodriguez Sanchez participated in the hearing. Image

economy
Source
April 30, 2026press_release_house

Ramirez Statement on the Passage of DHS Funding Bill

Position: Ramirez opposes the DHS funding bill, stating it inadequately constrains ICE and CBP funding, lacks necessary reforms and guardrails, and permits fund transfers between agencies. She advocates for dismantling DHS and replacing it with a new structure that prioritizes humanitarian concerns alongside security.

Washington, DC — Today, Congresswoman Delia C. Ramirez (IL-03) released the following statement on the passage of the Senate Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding bill: "Today, the House passed a DHS funding bill, and just like that, the shutdown is over. While I am relieved that essential employees will receive their paychecks, I am disappointed that I was not given an opportunity to cast a vote on the bill. For the record, I would have voted NO on the DHS funding bill, just as I voted no on the reconciliation bill to authorize $140B in additional funding for ICE and CBP. The Senate Bill passed by voice vote today is a win for our movement in that it did not have ICE funding, BUT it includes funding for CBP, does not include reforms or guardrails, gives permission to transfer funds to ICE and CBP, and continues to allow the department to manipulate emergency authorizations and abuse our data. Taken together, passing the DHS funding bill and the reconciliation bill ensures more of the same from DHS. DHS must be dismantled, and something new must take its place– something that honors our shared humanity and our security." Issues: Peace Building and Security Immigration Democracy

immigrationforeign_policy
Source
April 28, 2026press_release_house

Ramirez, García, Simon, Mejia Workers & Labor Leaders Introduce the Living Wage for All Act

Position: The representatives advocate for raising the federal minimum wage to $25 per hour through a phased approach, with large employers reaching the target by 2031 and smaller employers by 2038, while eliminating subminimum wages for all worker categories.

Washington, DC — Today, days before the largest May Day mobilizations in years and hours before the King of England’s congressional address, Congressmembers Delia C. Ramirez (IL-03), Jesús “Chuy” García (IL-04), Lateefah Simon (CA-12) and Analilia Mejia (NJ-11) stood with labor, civil rights, and economic justice leaders from across the country to introduce the Living Wage for All Act. The legislation is a landmark legislation that would raise the federal minimum wage to $25 per hour — the floor that working families need to meet the real cost of living in America today. The Living Wage for All Act would raise the federal minimum wage to $25 per hour through a phased approach that reflects both the cost of living and the structure of the modern economy. The bill establishes a two-track phase-in, requiring large, highly profitable corporations to lead the transition. Large employers would reach $25 by 2031, while smaller employers would phase in more gradually, reaching $25 by 2038. The Living Wage for All Act also ensures wages do not fall behind again by establishing a standard that keeps the minimum wage aligned with typical wages across the economy. As the economy grows and wages rise, the minimum wage would rise with it. The legislation also eliminates all subminimum wages, including for tipped workers, youth workers, and workers with disabilities — ensuring that every worker is guaranteed a full wage from their employer, with no exceptions. “Growing up, I saw my immigrant parents and my neighbors working multiple minimum wage jobs just to survive. Today, companies are reporting record-high earnings while working people struggle to survive. Minimum wage is not a living wage. That’s not right. If we want to address the affordability crisis, we must also address the wage crisis,” said Congresswoman Ramirez. “Congress must stop entertaining Kings and the whims of wannabe kings and start working for working people. I am proud to stand with Congressmembers García and Mejia and the Living Wage For All Coalition to ensure that working people have every single thing they need to thrive.” “The need for a living wage couldn’t be clearer. The gap between the wealthy and everyone else keeps widening. Corporate profits are at a record high and bosses are actively cutting their workforces, undermining organizing efforts, and trying to replace labor entirely,” said Congressman Jesús “Chuy” García. “Meanwhile, working families are struggling to pay their rent, buy groceries, and go to the doctor. It’s past time that workers are paid what they deserve.” “Housing, gas, and grocery costs have all surged, yet the federal minimum wage hasn’t been raised since 2009. This is unacceptable. No one working full time should be struggling to survive. We need an economy that reflects the realities of 2026, not one stuck over a decade ago. That’s why I led the fight to raise New Jersey’s minimum wage to $15 an hour. And it’s why I’m proud to partner with Congresswoman Delia Ramirez on the Living Wage for All Act to raise the federal minimum wage to $25 an hour. This bill would transform millions of lives, ensuring working people earn a true living wage instead of being forced to choose between putting food on the table and taking care of their health. Americans deserve an economy that works for all, not just the billionaire class,” said Congresswoman Mejia. "For too long, our economy has relied on underpaying the very workers who keep this country running. That harm has fallen hardest on women, workers with disabilities, tipped workers, Black and brown workers, and working families already struggling to afford basic necessities," said Congresswoman Lateefah Simon. "I am proud to join Congresswoman Ramirez, Congressman Garcia, and Congresswoman Mejia in introducing the Living Wage for All Act because a living wage is the absolute floor. We're leading this effort to ensure every worker from Oakland to Chicago to Detroit to New Jersey gets the fair wage and dignity they deserve.” “This is a worker-led movement that has grown from the groundbreaking Fight for $15 into a nationwide push for a true living wage. Across the country — from California to the Midwest to the East Coast — workers are organizing for $25 and $30 because that is what it takes to live. The polling shows this is not just popular, it is necessary. And ‘for all’ means exactly that: no worker left behind. This is what it looks like when politics begins to catch up to reality — and when democracy delivers real improvements in people’s lives, it becomes tangible. A living wage is how we make that promise real,” said Saru Jayaraman, President, One Fair Wage The legislation is cosponsored by Reps Yassamin Ansari (AZ-03), Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Greg Casar (TX-35), Congressional Hispanic Caucus Chair Adriano Espaillat (NY-13), Dan Goldman (NY-10), Adelita Grijalva (AZ-07), Jonathan Jackson (IL-01), Pramila Jayapal (WA-07), Ro Khanna (CA-17), Christian Menefee (TX-17), Donald Norcross (NJ-01), Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC-AL), Melanie Stansbury (NM-01), Shri Thanedar (MI-13), Rashida Tlaib (MI-12), Jill Tokuda (HI-02), Nydia Velazquez (NY-07), Bonnie Watson Coleman (NJ-12), and Frederica Wilson (FL-24). The legislation is endorsed by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), Service Employees International Union (SEIU), RWDSU, NEA, AFT, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 7, PolicyLink, One Fair Wage, Popular Democracy, Center for Law and Social Policy (CLASP), National Urban League (NUL), Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), Alliance for a Just Society, Black Women’s Roundtable, National Coalition for Black Civic Participation, Patriotic Millionaires, Our Revolution, Common Cause, Voices for Progress (V4P), National Organization for Women (NOW), Chicago Education Advocacy Cooperative, ACLU of Hawai’i, Hawai‘i Public Health Institute, Trabajadores Unidos Workers United (CA), La Colmena NY, Community Labor United, Pennsylvania Policy Center, The New York Progressive Action Network, New Disabled South, Rights & Democracy Vermont, Survivors Know, The Able Baker, Churches United for Fair Housing (CUFFH), Keystone Progress Education Fund (PA), San Francisco Living Wage Coalition, Make the Road NV, Las Doñas, Construyamos Otro Acuerdo (Puerto Rico), La Tejedora (Puerto Rico), Fuck You I Quit, and a growing List of Small Businesses: Beauty by Teal, Elysium Aesthetics Lounge LLC, Conscious Life Resources, Undermine, Black Remote She LLC, SEPA Mujer, Inc. “The introduction of the Living Wage for All Act is a powerful testament to the worker-led movement that is forcing a new baseline for livable wages. While the affordability crisis continues to squeeze working families, SEIU members are organizing and pushing for even higher standards across the country. We applaud Rep. Ramirez for this bold $25-an-hour proposal—an important step forward that's driven by workers demanding the money, power, and respect that they’ve earned,” said April Verrett, President of SEIU. "For 17 years, Washington has left the federal minimum wage at $7.25 while working people have fallen further behind. Our communities don’t need lip service or slogans — they're demanding real solutions that match the reality of this economy. A living wage is about dignity, but it is also about who holds power in this country. It is tied to every other fight for civil rights — from racial justice, to voting rights, to economic opportunity. When people are denied fair wages, they are denied the ability to fully participate in our democracy. The NAACP stands with this coalition because civil rights, racial justice, and economic justice are inseparable,” said Derrick Johnson, President & CEO of NAACP. “We cannot talk about affordability without talking about what people are paid. This bill is about holding corporate America accountable and not letting billionaires, corporations like Amazon, and CEOs get away with blaming everything else for an affordability crisis they are helping drive. While prices rise and profits grow, workers are still being paid poverty wages instead of a true living wage. That has to change if we are serious about dignity and fairness in this economy,” said Stuart Appelbaum, President of RWDSU. “As the Trump administration rips more and more resources away from the classrooms and communities that need them most, all while handing more power and privilege to the wealthy and well-connected, workers across our country need this legislation now more than ever,” said Kimberly Johnson Trinca, Government Relations Director for the National Education Association. “By paying educators and education support professionals a living wage, they will earn the respect, competitive wages, and support they deserve to provide their students with the skills needed to fulfill their dreams. At a time of massive income and wealth inequality, the National Education Association is proud to stand up for the working class and support the Living Wage for All Act. An investment in workers is an investment in the future of public schools and our nation,” said Becky Pringle, President of the National Education Association. “A living wage is about the kind of society we want - one where one job is enough; where if you work hard you will have a pathway to a life you and you r family can live on or one of constant struggle this also hugely impacts education When educators, paraprofessionals, school staff, and the families that make up our communities are paid less than what it takes to live, it destabilizes classrooms and weakens the foundation students rely on. When educators must work 2 and 4 jobs to make ends meet, how can they focus on their students. A true living wage is essential — and long overdue — to restoring dignity for workers, supporting families, and ensuring people can fully participate in their communities and in our democracy. That is how we build the thriving, stable environments every student deserves,” said Randi Weingarten, President of the American Federation of Teachers. "As business leaders, entrepreneurs, and investors, Voices for Progress members appreciate that The Living Wage for All Act supports employers like them who are not engaged in a race to the bottom on staff pay, and who recognize that putting money in the pockets of everyday Americans helps support local businesses. This moment reflects a growing recognition that affordability is not just about lowering prices — it’s about ensuring people are paid enough to live on, so we can build an economy that works for everyone, not just those at the top," said Sandra Fluke, President of Voices for Progress. "While 86% of Americans worry about the price of food, our billionaire president calls the affordability crisis a 'con job.' Wake up and smell the exploitation. There is one way to raise wages for American workers: Change the law,” said Ritchie Tabachnick, Member of Patriotic Millionaires. “Jeff Bezos thanked Amazon workers after his joyride into space for a reason: They paid for it—one grossly underpaid hour at a time. Smart businesspeople know that an economy based on consumer demand requires customers with money to spend. Unfortunately for everyone, including many rich people like us, it’s the opportunists and self-dealers, not the smart businesspeople, who are in the driver's seat. Buckle up, America, they’ll drive us over the cliff if we don’t stop them.” For the full text of the legislation, CLICK HERE. For the live video of the press conference, CLICK HERE. Background: The legislation reflects a national push to match wages with the rapidly growing cost of living. Across the country, campaigns are already moving at $25 and above — with $30 proposals advancing in Alameda County and Los Angeles, $27 legislation in Illinois, $30 efforts in New York, and $25 campaigns underway in Washington, D.C., and Maryland. These are part of a coordinated, multi-front strategy backed by a coalition of more than 100 labor, community, and social justice organizations. The Living Wage for All Act brings that momentum to the federal level — translating what workers and voters are already demanding across states and cities into a national standard. The federal minimum wage has remained stuck at $7.25 since 2009. For more than 17 years, workers have been impacted by rising costs for rent, groceries, childcare, and healthcare while their wages have remained stagnant. Issues: Jobs and the Economy

economy
Source
April 28, 2026press_release_house

Ramirez Statement on Being Appointed Top Democrat in the CHS Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection Subcommittee

Washington, DC — Today, Congresswoman Delia C. Ramirez (IL-03) released the following statement after being appointed as Ranking Member of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection Subcommittee of the House Homeland Security Committee: “Under Trump, Vance, Mullin, and Miller, it’s clear that the security of our communities’ information, federal networks, and critical infrastructure have not been priorities. Between the security failures of DOGE, the abuses of immigrant families’ data, and the decimation of CISA’s workforce and resources, Republicans have demonstrated a lack of interest in safeguarding our nation’s cybersecurity and our residents’ civil rights and privacy. In neglecting necessary oversight, Republicans have deregulated emerging technologies, allowed bad actors to profit from violations of our civil rights, and consented to the weaponization of government systems. It is more critical than ever that we assert our Congressional authority and disrupt the blatant corruption making us all less safe. I am thankful for my colleagues' trust in my track record of conducting oversight and holding the Trump administration and Republicans accountable. There is much work to do, and I am ready to roll up my sleeves and get to work to protect our data, rights and privacy, defend CISA’s mission, and dismantle DHS.” Issues: Peace Building and Security

Source
April 23, 2026press_release_house

Ramirez Leads Resolution Recognizing the Role of Housing in Keeping Families Together

Position: Congresswoman Ramirez opposes the Trump Administration's proposed HUD rule that would restrict federal housing assistance to mixed-status families, and calls on HUD to withdraw the rule and maintain current law allowing eligible family members to receive assistance regardless of other family members' immigration status.

Washington, D.C. – This week, Congresswoman Delia C. Ramirez (IL-03) led 27 members of Congress to introduce H. Res 1198, a resolution recognizing that stable housing keeps families together. The resolution responds to the Trump Administration’s proposed Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Rule entitled “Housing and Community Development Act of 1980: Verification of Eligible Status.” The rule would upend the long-standing policy that has allowed families with mixed immigration status to live together while eligible family members receive HUD housing assistance. The resolution calls on the Secretary of HUD to withdraw the proposed rule and abide by section 214 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1980 and the underlying congressional intent, which allows mixed-status families to receive federal housing assistance. “At a time when housing instability is at an all-time high, the Trump administration's proposed rule is cruel and unfairly targets our immigrant communities. We know that stable housing, affordable rent, and accessible homeownership opportunities are part of the American dream. Yet, the Trump Administration would rather force citizens to choose between pursuing the American dream without their family or face eviction and homelessness together,” said Congresswoman Ramirez. “ I’m proud to introduce H. Res 1198 because every member of Congress should recognize that stable housing is a fundamental human right. Every family deserves to stay whole and housed.” “The National Housing Law Project celebrates and endorses Representative Ramirez's resolution, which recognizes that stable housing keeps families together. The Trump administration's attempts to bypass existing housing law and scapegoat immigrant families are illegal and cruel and will force people into an impossible choice between their family or their housing. Rep. Ramirez's resolution affirms current law and that mixed-status families are American families,” said Shamus Roller, Executive Director at National Housing Law Project. "83% of Americans support health and social services for lawfully present immigrants, like those targeted by the HUD proposal," said Adriana Cadena, Executive Director of the Protecting Immigrant Families coalition. “The American people want a government that meets the needs of its people, not one that forces the eviction of families with an out-of-control immigration policy. We applaud Congresswoman Ramirez and her colleagues for standing up for mixed-status immigrant families." The resolution is sponsored by Representatives Dan Goldman (NY-10), Nanette Barragan(CA-44), Eleanor Holmes-Norton (DC), Rashida Tlaib (MI-12), Shri Thanedar (MI-13), Jasmine Crockett (TX-30), Tim Kennedy (NY-26), Yvette Clarke(NY-09), Hank Johnson Jr, (GA-04), Maxwell Frost (FL-10), Suzanne Bonamici, Jesus “Chuy” Garcia (IL-04), Mike Thompson (CA-04), Jimmy Gomez (CA-34), Scott Peters (CA-50), Frederica S. Wilson (FL-24), Sylvia Garcia (TX-29), Salud Carbajal (CA-24), Ritchie Torres (NY-15), André Carson (IN-07), Ted Lieu (CA-36), Bonnie Watson Coleman (NJ-12), Maxine Dexter (OR-03), Dina Titus (NV-01), Al Green (TX-09), Christian Menefee (TX-18), and Adelita Grijalva (AZ-07). The resolution is endorsed by the National Housing Law Project (NHLP), Protecting Immigrant Families (PIF), League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), African Communities Together, Housing Action Illinois, National Immigrant Justice Center (NIJC), The Center for Law and Social Policy (CLASP), National Low Income Housing Coalition (NLIHC), Palenque LSNA, and LUCHA For the full legislative text, CLICK HERE. Issues: Housing

housingimmigration
Source
April 22, 2026press_release_house

Congresswoman Ramirez, Senator Warren Demand Investigation into Trump Admin’s “Unlawful and Costly System” of Third-Country Deportations

Position: The lawmakers oppose the Trump administration's practice of deporting individuals to third countries without proper due process, arguing it violates U.S. law and the Constitution, and call for an investigation into the scope and legality of these removals.

Washington, D.C. — Congresswoman Delia C. Ramirez (IL-03), Co-chair of the Congressional Caucus on Global Migration, U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), along with Representative Troy Carter (LA-07), pressed the Inspectors General of the Departments of Homeland Security (DHS) and State to open an investigation into the Trump administration’s attempts to deport people to countries they have no ties to. The escalation comes after the Departments of State and Homeland Security failed to comply with an investigation into these practices that Congresswoman Ramirez and Senator Warren opened in September 2025. It also follows the February 25, 2026, federal court ruling that declared that a third-country removal system violates the U.S. Constitution and immigration law. Even so, DHS’s 2025 guidance on third-country removals — which does not appear to have been updated since the February 2026 court ruling — states that the Department can deport individuals to third countries without any individualized process whatsoever. “We request that your offices evaluate the Trump Administration’s unlawful and costly system of third-country removals,” wrote the lawmakers. “Congress and the public deserve answers to better understand the scale of legal violations within this system that was recently ruled unconstitutional.” Since President Trump took office for a second time, his administration has deported hundreds of people, including children, long-time U.S. residents, and individuals with no criminal records, to countries they are not from and that were not designated for their removal, which U.S. immigration law only allows in rare circumstances. Deportees are being sent to third countries without proper due process, and in some cases without being provided an opportunity to voice concerns that their life or freedom would be in danger in that third country. Some people deported to third countries have reported torture, arbitrary detention, and forced return to their countries of origin, where courts have found they are likely to face persecution and other human rights violations. Many people first learn they are being deported to a third country while on an overseas flight. It has been reported that some DHS attorneys have reportedly threatened asylum seekers that they may be deported to third countries in order to pressure them to abandon their asylum claims and accept deportation to their home countries. “Such reports cast serious doubt on DoS’s process, if one exists, of verifying the reliability of countries’ assertions that they will not torture or persecute deportees, or transport them onward to other countries where they’re likely to face torture or persecution,” added the lawmakers. “Meanwhile, the Administration is continuing to execute third-country deportations. As of early March, ICE had over 500 people in its custody slated for third-country deportations, and DHS signaled that it had its sights on deporting over 8,000 people to third countries.” To persuade countries to accept deportees, the Trump Administration has used a combination of threats and payments, including paying $32 million to El Salvador, Rwanda, Eswatini, Equatorial Guinea, and Palau. The lawmakers asked that the Inspector General’s investigation include the administration’s failure to follow due process, negotiations with foreign governments, evaluating the risk of torture and persecution, and the cost of third-country deportations. Representatives Donald Beyer (VA-08), Yvette Clarke (NY-09), Diana DeGette (CO-01), Dwight Evans (PA-03), John Garamendi (CA-08), Jesús García (IL-04), Sylvia Garcia (TX-29), Dan Goldman (NY-10), Jahana Hayes (CT-05), Jared Huffman (CA-02), Ro Khanna (CA-17), Raja Krishnamoorthi (IL-08), Stephen Lynch (MA-08), Jim McGovern (MA-02), Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC-AL), Ilhan Omar (MN-05), Chellie Pingree (ME-01), and Adam Smith (WA-09) signed on to this letter. Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Ed Markey (D-MA), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Patty Murray (D-WA), Alex Padilla (D-CA), Jackie Rosen (D-NV), Bernie Sanders (I-VT), and Adam Schiff (D-CA) signed on to this letter. For the full letter, CLICK HERE. Issues: Immigration

immigration
Source

Recent news mentions

Articles from a curated list of national outlets that mention Delia C. Ramirez.

  • Chicago Tribune·June 11, 2026
    House Republicans press CPS chief over DEI, transgender student policies
  • The Philadelphia Inquirer·May 30, 2026
    A deported mother returned to the United States to bury her slain toddler
  • Fox News·May 28, 2026
    GOP lawmakers urge Treasury to press ahead with probe of Hasan Piker over Cuba trip
  • CNN·May 16, 2026
    Ice immigration detention centers medical care deaths invs vis
  • CNN·May 15, 2026
    Ice immigration detention centers medical care deaths invs vis
  • NBC News·May 13, 2026
    Longtime ICE official David Venturella chosen to head agency
  • Chicago Tribune·May 12, 2026
    Patty García gets Congressional Progressive Caucus endorsement in race to replace US Rep. Jesús ‘Chuy’ García
  • CNN·May 10, 2026
    Kevin gonzalez cancer ice detention
  • CNN·May 10, 2026
    Kevin gonzalez cancer ice detention
  • CNN·May 10, 2026
    Kevin gonzalez cancer ice detention
  • Chicago Sun-Times·May 8, 2026
    DACA recipients in Chicago face uncertainty as renewal delays have them worried about being deported
  • ProPublica·May 7, 2026
    At Least 79 Kids Have Been Harmed by Tear Gas or Pepper Spray During Trump’s Immigration Crackdown

Source: GDELT 2.0 GKG, filtered to a curated list of national outlets. Inclusion is not endorsement; opinion pieces and reported news are mixed.

Recent stock activity

Periodic transaction reports filed under the STOCK Act — disclosed by the rep, sourced from public filings.

No disclosed trades on record.

Source: open-data mirrors of the Senate eFD and House Clerk financial-disclosure systems. Disclosure within 30 days of trade is required by law (45 for spouse/dependent trades).

Top PAC donors · 2026 cycle

Political action committees that gave the most to this rep's principal campaign committee this cycle. PAC giving is direct organizational support — industry, ideological, or leadership.

  1. 1.MACHINISTS NON PARTISAN POLITICAL LEAGUE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPACE WORKERSLabor5 contributionsTrade-union PAC of the International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers — backs candidates supporting union organizing, prevailing wages, and aerospace manufacturing jobs.AI$25,000
  2. 2.LOCAL 881 UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS POLITICAL ACTION FUND5 contributions$25,000
  3. 3.INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS POLITICAL ACTION LEAGUELabor4 contributionsTrade-union PAC for sheet metal, air, rail, and transportation workers — backs candidates supporting union organizing, prevailing wages, and infrastructure investment.AI$20,000
  4. 4.CARPENTERS LEGISLATIVE IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERSLabor4 contributionsTrade-union PAC for the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners — backs prevailing-wage protections, federal infrastructure funding, project labor agreements, and worker safety standards.AI$20,000
  5. 5.MEDICARE FOR ALL PACIdeological4 contributionsHealthcare advocacy PAC — supports candidates backing universal healthcare coverage and Medicare expansion policies.AI$20,000
  6. 6.AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, AFL-CIO COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATIONLabor3 contributionsTrade-union PAC for teachers — backs candidates supporting public education funding, collective bargaining rights, and worker protections.AI$15,000
  7. 7.CONGRESSIONAL PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS PAC3 contributions$15,000
  8. 8.ROOTED IN MOVEMENT2 contributions$10,850
  9. 9.JOBS, EDUCATION, & FAMILIES FIRST JEFF PAC2 contributions$10,000
  10. 10.PRAIRIE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEBusiness2 contributionsRegional or business-affiliated PAC — specific positions not inferable from the name.AI · low$10,000

Source: OpenFEC (api.open.fec.gov) Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “committee.” Aggregated by contributing committee. Self-transfers from joint-fundraising / victory committees are excluded.

Top individual contributors · 2026 cycle

Itemized individual contributions over $200 to this rep's campaign committee, aggregated by donor employer. PAC giving is shown above; this section is people, not organizations.

  1. 1.COMMUNITY PHYSICIANS$9,750
  2. 2.COGAN & POWER$8,650
  3. 3.CHP$8,000
  4. 4.SULAIMAN LAW GROUP$7,150
  5. 5.PMP$7,000
  6. 6.STONE SOUP$7,000
  7. 7.NEWSWEB CORPORATION$7,000
  8. 8.KAPITAN GOMAA$7,000
  9. 9.MEDICAL CENTER$7,000
  10. 10.PEDIATRIC HEALTH ASSOCIATES$7,000

Source: OpenFEC Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “individual,” aggregated by the donor's self-reported employer. This is a geographic / industry correlation, not a corporate endorsement.