2026 race

IN-01 — U.S. House

2 candidates on the November ballot. Incumbent: Frank J. Mrvan.

Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See where these candidates stand — and who's funding them.

DeepSyte tracks the money and the record in every race against the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your alignment.

How we got here · 2 earlier contests
Democratic primary · Tuesday, May 5, 2026
Called by manual backfill (AP/Wikipedia/Ballotpedia)
Frank J. MrvanWon80.2%
Republican primary · Tuesday, May 5, 2026
Called by manual backfill (AP/Wikipedia/Ballotpedia)
Barb RegnitzWon45.8%
  • RJames SchenkeDefeated30.1%
  • RDavid Benyamin RuizDefeated24.1%
Election held
Counting
Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Results appear here once a race is called and verified. Official returns from the Indiana Election Division.

Disclosed money in race
$6.0M
Candidate + outside spending. See finance breakdown below.
Incumbent

Currently in office

Challengers

Sorted by fundraising

Barb Regnitz

R
ChallengerFEC H6IN01231

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$2.8M
Cash on hand: $504K
3 defeated candidates — show

Jennifer-Ruth Green

RDefeated
ChallengerFEC H2IN01172

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$172K
Cash on hand: $5K

James Schenke

RDefeated
ChallengerFEC H6IN01223

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$59K
Cash on hand: $4K

David Benyamin Ruiz

RDefeated
ChallengerFEC H4IN01194

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$1K
Cash on hand: −$547
Local signal

Early read on IN-01 — U.S. House

A directional read on where this seat is trending, from the signals we have so far. This is an early scaffold — more inputs light up as coverage and constituent activity accrue.

Coverage tone · the matchup
Recent news coverage of the nominees heading to the general election.
Frank J. Mrvanleans positive
4 pos8 neutral0 neg12 articles
Barb Regnitzlimited coverage
No coverage in our tracked outlets in the last 90 days.
A media signal, not a poll of the district.
Constituent stakes
No one here has staked a position on a tracked vote yet. As neighbors weigh in on /pressure campaigns, the district's lean will show up here.
Money in the race

Finance breakdown

Disclosed funding shaping this race — both the money candidates raise themselves and the outside spending dropped by independent groups. Issue-ad spending by 501(c)(4) groups is excluded; the FEC doesn't require disclosure of it. See the note below for details.

Candidate fundraising: FEC reports through October 14, 2026 · 2025–26 cycle

Total disclosed
$6.0M
Candidate fundraising + independent expenditures (FEC).
Candidate-direct (Schedule A)
$6.0M
Raised by candidate committees themselves.
Outside spending (Schedule E)
$53
$53 for · $0 against
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Frank J. Mrvan(D)incumbent
+ GIVEGREEN UNITED ACTION $53
$3.0M$53—$3.0M
Barb Regnitz(R)
$2.8M——$2.8M
3 defeated candidates — show finances
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Jennifer-Ruth Green(R)defeated
$172K——$172K
James Schenke(R)defeated
$59K——$59K
David Benyamin Ruiz(R)defeated
$1K——$1K
Where the money comes from

In-state vs out-of-state

Share of each candidate's itemized individual contributions from donors inside IN versus the rest of the country. Excludes sub-$200 unitemized donations (no geography on file) and PAC money — see note below.

Frank J. Mrvan(D)39% in-state · $1.2M itemized
$457K in-state$701K out-of-state
Barb Regnitz(R)91% in-state · $159K itemized
$144K in-state$15K out-of-state
3 defeated candidates — show
Jennifer-Ruth Green(R)defeated32% in-state · $62K itemized
$20K in-state$42K out-of-state
James Schenke(R)defeated16% in-state · $56K itemized
$9K in-state$46K out-of-state
David Benyamin Ruiz(R)defeated100% in-state · $1K itemized
$1K in-state$0 out-of-state
What's counted, what isn't

Candidate-direct is each campaign's reported receipts on FEC Schedule A — individual contributions plus PAC contributions to the candidate's own committee — through the most recent filing.

Outside spending is independent expenditures on FEC Schedule E: money spent by PACs, super PACs, and party committees for or against a candidate, without legal coordination with the campaign. The committees listed under each candidate are the largest disclosed spenders on either side.

In-state vs out-of-state covers only itemized individual contributions — donations over $200, which are the only ones that carry a contributor address at the FEC. Sub-$200 unitemized donations (often a large share for grassroots campaigns) have no geography on file and are excluded, as is PAC money. So the percentages describe where a candidate's itemized individual money comes from, not where every dollar raised comes from.

Not counted: 501(c)(4) "social welfare" organizations run issue ads that frequently mention candidates by name but aren't classified as express advocacy under FEC rules — they file no Schedule E and don't appear in this breakdown. Press reporting on a race may cite figures that include this dark-money spending; ours doesn't.

Where they stand

Issue-by-issue comparison

Positions extracted from each candidate's campaign issues page by AI. Contested rows — where candidates disagree with each other — appear first.

StatementMrvanRegnitzYou
Abortion
A national law should protect access to abortion in every state.
—
Abortion
Each state should set its own abortion laws.
—
Healthcare
Medicare should be allowed to negotiate lower prescription drug prices.
—
Infrastructure
The government should invest in expanding passenger rail, including high-speed rail.
—
Labor
Federal labor law should make it easier for workers to form unions (PRO Act-style reforms).
—
Trade
Federal procurement should give strong preference to U.S.-made goods, even at higher cost.
—

SupportsOpposesNo public positionRinged = confirmed by the campaign

About this race page

Candidate roster is sourced from the FEC's active-candidate list for the 2026 cycle. Fundraising totals reflect committee filings through the last reporting period.

Alignment % compares the candidate's extracted policy positions against your quiz answers. Positions are pulled from the candidate's campaign issues page by AI; we save the source quote for each position so you can verify the extraction. Candidates without a campaign issues page show position data pending — we're working through the roster and re-checking stale extractions every 90 days.

News coverage is from the GDELT 2.0 global news feed, filtered to a curated list of national, political, and regional outlets.