2026 race

CA-40 — U.S. House

2 candidates on the November ballot. Incumbent: Young Kim.

Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See where these candidates stand — and who's funding them.

DeepSyte tracks the money and the record in every race against the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your alignment.

How we got here · 1 earlier contest
Primary · Tuesday, June 2, 2026
Called by California Secretary of State (certified Statement of Vote)
Top-two primary — Ken Calvert and Young Kim advanced to the general election.
  • RKen Calvert· inc.Advanced to general34.9%
  • RYoung Kim· inc.Advanced to general20.6%
  • DEsther Kim VaretDefeated16.6%
  • DLisa RamirezDefeated14.0%
  • DJoseph KerrDefeated8.6%
  • DClaude Manuel KeissiehDefeated2.2%
  • DFrancis "frank" HoffmanDefeated1.5%
  • INina LinhDefeated1.5%
Election held
Counting
Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Results appear here once a race is called and verified. Official returns from the California Secretary of State.

Disclosed money in race
$30M
Candidate + outside spending. See finance breakdown below.
Incumbent

Currently in office

Challengers

Sorted by fundraising

Esther Kim Varet

D
ChallengerFEC H6CA40309

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$3.0M
Cash on hand: $26K

Christina Gagnier

D
ChallengerFEC H6CA40325

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$607K
Cash on hand: $22K

Lisa Ramirez

D
ChallengerFEC H6CA40382

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$519K
Cash on hand: $0

Nina Linh

I
ChallengerFEC H6CA40341

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$442K
Cash on hand: $0

Joseph Kerr

D
ChallengerFEC H6CA40317

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$287K
Cash on hand: $0

Perry Meade

D
ChallengerFEC H6CA40374

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$276K
Cash on hand: $48K

Tiffanie Tate

D
ChallengerFEC H6CA41299

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$66K
Cash on hand: $0

Claude Manuel Keissieh

D
ChallengerFEC H6CA41323

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$34K
Cash on hand: $0

Paula Williams Swift

D
ChallengerFEC H6CA40333

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$15K
Cash on hand: $0

Francis "frank" Hoffman

D
ChallengerFEC H0CA39049

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$0
Cash on hand: $0
Local signal

Early read on CA-40 — U.S. House

A directional read on where this seat is trending, from the signals we have so far. This is an early scaffold — more inputs light up as coverage and constituent activity accrue.

Coverage tone · leans negative
Recent news coverage of Young Kim over the last 90 days.
0 positive9 neutral1 negative
10 articles · AI-assessed sentiment toward the rep. A media signal, not a poll of the district.
Constituent stakes
No one here has staked a position on a tracked vote yet. As neighbors weigh in on /pressure campaigns, the district's lean will show up here.
Money in the race

Finance breakdown

Disclosed funding shaping this race — both the money candidates raise themselves and the outside spending dropped by independent groups. Issue-ad spending by 501(c)(4) groups is excluded; the FEC doesn't require disclosure of it. See the note below for details.

Candidate fundraising: FEC reports through October 14, 2026 · 2025–26 cycle

Total disclosed
$30M
Candidate fundraising + independent expenditures (FEC).
Candidate-direct (Schedule A)
$22M
Raised by candidate committees themselves.
Outside spending (Schedule E)
$7.1M
$2.0M for · $5.1M against
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Ken Calvert(R)
+ AMERICANS 4 SECURITY PAC $52K
+ CALIFORNIA CONSERVATIVES PAC $27K
+ PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH PAC $8K
− CFF $574K
− YOUTH SAVE DEMOCRACY PAC $4K
− ACTIVATE AMERICA $4K
$7.1M$88K$581K$6.6M
Young Kim(R)incumbent
+ AMERICA'S CREDIT UNIONS PAC $500K
+ AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ACTION, INC. (AFP ACTION) DBA CVA ACTION AND DBA LIBRE ACTION $290K
+ NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $57K
− AMERICANS 4 SECURITY PAC $3.2M
− CALIFORNIA CONSERVATIVES PAC $1.3M
− ACTIVATE AMERICA $2K
$10M$847K$4.5M$6.5M
Esther Kim Varet(D)
+ CALIFORNIA BLUE PAC $702K
+ WESTERN BLUE PAC $350K
− YOUTH SAVE DEMOCRACY PAC $3K
$3.0M$1.1M$3K$4.0M
Christina Gagnier(D)
$607K——$607K
Lisa Ramirez(D)
$519K——$519K
Nina Linh(I)
$442K——$442K
Joseph Kerr(D)
+ PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ORANGE AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES' COMMUNITY ACTION FUND PAC $6
$287K$6—$287K
Perry Meade(D)
$276K——$276K
Tiffanie Tate(D)
$66K——$66K
Claude Manuel Keissieh(D)
$34K——$34K
Paula Williams Swift(D)
$15K——$15K
Francis "frank" Hoffman(D)
$0——$0
Where the money comes from

In-state vs out-of-state

Share of each candidate's itemized individual contributions from donors inside CA versus the rest of the country. Excludes sub-$200 unitemized donations (no geography on file) and PAC money — see note below.

Ken Calvert(R)38% in-state · $4.5M itemized
$1.7M in-state$2.8M out-of-state
Young Kim(R)38% in-state · $5.5M itemized
$2.1M in-state$3.4M out-of-state
Esther Kim Varet(D)55% in-state · $1.2M itemized
$669K in-state$542K out-of-state
Christina Gagnier(D)35% in-state · $339K itemized
$120K in-state$219K out-of-state
Lisa Ramirez(D)91% in-state · $310K itemized
$282K in-state$28K out-of-state
Nina Linh(I)78% in-state · $168K itemized
$132K in-state$37K out-of-state
Joseph Kerr(D)88% in-state · $141K itemized
$124K in-state$17K out-of-state
Perry Meade(D)63% in-state · $252K itemized
$159K in-state$94K out-of-state
Tiffanie Tate(D)55% in-state · $57K itemized
$31K in-state$26K out-of-state
Claude Manuel Keissieh(D)0% in-state · $400 itemized
$0 in-state$400 out-of-state
Paula Williams Swift(D)76% in-state · $7K itemized
$6K in-state$2K out-of-state
What's counted, what isn't

Candidate-direct is each campaign's reported receipts on FEC Schedule A — individual contributions plus PAC contributions to the candidate's own committee — through the most recent filing.

Outside spending is independent expenditures on FEC Schedule E: money spent by PACs, super PACs, and party committees for or against a candidate, without legal coordination with the campaign. The committees listed under each candidate are the largest disclosed spenders on either side.

In-state vs out-of-state covers only itemized individual contributions — donations over $200, which are the only ones that carry a contributor address at the FEC. Sub-$200 unitemized donations (often a large share for grassroots campaigns) have no geography on file and are excluded, as is PAC money. So the percentages describe where a candidate's itemized individual money comes from, not where every dollar raised comes from.

Not counted: 501(c)(4) "social welfare" organizations run issue ads that frequently mention candidates by name but aren't classified as express advocacy under FEC rules — they file no Schedule E and don't appear in this breakdown. Press reporting on a race may cite figures that include this dark-money spending; ours doesn't.

About this race page

Candidate roster is sourced from the FEC's active-candidate list for the 2026 cycle. Fundraising totals reflect committee filings through the last reporting period.

Alignment % compares the candidate's extracted policy positions against your quiz answers. Positions are pulled from the candidate's campaign issues page by AI; we save the source quote for each position so you can verify the extraction. Candidates without a campaign issues page show position data pending — we're working through the roster and re-checking stale extractions every 90 days.

News coverage is from the GDELT 2.0 global news feed, filtered to a curated list of national, political, and regional outlets.