DeepSyte™
Bill FeedAll repsScoreboardsPrimariesProAboutSign inGet started
DeepSyte™™

A nonpartisan civic accountability tool. We match federal legislation to your stated values — without partisan bias.

Learn

  • About
  • About the name
  • Methodology
  • Glossary

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Refund Policy
  • Contact

Sources

Bill data from Congress.gov. Summaries from the Congressional Research Service where available.

Follow

  • Bluesky — @deepsyte.app
  • X — @deepsyteapp
All content is for informational purposes only. Always verify against primary sources.
Back to bill feed
Val T. Hoyle official portrait

Val T. Hoyle

D

house · OR-4

CompareSign in to get alerts
Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See how Val T. Hoyle actually votes — against your values.

DeepSyte scores Val T. Hoyle's record on the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your personal alignment.

Get started freeTake the values quiz
Official websiteSee this seat's 2026 race

Alignment with your views

Sign in and take the values quiz to see how Val T. Hoyle's votes line up with your views.

Prediction track record

How often we called Val T. Hoyle's passage votes correctly, from their stated positions on each bill's tagged topics. Excludes “unclear” calls and abstentions.

50%
Accuracy
1
Correct
1
Incorrect
70
Pending
  1. Wrong119-hr-8428

    Federal Fraud Prevention Workforce Training Act

    Predicted NO
    Actual YES
    Bill
  2. Right119-hr-5587

    HEATS Act

    Predicted NO
    Actual NO
    Bill
  3. Unscored119-hr-4216

    Made-in-America Defense Act

    Predicted NO
    Actual NOT_VOTING
    Bill
  4. Pending vote119-sjres-123

    A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.

    Predicted YES
    Bill
  5. Pending vote119-hr-5340

    To prohibit the disclosure of records by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development of individuals for the purposes of immigration enforcement, and for other purposes.

    Predicted YES
    Bill
  6. Pending vote119-hr-5390

    FAMILY Act

    Predicted YES
    Bill

Consistency insights

Val T. Hoyle · statement ↔ vote record

60
Consistency score

Based on 21 data points across public statements and recorded votes · AI analysis of public records

  • 118-hr-2799·Notable gap

    Expanding Access to Capital Act of 2023

    15/100

    What they said

    Apr 20, 2026

    The Congressional Progressive Caucus Ending Corporate Greed Task Force is convening a hearing to examine tax code provisions that enable corporate profiteering and wealth inequality, and to explore policy solutions including wealth taxes on millionaires and billionaires, offshore tax avoidance crackdowns, and tax system rebalancing to benefit working people over high earners.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Mar 8, 2024

    Voted Nay on Expanding Access to Capital Act of 2023

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Rep. Hoyle's statement advocates for higher taxes on corporations and the wealthy, cracking down on tax avoidance, and rebalancing the tax system to benefit working people. The Expanding Access to Capital Act reduces securities regulations and compliance burdens on companies and emerging growth firms. These positions point in opposite directions: the statement calls for stricter corporate accountability and taxation, while the bill reduces regulatory requirements on businesses. The no vote aligns with the stated progressive tax position.

    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-8034·Notable gap

    Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024

    15/100

    What they said

    Apr 20, 2026

    The Congressional Progressive Caucus Ending Corporate Greed Task Force is convening a hearing to examine tax code provisions that enable corporate profiteering and wealth inequality, and to explore policy solutions including wealth taxes on millionaires and billionaires, offshore tax avoidance crackdowns, and tax system rebalancing to benefit working people over high earners.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Apr 20, 2024

    Voted Yea on Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Rep. Hoyle's statement advocates for taxing corporate greed, wealth taxes on billionaires, and closing offshore tax loopholes to benefit working people. The bill she voted for is a supplemental appropriations measure for Israel security and military aid, which does not address tax policy or corporate taxation. Her yes vote on this foreign aid/defense spending bill is inconsistent with her stated focus on rebalancing the tax system against the wealthy and corporations.

    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-3746·Consistent

    Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023

    85/100

    What they said

    Apr 20, 2026

    The Congressional Progressive Caucus Ending Corporate Greed Task Force is convening a hearing to examine tax code provisions that enable corporate profiteering and wealth inequality, and to explore policy solutions including wealth taxes on millionaires and billionaires, offshore tax avoidance crackdowns, and tax system rebalancing to benefit working people over high earners.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Jun 1, 2023

    Voted Nay on Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Rep. Hoyle's statement advocates for progressive tax policies—wealth taxes, closing offshore loopholes, and rebalancing the tax system to benefit working people over the wealthy. The Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 is a budget deal that increases the debt limit, imposes discretionary spending caps, and expands work requirements for federal programs. These address different specific policy questions: the statement focuses on tax fairness and wealth redistribution, while the bill focuses on spending limits and budget process. Rep. Hoyle's NO vote is consistent with progressive opposition to spending caps and work requirement expansions, which typically align with concerns about protecting social programs. However, the bill does not directly address the tax proposals in the statement, creating some granularity mismatch.

    medium confidence
    Sign in to report
  • 119-hr-3486·Consistent

    Stop Illegal Entry Act of 2025

    85/100

    What they said

    Jan 8, 2026

    Rep. Hoyle calls for investigation into a shooting by DHS immigration enforcement officials and advocates for deescalation and removal of ICE operations from Portland, characterizing recent federal immigration enforcement actions as inciting violence and harming families.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Sep 11, 2025

    Voted Nay on Stop Illegal Entry Act of 2025

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Rep. Hoyle's statement opposes aggressive federal immigration enforcement and calls for ICE removal from Portland, characterizing such enforcement as inciting violence. The Stop Illegal Entry Act increases criminal penalties for illegal reentry and entry, which represents a hardline immigration enforcement approach. Her NO vote on an amendment to this bill aligns with her stated opposition to aggressive enforcement policies, though the amendment's specific content is not detailed here, creating some ambiguity about what provision she opposed.

    medium confidence
    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-3602·Consistent

    Transnational Criminal Organization Illicit Spotter Prevention and Elimination Act

    85/100

    What they said

    Jan 8, 2026

    Rep. Hoyle calls for investigation into a shooting by DHS immigration enforcement officials and advocates for deescalation and removal of ICE operations from Portland, characterizing recent federal immigration enforcement actions as inciting violence and harming families.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Apr 20, 2024

    Voted Nay on Transnational Criminal Organization Illicit Spotter Prevention and Elimination Act

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Rep. Hoyle's statement opposes aggressive federal immigration enforcement and calls for ICE removal from Portland, characterizing such actions as inciting violence. The bill enhances criminal penalties for interference with border control and immigration enforcement operations. Her NO vote on passage is consistent with her stated opposition to expansive immigration enforcement measures and her call for deescalation of federal immigration operations.

    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-2·Consistent

    Secure the Border Act of 2023

    85/100

    What they said

    Jan 8, 2026

    Rep. Hoyle calls for investigation into a shooting by DHS immigration enforcement officials and advocates for deescalation and removal of ICE operations from Portland, characterizing recent federal immigration enforcement actions as inciting violence and harming families.

    Read statement

    What they did

    May 11, 2023

    Voted Nay on Secure the Border Act of 2023

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Rep. Hoyle's statement opposes aggressive federal immigration enforcement and calls for ICE removal from Portland, characterizing such actions as inciting violence. The Secure the Border Act expands border wall construction, increases DHS enforcement capacity, and tightens asylum eligibility—all measures that would strengthen federal immigration enforcement operations. Her NO vote on passage is consistent with her stated opposition to expansive immigration enforcement policies. The statement does not directly address border wall construction or asylum limits, but both reflect the same underlying disagreement about the scope and intensity of federal immigration enforcement.

    medium confidence
    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-8752·Consistent

    Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2025

    85/100

    What they said

    Jan 8, 2026

    Rep. Hoyle calls for investigation into a shooting by DHS immigration enforcement officials and advocates for deescalation and removal of ICE operations from Portland, characterizing recent federal immigration enforcement actions as inciting violence and harming families.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Jun 28, 2024

    Voted Nay on Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2025

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Rep. Hoyle's statement opposes ICE operations and federal immigration enforcement actions in Portland, characterizing them as harmful and inciting violence. Her NO vote on the DHS appropriations bill, which funds ICE and other immigration enforcement agencies, is directionally consistent with that opposition. The bill provides appropriations for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement among other DHS functions. A no vote on a bill that funds the agency she calls for removal from her district aligns with her stated position, though the appropriations bill bundles funding for multiple DHS functions (TSA, Coast Guard, FEMA, etc.), which may complicate the vote rationale.

    medium confidence
    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-4367·Consistent

    Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2024

    85/100

    What they said

    Jan 8, 2026

    Rep. Hoyle calls for investigation into a shooting by DHS immigration enforcement officials and advocates for deescalation and removal of ICE operations from Portland, characterizing recent federal immigration enforcement actions as inciting violence and harming families.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Sep 29, 2023

    Voted Nay on Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2024

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Rep. Hoyle's statement opposes federal immigration enforcement actions in Portland and calls for ICE removal from the city. The bill funds DHS operations including ICE. A NO vote on DHS appropriations is consistent with opposition to ICE operations, though the bill funds multiple DHS agencies and functions beyond immigration enforcement. The statement's specific focus on Portland ICE operations and deescalation aligns directionally with voting against a bill that appropriates funds to ICE, though the bill's broad scope and bundled provisions introduce some ambiguity about what specific funding levels or restrictions the rep preferred.

    medium confidence
    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-5717·Consistent

    No Bailout for Sanctuary Cities Act

    85/100

    What they said

    Jan 8, 2026

    Rep. Hoyle calls for investigation into a shooting by DHS immigration enforcement officials and advocates for deescalation and removal of ICE operations from Portland, characterizing recent federal immigration enforcement actions as inciting violence and harming families.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Sep 20, 2024

    Voted Nay on No Bailout for Sanctuary Cities Act

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Rep. Hoyle's statement opposes aggressive federal immigration enforcement and calls for ICE removal from Portland, reflecting opposition to strict immigration enforcement policies. The bill penalizes sanctuary jurisdictions that limit cooperation with immigration enforcement. Her NO vote on the bill aligns with her stated position against federal immigration enforcement actions and support for limiting ICE operations. The vote is consistent with her advocacy for deescalation and reduced federal immigration enforcement presence.

    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-7511·Consistent

    Laken Riley Act

    85/100

    What they said

    Jan 8, 2026

    Rep. Hoyle calls for investigation into a shooting by DHS immigration enforcement officials and advocates for deescalation and removal of ICE operations from Portland, characterizing recent federal immigration enforcement actions as inciting violence and harming families.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Mar 7, 2024

    Voted Nay on Laken Riley Act

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Rep. Hoyle's statement opposes aggressive federal immigration enforcement and calls for ICE removal from Portland, characterizing such enforcement as inciting violence. The Laken Riley Act expands DHS detention authority and creates state-level enforcement mechanisms, representing the type of aggressive immigration enforcement the statement criticizes. Her NO vote on passage is consistent with her stated opposition to expansive federal immigration enforcement actions.

    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-7024·Notable gap

    Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act of 2024

    25/100

    What they said

    Apr 20, 2026

    The Congressional Progressive Caucus Ending Corporate Greed Task Force is convening a hearing to examine tax code provisions that enable corporate profiteering and wealth inequality, and to explore policy solutions including wealth taxes on millionaires and billionaires, offshore tax avoidance crackdowns, and tax system rebalancing to benefit working people over high earners.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Feb 1, 2024

    Voted Yea on Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act of 2024

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Rep. Hoyle's statement advocates for wealth taxes on billionaires, cracking down on offshore tax avoidance, and rebalancing the tax system to benefit working people over high earners. The bill she voted for provides tax relief through increased child tax credits and earned income tax credit flexibility for working families, but also extends bonus depreciation and business deductions that primarily benefit corporations and high-income earners—provisions directly contrary to the stated goal of preventing ultra-wealthy tax avoidance. The vote is inconsistent with the explicit policy positions articulated in the statement.

    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-8035·Notable gap

    Ukraine Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024

    25/100

    What they said

    Apr 7, 2026

    Congresswoman Hoyle opposes President Trump's threatened military action against Iran, characterizing it as illegal and a war crime. She calls for Congress to vote on a War Powers Resolution to halt the action.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Apr 20, 2024

    Voted Yea on Ukraine Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Congresswoman Hoyle's statement opposes military action and calls for Congress to assert control over war powers through a War Powers Resolution. However, she voted yes on a bill that provides supplemental appropriations for military operations and expands presidential authority to transfer defense articles to foreign countries. While the bill addresses Ukraine rather than Iran, it directly funds and authorizes the type of executive military action her statement criticizes as requiring congressional approval and restraint.

    medium confidence
    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-8038·Consistent

    21st Century Peace through Strength Act

    75/100

    What they said

    Apr 7, 2026

    Congresswoman Hoyle opposes President Trump's threatened military action against Iran, characterizing it as illegal and a war crime. She calls for Congress to vote on a War Powers Resolution to halt the action.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Apr 20, 2024

    Voted Nay on 21st Century Peace through Strength Act

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Congresswoman Hoyle's statement opposes military action against Iran and calls for Congressional oversight via a War Powers Resolution. The bill imposes sanctions on Iranian entities and leaders but does not authorize or direct military action against Iran. Her NO vote on a broader foreign policy bill that includes Iran sanctions is somewhat consistent with her stated concern about unilateral executive military action, though the bill's sanctions provisions do not directly contradict her position on military strikes. The vote may reflect objection to other provisions in the omnibus bill or a preference for different Iran policy tools, creating some ambiguity about her specific objection.

    medium confidence
    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-6678·Notable gap

    Consequences for Social Security Fraud Act

    25/100

    What they said

    Jan 8, 2026

    Rep. Hoyle calls for investigation into a shooting by DHS immigration enforcement officials and advocates for deescalation and removal of ICE operations from Portland, characterizing recent federal immigration enforcement actions as inciting violence and harming families.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Jan 31, 2024

    Voted Yea on Consequences for Social Security Fraud Act

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Rep. Hoyle's statement opposes aggressive federal immigration enforcement and calls for ICE removal from Portland, characterizing such actions as inciting violence and harming families. The bill she voted for expands deportation grounds for immigration violations (Social Security and identity document fraud), which strengthens federal immigration enforcement mechanisms. Her yes vote on a bill that broadens deportation authority directly contradicts her stated position against aggressive immigration enforcement and her call to remove ICE operations.

    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-5717·Notable gap

    No Bailout for Sanctuary Cities Act

    25/100

    What they said

    Jan 8, 2026

    Rep. Hoyle calls for investigation into a shooting by DHS immigration enforcement officials and advocates for deescalation and removal of ICE operations from Portland, characterizing recent federal immigration enforcement actions as inciting violence and harming families.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Sep 20, 2024

    Voted Yea on No Bailout for Sanctuary Cities Act

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Rep. Hoyle's statement opposes federal immigration enforcement actions in Portland and calls for ICE removal from the city. The bill penalizes sanctuary jurisdictions that restrict cooperation with immigration enforcement and information-sharing with DHS. Her YES vote on this procedural motion is inconsistent with her stated opposition to aggressive federal immigration enforcement. However, the vote is procedural rather than on final passage, creating some ambiguity about whether it reflects her substantive position or a tactical procedural choice.

    medium confidence
    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-5585·Notable gap

    Agent Raul Gonzalez Officer Safety Act

    25/100

    What they said

    Jan 8, 2026

    Rep. Hoyle calls for investigation into a shooting by DHS immigration enforcement officials and advocates for deescalation and removal of ICE operations from Portland, characterizing recent federal immigration enforcement actions as inciting violence and harming families.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Jan 30, 2024

    Voted Yea on Agent Raul Gonzalez Officer Safety Act

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Rep. Hoyle's statement opposes aggressive federal immigration enforcement and calls for ICE removal from Portland, characterizing recent DHS actions as inciting violence. The bill she voted for establishes new criminal penalties for fleeing Border Patrol agents and bars immigration relief for non-citizens convicted under it—measures that expand federal immigration enforcement authority and severity. Her yes vote on a bill that strengthens immigration enforcement tools directly contradicts her stated position against aggressive federal immigration actions.

    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-7343·Consistent

    Detain and Deport Illegal Aliens Who Assault Cops Act

    75/100

    What they said

    Jan 8, 2026

    Rep. Hoyle calls for investigation into a shooting by DHS immigration enforcement officials and advocates for deescalation and removal of ICE operations from Portland, characterizing recent federal immigration enforcement actions as inciting violence and harming families.

    Read statement

    What they did

    May 15, 2024

    Voted Nay on Detain and Deport Illegal Aliens Who Assault Cops Act

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Rep. Hoyle's statement opposes aggressive federal immigration enforcement and calls for ICE removal from Portland, reflecting concern about how immigration enforcement is conducted. The bill mandates detention and deportation of non-citizens who assault law enforcement—a narrow provision focused on a specific criminal conduct category. While the statement criticizes immigration enforcement broadly and the bill addresses a specific enforcement mechanism, both concern immigration policy direction. The rep's NO vote aligns with her stated skepticism of aggressive federal immigration enforcement, though the bill targets a discrete criminal category (assault on first responders) rather than the broader enforcement posture she critiques.

    medium confidence
    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-5525·Consistent

    Continuing Appropriations and Border Security Enhancement Act, 2024

    75/100

    What they said

    Jan 8, 2026

    Rep. Hoyle calls for investigation into a shooting by DHS immigration enforcement officials and advocates for deescalation and removal of ICE operations from Portland, characterizing recent federal immigration enforcement actions as inciting violence and harming families.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Sep 29, 2023

    Voted Nay on Continuing Appropriations and Border Security Enhancement Act, 2024

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Rep. Hoyle's statement opposes aggressive federal immigration enforcement and calls for ICE removal from Portland. The bill is a continuing appropriations measure that includes provisions limiting asylum eligibility and restricts DHS use of certain funds for immigration purposes. Her NO vote on passage is consistent with opposition to enhanced border security measures, though the bill bundles appropriations for multiple agencies and programs, making it difficult to isolate her vote as a direct response to the immigration provisions alone.

    medium confidence
    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-2494·Consistent

    POLICE Act of 2023

    75/100

    What they said

    Jan 8, 2026

    Rep. Hoyle calls for investigation into a shooting by DHS immigration enforcement officials and advocates for deescalation and removal of ICE operations from Portland, characterizing recent federal immigration enforcement actions as inciting violence and harming families.

    Read statement

    What they did

    May 17, 2023

    Voted Nay on POLICE Act of 2023

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Rep. Hoyle's statement opposes aggressive federal immigration enforcement and calls for ICE removal from Portland, citing concerns about violence and family separation. The POLICE Act makes assault on law enforcement a deportable offense—a provision that could be seen as supporting law enforcement protection. However, Hoyle's NO vote is consistent with her broader skepticism of immigration enforcement expansion; the bill enhances deportation authority rather than addressing her stated concerns about deescalation and reducing ICE operations. The vote aligns with her position that federal immigration enforcement actions are counterproductive, even if the bill's specific mechanism (deportation for assault) is narrower than her statement's scope.

    medium confidence
    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-3941·Consistent

    Schools Not Shelters Act

    75/100

    What they said

    Jan 8, 2026

    Rep. Hoyle calls for investigation into a shooting by DHS immigration enforcement officials and advocates for deescalation and removal of ICE operations from Portland, characterizing recent federal immigration enforcement actions as inciting violence and harming families.

    Read statement

    What they did

    Jul 20, 2023

    Voted Nay on Schools Not Shelters Act

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Rep. Hoyle's statement opposes aggressive federal immigration enforcement and advocates for removing ICE operations from Portland, reflecting concern about harm to immigrant families and communities. Her NO vote on the Schools Not Shelters Act—which restricts schools from providing shelter to undocumented immigrants—is directionally consistent with that position: opposing restrictions on services to immigrants aligns with opposing aggressive enforcement that 'rips families apart.' However, the statement focuses on police violence and deescalation, while the bill addresses school facility use for shelter—a narrower, distinct policy question. The vote reflects opposition to the bill's restrictive approach, but the statement does not explicitly address school shelter policies.

    medium confidence
    Sign in to report
  • 118-hr-2·Mixed signal

    Secure the Border Act of 2023

    45/100

    What they said

    Jan 8, 2026

    Rep. Hoyle calls for investigation into a shooting by DHS immigration enforcement officials and advocates for deescalation and removal of ICE operations from Portland, characterizing recent federal immigration enforcement actions as inciting violence and harming families.

    Read statement

    What they did

    May 11, 2023

    Voted Yea on Secure the Border Act of 2023

    See bill record →

    AI analysis

    Rep. Hoyle's statement opposes aggressive federal immigration enforcement and calls for ICE removal from Portland, characterizing such actions as inciting violence. The Secure the Border Act expands border wall construction and strengthens immigration enforcement mechanisms. While both address immigration policy broadly, the statement focuses on deescalation and removal of enforcement operations, whereas the bill advances enforcement infrastructure and border security expansion—directionally opposed positions. However, the vote is procedural rather than on final passage, making the rep's substantive intent unclear; procedural votes often reflect tactical or scheduling considerations rather than policy agreement.

    medium confidence
    Sign in to report

Pairs with ambiguous language and high uncertainty are withheld until more data is available. Procedural, cloture, and amendment votes are excluded — they don't cleanly signal substantive support or opposition.

Pro analysis

AI rep analysis — Pro

Get an AI-narrated read on Val T. Hoyle's full voting record against your stated values — aligned themes, conflicts, notable votes, and what to watch for.

Sign in to use AI analysis

Campaign promises

We haven't extracted campaign positions for Val T. Hoyle yet. Once their campaign website or position pages are processed, this card will track what they said vs how they voted.

Crossing the aisle

Passage votes where Val T. Hoyle broke ranks with ≥75% of Democrats. Threshold catches substantively partisan splits; unanimous-ish or close votes are excluded.

2
Cross-aisle votes
  1. 118-hr-8038·Apr 20, 2024·83% of D voted YES

    21st Century Peace through Strength Act

    Rep voted NO
    Bill
  2. 118-hr-2670·Dec 14, 2023·78% of D voted YES

    National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024

    Rep voted NO
    Bill

Recent votes

  • Nay
    Condemning actors seeking to defraud the United States Government, and expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that governmentwide fraud and improper payment prevention reforms will meaningfully improve the financial prosperity of the United States, and that Federal program eligibility should be verified before payment.
    119-hres-1335··June 11, 2026
  • Nay
    To amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes.
    119-hr-9238··June 11, 2026
  • Nay
    To amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes.
    119-hr-9238··June 11, 2026
  • Nay
    Fraud Prevention and Accountability Act
    119-hr-8312··June 10, 2026
  • Nay
    No Aid for Ghost Students Act of 2026
    119-hr-7892··June 10, 2026
  • Yea
    Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5408) to accelerate workplace time-to-contract under the National Labor Relations Act.
    119-hres-1140·2 votes·Jun 9, 2026
    • ·June 9, 2026
    • ·June 9, 2026
  • Yea
    Faster Labor Contracts Act
    119-hr-5408··June 9, 2026
  • Yea
    Federal Fraud Prevention Workforce Training Act
    119-hr-8428··June 8, 2026
  • Yea
    Ukraine Support Act
    119-hr-2913··June 5, 2026
  • Nay
    Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.
    119-hres-1336··June 4, 2026
  • Yea
    Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agency Appropriations Act, 2027
    119-hr-8646··June 4, 2026
  • Nay
    Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.
    119-hres-1336··June 4, 2026
  • Nay
    Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agency Appropriations Act, 2027
    119-hr-8646··June 4, 2026
  • Yea
    Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
    119-hconres-86··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    ARTIST Act
    119-s-254··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    Northwest Straits Marine Conservation Initiative Reauthorization Act of 2025
    119-hr-2860··June 3, 2026
  • Nay
    Stop Child Care Scams Act of 2026
    119-hr-7726··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    Stop Child Care Scams Act of 2026
    119-hr-7726··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2913) to authorize support for Ukraine, and for other purposes.
    119-hres-518··June 3, 2026
  • Yea
    Fiscal Year 2025 Veterans Affairs Major Medical Facility Authorization Act
    119-s-2393··May 20, 2026
  • Yea
    Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
    119-hr-2853··May 12, 2026
  • Nay
    Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026
    119-hr-7567··April 30, 2026
  • Nay
    A bill to amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes.
    119-s-4465··April 30, 2026
  • Yea
    Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026
    119-hr-7567··April 30, 2026

Recent statements

May 12, 2026press_release_house

REP. HOYLE INTRODUCES THE SHARED MICROMOBILITY INVESTMENT ACT | Congresswoman Val Hoyle

Position: Rep. Hoyle introduced legislation to codify shared micromobility systems (bikeshare and scootershare) as eligible project types under three federal surface transportation grant programs, arguing this formalizes existing practice and removes barriers to federal funding for local communities.

EUGENE, OR – Congresswoman Val Hoyle (OR-4) introduced the Shared Micromobility Investment Act which would codify shared micromobility, including bikeshare and scootershare, as an eligible project type in three federal surface transportation programs: the Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD) grant program, the Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) program, and the Carbon Reduction program. The bill was announced at an event hosted by Cascadia Mobility in Eugene, Oregon. Congresswoman Hoyle was joined by Eugene Mayor Kaarin Knudson and representatives from the North American Bikeshare and Scootershare Association. “Eugene and Springfield are a model of a successful multimodal transportation network, and this bill will help more cities expand bikeshare into more neighborhoods, create more jobs and give residents an affordable and accessible way to get around,” said Rep. Hoyle. “Biking is becoming an increasingly important mode of transportation for Americans everywhere. The Shared Micromobility Investment Act makes clear that bikeshare and shared micromobility projects are eligible for more federal funding opportunities where transportation funding has historically treated bikeshare as a lesser form of transportation.” “Shared micromobility is an essential transportation service that is continuing to grow, and federal policy should reflect that,” said Sam Herr, Executive Director of NABSA. “Congresswoman Hoyle’s bill will make federal programs work better for communities across the country. Codifying eligibility for shared micromobility in these programs removes barriers to accessing these critical federal funds. We are proud to support it and grateful for her leadership.” Shared micromobility systems are already being funded through BUILD, STBG, and Carbon Reduction in practice, but that eligibility has never been written into federal statute. The legislation would formalize what communities across the country are already doing, reducing uncertainty for local governments and operators, streamlining the grant process, and sending a clear signal that shared micromobility is a recognized and valued part of the federal transportation system. The North American Bikeshare and Scootershare Association (NABSA) has been advocating for these codifications as part of the upcoming reauthorization of the federal surface transportation law. Shared micromobility is growing across the United States. In 2024, 171 million trips were taken on shared micromobility systems across the United States in communities of all sizes, a 31.7% increase over the previous year. A 2023 study found that shared micromobility increased restaurant spending by approximately 5.2%, representing an estimated $85.6 million in additional economic activity annually across the 371 American cities operating shared micromobility. “This new federal language will make a big difference as Cascadia Mobility continues to invest in bikeshare in Eugene. I’m grateful to Congresswoman Hoyle and NABSA for their work on behalf of shared micromobility and for championing this legislation,” said Brodie Hylton, CEO of Cascadia Mobility. The bill comes as Congress prepares to reauthorize the current surface transportation law, which is set to expire in September of 2026. NABSA has recommended that the reauthorization package expand shared micromobility’s access to existing federal programs, including by codifying eligibility in BUILD, STBG, and Carbon Reduction, all programs where shared micromobility is already an effective and active project type. The North American Bikeshare & Scootershare Association (NABSA) is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) industry association with the mission to collaborate across sectors to grow shared micromobility and its benefits to communities. Learn more at nabsa.net. Cascadia Mobility is an independent Oregon public benefit 501(c)(3) professional shared and active transportation operations nonprofit, helping to bridge the gap between the deliberate, purposeful pace of city government and transit agencies, and the fast-paced ever-innovating transportation technology industry, optimizing outcomes for both. They are a “two-wheel transit agency”, working with small to mid-sized cities and equipment providers to plan, launch, and operate shared micromobility and active transportation programs.

infrastructure
Source
May 5, 2026press_release_house

MERKLEY, WYDEN, HOYLE CONCERNED ABOUT EUGENE'S PEACEHEALTH TRANSITIONING EMERGENCY MEDICAL PROVIDERS | Congresswoman Val Hoyle

Position: The lawmakers express concern about PeaceHealth's decision to transition emergency department physician staffing from local Eugene Emergency Physicians to a Georgia-based staffing firm, citing potential negative impacts on patient care, workforce retention, and emergency services efficiency. They urge PeaceHealth to work transparently with physicians, staff, and the community on staffing decisions.

Eugene, OR – Oregon's U.S. Senators Jeff Merkley and Ron Wyden, along with Congresswoman Val Hoyle (OR-04), expressed concerns about PeaceHealth’s decision to end its contract with local Eugene Emergency Physicians in favor of Lane Emergency Physicians, which is owned by an Illinois physician and managed by Georgia-based ApolloMD. “We are troubled after hearing of PeaceHealth's proposed changes to emergency department (ED) physician staffing across three Oregon hospitals,” wrote Merkley, Wyden, and Hoyle. “These emergency departments are critical to the region, and we are deeply concerned that this approach may negatively impact patient care, workforce retention, and PeaceHealth's ability to maintain the efficiency necessary as the region's primary Level II trauma center.” The change affects three medical centers across Lane County, including PeaceHealth’s Riverbend in Springfield – a Level II trauma center – Cottage Grove Medical Center, and Peace Harbor Medical Center in Florence. PeaceHealth Riverbend is the only Level II trauma center – which provides specialized care for severely injured patients – between Corvallis and the California border. The lawmakers pointed out, “Rapid corporate staffing changes, particularly those driven by cost-cutting measures, private equity involvement, and third-party staffing firms, have been associated with increased ED wait times and reduced operational efficiency. Community members, physicians, and hospital staff have shared significant concerns that this decision could lead to inadequate staffing, which would result in serious disruption and deterioration of ED services at these critical PeaceHealth locations.” “We urge PeaceHealth to work in partnership and transparently with physicians, staff, and the community to develop an emergency department staffing plan that ensures continuity of care and maintains the integrity and reliability of emergency services across Lane County,” Merkley, Wyden, and Hoyle concluded. Full text of the letter can be found by clicking here.

healthcare
Source
May 4, 2026press_release_house

OREGON AIRPORTS TO RECEIVE MORE THAN $3 MILLION IN FEDERAL INVESTMENT | Congresswoman Val Hoyle

Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senators Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley as well as U.S. Reps. Suzanne Bonamici, Andrea Salinas, Val Hoyle, Janelle Bynum and Maxine Dexter today announced that 10 Oregon airports will receive a combined federal investment of more than $3.1 million to improve their infrastructure. “Small airports throughout our state need and deserve federal investments so Oregonians can count on them for small business support, emergency response, secure travel and more,” Wyden said. “These federal resources advance those key objectives statewide, and I’ll keep battling for similar infrastructure investments to make all airports in Oregon better and safer.” “Investing in critical airport improvements such as taxiways, helipads, hangars, and more increases safety and strengthens infrastructure across our state,” said Merkley. “Our regional airports are vital hubs for Oregonians, supporting local businesses and providing essential lifelines during natural disasters. I’ll keep fighting to secure critical federal funds to improve the efficiency and reliability of Oregon’s airports, benefitting the folks who rely on them for business, travel, and so much more.” “Regional airports are critical to keeping Oregon connected,” said Rep. Bonamici. “In rural communities like Tillamook, investments in transportation infrastructure give small businesses access to markets and make communities more resilient in the event of a disaster. I'm grateful that this funding will support work at the Port of Tillamook Bay.” "Small airports are vital for rural Oregonians,” said Rep. Salinas. “They support local businesses and enable emergency responses when our communities need them most. This $1 million investment in McMinnville Municipal Airport will replace aging infrastructure and improve safety for everyone who uses it. I'm proud to help deliver these federal dollars to the airports that keep Oregon connected, and I'll keep pushing to make sure rural communities keep getting the federal investment they deserve.” "These infrastructure investments across our regional airports in Corvallis, Florence, Gold Beach and Newport are a win for the economic growth of our rural and coastal communities,”said Rep. Hoyle. “We rely on these federal dollars to build up our airports' resilience in the face of worsening wildfire seasons." “Making it easier to get where you need to go keeps our economy strong and makes everyday life more convenient,” said Rep. Bynum. “Regional airports connect our communities, small businesses, and ensure Oregonians don’t have to drive hours just to access reliable transportation. I am proud to work with my colleagues to secure this critical funding for Oregon.” “Investments in small airports are invaluable and will pay dividends for Oregonians in the years to come,” said Rep. Dexter. “This funding will support critical improvements to the Troutdale Airport, a key hub for the Port of Portland and our regional economy. I will keep working to bring federal dollars into high-value projects in our community.” The awards totaling $3.14 million from the federal Department of Transportation for the Oregon airports are as follows: “The City of McMinnville greatly appreciates the continued federal financial support of safety and security improvements at the McMinnville Municipal Airport,” said airport manager John Paskell. “This important project provides for a significant security upgrade by adding nearly three miles of perimeter security fencing and adds an additional level of safety for pilots by installing a supplement wind cone on the Runway 4 end of the airport’s primary runway. As a developing regional general aviation airport, and as a significant economic asset and job creator in the community, continued federal infrastructure investment in airports is critical in ensuring their viability well into the future, particularly for airports in smaller communities like McMinnville. Those airport improvement dollars go a long way and help protect and preserve the airport’s financial self-sufficiency while also improving the facility.” “This federal investment is crucial as it ensures our airport infrastructure remains fully functional year-round, which is vital for emergency response and general aviation access in Eastern Oregon,” said Burns City Manager Brenda Engebretson. “The City of Florence is excited to receive this FAA funding to support the Beacon & Wind Cone Replacement Project at the Florence Municipal Airport,” the city said in a statement. “This project will help to improve essential airport safety infrastructure, as well as support safe and reliable aviation facilities that serve local and regional users. The Florence Municipal Airport is an economic driver for our area that provides a valuable space for commerce, emergency response, and recreational uses. The City of Florence is grateful for the continued support of this regional asset. “ “Ensuring safe and efficient operations is the Port’s top priority, and this federal investment will help to maintain taxiways at Troutdale Airport,” said Curtis Robinhold, Executive Director of the Port of Portland. “We are grateful for the Oregon delegation’s continued support for our projects to meet the diverse transportation needs of our region.” "The recent FAA award for the Lexington Airport to upgrade our precision approach path indicators (PAPIs), is a major win for a small regional airport like ours,” said Morrow County Commissioner Gus Peterson. “This system will allow us to continue to serve our users with improved safety and efficiency as well as allow us to be able to potentially expand in the future. Morrow County is grateful for the opportunity to continue to improve our small but important regional airport." "We’re grateful to see this investment in Morrow County," said Morrow County Commissioner David Sykes. "Upgrading the lighting systems at the airport is a common-sense move that keeps our pilots safe and ensures one of our important local assets stays in good condition." “Securing funding for a new hangar is significant investment in the future of Newport Municipal Airport,” said Lance Vanderbeck, Newport Municipal Airport Director. “This project will enhance our ability to serve pilots, aircrafts, and improve overall efficiency and safety. Through this funding, we’re better positioned to meet demand and ensure the airport remains a reliable asset for our community." "As Mayor of Gold Beach, I know the port is critical for emergency services and is an economic development engine,” said Gold Beach Mayor Tamie Kaufman. “This work helps make sure the port can continue being an asset to our community.”

Source
April 30, 2026press_release_house

REP. HOYLE INTRODUCES THE NO WAR APPROPRIATIONS THROUGH RECONCILIATION ACT | Congresswoman Val Hoyle

Position: Rep. Hoyle opposes fast-tracking military funding for the Iran conflict through budget reconciliation without a transparent congressional vote, arguing that Congress must exercise its constitutional duty to authorize or end military action.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Representative Val Hoyle (OR-04) introduced the No War Appropriations through Reconciliation Act, or the No WAR Act, to prevent Congress from fast-tracking funding for a war in Iran through a backdoor budget process. “If Congress is going to spend money to put American boots on the ground in another foreign war for oil, we need to have a transparent process and an up or down vote in Congress,” said Rep. Val Hoyle. “While we have spent $45 billion on this war over the past 60 days, Congress has not weighed in.” “This is the very least the American people should expect from Congress: For us to stand up for We the People and exercise our Constitutional duty to either declare war or ensure that we end this expensive, immoral and unconstitutional military action in Iran.” The No WAR Act is endorsed by MoveOn, Council for a Livable World, J Street, Friends Committee on National Legislation, Center for International Policy and Foreign Policy for America. Move On – Katie Bethell, Executive Director of MoveOn Civic Action “The American people are clear: Not another dime for Donald Trump’s war in Iran. MoveOn members applaud those in Congress who will fight to stop Donald Trump from escalating this war, and ensure that the money he wants to spend on war goes toward making healthcare, childcare, housing, and gas more affordable.” Council For a Livable World – John Tierney, Executive Director "Congress should not fund a war it has not authorized, especially through back-door means. Year after year, the Pentagon faces serious questions about its stewardship of American taxpayer dollars. Opening the door to spend billions more for a war that Congress has not authorized and for which the American people have still not received a real explanation is absurd. Council for a Livable World is pleased to support this critical legislation from Rep. Hoyle, which would restrain the Trump administration's unconstitutional, unjustified and unnecessary war in Iran. The American people want and deserve real transparency on how our tax dollars are spent, and attempts to push additional funding through an inherently untransparent process are reckless." J Street – Hannah Morris, VP of Government Affairs "The war with Iran has been an unmitigated disaster. We must ensure that Republicans do not force through additional funds to continue this war of choice via the reconciliation process. We are grateful to Congresswoman Hoyle for introducing this legislation to ensure that our democratic processes are not circumvented in pursuit of this reckless, unauthorized war that has no real end in sight. We urge her colleagues in Congress to support this bill while pushing for a durable ceasefire and diplomatic agreement.” Friends Committee on National Legislation – Hassan El-Tayyab, Legislative Director for Middle East Policy “It’s welcome news that Representative Val Hoyle and her House colleagues have introduced this bill to block funding for unauthorized military operations against Iran through reconciliation or other procedural workarounds. Escalation is already costing civilian lives and shaking the global economy. Congress must not approve another penny for a war of choice that risks mass casualties and regional destabilization. This is about reclaiming Congress’s constitutional authority over war powers and preventing another unauthorized conflict. Members should support this bill and make clear that diplomacy, not war, must guide U.S. policy toward Iran.” The bill is co-sponsored by Budget Committee Ranking Member Brendan Boyle (PA-02). The full bill text can be found here. The Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 allows Congress to expedite passage of budget-related legislation while bypassing the Senate filibuster, a process known as budget reconciliation. The Trump administration is now requesting $1.5 trillion in military spending for FY2027, $350 billion of which it wants funded through a party-line reconciliation bill. The No War through Reconciliation Act prevents Congress from abusing that process to fund an unauthorized war. Since this war began, 6,000 people have died, including 1,701 civilians, over 254 children and at least 13 U.S. Service Members. Oil prices have increased by 40%, fertilizer costs have risen by almost 50% and Oregonians are spending over $150 million more cumulatively on gas.

foreign_policy
Source
April 28, 2026press_release_house

HOUSE REPUBLICANS BLOCK REP. HOYLE’S AMENDMENT TO PREVENT IRAN WAR FUNDING | Congresswoman Val Hoyle

Position: Rep. Hoyle opposes using the reconciliation process to fund military operations in Iran without full congressional debate and authorization. She argues that decisions of this magnitude require transparent deliberation and recorded votes from members of both parties.

Washington, D.C. – This week, the House of Representatives will vote on S. Con. Res. 33, which will provide up to $140 billion in additional funding for ICE and CBP. Congresswoman Val Hoyle (OR-04) introduced an amendment rejected by congressional Republicans that would prevent reconciliation from being used as a backdoor way to fund the war in Iran without congressional authorization and debate. “We cannot normalize using reconciliation for every party line priority,” said Rep. Hoyle. “A decision this serious requires open debate, transparency for the American people and Members of both parties being forced to take a vote.” The full written testimony can be found here. The Congressional Budget Act of 1974 created the reconciliation process to expedite changes to spending, revenue or the debt limit without being subject to the Senate filibuster. Congressional Republicans are moving ahead with a plan to use reconciliation to fast-track passage of legislation to fund ICE and CBP, and Republican leadership is opening the door to using another reconciliation package for other priorities. The Trump administration has already requested $350 billion in military spending, which could include support for the war in Iran, that would need to move using reconciliation. The American Enterprise Institute’s estimate places the total cost of the war between $25 billion and $35 billion. Since this war began, 6,000 people have died, including 1,701 civilians, over 254 children and at least 13 U.S. Service Members. Oil prices have increased by 40%, fertilizer costs have risen by almost 50% and Oregonians are spending over $150 million more cumulatively on gas.

foreign_policy
Source
April 27, 2026press_release_house

HOYLE, MERKLEY AND WYDEN ANNOUNCE $11.2 MILLION FEDERAL GRANT FOR PORT OF COOS BAY RAIL PROJECT | Congresswoman Val Hoyle

Washington, D.C. – Today, Oregon’s U.S. Senators Jeff Merkley and Ron Wyden, along with U.S. Representative Val Hoyle (OR-04), announced $11,250,000 in federal funds have been awarded for the Pacific Coast Intermodal Port (PCIP) Terminal Connection Project. This funding will support the Coos Bay Rail Line triplicate track and run-around section of track on the North Spit of Coos Bay, improving the port’s rail operations. "I want to thank Secretary Duffy and MARAD for recognizing the importance of this project,” said Rep. Hoyle. “This award reflects and builds on the tens of millions we've already secured for it, and reflects a serious investment in Coos Bay. We're determined to make the South Coast a place where working people can find good-paying jobs, support their families and build a future. It’s about time we start delivering on the promise that we made after the timber industry died to transition to an economy that provides family wage jobs and the opportunity to build a future for working families on the South Coast." “When I was Speaker of the Oregon House, I helped save the rail line to Coos Bay because I saw how critical the Port of Coos Bay was to all those who call Oregon’s rural South Coast home. Now, we are one step closer to the Port of Coos Bay becoming the first fully ship-to-rail port facility on the West Coast—with the potential to transform the region and our state,” said Senator Merkley. “The Port of Coos Bay project stands to benefit working families across the region by creating good-paying, local union jobs and will continue to work with local and federal partners to get this project over the finish line.” “I’m glad the teamwork with Senator Merkley, Congresswoman Hoyle along with state and local officials has generated this most recent federal investment in the rail line that keeps this transformational Port of Coos Bay project advancing down the tracks,” said Senator Wyden. “This significant investment is great news for the port’s fresh approach to generate thousands of good-paying jobs on the South Coast and to expand supply chain capacity for our entire country. And I’ll keep pressing for the needed additional federal investments to complete this innovative ship-to-rail approach.” This latest funding to the Port of Coos Bay comes from the Port Infrastructure Development Program (PIDP) grant program, which supports projects that improve the safety, efficiency, or reliability of the movement of goods into, out of, around, or within a port. Previously, Merkley, Wyden, and Hoyle announced over $55 million in federal funds to the Port of Coos Bay.

Source
April 20, 2026press_release_house

REP. HOYLE JOINS REP. BALINT FOR THE CPC ENDING CORPORATE GREED TASK FORCE SHADOW HEARING ON

Position: The Congressional Progressive Caucus Ending Corporate Greed Task Force is convening a hearing to examine tax code provisions that enable corporate profiteering and wealth inequality, and to explore policy solutions including wealth taxes on millionaires and billionaires, offshore tax avoidance crackdowns, and tax system rebalancing to benefit working people over high earners.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Congresswoman Becca Balint (VT-AL), Chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) Ending Corporate Greed (ECG) Task Force, will convene a shadow hearing on “Visions of an Affordable Life: Taxing Corporate Greed” examining how the current tax code fuels corporate profiteering and deepening inequality—and what Congress can do to fix it. At a time when billionaires and large corporations are raking in record profits while working families struggle with rising costs, this hearing will highlight policy solutions to ensure the ultra-wealthy finally pay their fair share. WHAT: ECG Task Force Shadow Hearing — “Visions of an Affordable Life: Taxing Corporate Greed” WHEN: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 | 8:30 AM – 10:00 AM WHERE: Rayburn House Office Building, Gold Room (2168 RHOB) MEMBERS: Rep. Becca Balint (VT-AL), Chair Rep. Jim McGovern (MA-02), Co-Chair Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (NJ-12), Co-Chair Rep. Maxine Dexter (OR-03), Co-Chair WITNESSES: Elizabeth Wilkins, President and CEO, Roosevelt Institute Kristen Crowell, Executive Director, Families Over Billionaires Zorka Milin, Policy Director, FACT Coalition Corey Husak, Director of Tax Policy, Center for American Progress Liz Watson, Director of Federal Government Affairs, AFSCME This shadow hearing will be livestreamed here. Corporate greed is driving a crisis of affordability in the United States. Under President Trump, wealth inequality has surged, with the ultra-wealthy exploiting loopholes in the tax code while everyday Americans pay the price. This hearing will examine proposals to implement wealth taxes on millionaires and billionaires, crack down on offshore tax avoidance, and rebalance the tax system to work for working people—not just those at the top. The CPC Ending Corporate Greed Task Force is focused on advancing policies to hold corporations and billionaires accountable, including efforts on tax fairness, antitrust enforcement, price gouging, money in politics, and financial regulation.

taxeseconomy
Source
April 7, 2026press_release_house

REP. HOYLE'S STATEMENT ON PRESIDENT TRUMP'S THREATS TO IRAN | Congresswoman Val Hoyle

Position: Congresswoman Hoyle opposes President Trump's threatened military action against Iran, characterizing it as illegal and a war crime. She calls for Congress to vote on a War Powers Resolution to halt the action.

Eugene, OR – Congresswoman Val Hoyle released the following statement in response to President Trump’s Truth Social post threatening Iran: “This is evil. Plain and simple. Pure evil. The President has stated that he plans to commit genocide against more than 100 million civilians and the infrastructure they rely on—the literal definition of a war crime. This is an illegal war, and the President’s allies in Congress have done nothing to stop it. Mike Johnson should call us back to DC so we can do our jobs and protect the safety and security of our nation. I am once again calling on Congress to vote on the War Powers Resolution and put a stop to this—now.” Congresswoman Hoyle has called to invoke the 25th amendment.

foreign_policy
Source
March 31, 2026press_release_house

SALINAS, MERKLEY, HOYLE-LED LETTER FORCES ICE TO CONFIRM: NO PLANS TO EXPAND OR BUILD ICE DETENTION FACILITIES IN OREGON | Congresswoman Val Hoyle

Position: The representatives oppose expansion or construction of ICE detention facilities in Oregon and call for accountability regarding ICE operations and detention conditions.

Washington, D.C. – Today, in response to an inquiry led by U.S. Congresswomen Andrea Salinas (OR-06) and Val Hoyle (OR-04) and Senator Jeff Merkley and signed by Senator Wyden and U.S. Congresswomen Bonamici, Dexter, and Bynum, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Acting Director Todd Lyons confirmed that, “ICE is not currently planning to expand current detention facilities or open any new long or short-term detention facilities in Oregon.” “Oregonians never wanted an ICE detention facility in our state, especially as ICE and DHS have repeatedly abused their power and terrorized our communities,” saidSalinas. “I am glad that the Administration confirmed they currently have no plans to build or expand any ICE detention facility in Oregon. I have consistently demanded full transparency and accountability from ICE and the Trump Administration for their misconduct, and I will keep using every avenue available to call out ICE’s overreach and keep our communities safe.” “Again and again, ICE has been caught lying to the American people, so we should be skeptical of anything they tell us,” said Merkley. “Trump is hellbent on deploying his secret police across Oregon, and we won’t stand for it. I say HELL NO to any plans to expand ICE facilities or operations in Oregon, whether it’s office space, detention centers, or anything else the Trump Administration cooks up.” “The President has taken us into war, gas and grocery prices are skyrocketing and people can’t afford health care,” said Rep. Val Hoyle. “We need leadership that actually puts the needs of Americans first instead of spending taxpayer dollars to militarize our streets. We don’t need more money wasted on having a larger ICE presence here to harass, intimidate and detain hardworking Oregonians based on the color of their skin. Thanks, but no thanks.” On February 12, 2026, Congresswoman Salinas and Senator Merkley led their democratic Oregon delegation colleagues and ten additional House Members in a letter opposing any plans to open or expand ICE detention facilities in Oregon, including a potential facility in Newport. They also demanded details about the safety and standards of “soft-sided” facilities. On March 26, 2026, Acting Director Lyons responded to confirm that ICE currently does not have plans to build or expand any ICE facility in Oregon. The response indicates that ICE does not plan to move forward with a soft-sided detention facility in Newport, as had previously been reported. The response also provided details about the conditions of their soft-sided facilities. It claims that detainees are provided with three nutritious meals a day, that facilities are subject to inspections and audits conducted by the DHS Office of Inspector General, and that detainees are provided with sufficient clean clothing. These claims are contrary to many reports from detainees inside ICE facilities, and the Members will continue pushing for the truth about conditions in ICE facilities. “Oregonians do not want or need ICE in our state,” said Congresswoman Suzanne Bonamici. “ICE has confirmed that they do not plan to open any additional detention facilities in Oregon, and we will hold them to that while we work to make our communities safer by getting masked, armed ICE agents off our streets.” “ICE should be defunded and dismantled—and it should not be allowed to build new detention facilities anywhere. I’m grateful that in our home state of Oregon, ICE has said there are no plans to expand or build any new detention facilities. Oregonians are united in rejecting the cruelty this agency brings to our communities,” said Dexter. “ICE has already caused so much damage in our community. From tear-gassing kids to tearing families apart, this agency is out of line and has no place in our cities," Rep. Bynum said.“I'm glad that ICE confirmed that they do not have any plans right now to add detention facilities in Oregon. I'll continue to work with my colleagues to keep them out of our city and our state.” Click here or see below for the full letter response from Acting Director Todd Lyons: Thank you for your February 13, 2026 letter to the Department of Homeland Security(DHS). I am responding on behalf of the Department. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is committed to safe, secure, and humane environments for all of those in its custody. ICE continues to evaluate bedspace requirements and availability and is committed to strategically using existing detention beds in a fiscally responsible manner. As part of its detention operations, aliens in ICE custody are housed at a variety of facilities across the United States, including ICE owned and operated facilities; federal, state, county, or local facilities contracted through intergovernmental service agreements; and contractor owned and operated facilities. ICE constantly evaluates its detention needs and contract structures based on changes in immigration patterns, the operational needs of the agency, and the availability of resources. ICE's enhanced enforcement operations have resulted in a significant number of arrests of criminal aliens, requiring greater detention capacity. As part of these efforts, ICE is exploring various options to increase bedspace capacity nationwide working in collaboration with federal partners such as the U.S. Marshals Service, the Department of War, and the Bureau of Prisons. ICE will continue to prioritize its resources and work closely with its network of federal, state, local, and private sector partners to ensure the agency can acquire sufficient bedspace to fully achieve its mission. Regarding potential detention facilities in Oregon, ICE is not currently planning to expand current detention facilities or open any new long or short-term detention facilities in Oregon. As for detention expansion outside of Oregon, ICE issued a solicitation under the U.S. Naval Supply Systems Command's Worldwide Expeditionary Multiple Award Contract vehicle to identify vendors to provide comprehensive detention operations and wraparound services including facility, grounds maintenance, and operations services at all newly acquired facilities. ICE anticipates making awards under this solicitation in the coming months and plans to onboard facilities by the end of Fiscal Year 2026. All detention facilities are acquired, constructed, and operated in accordance with federal regulations, court orders, and national detention standards. Unfortunately, ICE cannot provide additional details due to law enforcement sensitivity and operational security maintenance. Additionally, you request information regarding the capacities of ICE's soft-sided facilities. Camp East Montana, located in El Paso, Texas, is an over 72-hour facility with an average length of stay of 10 days. The Krome North Service Processing Center, which includes a soft-sided facility, in Miami, Florida, is an over 72-hour facility with an average length of stay of 23 days. All of ICE's detention facilities, including soft-sided facilities, are contractually obligated to operate in accordance with one of several sets of detention standards. The detention standards describe a facility's immigration detention responsibilities, explain what detainee services a facility must provide, and identify what a facility must do to ensure a safe and secure detention environment for staff and detainees. Specifically, soft-sided facilities operate in accordance with National Detention Standards 2025. To ensure compliance with each contract's terms and conditions and the applicable detention standards, DHS and ICE employ a robust, multilevel oversight and compliance program. At the agency level, Detention Service Managers and Detention Standards Compliance Officers monitor detention conditions through daily on-site compliance reviews to identify deficiencies, areas of concern, contract and facility issues, and to facilitate corrective actions. Additionally, facilities are subject to inspections and audits conducted by the DHS Office of Inspector General, the DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, the DHS Office of the Immigration Detention Ombudsman, and the ICE Office of Detention Oversight within ICE's Office of Professional Responsibility. During their immigration proceedings, detainees are afforded numerous procedural protections that ensure they are provided with notice and an opportunity to be heard. In removal proceedings, these protections include, but are not limited to, the right to be represented by an attorney, to contest any charges of removal, to present evidence, and generally to examine evidence against them. While the government does not provide attorneys at the government's expense, all those arrested by ICE and placed into removal proceedings are provided with a list of free legal services and aid resources, including pro bono providers. Additionally, ICE facilities continue to provide detainees with opportunities to meet privately with their current or prospective legal representatives, legal assistants, interpreters, and consular officials. While in-person contact visits remain available at the request of legal representatives, non-contact legal visitation (e.g., video teleconference) is available, wherever possible. This offers an alternative for attorneys to communicate with detained clients in a timely and efficient manner, especially when in-person visitation is not possible or practical. While in detention, detainees reside in temperature-controlled environments at all times. Furthermore, detainees are provided with three nutritious meals a day and meals that support specialized diets, including religious diets and more than a dozen therapeutic diets, as well as cultural preferences. Menus are reviewed and approved on a regular basis by a registered dietitian to ensure appropriate nutrition is provided. Additionally, detainees are provided with clean bedding and "sufficient clean clothing" during their time in detention. Currently, the Office of Professional Responsibility does not inspect state-owned and operated facilities such as the soft-sided facility in Miami, Florida. The Office of Detention Oversight conducts congressionally mandated compliance inspections of ICE detention facilities that house ICE detainees pursuant to contractual obligations. Camp East Montana is currently the only soft-sided facility subject to Office of Detention Oversight inspection. The Office of Detention Oversight inspected Camp East Montana, which is contractually obligated to the National Detention Standards 2025 inspection standard, from February 10 to 12, 2026. The report is currently being drafted. ICE will publish the final report by April 13, 2026, 60 days after the inspection. In your letter, you request "a detailed list of every detention standard that has been waived for a soft-sided facility in CY 2025." As previously mentioned, all of ICE's detention facilities operate in accordance with national detention standards. ICE has not approved any waivers of detention standards for any of the soft-sided facilities. Thank you again for your letter.

immigration
Source
March 26, 2026press_release_house

Congresswoman Val Hoyle Secures Passage of “Columbia River Clean-Up Act”, Hails Bipartisan Measure Protecting the Basin, its Communities and Tribal Nations | Congresswoman Val Hoyle

Washington, D.C.- Today, Rep. Hoyle’s (OR-4) “Columbia River Clean-Up Act” passed the House as part of “H.R. 6422 American Water Stewardship Act”. The act extends the successful Columbia River Basin Restoration program which funds projects to reduce toxic pollutants and improve water quality in the Columbia River and its tributaries, including the Willamette and McKenzie Rivers. “Millions call the Columbia River Basin home. Millions more rely on it for their livelihoods and recreation. This bill is an important step to ensure that critical work on the basin is protected and adequately funded. The basin’s long-term health isn’t just for show; it is quite literally a matter of survival for countless critical species and people,” said Rep. Hoyle. “I am proud to have helped pass a bipartisan measure that will protect the basin for generations to come.” Rep. Hoyle’s bill, originally introduced in 2025 is a rare bipartisan win for the environment, and Oregonians. The Columbia River Basin is the second largest watershed in the U.S. and home to more than 8 million people and more than 15 tribal nations. A Senate version of this bill was introduced by Senator Merkley, and it is co-sponsored by Senators Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Patty Murray (D-WA). The Columbia River Basin Restoration Program:

Source

Recent news mentions

Articles from a curated list of national outlets that mention Val T. Hoyle.

No recent news mentions yet.

Source: GDELT 2.0 GKG, filtered to a curated list of national outlets. Inclusion is not endorsement; opinion pieces and reported news are mixed.

Recent stock activity

Periodic transaction reports filed under the STOCK Act — disclosed by the rep, sourced from public filings.

No disclosed trades on record.

Source: open-data mirrors of the Senate eFD and House Clerk financial-disclosure systems. Disclosure within 30 days of trade is required by law (45 for spouse/dependent trades).

Top PAC donors · 2026 cycle

Political action committees that gave the most to this rep's principal campaign committee this cycle. PAC giving is direct organizational support — industry, ideological, or leadership.

  1. 1.AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEAgriculture4 contributionsAgricultural processing PAC for American Crystal Sugar — backs candidates supporting farm subsidies, sugar price supports, and agricultural trade policies.AI$20,000
  2. 2.MEDICARE FOR ALLIdeological3 contributionsHealthcare-reform advocacy PAC — supports candidates backing universal single-payer Medicare coverage for all Americans.AI$15,000
  3. 3.MACHINISTS NON PARTISAN POLITICAL LEAGUE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPACE WORKERSLabor3 contributionsTrade-union PAC of the International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers — backs candidates supporting union organizing, prevailing wages, and aerospace manufacturing jobs.AI$15,000
  4. 4.INT'L UNION OF BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS3 contributions$15,000
  5. 5.AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, AFL-CIO COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATIONLabor3 contributionsTrade-union PAC for teachers — backs candidates supporting public education funding, collective bargaining rights, and worker protections.AI$15,000
  6. 6.HOOPS PAC3 contributions$15,000
  7. 7.PAC TO THE FUTURELeadership3 contributionsMember-of-Congress leadership PAC — specific affiliations and policy positions not inferable from the name.AI · low$15,000
  8. 8.JOBS, EDUCATION, & FAMILIES FIRST JEFF PAC3 contributions$15,000
  9. 9.UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION ACTIVE BALLOT CLUBLabor3 contributionsTrade-union PAC for the United Food and Commercial Workers — backs candidates supporting union organizing, collective bargaining, worker protections, and labor-friendly workplace standards.AI$15,000
  10. 10.UA UNION PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS VOTE! PAC (UNITED ASSOCIATION OF JOURNEYMEN AND APPRENTICES OF THE PLUMBING & PIPEFITTING INDUSTRY OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA)Labor3 contributionsTrade-union PAC for United Association plumbers and pipefitters — backs prevailing-wage protections, federal infrastructure funding, project labor agreements, and apprenticeship programs.AI$15,000

Source: OpenFEC (api.open.fec.gov) Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “committee.” Aggregated by contributing committee. Self-transfers from joint-fundraising / victory committees are excluded.

Top individual contributors · 2026 cycle

Itemized individual contributions over $200 to this rep's campaign committee, aggregated by donor employer. PAC giving is shown above; this section is people, not organizations.

  1. 1.SELF$36,110
  2. 2.PUBLIC AFFAIRS COUNSEL$7,000
  3. 3.ARNOLD VENTURES$7,000
  4. 4.BGR GROUP$7,000
  5. 5.FE RAIL$7,000
  6. 6.CHAIRMAN, CFO$7,000
  7. 7.ALSOP LOUIE PARTNERS$6,500
  8. 8.BULK HANDLING SYSTEMS$5,000
  9. 9.ACCELERATE STRATEGIES$4,800
  10. 10.TREMONT STRATEGIES GROUP LLC$4,500

Source: OpenFEC Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “individual,” aggregated by the donor's self-reported employer. This is a geographic / industry correlation, not a corporate endorsement.