2026 race

WI-06 — U.S. House

5 candidates on the November ballot. Incumbent: Glenn Grothman.

Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See where these candidates stand — and who's funding them.

DeepSyte tracks the money and the record in every race against the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your alignment.

How we got here · 2 earlier contests
Democratic primary · Tuesday, August 11, 2026
Called by audit: web-verified
Brad SmithWon50.4%
  • DAmanda BellDefeated49.6%
Republican primary · Tuesday, August 11, 2026
Called by Uncontested
Glenn GrothmanWon99.7%
Election held
Counting
Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Results appear here once a race is called and verified. Official returns from the Wisconsin Elections Commission.

Disclosed money in race
$1.8M
Candidate + outside spending. See finance breakdown below.
Incumbent

Currently in office

Challengers

Sorted by fundraising

Brad Smith

D
ChallengerFEC H6WI06191

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$322K
Cash on hand: $91K

Mike Thurow

I
ChallengerFEC H6WI06233

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$195K
Cash on hand: $8K

Elizabeth Anne Fitzgibbon

I
ChallengerFEC H6WI06241

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$21K
Cash on hand: $4K

Matthew Arndt

I
ChallengerFEC H6WI06274

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$2K
Cash on hand: $2K
2 defeated candidates — show

Amanda Bell

DDefeated
ChallengerFEC H6WI06225

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$51K
Cash on hand: $0

Aaron Michael Wojciechowski

DDefeated
ChallengerFEC H6WI06142

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$44K
Cash on hand: $0
Local signal

Early read on WI-06 — U.S. House

A directional read on where this seat is trending, from the signals we have so far. This is an early scaffold — more inputs light up as coverage and constituent activity accrue.

Coverage tone · the matchup
Recent news coverage of the nominees heading to the general election.
Glenn Grothmanlimited coverage
No coverage in our tracked outlets in the last 90 days.
Brad Smithlimited coverage
No coverage in our tracked outlets in the last 90 days.
A media signal, not a poll of the district.
Constituent stakes
No one here has staked a position on a tracked vote yet. As neighbors weigh in on /pressure campaigns, the district's lean will show up here.
Money in the race

Finance breakdown

Disclosed funding shaping this race — both the money candidates raise themselves and the outside spending dropped by independent groups. Issue-ad spending by 501(c)(4) groups is excluded; the FEC doesn't require disclosure of it. See the note below for details.

Candidate fundraising: FEC reports through October 14, 2026 · 2025–26 cycle

Total disclosed
$1.8M
Candidate fundraising + independent expenditures (FEC).
Candidate-direct (Schedule A)
$1.8M
Raised by candidate committees themselves.
Outside spending (Schedule E)
$19
$19 for · $0 against
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Glenn Grothman(R)incumbent
$1.2M——$1.2M
Brad Smith(D)
+ GRASSROOTS NORTH SHORE $19
$322K$19—$322K
Mike Thurow(I)
$195K——$195K
Elizabeth Anne Fitzgibbon(I)
$21K——$21K
Matthew Arndt(G)
$2K——$2K
2 defeated candidates — show finances
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Amanda Bell(D)defeated
$51K——$51K
Aaron Michael Wojciechowski(D)defeated
$44K——$44K
Where the money comes from

In-state vs out-of-state

Share of each candidate's itemized individual contributions from donors inside WI versus the rest of the country. Excludes sub-$200 unitemized donations (no geography on file) and PAC money — see note below.

Glenn Grothman(R)84% in-state · $553K itemized
$463K in-state$90K out-of-state
Brad Smith(D)96% in-state · $99K itemized
$95K in-state$4K out-of-state
Mike Thurow(I)18% in-state · $142K itemized
$25K in-state$117K out-of-state
2 defeated candidates — show
Amanda Bell(D)defeated97% in-state · $30K itemized
$29K in-state$750 out-of-state
Aaron Michael Wojciechowski(D)defeated88% in-state · $4K itemized
$4K in-state$500 out-of-state
What's counted, what isn't

Candidate-direct is each campaign's reported receipts on FEC Schedule A — individual contributions plus PAC contributions to the candidate's own committee — through the most recent filing.

Outside spending is independent expenditures on FEC Schedule E: money spent by PACs, super PACs, and party committees for or against a candidate, without legal coordination with the campaign. The committees listed under each candidate are the largest disclosed spenders on either side.

In-state vs out-of-state covers only itemized individual contributions — donations over $200, which are the only ones that carry a contributor address at the FEC. Sub-$200 unitemized donations (often a large share for grassroots campaigns) have no geography on file and are excluded, as is PAC money. So the percentages describe where a candidate's itemized individual money comes from, not where every dollar raised comes from.

Not counted: 501(c)(4) "social welfare" organizations run issue ads that frequently mention candidates by name but aren't classified as express advocacy under FEC rules — they file no Schedule E and don't appear in this breakdown. Press reporting on a race may cite figures that include this dark-money spending; ours doesn't.

Where they stand

Issue-by-issue comparison

Positions extracted from each candidate's campaign issues page by AI. Contested rows — where candidates disagree with each other — appear first.

StatementGrothmanSmithThurowFitzgibbonArndtYou
Agriculture
Federal antitrust enforcement against meatpacking consolidation should be increased.
—
Antitrust & Competition
Federal antitrust laws should be strengthened to break up dominant technology platforms.
—
Criminal Justice
Marijuana should be legal under federal law.
—
Economy
The expanded child tax credit (refundable, paid monthly) should be made permanent.
—
Foreign Policy
The U.S. should keep sending military aid to Ukraine.
—
Foreign Policy
The U.S. should spend more on the military.
—
Healthcare
Medicare should be allowed to negotiate lower prescription drug prices.
—
Housing
The government should spend more building affordable housing.
—
Immigration
The U.S. should do more to enforce immigration laws and secure the border.
—
Labor
Federal labor law should make it easier for workers to form unions (PRO Act-style reforms).
—
Governance & Other
There should be term limits for senators and representatives.
—
Governance & Other
Outside political spending — from PACs and super PACs — should be limited more strictly.
—
Social Security
Future workers should have to wait longer to collect full Social Security.
—
Social Security
Workers should be able to invest part of their Social Security in the stock market.
—
Technology
There should be a national law protecting personal data online.
—
Trade
Congress should pursue new bilateral free-trade agreements with U.S. allies.
—
Trade
Federal procurement should give strong preference to U.S.-made goods, even at higher cost.
—

SupportsOpposesNo public positionRinged = confirmed by the campaign

About this race page

Candidate roster is sourced from the FEC's active-candidate list for the 2026 cycle. Fundraising totals reflect committee filings through the last reporting period.

Alignment % compares the candidate's extracted policy positions against your quiz answers. Positions are pulled from the candidate's campaign issues page by AI; we save the source quote for each position so you can verify the extraction. Candidates without a campaign issues page show position data pending — we're working through the roster and re-checking stale extractions every 90 days.

News coverage is from the GDELT 2.0 global news feed, filtered to a curated list of national, political, and regional outlets.