
Young Kim
RSign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
10 active candidates on file with the FEC. Incumbent: Young Kim.
DeepSyte tracks the money and the record in every race against the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your alignment.

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
A directional read on where this seat is trending, from the signals we have so far. This is an early scaffold — more inputs light up as coverage and constituent activity accrue.
Disclosed funding shaping this race — both the money candidates raise themselves and the outside spending dropped by independent groups. Issue-ad spending by 501(c)(4) groups is excluded; the FEC doesn't require disclosure of it. See the note below for details.
| Candidate | Raised directly | Outside for | Outside against | Net in corner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Ken Calvert(R) + AMERICANS 4 SECURITY PAC $52K + CALIFORNIA CONSERVATIVES PAC $27K + PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH PAC $8K − CFF $574K − YOUTH SAVE DEMOCRACY PAC $4K − ACTIVATE AMERICA $4K | $5.2M | $88K | $581K | $4.8M |
Young Kim(R)incumbent + AMERICA'S CREDIT UNIONS PAC $500K + AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ACTION, INC. (AFP ACTION) DBA CVA ACTION AND DBA LIBRE ACTION $290K + NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $57K − AMERICANS 4 SECURITY PAC $3.2M − CALIFORNIA CONSERVATIVES PAC $1.3M − ACTIVATE AMERICA $2K | $7.7M | $847K | $4.5M | $4.0M |
Christina Gagnier(D) | $607K | — | — | $607K |
Lisa Ramirez(D) | $392K | — | — | $392K |
Perry Meade(D) | $276K | — | — | $276K |
Nina Linh(I) | $267K | — | — | $267K |
Joseph Kerr(D) | $223K | — | — | $223K |
Tiffanie Tate(D) | $66K | — | — | $66K |
Claude Manuel Keissieh(D) | $34K | — | — | $34K |
Paula Williams Swift(D) | $15K | — | — | $15K |
Share of each candidate's itemized individual contributions from donors inside CA versus the rest of the country. Excludes sub-$200 unitemized donations (no geography on file) and PAC money — see note below.
Candidate-direct is each campaign's reported receipts on FEC Schedule A — individual contributions plus PAC contributions to the candidate's own committee — through the most recent filing.
Outside spending is independent expenditures on FEC Schedule E: money spent by PACs, super PACs, and party committees for or against a candidate, without legal coordination with the campaign. The committees listed under each candidate are the largest disclosed spenders on either side.
In-state vs out-of-state covers only itemized individual contributions — donations over $200, which are the only ones that carry a contributor address at the FEC. Sub-$200 unitemized donations (often a large share for grassroots campaigns) have no geography on file and are excluded, as is PAC money. So the percentages describe where a candidate's itemized individual money comes from, not where every dollar raised comes from.
Not counted: 501(c)(4) "social welfare" organizations run issue ads that frequently mention candidates by name but aren't classified as express advocacy under FEC rules — they file no Schedule E and don't appear in this breakdown. Press reporting on a race may cite figures that include this dark-money spending; ours doesn't.
Candidate roster is sourced from the FEC's active-candidate list for the 2026 cycle. Fundraising totals reflect committee filings through the last reporting period.
Alignment % compares the candidate's extracted policy positions against your quiz answers. Positions are pulled from the candidate's campaign issues page by AI; we save the source quote for each position so you can verify the extraction. Candidates without a campaign issues page show position data pending — we're working through the roster and re-checking stale extractions every 90 days.
News coverage is from the GDELT 2.0 global news feed, filtered to a curated list of national, political, and regional outlets.