DeepSyte™
Bill FeedAll repsScoreboardsPrimariesProAboutSign inGet started
DeepSyte™™

A nonpartisan civic accountability tool. We match federal legislation to your stated values — without partisan bias.

Learn

  • About
  • About the name
  • Methodology
  • Glossary

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Refund Policy
  • Contact

Sources

Bill data from Congress.gov. Summaries from the Congressional Research Service where available.

Follow

  • Bluesky — @deepsyte.app
  • X — @deepsyteapp
All content is for informational purposes only. Always verify against primary sources.
Back to bill feed
Tina Smith official portrait

Tina Smith

D

senate · MN

CompareSign in to get alerts
Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See how Tina Smith actually votes — against your values.

DeepSyte scores Tina Smith's record on the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your personal alignment.

Get started freeTake the values quiz
Official websiteSee this seat's 2026 race

Alignment with your views

Sign in and take the values quiz to see how Tina Smith's votes line up with your views.

Prediction track record

We haven't made any vote predictions for Tina Smith yet. Predictions are generated for bills with tagged effects; they show up here as soon as the predict-votes job covers this rep's upcoming docket.

Consistency insights

No paired statements and votes yet for Tina Smith

We haven't yet found statement/vote pairs on the same topic for Tina Smith. This usually means either the rep hasn't taken public positions on bills that have come to a passage vote, or those bills haven't been tagged yet. The checker runs as new press releases and votes come in.

Pro analysis

AI rep analysis — Pro

Get an AI-narrated read on Tina Smith's full voting record against your stated values — aligned themes, conflicts, notable votes, and what to watch for.

Sign in to use AI analysis

Campaign promises

We haven't extracted campaign positions for Tina Smith yet. Once their campaign website or position pages are processed, this card will track what they said vs how they voted.

Crossing the aisle

No party-break passage votes recorded for Tina Smith. Either they've voted with Democrats on every substantive passage vote in the corpus, or their tenure overlaps few high-threshold party-line votes so far.

Recent votes

  • Nay
    Fallen Servicemembers Religious Heritage Restoration Act
    119-s-1318··June 5, 2026
  • Yea
    Secure America Act
    119-s-2·2 votes·Jun 5, 2026
    • ·June 5, 2026
    • ·June 5, 2026
  • Nay
    Secure America Act
    119-s-2··June 5, 2026
  • Yea
    Secure America Act
    119-s-2·2 votes·Jun 4, 2026
    • ·June 4, 2026
    • ·June 4, 2026
  • Nay
    Secure America Act
    119-s-2··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units: Final Repeal".
    119-sjres-188··June 3, 2026
  • Nay
    An executive resolution authorizing the en bloc consideration in Executive Session of certain nominations on the Executive Calendar.
    119-sres-690··April 30, 2026
  • Yea
    A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
    119-sjres-184··April 30, 2026
  • Nay
    An executive resolution authorizing the en bloc consideration in Executive Session of certain nominations on the Executive Calendar.
    119-sres-690··April 28, 2026
  • Nay
    A concurrent resolution setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2026 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2027 through 2035.
    119-sconres-33··April 23, 2026
  • Nay
    A concurrent resolution setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2026 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2027 through 2035.
    119-sconres-33··April 21, 2026
  • Nay
    Homeland Security and Further Additional Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026.
    119-hr-7147·2 votes·Mar 25, 2026 – Mar 26, 2026
    • ·March 26, 2026
    • ·March 25, 2026
  • Not voting
    Homeland Security and Further Additional Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026.
    119-hr-7147··March 20, 2026
  • Nay
    Homeland Security and Further Additional Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026.
    119-hr-7147·4 votes·Feb 12, 2026 – Mar 12, 2026
    • ·March 12, 2026
    • ·March 5, 2026
    • ·February 24, 2026
    • ·February 12, 2026
  • Nay
    Pregnant Students’ Rights Act
    119-s-3627··January 27, 2026
  • Nay
    Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act
    119-s-6··January 22, 2025
  • Yea
    Social Security Fairness Act of 2023
    118-hr-82··December 21, 2024
  • Yea
    Social Security Fairness Act of 2023
    118-hr-82··December 21, 2024
  • Yea
    American Relief Act, 2025
    118-hr-10545··December 21, 2024

Recent statements

June 9, 2026press_release_senate

Smith's New Report on Solutions to the Home Insurance Crisis

Position: Senator Smith released a report examining the home insurance affordability crisis driven by climate-change-related extreme weather and insurance industry practices, and outlined more than two dozen policy options ranging from risk reduction measures to alternatives to the current private insurance system.

WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senator Tina Smith (D-MN), the lead Democrat on the Senate Housing Subcommittee, released a new report, Bold Solutions to the Home Insurance Crisis. It examines the nationwide crisis of rising home insurance costs, the role of climate-change-driven extreme weather events, and policy solutions that would tackle this affordability crisis. Across the country, Americans are increasingly facing unaffordable home insurance bills or aren’t able to access coverage at all. Insurers have significantly increased their rates, pushing up home insurance premiums an average of 45% since 2019. Sixteen years ago, home insurance was much more affordable and cost only 5% of the typical monthly mortgage payment. But these costs have now more than doubled to more than 10% of a typical mortgage payment, even as mortgage costs have also surged. Former Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell emphasized the risk we face in response to Sen. Smith’s questioning during a Senate Banking Committee hearing, saying that “If you fast-forward 10 or 15 years, there are going to be regions of the country where you can’t get a mortgage” due to insurance companies pulling out of high-risk areas. Minnesotans have been particularly hit hard by rate increases. Last year, Minnesota home insurance rates increased 34%, which was the largest increase of any state, according to reports. These problems, Sen. Smith argues, are driven by the growing strength and severity of disasters due to climate change and an insurance industry motivated more by profits than protecting its customers. To address the problem, Sen. Smith lays out more than two dozen policy options that Washington can consider, ranging from those that lower physical risks for homeowners and communities, to wholesale alternatives to our current, private home insurance system. You can read the full report HERE: · Senator Smith’s opening letter here “Owning a home has always been part of the American dream. But for too many families today, that dream feels further out of reach than ever before. Without affordable insurance, mortgages may become harder to get, home values could decline and whole communities could face financial ruin. This isn’t some distant threat; it’s happening right now all across the country. This crisis is the result of several intertwined factors—including the worsening effects of climate change, the realities of our built environment and the structure of our financial systems,” said Senator Smith. “This report lays out the facts behind the home insurance crisis. It discusses the role of climate change, shows who is profiting from the status quo and highlights bold solutions that would help keep homeownership within reach.” "The scale of the crisis of insurance availability, affordability, and adequacy mandates ambitious policy solutions," said Moira Birss, Senior Fellow at Climate and Community Institute. "As this comprehensive and invaluable report from Senator Smith outlines, the public sector must forge a new path forward that keeps communities whole and holds private actors accountable." “Home insurance is a major part of America’s affordability crisis. Countless families are shouldering the costs of the climate crisis through increased insurance premiums or lack of coverage. This is already having real-world impacts as disaster survivors struggle to rebuild and recover,” said TJ Helmstetter, a spokesperson for the Insurance Fairness Project. “Insurance is supposed to be the safety net when disasters occur, and right now the net is dangerously frayed. Homeowners and renters cannot be the only ones responsible for repairing it, especially when so many of us are barely making ends meet. Senator Smith’s report provides insights on avenues to ease costs and create a stronger, more reliable insurance system that manages rising premiums and risks. It also examines solutions to some root causes, including excessive profiteering and accelerating climate change.” “The home insurance availability and affordability crisis is threatening the housing security of families across the United States. While climate change is increasing damages, insurance companies are continuing to profit while playing states off against each other. Federal intervention will be necessary to protect families and head off a full-blown economic crisis, and we laud Senator Smith for her forward-thinking approach on this pressing issue,” said Caroline Nagy, associate director for housing at Americans for Financial Reform Education Fund. “From skyrocketing home insurance premiums to total policy cancellations, families are paying the price for record-breaking heat, severe drought, and devastating flooding. Meanwhile, insurance companies are raking in record profits and pushing the costs onto their customers. Americans deserve solutions now. We appreciate Senator Smith’s leadership in bringing much-needed attention to the climate-fueled home insurance crisis and offering real solutions to make housing more affordable,” said Mia Logan, Senior Advisor at Climate Power. "Across the country, survivors of floods, wildfires, hurricanes, and extreme heat are facing a second disaster when they open their insurance bills," said Sierra Kos, Co-Founder and Co-Executive Director, Extreme Weather Survivors. "Rising premiums, reduced coverage, and policy nonrenewals are making it harder for families to stay in the homes and communities they love. We welcome Senator Smith's attention to the growing home insurance crisis and her commitment to exploring solutions that help keep coverage affordable and accessible for homeowners. Survivors need leaders at every level of government to recognize that as extreme weather events become more frequent and costly, insurance is increasingly becoming a housing issue, an affordability issue, and a recovery issue." Senator Smith has been a champion in the Senate for affordable housing and clean energy policy. She has been the top Democrat on the Senate Housing Subcommittee since 2021 and has a record of proposing and delivering on bipartisan housing solutions, ranging from reforming rural housing programs, improving homeless assistance and access to homeownership, and has made addressing Minnesota’s housing challenges a priority as Senator. She was instrumental in securing major climate and energy provisions in the Inflation Reduction Act, including tax credits for clean energy technologies.

housingenvironment
Source

Recent news mentions

Articles from a curated list of national outlets that mention Tina Smith.

  • The Forum (Fargo)·June 14, 2026
    Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan made campaign stop near Moorhead Saturday
  • The Seattle Times·June 13, 2026
    ‘Democrats want to win’: Platner’s support reflects a changing party in the Trump era
  • The Forum (Fargo)·June 12, 2026
    Klobuchar, Smith honor Hortmans on U.S. Senate floor
  • NPR·June 10, 2026
    nx s1 5851664
  • Fox News·June 4, 2026
    SEE IT: Dem senators dodge on backing Platner as Maine candidate’s scandal clouds final days before primary
  • CNN·June 3, 2026
    Graham platner senate democrats maine
  • The Forum (Fargo)·May 30, 2026
    After long delays and a challenge, Klobuchar gets the DFL nod in race for governor
  • The Forum (Fargo)·May 26, 2026
    Delegates will arrive at DFL convention in Rochester energized and restive
  • NBC News·May 21, 2026
    Democratic group launches ICE attack against Rep. Angie Craig in Minnesota Senate primary
  • Roll Call·May 14, 2026
    The most vulnerable senators of 2026, less than 6 months before Election Day

Source: GDELT 2.0 GKG, filtered to a curated list of national outlets. Inclusion is not endorsement; opinion pieces and reported news are mixed.

Recent stock activity

Periodic transaction reports filed under the STOCK Act — disclosed by the rep, sourced from public filings.

No disclosed trades on record.

Source: open-data mirrors of the Senate eFD and House Clerk financial-disclosure systems. Disclosure within 30 days of trade is required by law (45 for spouse/dependent trades).

Top PAC donors · 2026 cycle

Political action committees that gave the most to this rep's principal campaign committee this cycle. PAC giving is direct organizational support — industry, ideological, or leadership.

  1. 1.WOMEN ON THE ROAD CALIFORNIA 2018Ideological1 contributionCalifornia-based PAC focused on women's political engagement — specific policy positions not inferable from the name.AI · low$15,000
  2. 2.SHAHEEN SMITH 2020Leadership1 contributionMember-of-Congress leadership PAC — supports Democratic candidates and causes aligned with the officeholder.AI$11,200
  3. 3.GREEN SENATE IMPACT1 contribution$10,361
  4. 4.NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEPublic Sector2 contributionsPublic-sector employee union PAC — backs candidates supporting federal employee benefits, workplace protections, and collective bargaining rights.AI$10,000
  5. 5.EMILY'S LISTIdeological2 contributionsPro-choice advocacy PAC — supports Democratic women candidates who back abortion access and reproductive rights.AI$10,000
  6. 6.XCEL ENERGY EMPLOYEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (XPAC)Energy2 contributionsEnergy utility company PAC — supports candidates backing electric utility operations, grid infrastructure investment, and energy policy favorable to large power producers.AI$10,000
  7. 7.UA UNION PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS VOTE! PACLabor2 contributionsTrade-union PAC for United Association plumbers and pipefitters — backs prevailing-wage protections, infrastructure funding, project labor agreements, and pro-union labor policies.AI$10,000
  8. 8.LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA (LIUNA) PACLabor2 contributionsTrade-union PAC for construction laborers — backs prevailing-wage standards, infrastructure investment, apprenticeship programs, and project labor agreements.AI$10,000
  9. 9.COMCAST CORPORATION & NBCUNIVERSAL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE - FEDERAL2 contributions$10,000
  10. 10.THE TOP 4 2020 COMMITTEE1 contribution$5,440

Source: OpenFEC (api.open.fec.gov) Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “committee.” Aggregated by contributing committee. Self-transfers from joint-fundraising / victory committees are excluded.

Top individual contributors · 2026 cycle

Itemized individual contributions over $200 to this rep's campaign committee, aggregated by donor employer. PAC giving is shown above; this section is people, not organizations.

  1. 1.SELF$3,945
  2. 2.ALBRIGHT STONEBRIDGE GROUP LLC$1,000
  3. 3.EDINA REALTY, INC.$500
  4. 4.MAYO CLINIC$160
  5. 5.MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIV$75
  6. 6.STATE OF MINNESOTA$70
  7. 7.UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA$65
  8. 8.WHEN I WORK$50
  9. 9.HCMC$50
  10. 10.DB SYSTEL GMBH$50

Source: OpenFEC Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “individual,” aggregated by the donor's self-reported employer. This is a geographic / industry correlation, not a corporate endorsement.