2026 race

CA-23 — U.S. House

2 candidates on the November ballot. Incumbent: Jay Obernolte.

Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See where these candidates stand — and who's funding them.

DeepSyte tracks the money and the record in every race against the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your alignment.

How we got here · 1 earlier contest
Primary · Tuesday, June 2, 2026
Called by audit: web-verified
Top-two primary — Jay Obernolte and Tessa Lynn Hodge advanced to the general election.
  • RJay Obernolte· inc.Advanced to general
  • DTessa Lynn HodgeAdvanced to general
Election held
Counting
Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Results appear here once a race is called and verified. Official returns from the California Secretary of State.

Disclosed money in race
$3.0M
Candidate + outside spending. See finance breakdown below.
Incumbent

Currently in office

Challengers

Sorted by fundraising

Karen Matthews

I
ChallengerFEC H6CA23289

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$175K
Cash on hand: $0

Tessa Lynn Hodge

D
ChallengerFEC H6CA23230

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$127K
Cash on hand: $12K

Paul Chakalian

D
ChallengerFEC H6CA23263

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$73K
Cash on hand: $0

Charles Patrick Wallis

D
ChallengerFEC H6CA23305

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$64K
Cash on hand: $24

Alexis Claiborne

D
ChallengerFEC H6CA23255

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$12K
Cash on hand: $3K
Local signal

Early read on CA-23 — U.S. House

A directional read on where this seat is trending, from the signals we have so far. This is an early scaffold — more inputs light up as coverage and constituent activity accrue.

Coverage tone · leans negative
Recent news coverage of Jay Obernolte over the last 90 days.
0 positive6 neutral1 negative
7 articles · AI-assessed sentiment toward the rep. A media signal, not a poll of the district.
Constituent stakes
No one here has staked a position on a tracked vote yet. As neighbors weigh in on /pressure campaigns, the district's lean will show up here.
Money in the race

Finance breakdown

Disclosed funding shaping this race — both the money candidates raise themselves and the outside spending dropped by independent groups. Issue-ad spending by 501(c)(4) groups is excluded; the FEC doesn't require disclosure of it. See the note below for details.

Candidate fundraising: FEC reports through October 14, 2026 · 2025–26 cycle

Total disclosed
$3.0M
Candidate fundraising + independent expenditures (FEC).
Candidate-direct (Schedule A)
$2.3M
Raised by candidate committees themselves.
Outside spending (Schedule E)
$739K
$721K for · $19K against
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Jay Obernolte(R)incumbent
+ AMERICAN MISSION $260K
− WORKING CLASS HEROES FUND $19K
$1.9M$260K$19K$2.1M
Karen Matthews(I)
+ WORKING CLASS HEROES FUND $460K
$175K$460K—$635K
Tessa Lynn Hodge(D)
+ SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL COMMITTEE $851
$127K$851—$128K
Paul Chakalian(D)
$73K——$73K
Charles Patrick Wallis(D)
$64K——$64K
Alexis Claiborne(D)
$12K——$12K
Where the money comes from

In-state vs out-of-state

Share of each candidate's itemized individual contributions from donors inside CA versus the rest of the country. Excludes sub-$200 unitemized donations (no geography on file) and PAC money — see note below.

Jay Obernolte(R)49% in-state · $559K itemized
$272K in-state$288K out-of-state
Karen Matthews(I)30% in-state · $116K itemized
$35K in-state$80K out-of-state
Tessa Lynn Hodge(D)87% in-state · $40K itemized
$35K in-state$5K out-of-state
Paul Chakalian(D)93% in-state · $31K itemized
$29K in-state$2K out-of-state
Charles Patrick Wallis(D)49% in-state · $30K itemized
$15K in-state$15K out-of-state
Alexis Claiborne(D)64% in-state · $6K itemized
$4K in-state$2K out-of-state
What's counted, what isn't

Candidate-direct is each campaign's reported receipts on FEC Schedule A — individual contributions plus PAC contributions to the candidate's own committee — through the most recent filing.

Outside spending is independent expenditures on FEC Schedule E: money spent by PACs, super PACs, and party committees for or against a candidate, without legal coordination with the campaign. The committees listed under each candidate are the largest disclosed spenders on either side.

In-state vs out-of-state covers only itemized individual contributions — donations over $200, which are the only ones that carry a contributor address at the FEC. Sub-$200 unitemized donations (often a large share for grassroots campaigns) have no geography on file and are excluded, as is PAC money. So the percentages describe where a candidate's itemized individual money comes from, not where every dollar raised comes from.

Not counted: 501(c)(4) "social welfare" organizations run issue ads that frequently mention candidates by name but aren't classified as express advocacy under FEC rules — they file no Schedule E and don't appear in this breakdown. Press reporting on a race may cite figures that include this dark-money spending; ours doesn't.

About this race page

Candidate roster is sourced from the FEC's active-candidate list for the 2026 cycle. Fundraising totals reflect committee filings through the last reporting period.

Alignment % compares the candidate's extracted policy positions against your quiz answers. Positions are pulled from the candidate's campaign issues page by AI; we save the source quote for each position so you can verify the extraction. Candidates without a campaign issues page show position data pending — we're working through the roster and re-checking stale extractions every 90 days.

News coverage is from the GDELT 2.0 global news feed, filtered to a curated list of national, political, and regional outlets.