See how Pat Harrigan actually votes — against your values.
DeepSyte scores Pat Harrigan's record on the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your personal alignment.
Sign in and take the values quiz to see how Pat Harrigan's votes line up with your views.
Prediction track record
How often we called Pat Harrigan's passage votes correctly, from their stated positions on each bill's tagged topics. Excludes “unclear” calls and abstentions.
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
To prohibit the disclosure of records by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development of individuals for the purposes of immigration enforcement, and for other purposes.
No paired statements and votes yet for Pat Harrigan
We haven't yet found statement/vote pairs on the same topic for Pat Harrigan. This usually means either the rep hasn't taken public positions on bills that have come to a passage vote, or those bills haven't been tagged yet. The checker runs as new press releases and votes come in.
Pro analysis
AI rep analysis — Pro
Get an AI-narrated read on Pat Harrigan's full voting record against your stated values — aligned themes, conflicts, notable votes, and what to watch for.
We haven't extracted campaign positions for Pat Harrigan yet. Once their campaign website or position pages are processed, this card will track what they said vs how they voted.
Crossing the aisle
Passage votes where Pat Harrigan broke ranks with ≥75% of Republicans. Threshold catches substantively partisan splits; unanimous-ish or close votes are excluded.
10
Cross-aisle votes
119-hr-2860·Jun 3, 2026·76% of R voted YES
Northwest Straits Marine Conservation Initiative Reauthorization Act of 2025
Congressman Pat Harrigan Co-Leads Legislation to Keep Chinese Fibers Out of American Body Armor
Position: Congressman Harrigan co-leads legislation requiring disclosure of ballistic fiber country of origin in body armor and prohibiting federal procurement of armor containing non-American fibers, citing national security and supply chain integrity concerns.
Contact: Lexi Kranich (814) 380-4408
WASHINGTON, D.C.—Today, Congressman Pat Harrigan (NC-10) joined Congressman Clay Higgins (LA-03) and Congresswoman Sheri Biggs (SC-3) in co-leading the Ballistic Armor Made in America Act of 2026, legislation requiring body armor manufacturers to disclose the country of origin of the ballistic fibers used in their products, and prohibiting the use of federal dollars to purchase body armor containing non-American fibers.
"Law enforcement officers are buying body armor they believe is made in America, and in too many cases, they are wrong. Chinese fibers are being woven into these products, stamped with a Made in America label, and sold to the men and women who put their lives on the line every day. That is a national security risk, and a betrayal of the people protecting this country. This bill ends it. Full transparency on where these fibers come from, and not a single federal dollar going to armor that does not meet the standard," said Congressman Pat Harrigan.
“Federal law enforcement should wear ballistic armor made in America, not China. This is a national security issue, as well as a matter of integrity in government procurement. As chairman of the Oversight Subcommittee on Federal Law Enforcement, I will continue to stand with the Thin Blue Line,” said Congressman Clay Higgins.
"I am proud to join Congressman Higgins and Congressman Harrigan on this important effort to make sure the armor protecting our law enforcement officers is American-made. The men and women who put their lives on the line every day deserve gear they can trust. This bill closes a dangerous loophole, strengthens our supply chain, and keeps taxpayer dollars from supporting foreign adversaries like China,” said Congresswoman Sheri Biggs.
The legislation requires companies submitting ballistic-resistant body armor to the National Institutes of Justice to disclose the country of origin of the fibers used in their products, with those disclosures published publicly on the NIJ Compliant Products List. Any body armor containing non-American fibers is prohibited from being marketed or labeled as Made in America. The bill also prohibits agencies at every level from using federal dollars to procure body armor containing foreign fibers, with narrow exceptions mirroring those already in place at the Departments of Defense and Homeland Security. Additionally, the Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers are directed to provide training to all agencies receiving federal funding for body armor purchases, to ensure they understand the new disclosure requirements and can make fully informed procurement decisions.
The Ballistic Armor Made in America Act will now be referred to the relevant committees for consideration. Congressman Harrigan will continue working to ensure that the men and women protecting this country are protected by gear that is genuinely built here.
Congressman Pat Harrigan and Senator Joni Ernst Introduce Resolution Defending Allied Special Operations Forces from Politically Motivated Prosecutions
Position: The resolution expresses Congress's view that retrospective prosecutions of allied special operations forces for alleged war crimes damage U.S. alliances and national security, and urges the Departments of Defense and State to engage with allied governments to ensure investigations are free from political interference.
Contact: Lexi Kranich (814) 380-4408
WASHINGTON, D.C.—Today, Congressman Pat Harrigan (NC-10) and Senator Joni Ernst introduced a bicameral resolution addressing the politicization of war crimes allegations against allied Special Operations Forces, calling on Congress to go on record that retrospective, politically motivated prosecutions of allied special operators damage the trust and interoperability that American alliances depend on.
"What is happening to allied special operators in Australia and the United Kingdom is a direct threat to American national security, and Congress needs to go on the record about it. These men executed the hardest missions of the Afghanistan war at America's request, under shared doctrine, against shared enemies, and prosecuting warriors years after the fact under legal standards that were never in place when they acted serves politics, not justice. This isn't limited to the Global War on Terror either. British soldiers are now being hauled into court for operations they conducted during the Troubles in Northern Ireland in the 1980s, under legal frameworks that simply did not exist at the time. Our allies fought beside us when we asked them to, and they have earned more than silence from Washington," said Congressman Harrigan.
The resolution expresses the sense of Congress that the United States deeply values its longstanding alliances with the United Kingdom, Australia, and other coalition partners whose forces fought alongside American troops in Afghanistan, Iraq, and other conflicts, including the 457 United Kingdom and 41 Australian personnel who gave their lives during the Afghanistan war. It urges the Departments of Defense and State to engage allied governments directly to ensure that any investigations or legal processes regarding alleged war crimes are conducted free from political interference. The resolution also warns that retroactively applying novel or evolving interpretations of humanitarian law to past operations, including operations conducted decades ago during conflicts like the Troubles in Northern Ireland, undermines legal certainty, erodes interoperability among allies, and emboldens adversaries who would weaponize legal ambiguity against Western forces. The retroactive application of laws that did not exist at the time of these operations is not accountability. It is a political weapon being used against men who served in good faith under the rules their governments established.
Congressman Harrigan and Senator Ernst are urging their colleagues to support the resolution and stand alongside America's closest allies in pushing back against the politicization of war crimes allegations against the special operators who fought beside American forces.
Issues:
Supporting Veterans and Military Families
National Security
Congressman Pat Harrigan Votes in Favor of Congressional Budget Resolution for Fiscal Year 2026
Position: Congressman Harrigan voted in favor of the fiscal year 2026 congressional budget resolution, which increases defense spending above $1.1 trillion annually and directs committees to identify $70 billion in deficit-reducing reforms, including immigration enforcement and border security measures.
Contact: Lexi Kranich (814) 380-4408
WASHINGTON, D.C.—Today, Congressman Pat Harrigan (NC-10) voted in favor of S. Con. Res. 33, the congressional budget resolution for fiscal year 2026, setting federal spending levels through 2035 and providing reconciliation instructions to begin cutting wasteful spending and securing the border.
"Washington has a spending addiction and this budget does not cure it. We are $36 trillion in debt and running deficits that would have been unthinkable a generation ago. What this budget does is put real money into defense and border security, and it forces committees to actually find cuts for once. Seventy billion dollars sounds like a lot until you look at what we owe and what we keep spending every single year. I voted for it because it moves in the right direction, not because anyone should be satisfied with where we are. The hard work of actually fixing this starts now," said Congressman Harrigan.
S. Con. Res. 33 establishes the federal budget framework for fiscal year 2026 and sets appropriate spending levels through 2035. The resolution includes significant increases to national defense spending, bringing defense budgets above $1.1 trillion annually beginning in fiscal year 2027. It also provides reconciliation instructions directing the Judiciary and Homeland Security committees to identify $70 billion in deficit-reducing reforms within their jurisdictions, creating a legislative pathway to fund immigration enforcement, border security, and deportation of criminal illegal aliens. The resolution also establishes reserve funds to support reforms following Operation Metro Surge and to fund the apprehension and deportation of illegal aliens convicted of rape, murder, or sexual abuse of a minor.
Congressman Harrigan has been a consistent voice for a strong national defense and securing the southern border, and will continue pushing for the deeper spending reforms Washington has put off for far too long.
Congressman Pat Harrigan Votes in Favor of the Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026
Position: Congressman Harrigan voted in favor of H.R. 7567, the Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026, citing its protections for crop insurance, prevention of foreign acquisition of American farmland, and support for agricultural producers.
Contact: Lexi Kranich (814) 380-4408
WASHINGTON, D.C.—Today, Congressman Pat Harrigan (NC-10) voted in favor of H.R. 7567, the Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026, a comprehensive farm bill reauthorization covering commodity support, conservation, trade, nutrition, credit, rural development, research, forestry, energy, crop insurance, and more.
"Iredell County is the number one dairy county in North Carolina, and we have cattle operations, poultry farms, and grain producers spread across this district who needed Congress to act," said Congressman Harrigan. "This bill is not everything I would have written, but it protects crop insurance, keeps foreign adversaries from buying up American farmland, and gives our producers the stability they need to keep their operations running. Leaving them without a safety net while Washington kept arguing was not something I was willing to do."
The Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026 is the first major farm bill reauthorization in several years, setting agricultural and food policy for the country for years to come. No farm bill is everything every farmer wants, and this one is no exception, but leaving producers without a safety net was not an acceptable outcome. Key provisions include expanded crop insurance protections for specialty crops, investments in rural broadband, stronger conservation programs for working lands, increased support for beginning and veteran farmers, expanded funding for feral swine eradication, and critical measures to protect American agricultural land from foreign adversaries including China.
Congressman Harrigan is urging the Senate to take up the legislation and send it to the President's desk.
ICYMI: Congressman Pat Harrigan Pens Op-ed with Senator Joni Ernst on Standing Up for Allied Special Operations Warriors
Position: The representatives call on Congress to formally oppose retroactive legal proceedings against allied special operations forces from Australia and the United Kingdom for battlefield decisions made over a decade ago, arguing these prosecutions constitute political weaponization against warriors who fought alongside American forces.
Contact: Lexi Kranich (814) 380-4408
WASHINGTON, D.C.—In a new op-ed for the New York Post, Congressman Pat Harrigan (R-NC-10) and Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA) call on Washington to stop staying silent as Australia and the United Kingdom subject their special operations veterans to politically motivated, retroactive prosecutions for decisions made on the battlefield over a decade ago. These are the warriors who fought beside American soldiers at America's request, and their governments are now hanging them out to dry. The op-ed lays out their congressional resolution to go on the record against this trend and ensure allied operators are not abandoned by the political winds of their own governments.
You can read the full piece here or below.
Stand Up For US-Allied Warriors Against Political Lawfare From Their Own Governments
Australian authorities this month arrested Ben Roberts-Smith, the most decorated soldier in his country’s history.
They accused him of war crimes tied to special operations he conducted in Afghanistan 15 or more years ago — charges he has repeatedly, consistently denied.
Meanwhile, Britain’s elite Special Air Service is being dragged through a parallel process of government-commissioned inquiries and retrospective legal proceedings that its members never could have imagined when they volunteered to serve.
Together, these cases reveal a pattern that’s spreading through the special operations forces of America’s closest allies.
It’s hollowing out the very units that fought beside ours for more than two decades — and Washington has been far too quiet about it.
We have both served in combat, and we understand the importance of special operations forces, elite units trained and equipped to execute the toughest missions on our nation’s behalf.
That’s why we’re calling on Congress to acknowledge that what’s now happening to our allied warriors is as much a concern to the United States as protecting soldiers’ lives on an active battlefield.
The United Kingdom lost 457 personnel in Afghanistan, while Australia lost 41.
The special forces of both nations executed the hardest missions of that war at America’s request — under shared doctrine, against shared enemies.
Of necessity, they often operated in conditions where the margin between a lawful kill and a catastrophic mistake came down to incomplete intelligence and a fraction of a second.
What those men could not have anticipated is that their governments would later construct elaborate legal architectures to second-guess those decisions, with the benefit of years of hindsight and in the comfort of a hearing room.
We wouldn’t stand for this kind of weaponization against our own forces, so we shouldn’t stand mute as our allies prosecute the warriors who had our soldiers’ backs on the battlefield.
There’s an important distinction to draw here, and we want to draw it carefully: Accountability matters, and no uniform places a soldier above the law.
But what we’re seeing today in both the United Kingdom and Australia is retroactive prosecution driven by domestic political pressure rather than by evidence, applied to men who acted in good faith under the rules their own governments established.
These politicized legal proceedings risk corroding something that takes generations to build, and the confidence of allied forces that their countries will stand behind them.
Now that confidence can be destroyed in a single political cycle.
That corrosion is already showing up in the ranks.
Elite units in both countries are quietly losing experienced operators who have weighed their options and decided the system will not protect them.
Every departure sends the same message to whoever is still considering service: Your government will send you into the hardest fights, place you in legal grey zones of its own design, but abandon you to shifting political winds a decade down the line.
Recruitment suffers, retention suffers, and so does the willingness to make the hard calls that difficult operations demand.
That’s unacceptable.
Our resolution asks Congress to go on the record, formally, and declare that politically motivated and retrospective prosecutions of allied special operators damage the trust and interoperability that coalition warfare depends on.
It also urges the Departments of Defense and State to engage London and Canberra directly to protect these processes from political interference.
Alongside it, we are pursuing legislation to ensure American special operators cannot be subjected to the same treatment — because nothing in current US law forecloses it.
King Charles III is visiting the United States this week to help celebrate our nation’s 250th birthday, demonstrating to the world that alliances are strongest when they’re based on a shared understanding that runs deeper than any treaty.
Part of this understanding recognizes that when soldiers fight side by side, their countries continue to support them long after the shooting stops.
Our allies’ warriors have earned that from us — and, on behalf of the men and women who have backed our own soldiers on the battlefield, we owe them more than silence.
Joni Ernst represents Iowa in the US Senate. Pat Harrigan is a US congressman from North Carolina.
Issues:
Supporting Veterans and Military Families
National Security
Congressman Pat Harrigan Statement on His Vote Against FISA Section 702
Position: Congressman Harrigan opposes reauthorization of FISA Section 702 without reforms to protect Fourth Amendment rights, citing concerns about past FBI abuse of surveillance authority.
Contact: Lexi Kranich (814) 380-4408
WASHINGTON, D.C.—Congressman Pat Harrigan (NC-10) released the following statement after voting against S.1318, the Foreign Intelligence Accountability Act:
"FISA Section 702 is a critical national security tool, and I do not take this vote lightly. But Congress cannot keep rubber stamping a surveillance program that has been used to spy on American citizens. The FBI has abused this authority before in previous administrations, and reauthorizing it without a single reform to protect the Fourth Amendment rights of the people I represent would be a disservice to every constituent in North Carolina's Tenth District.”
Congressman Pat Harrigan Introduces the Nuclear Rate Stabilization Act to Lower Energy Bills and Expand Nuclear Energy
Position: Congressman Harrigan supports legislation to fix tax credit rules for nuclear energy construction, arguing that the Nuclear Rate Stabilization Act will make existing clean energy tax credits more effective, lower consumer energy costs, and accelerate nuclear reactor development.
Contact: Lexi Kranich (814) 380-4408
WASHINGTON, D.C.—Today, Congressman Pat Harrigan (NC-10), alongside co-lead Congressman Jimmy Panetta (D-CA-19), introduced the Nuclear Rate Stabilization Act, bipartisan legislation to fix broken tax credit rules that have been holding back nuclear energy construction and preventing savings from reaching consumers at the meter.
"We have the most powerful energy source on earth, zero emissions, reliable baseload power that can run for decades, and we are letting outdated accounting rules strangle it before it gets off the ground," said Congressman Harrigan. "The Nuclear Rate Stabilization Act makes sure the tax credits Congress already passed actually reach the people they were meant to help, lowers costs for consumers, and gets more reactors built. Nuclear is the future of American energy dominance and it is past time our tax code reflected that."
“Safe and secure nuclear energy has immense potential to slash emissions and lower energy costs for working families, but inefficient tax rules are blocking nuclear construction from reaching its full potential,” said Congressman Panetta. “Our bipartisan bill would update the tax code to ensure that safe and secure nuclear projects can properly utilize clean energy investment tax credits to build reactors in a timely manner, cutting greenhouse gas emissions for our environment and saving consumers money on their electricity bills. I’m always glad to work across the aisle when it comes to reducing energy costs and strengthening America’s energy independence.”
“NEI applauds Representatives Harrigan and Panetta for introducing the Nuclear Rate Stabilization Act (NRSA). The bill strengthens existing energy tax credits to support the next generation of reliable, clean nuclear energy. By making nuclear investment tax credits more effective and improving affordability for customers, NRSA will help utilities move forward with new nuclear projects to meet growing energy demand. We urge Congress to act quickly to enact this legislation,” said Maria Korsnick, president and CEO of the Nuclear Energy Institute.
“The tax policy called for in the bipartisan Nuclear Rate Stabilization Act will help encourage further investment in the construction of new nuclear energy projects, accelerating the benefits these projects can deliver to our nation. Elementl Power looks forward to working with Congress and our partners to advance this legislation,” said Chris Colbert, Chairman and CEO, Elementl Power.
Currently, utilities constructing nuclear reactors are eligible for a clean energy investment tax credit of between 30 and 50 percent of construction costs. However, ITC normalization rules require that credit to be stretched over the 40-year life of the reactor, diluting its effectiveness and preventing near-term rate relief from reaching consumers. Additionally, Qualified Project Expenditure credits for nuclear projects cannot be transferred to third parties, leaving utilities sitting on unusable credits and cutting off access to capital that new reactor projects desperately need.
The Nuclear Rate Stabilization Act gives nuclear energy projects the same opt-out option from ITC normalization rules currently available to battery storage projects and allows QPE credits to be transferred to third parties, unlocking critical capital and making new reactor construction more financially viable. Congressman Harrigan is urging his colleagues to support the legislation and take a meaningful step toward lower energy bills, energy independence, and a stronger American nuclear industrial base.
Issues:
Energy Independence and Security
Congressman Pat Harrigan Votes to Cut Red Tape Blocking Fossil Fuels from Federal Buildings
Position: Congressman Harrigan voted to repeal federal building energy efficiency mandates that restricted fossil fuel use in federal construction, arguing that energy source alone should not disqualify buildings from green certification and that such restrictions increase costs.
Contact: Lexi Kranich (814) 380-4408
WASHINGTON, D.C.—Today, Congressman Pat Harrigan (NC-10) voted in favor of H.R. 4690, the Reliable Federal Infrastructure Act, legislation that repeals Biden-era federal building energy efficiency mandates that effectively banned fossil fuel use in federal construction and blocked buildings from receiving green certifications if they used natural gas or other fossil fuels.
"The last administration decided that natural gas had no place in a federal building, and they buried that ideology deep in the regulatory code where most people would never find it," said Congressman Harrigan. "That is exactly the kind of bureaucratic overreach that drives up costs and leaves hardworking Americans footing the bill. Energy that is reliable and affordable should not be penalized because it does not fit Washington's preferred agenda. This bill fixes that."
Under the previous rules, a federal building could be denied a green certification solely because it used fossil fuels, regardless of how efficient or reliable it was. The Reliable Federal Infrastructure Act repeals those restrictions and ensures energy source alone cannot disqualify a building from certification.
The bill now heads to the Senate. The Secretary of Energy will also be directed to issue updated regulations within 180 days of enactment. Congressman Harrigan will continue pushing to roll back the regulations that drive up costs and limit energy choices for North Carolina families and businesses.
Issues:
Energy Independence and Security
Congressman Pat Harrigan Introduces the Special Operations Forces Concealed Carry Act to Extend Concealed Carry Rights to Elite Military Veterans
Position: Congressman Harrigan supports extending federal concealed carry authority to qualified active and retired special operations forces personnel, modeled on existing law for retired law enforcement officers.
Contact: Lexi Kranich (814) 380-4408
WASHINGTON, D.C.—Today, Congressman Pat Harrigan (NC-10) introduced the Special Operations Forces Concealed Carry Act, legislation that extends federal concealed carry authority to both serving and veteran special operations forces whose firearms training and marksmanship standards match or exceed those of retired law enforcement officers.
"Federal law already trusts retired police officers to carry concealed nationwide. That makes sense. But it makes no sense that an active or retired SEAL or Green Beret, someone who spent a career mastering firearms under the most demanding conditions in the world, has no equivalent recognition under federal law," said Congressman Harrigan. "This bill fixes that. It does not create new rights or weaken any safeguard. It simply extends an existing, proven framework to the warriors who have earned it more than anyone."
“Atlas Rescue enthusiastically supports this legislation recognizing Special Operations veterans for their unique skills and service to our country. This recognition strengthens our ability to deploy highly trained operators in the fight against human trafficking, enabling us to more effectively bring that expertise to missions that protect the vulnerable and dismantle trafficking networks,” Sean Williamson, Executive Director ATLAS Rescue.
The Special Operations Forces Concealed Carry Act amends 18 U.S.C. Section 926C, the statute that currently grants concealed carry authority to qualified retired law enforcement officers, to also cover qualified special operators. Eligible veterans will receive permanent, nationwide concealed carry authority with no annual firearms requalification requirement, while remaining fully subject to all existing federal firearm restrictions. The bill covers honorably discharged servicemembers from paygrade E5-E9, W1-W5 or O1-O10 with verified service in Army Special Forces, the 75th Ranger Regiment, Delta Force, Navy SEALs, Marine Corps Scout Snipers, Reconnaissance Marines, MARSOC operators, and Air Force Combat Control, Pararescue, Special Reconnaissance, TACP, and Special Operations Weather. The legislation also directs the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs to establish a photographic identification program within 180 days of enactment, and requires the Department of Justice to issue guidance to law enforcement agencies nationwide ensuring uniform recognition of qualifying credentials.
Congressman Harrigan is urging his colleagues to support the Special Operations Forces Concealed Carry Act and honor the service of America's most elite warriors.
Issues:
Supporting Veterans and Military Families
National Security
Source: GDELT 2.0 GKG, filtered to a curated list of national outlets. Inclusion is not endorsement; opinion pieces and reported news are mixed.
Recent stock activity
Periodic transaction reports filed under the STOCK Act — disclosed by the rep, sourced from public filings.
No disclosed trades on record.
Source: open-data mirrors of the Senate eFD and House Clerk financial-disclosure systems. Disclosure within 30 days of trade is required by law (45 for spouse/dependent trades).
Top PAC donors · 2026 cycle
Political action committees that gave the most to this rep's principal campaign committee this cycle. PAC giving is direct organizational support — industry, ideological, or leadership.
1.WAR VETERANS FUND 2024Other3 contributionsVeterans-focused PAC — specific policy positions and beneficiary candidates not inferable from the name.AI · low$21,436
2.AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEIdeological4 contributionsPAC arm of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, federalized in 2021. Backs candidates of both parties who support U.S.-Israel security and economic ties.AI$20,000
3.TAKE BACK THE HOUSE 2022Leadership2 contributionsMember-of-Congress leadership PAC — supports Republican candidates aligned with the party's House agenda.AI$17,110
4.THE EYE OF THE TIGER POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEOther3 contributionsPAC with a motivational slogan name — specific policy positions and affiliations not inferable from the name alone.AI · low$15,000
5.INNOVATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE3 contributions$15,000
6.HUCK PACLeadership3 contributionsMember-of-Congress leadership PAC — directs contributions to allied candidates, likely associated with a member using the nickname or surname Huck.AI$15,000
7.AMERICAN REVIVAL PACIdeological3 contributionsSingle-issue or ideological PAC — specific positions not clearly inferable from the name alone.AI · low$15,000
8.SEAL PAC SUPPORTING ELECTING AMERICAN LEADERS PACLeadership3 contributionsLeadership PAC focused on electing candidates aligned with its mission. Specific candidate affiliations and policy priorities not inferable from the name alone.AI$15,000
9.AUTOMOTIVE FREE INTERNATIONAL TRADE PACTransport2 contributionsAutomotive-industry PAC — supports candidates and policies favoring free-trade agreements and reduced tariffs on vehicle imports and parts.AI$10,000
10.AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE2 contributions$10,000
Source: OpenFEC (api.open.fec.gov) Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “committee.” Aggregated by contributing committee. Self-transfers from joint-fundraising / victory committees are excluded.
Top individual contributors · 2026 cycle
Itemized individual contributions over $200 to this rep's campaign committee, aggregated by donor employer. PAC giving is shown above; this section is people, not organizations.
1.WINKLEVOSS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT$17,300
2.CORVID TECHNOLOGIES$17,000
3.D&H MARKETING$14,000
4.RISE CAPITAL$12,000
5.ANDURIL INDUSTRIES, INC.$10,500
6.C2 STRATEGIES$9,771
7.CPFRM LLC$8,500
8.ALG SENIOR LLC$7,000
9.EOTECH$7,000
10.EXECUTIVE$7,000
Source: OpenFEC Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “individual,” aggregated by the donor's self-reported employer. This is a geographic / industry correlation, not a corporate endorsement.
