DeepSyte™
Bill FeedAll repsScoreboardsPrimariesProAboutSign inGet started
DeepSyte™™

A nonpartisan civic accountability tool. We match federal legislation to your stated values — without partisan bias.

Learn

  • About
  • About the name
  • Methodology
  • Glossary

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Refund Policy
  • Contact

Sources

Bill data from Congress.gov. Summaries from the Congressional Research Service where available.

Follow

  • Bluesky — @deepsyte.app
  • X — @deepsyteapp
All content is for informational purposes only. Always verify against primary sources.
Back to bill feed
Adam Smith official portrait

Adam Smith

D

house · WA-9

CompareSign in to get alerts
Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See how Adam Smith actually votes — against your values.

DeepSyte scores Adam Smith's record on the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your personal alignment.

Get started freeTake the values quiz
Official websiteSee this seat's 2026 race

Alignment with your views

Sign in and take the values quiz to see how Adam Smith's votes line up with your views.

Prediction track record

How often we called Adam Smith's passage votes correctly, from their stated positions on each bill's tagged topics. Excludes “unclear” calls and abstentions.

0%
Accuracy
0
Correct
1
Incorrect
33
Pending
  1. Wrong119-hr-4216

    Made-in-America Defense Act

    Predicted NO
    Actual YES
    Bill
  2. Pending vote119-sjres-123

    A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.

    Predicted YES
    Bill
  3. Pending vote119-hr-5340

    To prohibit the disclosure of records by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development of individuals for the purposes of immigration enforcement, and for other purposes.

    Predicted YES
    Bill
  4. Pending vote119-sjres-184

    A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.

    Predicted YES
    Bill
  5. Pending vote119-s-2934

    Protecting Americans from Russian Litigation Act of 2025

    Predicted NO
    Bill
  6. Pending vote119-hr-7703

    Stop Illegal Alien Cops Act

    Predicted NO
    Bill

Consistency insights

No paired statements and votes yet for Adam Smith

We haven't yet found statement/vote pairs on the same topic for Adam Smith. This usually means either the rep hasn't taken public positions on bills that have come to a passage vote, or those bills haven't been tagged yet. The checker runs as new press releases and votes come in.

Pro analysis

AI rep analysis — Pro

Get an AI-narrated read on Adam Smith's full voting record against your stated values — aligned themes, conflicts, notable votes, and what to watch for.

Sign in to use AI analysis

Campaign promises

We haven't extracted campaign positions for Adam Smith yet. Once their campaign website or position pages are processed, this card will track what they said vs how they voted.

Crossing the aisle

Passage votes where Adam Smith broke ranks with ≥75% of Democrats. Threshold catches substantively partisan splits; unanimous-ish or close votes are excluded.

2
Cross-aisle votes
  1. 118-hr-5349·Dec 6, 2024·81% of D voted YES

    Crucial Communism Teaching Act

    Rep voted NO
    Bill
  2. 118-hr-5826·Apr 16, 2024·81% of D voted YES

    No Paydays for Hostage-Takers Act

    Rep voted NO
    Bill

Recent votes

  • Nay
    Condemning actors seeking to defraud the United States Government, and expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that governmentwide fraud and improper payment prevention reforms will meaningfully improve the financial prosperity of the United States, and that Federal program eligibility should be verified before payment.
    119-hres-1335··June 11, 2026
  • Nay
    To amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes.
    119-hr-9238··June 11, 2026
  • Nay
    To amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes.
    119-hr-9238··June 11, 2026
  • Nay
    No Aid for Ghost Students Act of 2026
    119-hr-7892··June 10, 2026
  • Nay
    Fraud Prevention and Accountability Act
    119-hr-8312··June 10, 2026
  • Yea
    Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5408) to accelerate workplace time-to-contract under the National Labor Relations Act.
    119-hres-1140··June 9, 2026
  • Yea
    Faster Labor Contracts Act
    119-hr-5408··June 9, 2026
  • Yea
    Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5408) to accelerate workplace time-to-contract under the National Labor Relations Act.
    119-hres-1140··June 9, 2026
  • Yea
    Federal Fraud Prevention Workforce Training Act
    119-hr-8428··June 8, 2026
  • Yea
    Ukraine Support Act
    119-hr-2913··June 5, 2026
  • Nay
    Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.
    119-hres-1336··June 4, 2026
  • Yea
    Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agency Appropriations Act, 2027
    119-hr-8646··June 4, 2026
  • Nay
    Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agency Appropriations Act, 2027
    119-hr-8646··June 4, 2026
  • Nay
    Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.
    119-hres-1336··June 4, 2026
  • Yea
    ARTIST Act
    119-s-254··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    Stop Child Care Scams Act of 2026
    119-hr-7726··June 3, 2026
  • Nay
    Stop Child Care Scams Act of 2026
    119-hr-7726··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2913) to authorize support for Ukraine, and for other purposes.
    119-hres-518··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    Northwest Straits Marine Conservation Initiative Reauthorization Act of 2025
    119-hr-2860··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
    119-hconres-86··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    Fiscal Year 2025 Veterans Affairs Major Medical Facility Authorization Act
    119-s-2393··May 20, 2026
  • Yea
    Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
    119-hr-2853··May 12, 2026
  • Yea
    Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026
    119-hr-7567··April 30, 2026
  • Not voting
    A bill to amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes.
    119-s-4465··April 30, 2026
  • Nay
    Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026
    119-hr-7567··April 30, 2026

Recent statements

February 28, 2026press_release_house

Rep. Adam Smith Statement on Trump Administration Employing Military Force Against Iran

Position: Rep. Smith opposes the Trump Administration's preemptive military strikes against Iran, arguing they lack congressional authorization, risk escalation, and represent a war of choice. He advocates for diplomatic engagement, coalition-building, and targeted economic sanctions as more appropriate pressure mechanisms.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Representative Adam Smith (D-Wash.), Ranking Member of the House Armed Services Committee, released the following statement in response to the Trump Administration employing U.S. military force against Iran. “Overnight, the President ordered preemptive military strikes against Iran. Let me be clear that I oppose these preemptive strikes and am concerned the situation is prone to rapid escalation that puts Americans at risk and threatens to drag us into a war of choice with no strategic endgame. “This offensive use of military force against Iran, absent congressional authorization, is contrary to domestic and international law. Our system of checks and balances is crucial to ensuring that we adhere to the law and, hopefully, learn from the mistakes of our past. “There is no question that the Iranian regime is guilty of horrific crimes against its own people and conducts destabilization activities in the region. That is why the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) was so important for limiting Iran’s nuclear ambitions and allowed access into the country to monitor their nuclear activities. The Trump Administration’s abandonment of that agreement, which was overwhelmingly beneficial to U.S. and regional interests, has left us without a key point of leverage at a critical time. “We absolutely should exert pressure on Iran in order to ensure that they don’t build a nuclear weapon. However, the far more appropriate options for exerting that pressure are continued diplomatic engagement, coalition building with partners and allies in the region, and enforcement of targeted economic sanctions. These options are also far more likely to succeed without risking war with a country with advanced weapons systems and a demonstrated willingness to use those systems against thousands of American service members in the region and beyond. “Make no mistake, the president's actions have dragged the United States into a war of his choosing. Regardless of my opposition to the course of action the president has unilaterally taken, my thoughts are with the brave men and women in uniform, and their families.” ### Issues: International Leadership and Foreign Affairs

foreign_policy
Source
February 24, 2026press_release_house

Congressman Adam Smith statement on the ROTOR Act

Position: Congressman Smith supports the ROTOR Act, which would strengthen collision-avoidance standards and improve coordination between civilian and military aircraft operations in shared airspace following a fatal mid-air collision.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congressman Adam Smith (D-Wash.), Ranking Member of the House Armed Services Committee, released the following statement about the failed vote for the ROTOR Act on the floor of the House of Representatives. “Last year’s tragic mid-air collision between an American Airlines regional jet and a U.S. Army Black Hawk helicopter took 67 lives and devastated families and communities across our country. It was the deadliest U.S. aviation disaster in decades. The subsequent investigation by the National Transportation Safety Board identified systemic failures in how civilian and military aircraft operate in shared airspace. “More recently, serious coordination failures in El Paso between the Department of Defense (DoD), the Department of Homeland Security, and civilian authorities led to the temporary closure of airspace affecting an international commercial airport and its surrounding community. That incident underscores that these challenges are not isolated — they are systemic and ongoing. These failures demand legislative action. “Today, the House of Representatives considered the ROTOR Act as an initial response to this tragic disaster. The bill would have made changes to strengthen collision-avoidance standards and improve aviation safety, which is why I voted in favor of its passage. “I’m disappointed that the ROTOR Act failed to pass the House of Representatives. This legislation began the important process of addressing aviation safety and improved communication between civilian and military aircrafts. “The tragedy that occurred over Washington, D.C. last year made clear that fragmented oversight and poor coordination cannot continue. I urge Speaker Johnson to work with the relevant committees, departments and agencies, families, and stakeholders to consider aviation safety legislation so that Congress can quickly enact the full scope of reforms necessary to protect the flying public and prevent another catastrophic loss of life." BACKGROUND: Link to the text of the ROTOR Act. ### Issues: Aviation Noise and Emissions Transportation and Infrastructure

infrastructure
Source
February 20, 2026press_release_house

Statement from Congressman Adam on Supreme Court Tariff Ruling

Position: Congressman Smith welcomes the Supreme Court's ruling striking down President Trump's reciprocal tariffs as an unconstitutional expansion of executive power, arguing the decision upholds the separation of powers and will help lower costs for consumers.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congressman Adam Smith (D-Wash.) released the following statement: “Today, the Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 decision that President Trump’s tariffs represent an unconstitutional expansion of executive power and that his reciprocal tariffs on nearly every country are illegal. After months of uncertainty caused by his shifting tariff policies, this decision marks an important step toward lowering costs for those in our state and across the country. “Today's ruling is a powerful reminder of the weight of the rule of law. Upholding the coequal branches of government keeps our democracy stable. As Trump tries to consolidate powers reserved to Congress under Article I of the Constitution, this decision demonstrates that his authoritarian overreach will not be tolerated in the United States of America. There are constraints to Trump’s power, and we will not stand idly by and allow him to jeopardize our nation’s stability.” ### Issues: Government International Leadership and Foreign Affairs Local Economy and Business

economyforeign_policy
Source
February 3, 2026press_release_house

Statement from Congressman Adam Smith on Today’s Vote Against Federal Funding

Position: Congressman Smith voted against a federal funding package because it does not include sufficient guardrails on Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations, which he characterizes as unlawful and abusive. He calls for immediate restrictions on ICE authority and will not support funding that enables what he views as governmental overreach.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congressman Adam Smith (D-Wash.) released the following statement after voting against the Senate-passed funding package that includes two-weeks of funding for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). “Today, I voted against the Senate Amendments to H.R. 7148. Congress has a constitutional responsibility to fund the government that is both effective and accountable. I recognize that this legislation contains important investments and reflects bipartisan work to keep the government operating. I understand why some of my colleagues chose to support it and I share their goal of ensuring continuity of essential federal services. However, as this funding bill is written, it asks Congress to overlook serious concerns in how certain authorities are exercised, especially within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). “I am gravely concerned by the DHS and ICE provisions included in this funding package. The two-week buffer to renegotiate DHS funding is insufficient and too long of a delay. We need immediate guardrails and stopgap measures to curtail ICE. The behavior from ICE in Minnesota, Los Angeles, Chicago and across the country does not represent responsible governance. It is lawless behavior that puts communities at risk and undermines trust in government itself. “I am ready to support funding that upholds the rule of law, respects constitutional limits, treats individuals with dignity, and serves the public interest. Until this administration changes course and demonstrates a commitment to lawful, accountable governance, I will not support funding that enables continued abuse and overreach.” ### Issues: Government Immigration Reform

immigrationcriminal_justice
Source
January 27, 2026press_release_house

CONGRESSMAN SMITH SUPPORTS IMPEACHMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY SECRETARY KRISTI NOEM

Position: Congressman Smith supports impeachment of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, citing concerns about ICE enforcement operations that he characterizes as lawless, violent, and lacking accountability. He argues the Secretary must be held responsible for enforcement tactics that harm communities and violate due process standards.

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Congressman Adam Smith (D-Wash.) released the following statement after signing onto an effort to impeach Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. “Today, I joined my colleagues in supporting H.Res. 996, a resolution to impeach Secretary Kristi Noem for high crimes and misdemeanors. I do not take the decision to pursue impeachment lightly. It is one of the most solemn responsibilities of the House of Representatives. “Congress must ensure accountability at the highest levels of our government. When a cabinet official willfully disregards statutes passed by Congress and obstructs lawful oversight, it diminishes trust in our institutions and threatens the constitutional framework that protects American rights and liberties. I believe these matters warrant careful consideration by the House Judiciary Committee and ultimately by the full House. “My support for this resolution is rooted in a broader concern about the Department of Homeland Security and the direction of federal immigration enforcement under this administration. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations are, right now, sowing fear and chaos in American communities. “Last week, I voted against funding for DHS and ICE, and now as ICE continues to escalate its lawless operations, I am taking the extraordinary step of supporting impeachment of the Secretary Noem. As the head of this Department, Secretary Noem must be the held responsible for the lawlessness, terror, and havoc that ICE has caused across this country, and especially in places like Minneapolis. “We have seen ICE embrace enforcement tactics that are violent, that tear families apart, and that are untethered from basic standards of accountability, due process, and public safety. The killings of Renée Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis this month have deepened concerns about federal tactics and the impact on local public safety and community trust. “Accountability and reform must come now. Secretary Noem must be held accountable for the lawless behavior that ICE has committed under her stewardship. I join my colleagues in demanding that Secretary Noem must be impeached and her oversight of ICE must be investigated thoroughly before Congress.” Issues: Immigration Reform

immigrationcriminal_justice
Source
January 16, 2026press_release_house

Statement by Congressman Adam Smith on the Protests in Iran

Position: The congressman condemns the Iranian regime's violent crackdown on protesters and expresses solidarity with Iranians demanding democratic freedoms and accountability.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Representative Adam Smith released the following statement regarding the protests in Iran: “The Iranian regime is violently cracking down on its own people. Security forces are killing protesters, carrying out mass arrests, and attempting to silence dissent through fear and brutality and a state-imposed communications blackout. This is not public order. It is repression. “For decades, the Iranian regime has failed its people, denying them basic freedoms, economic opportunity, and a voice in their own future. Iranians have made clear that they want dignity, accountability, and the ability to live without fear. The regime’s response has been violence and bloodshed. “The courage of those risking their safety to demand a better future deserves global attention. I stand with the Iranian people and condemn the regime’s response to protestors in the strongest terms. The Iranian peoples’ voices must not be silenced.” Issues: International Leadership and Foreign Affairs

foreign_policy
Source

Recent news mentions

Articles from a curated list of national outlets that mention Adam Smith.

  • CNN·June 15, 2026
    Trump iran deal strait of hormuz nuclear analysis
  • CNN·June 15, 2026
    Trump iran deal strait of hormuz nuclear analysis
  • The Atlantic·June 6, 2026
    American Democracy Wasn’t Designed for This
  • The New Yorker·May 25, 2026
    What Dogs See When They Look at Us
  • The Philadelphia Inquirer·May 24, 2026
    Our unhappy anniversary | Opinion
  • The Denver Post·May 22, 2026
    Republicans call off vote on Iran war resolution that was on the verge of passing
  • CBS News·May 20, 2026
    Live Updates: Iran threatens to take war
  • The Baltimore Sun·May 20, 2026
    Pentagon watchdog to evaluate US military’s boat strikes in Latin America
  • Newsday·May 19, 2026
    The Latest: Blanche faces questions from lawmakers over a fund to compensate Trump allies
  • The Seattle Times·May 19, 2026
    Bellevue bans some protests
  • Washington Examiner·May 18, 2026
    ‘A republic if you can keep it’: America at 250
  • Fox News·May 14, 2026
    JONATHAN TURLEY: AOC's war on billionaires twists America's birth into a socialist myth
  • The New Yorker·May 11, 2026
    From the Spirit Effect to the Spirit Dilemma
  • Arkansas Democrat-Gazette·May 9, 2026
    Letters | Arkansas Democrat Gazette
  • The Seattle Times·May 9, 2026
    WA filing closes, U.S. House battleground and GOP test emerge

Source: GDELT 2.0 GKG, filtered to a curated list of national outlets. Inclusion is not endorsement; opinion pieces and reported news are mixed.

Recent stock activity

Periodic transaction reports filed under the STOCK Act — disclosed by the rep, sourced from public filings.

No disclosed trades on record.

Source: open-data mirrors of the Senate eFD and House Clerk financial-disclosure systems. Disclosure within 30 days of trade is required by law (45 for spouse/dependent trades).

Top PAC donors · 2026 cycle

Political action committees that gave the most to this rep's principal campaign committee this cycle. PAC giving is direct organizational support — industry, ideological, or leadership.

  1. 1.AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEIdeological19 contributionsPAC arm of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, federalized in 2021. Backs candidates of both parties who support U.S.-Israel security and economic ties.AI$123,000
  2. 2.UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC. PAC5 contributions$25,000
  3. 3.SEIU C.O.P.E.Labor4 contributionsTrade-union PAC for the Service Employees International Union — backs candidates supporting union organizing, collective bargaining, and worker protections.AI$20,000
  4. 4.CULAC THE PAC OF CREDIT UNION NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONFinance3 contributionsCredit union industry PAC — supports candidates and policies favoring credit union regulatory treatment, consumer lending, and financial services competition.AI$15,000
  5. 5.CARPENTERS LEGISLATIVE IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERSLabor3 contributionsTrade-union PAC for the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners — backs prevailing-wage protections, federal infrastructure funding, project labor agreements, and worker safety standards.AI$15,000
  6. 6.NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE DEALERS ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEBusiness3 contributionsTrade association PAC for new-car dealers — backs candidates supporting dealer franchise protections, vehicle sales regulations, and automotive retail interests.AI$15,000
  7. 7.OSHKOSH CORPORATION EMPLOYEES PAC2 contributions$10,000
  8. 8.MACHINISTS NON PARTISAN POL LEAGUE OF THE INT'L ASLabor2 contributionsTrade-union PAC of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers — backs candidates supporting union organizing, prevailing wages, and aerospace manufacturing jobs.AI$10,000
  9. 9.PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEFinance2 contributionsAccounting and professional-services PAC — supports candidates aligned with business-friendly tax policy, financial regulation, and professional-services industry interests.AI$10,000
  10. 10.INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEELabor2 contributionsTrade-union PAC for the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW). Backs candidates supporting prevailing-wage standards, infrastructure investment, apprenticeship programs, and union organizing rights.AI$10,000

Source: OpenFEC (api.open.fec.gov) Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “committee.” Aggregated by contributing committee. Self-transfers from joint-fundraising / victory committees are excluded.

Top individual contributors · 2026 cycle

Itemized individual contributions over $200 to this rep's campaign committee, aggregated by donor employer. PAC giving is shown above; this section is people, not organizations.

  1. 1.PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES$38,500
  2. 2.MICROSOFT$27,847
  3. 3.SELF$20,695
  4. 4.L3 HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES$19,250
  5. 5.BLUE ORIGIN$17,250
  6. 6.GENERAL ATOMICS$13,000
  7. 7.SOCIAL MEDIA VICTIMS LAW CENTER$11,600
  8. 8.ANDURIL INDUSTRIES$10,500
  9. 9.ARMADA$10,500
  10. 10.KRATOS DEFENSE & SECURITY SOLUTIONS$10,500

Source: OpenFEC Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “individual,” aggregated by the donor's self-reported employer. This is a geographic / industry correlation, not a corporate endorsement.