2026 race

NM-02 — U.S. House

2 candidates on the November ballot. Incumbent: Gabe Vasquez.

Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See where these candidates stand — and who's funding them.

DeepSyte tracks the money and the record in every race against the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your alignment.

How we got here · 2 earlier contests
Democratic primary · Tuesday, June 2, 2026
Called by audit: web-verified
Gabe VasquezWon100.0%
Republican primary · Tuesday, June 2, 2026
Called by audit: web-verified
Gregory G CunninghamWon85.0%
  • RJose OrozcoDefeated15.0%
Election held
Counting
Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Results appear here once a race is called and verified. Official returns from the New Mexico Secretary of State.

Disclosed money in race
$10M
Candidate + outside spending. See finance breakdown below.
Incumbent

Currently in office

Challengers

Sorted by fundraising

Gregory G Cunningham

R
ChallengerFEC H6NM02127

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$2.5M
Cash on hand: $344K
1 defeated candidate — show

Jose Orozco

RDefeated
ChallengerFEC H6NM02135

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$219K
Cash on hand: $3K
Local signal

Early read on NM-02 — U.S. House

A directional read on where this seat is trending, from the signals we have so far. This is an early scaffold — more inputs light up as coverage and constituent activity accrue.

Coverage tone · the matchup
Recent news coverage of the nominees heading to the general election.
Gabe Vasquezleans negative
2 pos12 neutral3 neg17 articles
Gregory G Cunninghamleans positive
1 pos15 neutral0 neg16 articles
A media signal, not a poll of the district.
Constituent stakes
No one here has staked a position on a tracked vote yet. As neighbors weigh in on /pressure campaigns, the district's lean will show up here.
Money in the race

Finance breakdown

Disclosed funding shaping this race — both the money candidates raise themselves and the outside spending dropped by independent groups. Issue-ad spending by 501(c)(4) groups is excluded; the FEC doesn't require disclosure of it. See the note below for details.

Candidate fundraising: FEC reports through October 14, 2026 · 2025–26 cycle

Total disclosed
$10M
Candidate fundraising + independent expenditures (FEC).
Candidate-direct (Schedule A)
$8.3M
Raised by candidate committees themselves.
Outside spending (Schedule E)
$2.1M
$7K for · $2.1M against
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Gabe Vasquez(D)incumbent
+ FIELD TEAM 6, INC. $3K
+ BLUE CD2 NEW MEXICO USA $3K
+ GIVEGREEN UNITED ACTION $363
− CLF $1.9M
$5.5M$7K$1.9M$3.7M
Gregory G Cunningham(R)
− HMP $204K
$2.5M—$204K$2.3M
1 defeated candidate — show finances
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Jose Orozco(R)defeated
$219K——$219K
Where the money comes from

In-state vs out-of-state

Share of each candidate's itemized individual contributions from donors inside NM versus the rest of the country. Excludes sub-$200 unitemized donations (no geography on file) and PAC money — see note below.

Gabe Vasquez(D)29% in-state · $2.4M itemized
$680K in-state$1.7M out-of-state
Gregory G Cunningham(R)58% in-state · $1.1M itemized
$627K in-state$447K out-of-state
1 defeated candidate — show
Jose Orozco(R)defeated28% in-state · $218K itemized
$62K in-state$156K out-of-state
What's counted, what isn't

Candidate-direct is each campaign's reported receipts on FEC Schedule A — individual contributions plus PAC contributions to the candidate's own committee — through the most recent filing.

Outside spending is independent expenditures on FEC Schedule E: money spent by PACs, super PACs, and party committees for or against a candidate, without legal coordination with the campaign. The committees listed under each candidate are the largest disclosed spenders on either side.

In-state vs out-of-state covers only itemized individual contributions — donations over $200, which are the only ones that carry a contributor address at the FEC. Sub-$200 unitemized donations (often a large share for grassroots campaigns) have no geography on file and are excluded, as is PAC money. So the percentages describe where a candidate's itemized individual money comes from, not where every dollar raised comes from.

Not counted: 501(c)(4) "social welfare" organizations run issue ads that frequently mention candidates by name but aren't classified as express advocacy under FEC rules — they file no Schedule E and don't appear in this breakdown. Press reporting on a race may cite figures that include this dark-money spending; ours doesn't.

Where they stand

Issue-by-issue comparison

Positions extracted from each candidate's campaign issues page by AI. Contested rows — where candidates disagree with each other — appear first.

StatementVasquezCunninghamYou
Abortion
A national law should protect access to abortion in every state.
—
Abortion
Each state should set its own abortion laws.
—
Abortion
Access to contraception should be guaranteed by federal law in all states (Right to Contraception Act).
—
Criminal Justice
The federal government should send more money to local police departments.
—
Economy
The federal minimum wage should be raised.
—
Healthcare
Medicare should be allowed to negotiate lower prescription drug prices.
—
Healthcare
Enhanced ACA premium subsidies should be made permanent at expanded levels.
—
Healthcare
A government-run public health insurance option should be added to the ACA marketplace.
—
Immigration
People who were brought to the U.S. illegally as children should have a path to citizenship.
—
Immigration
The U.S. should do more to enforce immigration laws and secure the border.
—
Labor
Federal labor law should make it easier for workers to form unions (PRO Act-style reforms).
—
Veterans
The VA should cover more veterans and more health conditions.
—

SupportsOpposesNo public positionRinged = confirmed by the campaign

Recent coverage

In the news

About this race page

Candidate roster is sourced from the FEC's active-candidate list for the 2026 cycle. Fundraising totals reflect committee filings through the last reporting period.

Alignment % compares the candidate's extracted policy positions against your quiz answers. Positions are pulled from the candidate's campaign issues page by AI; we save the source quote for each position so you can verify the extraction. Candidates without a campaign issues page show position data pending — we're working through the roster and re-checking stale extractions every 90 days.

News coverage is from the GDELT 2.0 global news feed, filtered to a curated list of national, political, and regional outlets.