2026 race

PA-08 — U.S. House

2 candidates on the November ballot. Incumbent: Robert P. Bresnahan.

Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See where these candidates stand — and who's funding them.

DeepSyte tracks the money and the record in every race against the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your alignment.

How we got here · 2 earlier contests
Democratic primary · Tuesday, May 19, 2026
Called by audit: web-verified
Paige CognettiWon
Republican primary · Tuesday, May 19, 2026
Called by audit: web-verified
Robert P. BresnahanWon
Election held
Counting
Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Results appear here once a race is called and verified. Official returns from the Pennsylvania Department of State.

Disclosed money in race
$19M
Candidate + outside spending. See finance breakdown below.
Incumbent

Currently in office

Challengers

Sorted by fundraising

Paige Cognetti

D
ChallengerFEC H6PA08293

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$7.5M
Cash on hand: $244K
Local signal

Early read on PA-08 — U.S. House

A directional read on where this seat is trending, from the signals we have so far. This is an early scaffold — more inputs light up as coverage and constituent activity accrue.

Coverage tone · the matchup
Recent news coverage of the nominees heading to the general election.
Paige Cognettileans negative
0 pos18 neutral1 neg19 articles
Robert P. Bresnahanlimited coverage
No coverage in our tracked outlets in the last 90 days.
A media signal, not a poll of the district.
Constituent stakes
No one here has staked a position on a tracked vote yet. As neighbors weigh in on /pressure campaigns, the district's lean will show up here.
Money in the race

Finance breakdown

Disclosed funding shaping this race — both the money candidates raise themselves and the outside spending dropped by independent groups. Issue-ad spending by 501(c)(4) groups is excluded; the FEC doesn't require disclosure of it. See the note below for details.

Candidate fundraising: FEC reports through October 14, 2026 · 2025–26 cycle

Total disclosed
$19M
Candidate fundraising + independent expenditures (FEC).
Candidate-direct (Schedule A)
$14M
Raised by candidate committees themselves.
Outside spending (Schedule E)
$5.3M
$202K for · $5.1M against
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Paige Cognetti(D)
+ WELCOMEPAC $103K
+ PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT $41K
+ RURAL FREEDOM NETWORK $32K
− CLF $2.4M
− THE GOVERNING MAJORITY FUND $56K
− PENNSYLVANIA PRO-LIFE FEDERATION PAC $23
$7.5M$202K$2.4M$5.3M
Robert P. Bresnahan(R)incumbent
− HMP $1.2M
− GIFFORDS PAC $860K
− AB PAC $368K
$6.5M—$2.7M$3.8M
Where the money comes from

In-state vs out-of-state

Share of each candidate's itemized individual contributions from donors inside PA versus the rest of the country. Excludes sub-$200 unitemized donations (no geography on file) and PAC money — see note below.

Paige Cognetti(D)23% in-state · $3.5M itemized
$811K in-state$2.7M out-of-state
Robert P. Bresnahan(R)32% in-state · $3.4M itemized
$1.1M in-state$2.3M out-of-state
What's counted, what isn't

Candidate-direct is each campaign's reported receipts on FEC Schedule A — individual contributions plus PAC contributions to the candidate's own committee — through the most recent filing.

Outside spending is independent expenditures on FEC Schedule E: money spent by PACs, super PACs, and party committees for or against a candidate, without legal coordination with the campaign. The committees listed under each candidate are the largest disclosed spenders on either side.

In-state vs out-of-state covers only itemized individual contributions — donations over $200, which are the only ones that carry a contributor address at the FEC. Sub-$200 unitemized donations (often a large share for grassroots campaigns) have no geography on file and are excluded, as is PAC money. So the percentages describe where a candidate's itemized individual money comes from, not where every dollar raised comes from.

Not counted: 501(c)(4) "social welfare" organizations run issue ads that frequently mention candidates by name but aren't classified as express advocacy under FEC rules — they file no Schedule E and don't appear in this breakdown. Press reporting on a race may cite figures that include this dark-money spending; ours doesn't.

Where they stand

Issue-by-issue comparison

Positions extracted from each candidate's campaign issues page by AI. Contested rows — where candidates disagree with each other — appear first.

StatementCognettiBresnahanYou
Antitrust & Competition
Federal antitrust laws should be strengthened to break up dominant technology platforms.
—
Antitrust & Competition
Pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) should be subject to stricter federal antitrust scrutiny.
—
Digital Assets
Federal restrictions on cryptocurrency mining for energy use and emissions should be enacted.
—
Economy
Tariffs on foreign goods should be used to protect American jobs.
—
Economy
The federal government should require employers to provide paid family and medical leave.
—
Environment
Government environmental reviews for energy and infrastructure projects should move faster, even if it means fewer reviews.
—
Foreign Policy
The U.S. should spend more on the military.
—
Healthcare
Enhanced ACA premium subsidies should be made permanent at expanded levels.
—
Infrastructure
The government should invest in expanding passenger rail, including high-speed rail.
—
Labor
Federal labor law should make it easier for workers to form unions (PRO Act-style reforms).
—
Governance & Other
Outside political spending — from PACs and super PACs — should be limited more strictly.
—
Trade
Presidents should be able to impose broad tariffs unilaterally under emergency powers (IEEPA-style authority).
—
Trade
Federal procurement should give strong preference to U.S.-made goods, even at higher cost.
—

SupportsOpposesNo public positionRinged = confirmed by the campaign

Recent coverage

In the news

About this race page

Candidate roster is sourced from the FEC's active-candidate list for the 2026 cycle. Fundraising totals reflect committee filings through the last reporting period.

Alignment % compares the candidate's extracted policy positions against your quiz answers. Positions are pulled from the candidate's campaign issues page by AI; we save the source quote for each position so you can verify the extraction. Candidates without a campaign issues page show position data pending — we're working through the roster and re-checking stale extractions every 90 days.

News coverage is from the GDELT 2.0 global news feed, filtered to a curated list of national, political, and regional outlets.