All North Carolina races
2026 race

NC-11 — U.S. House

9 active candidates on file with the FEC. Incumbent: Chuck Edwards.

Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See where these candidates stand — and who's funding them.

DeepSyte tracks the money and the record in every race against the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your alignment.

Democratic primary · Tuesday, March 3, 2026
Called by audit: web-verified
Jamie AgerWon65.0%
  • DRichard HudspethDefeated16.0%
  • DZelda BriarwoodDefeated13.0%
  • DPaul MaddoxDefeated5.0%
Republican primary · Tuesday, March 3, 2026
Called by audit: web-verified
Chuck EdwardsWon70.1%
  • RAdam SmithDefeated29.9%
Election day
135days
Tuesday, November 3, 2026
Disclosed money in race
$3.1M
Candidate + outside spending. See finance breakdown below.
Incumbent

Currently in office

Challengers

Sorted by fundraising

Jamie Ager

D
ChallengerFEC H6NC11248

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$1.7M
Cash on hand: $1.1M
7 defeated candidates — show

Richard Hudspeth

DDefeated
ChallengerFEC H6NC11255

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$209K
Cash on hand: $225

Morris Col Davis

DDefeated
ChallengerFEC H6NC11222

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$111K
Cash on hand: $0

Paul Maddox

DDefeated
ChallengerFEC H6NC11271

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$95K
Cash on hand: $3K

Christopher John Harjes

DDefeated
ChallengerFEC H6NC11206

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$74K
Cash on hand: $0

Adam Smith

RDefeated
ChallengerFEC H6NC11263

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$67K
Cash on hand: $2K

Jacob Lawrence

DDefeated
ChallengerFEC H6NC11230

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$43K
Cash on hand: $936

Zelda Briarwood

DDefeated
ChallengerFEC H6NC11214

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$39K
Cash on hand: $17
Local signal

Early read on NC-11 — U.S. House

A directional read on where this seat is trending, from the signals we have so far. This is an early scaffold — more inputs light up as coverage and constituent activity accrue.

Coverage tone · the matchup
Recent news coverage of the nominees heading to the general election.
Jamie Agerlimited coverage
No tracked coverage in the last 90 days yet.
Chuck Edwardslimited coverage
No tracked coverage in the last 90 days yet.
A media signal, not a poll of the district.
Constituent stakes
No one here has staked a position on a tracked vote yet. As neighbors weigh in on /pressure campaigns, the district's lean will show up here.
Money in the race

Finance breakdown

Disclosed funding shaping this race — both the money candidates raise themselves and the outside spending dropped by independent groups. Issue-ad spending by 501(c)(4) groups is excluded; the FEC doesn't require disclosure of it. See the note below for details.

Total disclosed
$3.1M
Candidate fundraising + independent expenditures (FEC).
Candidate-direct (Schedule A)
$3.1M
Raised by candidate committees themselves.
Outside spending (Schedule E)
$0
No outside spending reported yet.
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Jamie Ager(D)
$1.7M$1.7M
Chuck Edwards(R)incumbent
$785K$785K
7 defeated candidates — show finances
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Richard Hudspeth(D)defeated
$209K$209K
Morris Col Davis(D)defeated
$111K$111K
Paul Maddox(D)defeated
$95K$95K
Christopher John Harjes(D)defeated
$74K$74K
Adam Smith(R)defeated
$67K$67K
Jacob Lawrence(D)defeated
$43K$43K
Zelda Briarwood(D)defeated
$39K$39K
Where the money comes from

In-state vs out-of-state

Share of each candidate's itemized individual contributions from donors inside NC versus the rest of the country. Excludes sub-$200 unitemized donations (no geography on file) and PAC money — see note below.

Jamie Ager(D)52% in-state · $1.2M itemized
$623K in-state$576K out-of-state
Chuck Edwards(R)48% in-state · $448K itemized
$217K in-state$231K out-of-state
What's counted, what isn't

Candidate-direct is each campaign's reported receipts on FEC Schedule A — individual contributions plus PAC contributions to the candidate's own committee — through the most recent filing.

Outside spending is independent expenditures on FEC Schedule E: money spent by PACs, super PACs, and party committees for or against a candidate, without legal coordination with the campaign. The committees listed under each candidate are the largest disclosed spenders on either side.

In-state vs out-of-state covers only itemized individual contributions — donations over $200, which are the only ones that carry a contributor address at the FEC. Sub-$200 unitemized donations (often a large share for grassroots campaigns) have no geography on file and are excluded, as is PAC money. So the percentages describe where a candidate's itemized individual money comes from, not where every dollar raised comes from.

Not counted: 501(c)(4) "social welfare" organizations run issue ads that frequently mention candidates by name but aren't classified as express advocacy under FEC rules — they file no Schedule E and don't appear in this breakdown. Press reporting on a race may cite figures that include this dark-money spending; ours doesn't.

Where they stand

Issue-by-issue comparison

Positions extracted from each candidate's campaign issues page by AI. Contested rows — where candidates disagree with each other — appear first.

StatementAgerEdwardsYou
Agriculture
SNAP (food stamp) eligibility and benefit levels should be expanded.
Economy
The federal minimum wage should be raised.
Healthcare
Medicare should be allowed to negotiate lower prescription drug prices.
Healthcare
Enhanced ACA premium subsidies should be made permanent at expanded levels.

SupportsOpposesNo public positionRinged = confirmed by the campaign

About this race page

Candidate roster is sourced from the FEC's active-candidate list for the 2026 cycle. Fundraising totals reflect committee filings through the last reporting period.

Alignment % compares the candidate's extracted policy positions against your quiz answers. Positions are pulled from the candidate's campaign issues page by AI; we save the source quote for each position so you can verify the extraction. Candidates without a campaign issues page show position data pending — we're working through the roster and re-checking stale extractions every 90 days.

News coverage is from the GDELT 2.0 global news feed, filtered to a curated list of national, political, and regional outlets.