Emily Randall
DIncumbentFEC H4WA06117
Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.
Raised this cycle$1.4M
Cash on hand: $169K
2026 race
WA-06 — U.S. House
2 candidates on the November ballot. Incumbent: Emily Randall.
Read the record. Not the rhetoric.
See where these candidates stand — and who's funding them.
DeepSyte tracks the money and the record in every race against the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your alignment.
How we got here · 1 earlier contest
Primary · Tuesday, August 4, 2026
Called by audit: web-verified
Top-two primary — Emily Randall and Teresa Fox advanced to the general election.
- DEmily Randall· inc.Advanced to general60.4%
- RTeresa FoxAdvanced to general25.1%
- RLeon LawsonDefeated9.2%
Election held
Counting
Tuesday, November 3, 2026
Results appear here once a race is called and verified. Official returns from the Washington Secretary of State.
Make sure you can vote
Disclosed money in race
$1.5M
Candidate + outside spending. See finance breakdown below.
Incumbent
Currently in office
Challengers
Sorted by fundraising
Money in the race
Finance breakdown
Disclosed funding shaping this race — both the money candidates raise themselves and the outside spending dropped by independent groups. Issue-ad spending by 501(c)(4) groups is excluded; the FEC doesn't require disclosure of it. See the note below for details.
Candidate fundraising: FEC reports through October 14, 2026 · 2025–26 cycle
Total disclosed
$1.5M
Candidate fundraising + independent expenditures (FEC).
Candidate-direct (Schedule A)
$1.5M
Raised by candidate committees themselves.
Outside spending (Schedule E)
$20
$20 for · $0 against
| Candidate | Raised directly | Outside for | Outside against | Net in corner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Emily Randall(D)incumbent + SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION $10 + GIVEGREEN UNITED ACTION $10 | $1.4M | $20 | — | $1.4M |
Teresa Fox(R) | $71K | — | — | $71K |
Leon Lawson(R) | $18K | — | — | $18K |
Where the money comes from
In-state vs out-of-state
Share of each candidate's itemized individual contributions from donors inside WA versus the rest of the country. Excludes sub-$200 unitemized donations (no geography on file) and PAC money — see note below.
Emily Randall(D)80% in-state · $645K itemized
$518K in-state$126K out-of-state
Teresa Fox(R)100% in-state · $10K itemized
$10K in-state$0 out-of-state
Leon Lawson(R)100% in-state · $160 itemized
$160 in-state$0 out-of-state
What's counted, what isn't
Candidate-direct is each campaign's reported receipts on FEC Schedule A — individual contributions plus PAC contributions to the candidate's own committee — through the most recent filing.
Outside spending is independent expenditures on FEC Schedule E: money spent by PACs, super PACs, and party committees for or against a candidate, without legal coordination with the campaign. The committees listed under each candidate are the largest disclosed spenders on either side.
In-state vs out-of-state covers only itemized individual contributions — donations over $200, which are the only ones that carry a contributor address at the FEC. Sub-$200 unitemized donations (often a large share for grassroots campaigns) have no geography on file and are excluded, as is PAC money. So the percentages describe where a candidate's itemized individual money comes from, not where every dollar raised comes from.
Not counted: 501(c)(4) "social welfare" organizations run issue ads that frequently mention candidates by name but aren't classified as express advocacy under FEC rules — they file no Schedule E and don't appear in this breakdown. Press reporting on a race may cite figures that include this dark-money spending; ours doesn't.
About this race page
Candidate roster is sourced from the FEC's active-candidate list for the 2026 cycle. Fundraising totals reflect committee filings through the last reporting period.
Alignment % compares the candidate's extracted policy positions against your quiz answers. Positions are pulled from the candidate's campaign issues page by AI; we save the source quote for each position so you can verify the extraction. Candidates without a campaign issues page show position data pending — we're working through the roster and re-checking stale extractions every 90 days.
News coverage is from the GDELT 2.0 global news feed, filtered to a curated list of national, political, and regional outlets.