DeepSyte™
Bill FeedAll repsScoreboardsPrimariesProAboutSign inGet started
DeepSyte™™

A nonpartisan civic accountability tool. We match federal legislation to your stated values — without partisan bias.

Learn

  • About
  • About the name
  • Methodology
  • Glossary

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Refund Policy
  • Contact

Sources

Bill data from Congress.gov. Summaries from the Congressional Research Service where available.

Follow

  • Bluesky — @deepsyte.app
  • X — @deepsyteapp
All content is for informational purposes only. Always verify against primary sources.
Back to bill feed
119-hr-3160Committee
Sign in to get alerts

PREVAIL Act

Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See how your representatives voted on this bill.

DeepSyte matches this bill to the issues you care about and shows whether your reps' votes line up — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your alignment.

Get started freeTake the values quiz

Alignment with your views

Sign in and take the values quiz to see how this bill lines up with what you've said.

Summary

Official CRS summary
Promoting and Respecting Economically Vital American Innovation Leadership Act or the PREVAIL Act This bill addresses various issues relating to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), including by imposing additional requirements on administrative patent validity challenges (proceedings to review and potentially cancel issued patents) at the USPTO. The bill modifies provisions relating to inter partes reviews (IPRs) and other administrative patent validity proceedings, including by prohibiting an administrative patent judge who participated in deciding whether to institute an IPR (i.e., whether to allow the IPR to proceed based on the initial petition) from also participating in deciding the final outcome of the same IPR; prohibiting a person (individual or entity) from petitioning for an IPR against a patent unless the person meets certain standing requirements (currently, any person may petition for an IPR); prohibiting a person who has challenged a patent's validity in an IPR from raising the same challenges against the patent in other proceedings (e.g., district court) if the IPR has been instituted; and raising the burden that the petitioner in an IPR must meet to invalidate a previously issued patent claim. The bill also makes institutions of higher education (IHEs) and nonprofit entities that hold patents on behalf of IHEs eligible for reduced patent-related fees, including filing fees. (Currently, employees of IHEs are eligible for reduced fees but not the IHEs themselves.) The bill also makes fees collected by the USPTO available for the USPTO's use without further appropriations from Congress.
Read full bill text

Values analysis

Sign in and take the values quiz to get a personalized read on how this bill lines up with your positions.

Bill details

Congress
119
Bill type
hr
Introduced
May 1, 2025
Sponsor
Nathaniel MoranRTX
Cosponsors
2
Last action
May 1, 2025— Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

How your representatives voted

Sign in to see how your representatives voted on this bill.