
John W. Rose
RDefeatedSign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
4 candidates on the November ballot. Incumbent: John W. Rose.
DeepSyte tracks the money and the record in every race against the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your alignment.
Results appear here once a race is called and verified. Official returns from the Tennessee Secretary of State.

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
A directional read on where this seat is trending, from the signals we have so far. This is an early scaffold — more inputs light up as coverage and constituent activity accrue.
Disclosed funding shaping this race — both the money candidates raise themselves and the outside spending dropped by independent groups. Issue-ad spending by 501(c)(4) groups is excluded; the FEC doesn't require disclosure of it. See the note below for details.
Candidate fundraising: FEC reports through October 14, 2026 · 2025–26 cycle
| Candidate | Raised directly | Outside for | Outside against | Net in corner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Johnny Garrett(R) + THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER PAC $289K + AMERICAN MISSION $288K + CHARTER SCHOOLS ACTION PAC $25K − CONSERVATIVE FUTURE FUND $115K | $3.0M | $602K | $115K | $3.5M |
Mike Croley(D) | $117K | — | — | $117K |
Christopher B. Monday | $0 | — | — | $0 |
Angus Purdy(I) | $0 | — | — | $0 |
| Candidate | Raised directly | Outside for | Outside against | Net in corner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
William Hilleary(R)defeated + CONSERVATIVE FUTURE FUND $38K | $1.7M | $38K | — | $1.7M |
Chaney Mosley(D)defeated | $95K | — | — | $95K |
John W. Rose(R)incumbentdefeated | $78K | — | — | $78K |
Natisha Brooks(R)defeated | $50K | — | — | $50K |
Craig Ballin(D)defeated | $6K | — | — | $6K |
Lore Ann Bergman(D)defeated | $5K | — | — | $5K |
Jon Henry(R)defeated | $0 | — | — | $0 |
Share of each candidate's itemized individual contributions from donors inside TN versus the rest of the country. Excludes sub-$200 unitemized donations (no geography on file) and PAC money — see note below.
Candidate-direct is each campaign's reported receipts on FEC Schedule A — individual contributions plus PAC contributions to the candidate's own committee — through the most recent filing.
Outside spending is independent expenditures on FEC Schedule E: money spent by PACs, super PACs, and party committees for or against a candidate, without legal coordination with the campaign. The committees listed under each candidate are the largest disclosed spenders on either side.
In-state vs out-of-state covers only itemized individual contributions — donations over $200, which are the only ones that carry a contributor address at the FEC. Sub-$200 unitemized donations (often a large share for grassroots campaigns) have no geography on file and are excluded, as is PAC money. So the percentages describe where a candidate's itemized individual money comes from, not where every dollar raised comes from.
Not counted: 501(c)(4) "social welfare" organizations run issue ads that frequently mention candidates by name but aren't classified as express advocacy under FEC rules — they file no Schedule E and don't appear in this breakdown. Press reporting on a race may cite figures that include this dark-money spending; ours doesn't.
Positions extracted from each candidate's campaign issues page by AI. Contested rows — where candidates disagree with each other — appear first.
| Statement | Garrett | Croley | Monday | Purdy | You |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Abortioncontested A national law should protect access to abortion in every state. | — | ||||
Immigrationcontested The U.S. should do more to enforce immigration laws and secure the border. | — | ||||
Taxescontested People making over $400,000 a year should pay higher taxes. | — | ||||
Veterans The VA should cover more veterans and more health conditions. | — | ||||
Agriculture Federal farm subsidies should be reduced and redirected toward smaller producers. | — | ||||
Agriculture SNAP (food stamp) eligibility and benefit levels should be expanded. | — | ||||
Antitrust & Competition Federal antitrust laws should be strengthened to break up dominant technology platforms. | — | ||||
Economy Reducing the national debt should be a higher priority than new spending. | — | ||||
Economy Tariffs on foreign goods should be used to protect American jobs. | — | ||||
Environment Government environmental reviews for energy and infrastructure projects should move faster, even if it means fewer reviews. | — | ||||
Foreign Policy The U.S. should spend more on the military. | — | ||||
Foreign Policy Conditions on U.S. military aid to Israel — tied to humanitarian or human-rights compliance — should be strengthened. | — | ||||
Guns Civilian ownership of AR-15-style rifles should be restricted. | — | ||||
Housing The government should spend more building affordable housing. | — | ||||
Judicial Reform The number of Supreme Court justices should be increased above nine. | — | ||||
Labor Federal labor law should make it easier for workers to form unions (PRO Act-style reforms). | — | ||||
Governance & Other There should be term limits for senators and representatives. | — | ||||
Governance & Other Voters should be required to show photo ID, with the same rule in every state. | — | ||||
Governance & Other Outside political spending — from PACs and super PACs — should be limited more strictly. | — | ||||
Social Security High earners should pay Social Security taxes on more of their income. | — | ||||
Trade U.S. trade policy should reduce economic interdependence with China, especially on technology and critical minerals. | — |
SupportsOpposesNo public positionRinged = confirmed by the campaign
Candidate roster is sourced from the FEC's active-candidate list for the 2026 cycle. Fundraising totals reflect committee filings through the last reporting period.
Alignment % compares the candidate's extracted policy positions against your quiz answers. Positions are pulled from the candidate's campaign issues page by AI; we save the source quote for each position so you can verify the extraction. Candidates without a campaign issues page show position data pending — we're working through the roster and re-checking stale extractions every 90 days.
News coverage is from the GDELT 2.0 global news feed, filtered to a curated list of national, political, and regional outlets.