See how Norma J. Torres actually votes — against your values.
DeepSyte scores Norma J. Torres's record on the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your personal alignment.
Sign in and take the values quiz to see how Norma J. Torres's votes line up with your views.
Prediction track record
How often we called Norma J. Torres's passage votes correctly, from their stated positions on each bill's tagged topics. Excludes “unclear” calls and abstentions.
40 predictions on record · none have been resolved by a passage vote yet. Check back as bills move.
To prohibit the disclosure of records by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development of individuals for the purposes of immigration enforcement, and for other purposes.
No paired statements and votes yet for Norma J. Torres
We haven't yet found statement/vote pairs on the same topic for Norma J. Torres. This usually means either the rep hasn't taken public positions on bills that have come to a passage vote, or those bills haven't been tagged yet. The checker runs as new press releases and votes come in.
Pro analysis
AI rep analysis — Pro
Get an AI-narrated read on Norma J. Torres's full voting record against your stated values — aligned themes, conflicts, notable votes, and what to watch for.
We haven't extracted campaign positions for Norma J. Torres yet. Once their campaign website or position pages are processed, this card will track what they said vs how they voted.
Crossing the aisle
Passage votes where Norma J. Torres broke ranks with ≥75% of Democrats. Threshold catches substantively partisan splits; unanimous-ish or close votes are excluded.
4
Cross-aisle votes
119-hconres-108·Jun 30, 2026·90% of D voted YES
Directing the President pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities in Lebanon.
Torres Sounds Alarm on GOP Cutting WIC Funding that Helps Feed Mothers, Infants, and Children | U.S. Congresswoman Norma Torres of California's 35th District
Position: Rep. Torres opposes the FY2027 Agriculture appropriations bill, arguing that proposed cuts to WIC funding and fruit/vegetable benefits, combined with prior SNAP reductions, harm vulnerable families and maternal and child health outcomes.
Washington, D.C. – Congresswoman Norma J. Torres (CA-35) during the House Appropriations Subcommittee markup of the Fiscal Year 2027 Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies funding bill, spoke out against harmful cuts that would take food off the tables of women, children, and working families. Rep. Torres voted against the bill.
The Republican proposal cuts $200 million from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), reduces access to critical fruit and vegetable benefits, and reflects billions in cuts to SNAP (CalFresh) following Republicans’ “One Big Beautiful Bill.”
“This bill doesn’t make America healthier, it makes families hungrier,” said Congresswoman Torres. “It cuts $200 million from WIC and takes fresh fruits and vegetables away from millions of moms and kids who rely on this program to stay healthy. At a time when families are already struggling with the cost of groceries, Republicans are doubling down on cuts that hit the most vulnerable the hardest.”
WIC helps feed mothers from the moment they find out they are pregnant to when their children are five years old. The program helps mothers and babies access free healthy foods, as well as providing breastfeeding support, nutrition education, and health resources. Nearly 25,000 mothers, infants, and children benefit from WIC in CA-35.
The bill also fails to fully fund WIC fruit and vegetable vouchers, threatening access to nutritious food for millions of participants nationwide. Torres emphasized that these benefits are essential to improving maternal and child health outcomes. For California, this would mean 827,000 mothers would see an estimated cut of $21,826,000 in total for the vouchers that help purchase fresh and nutritious fruits and vegetables.
In addition, the bill includes $6 billion in cuts to SNAP and CalFresh that Republicans pushed through last year with the Big Ugly Law, even as working families struggle with rising food prices. In CA-35, SNAP and CalFresh help nearly 110,000 constituents put food on the table.
“This is a pattern from the Trump Administration and Republicans to cut SNAP, cut WIC, and call it fiscal responsibility,” Torres continued. “But families in my district know exactly what this means: fewer groceries, tougher choices, and more moms and babies going without the nutrition they need to grow and succeed.”
Rep. Torres Cracks Down on Child Traffickers and Corrupt Diplomacy in National Security Funding Bill Amendments | U.S. Congresswoman Norma Torres of California's 35th District
Position: Rep. Torres advocates for stronger accountability measures in foreign aid spending, including restrictions on sanctions waivers for individuals credibly accused of child trafficking and mandatory financial disclosure requirements for diplomatic appointees before federal funds support their work.
Washington, D.C. – Today, Congresswoman Norma Torres, a member of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs (SFOPS), announced two critical amendments during the National Security Full Committee markup aimed at strengthening accountability and protecting vulnerable populations.
The amendments take direct aim at child trafficking and self-dealing diplomatic actors, ensuring U.S. taxpayer dollars are never used to shield abusers or fund diplomacy.
“If you traffic children, you should never get a pass from the United States government and I’m proud that my amendment passed and puts us on record standing up for victims and holding traffickers accountable,” said Congresswoman Torres. “But Republicans turned around and blocked a simple, common-sense transparency measure. My No Blank Check Diplomacy amendment would have required basic financial disclosures before taxpayer dollars are used to support diplomatic appointees. That’s not controversial, it’s accountability. Instead, Republicans chose to shield unelected envoys from scrutiny and deny the American people the transparency they deserve. I’ll keep fighting to make sure accountability, transparency, and human rights are reflected in how we spend every taxpayer dollar.”
Rep. Torres’ first amendment passed and ensures that no funds in the bill can be used to lift or waive sanctions against individuals credibly accused of child trafficking, unless the Secretary of State certifies, at least 60 days in advance, that doing so is essential to U.S. national security and provides a written justification to Congress.
This provision relies on determinations made by the Office of Foreign Asset Control.
The second amendment requires full financial transparency from any Special Envoy, Special Representative, or diplomatic appointee before taxpayer funds can be used to support their work. Under the amendment, no federal funds may be spent on travel, communications, staffing, or other non-security support unless the individual has filed a complete financial disclosure with the Office of Government Ethics within 30 days, and made it publicly available.
As a longtime advocate for transparency and human rights, Congresswoman Torres continues to push for policies that uphold American values at home and abroad while ensuring taxpayer resources are used responsibly.
Tri-Caucus Leads More Than 60 Democrats in Demand to Preserve Housing Assistance for Mixed-status Families | U.S. Congresswoman Norma Torres of California's 35th District
Position: The lawmakers oppose HUD's proposed rule that would restrict housing assistance eligibility based on immigration status, arguing it is illegal, conflicts with congressional intent, and would displace thousands of families including U.S. citizens while worsening the affordable housing shortage.
Washington, D.C. — The Congressional Tri-Caucus, composed of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus (CAPAC), Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC), and the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC), condemned the Trump administration's illegal push to gut housing assistance for thousands of families with mixed immigration statuses.
In a letter to Housing Secretary Scott Turner co-signed by more than 75 members of the House of Representatives, Rep. Norma Torres (CA-35) joined CAPAC Chair Rep. Grace Meng (NY-06), CHC Chair Rep. Adriano Espaillat (NY-13), and CBC Chair Rep. Yvette Clarke (NY-09) — in calling the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to withdraw its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking entitled “Housing and Community Development Act of 1980: Verification of Eligible Status (FR-6524).”
HUD's proposed rule threatens housing for tens of thousands of Americans, is blatantly illegal, and strains the agency's remaining resources.
“Like other immigration policies from this Administration, the proposed rule attempts to solve a problem that does not exist. It is based on the false premise that ineligible noncitizens are receiving housing assistance and diverting resources from citizens,” wrote the lawmakers. “In reality, current HUD rules limit rental assistance to household members with eligible immigration status, and ineligible individuals are prohibited from receiving such aid.”
The proposal flies against the intent of Congress, which in 1988 amended the Housing and Community Development Act to prioritize family unity while making sure non-eligible residents do not receive federal assistance.
If implemented, the rule will kick 80,000 people out of housing, including nearly 37,000 children, most of whom are U.S. citizens.
HUD's own analysis shows that the proposed rule will reduce, not increase, the number of HUD-assisted units, effectively worsening the affordable housing crisis for everyone.
“HUD’s proposed rule is directly in conflict with the agency’s mandate to provide fair housing opportunities. Immigrant populations already face discrimination in housing, and the enactment of this proposed rule would exacerbate this issue. It blatantly disregards the congressional intent of the law and would disrupt the lives of thousands of families – citizen and noncitizen alike,” wrote the lawmakers.
“At a time when over 21 million renter households are cost-burdened and there is a shortage of 7.2 million affordable rental homes, HUD should not attempt to restrict safety net housing programs,” the lawmakers concluded.
Washington, D.C. – El Tri-Caucus encabeza a más de 75 demócratas en su exigencia de preservar la asistencia de vivienda para familias de estatus migratorio mixto.
Washington, D.C. – El Tri-Caucus del Congreso, compuesto por el Caucus Hispano del Congreso (CHC), el Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus (CAPAC) y el Congressional Black Caucus (CBC), condenó el intento ilegal de la administración Trump de eliminar la asistencia de vivienda para miles de familias con estatus migratorio mixto.
En una carta al secretario de Vivienda Scott Turner, cofirmada por más de 60 miembros de la Cámara de Representantes, la representante Norma Torres (CA-35) se unió a con el presidente del CHC, representante Adriano Espaillat (NY-13); la presidenta del CAPAC, representante Grace Meng (NY-06); y la presidenta del CBC, representante Yvette Clarke (NY-09) — instaron al Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) a retirar su Notificación de Reglamentación Propuesta titulada "Housing and Community Development Act of 1980: Verification of Eligible Status (FR-6524)."
La norma propuesta por HUD amenaza la vivienda de decenas de miles de estadounidenses, es manifiestamente ilegal y agota los escasos recursos que le quedan a la agencia.
"Al igual que otras políticas migratorias de esta administración, la norma propuesta intenta resolver un problema que no existe. Se basa en la premisa falsa de que personas no elegibles están recibiendo asistencia de vivienda y desviando recursos que corresponden a ciudadanos", escribieron los legisladores. "En realidad, las normas vigentes de HUD limitan la asistencia de alquiler a los miembros del hogar con estatus migratorio elegible, y las personas no elegibles tienen prohibido recibir dicha ayuda."
La propuesta va en contra de la voluntad del Congreso, que en 1988 enmendó la Housing and Community Development Act para priorizar la unidad familiar, al tiempo que garantiza que los residentes no elegibles no reciban asistencia federal.
De implementarse, la norma desalojaría a 80,000 personas de sus viviendas, incluyendo a casi 37,000 niños, la mayoría de los cuales son ciudadanos estadounidenses.
El propio análisis de HUD muestra que la norma propuesta reduciría, en lugar de aumentar, el número de unidades asistidas por HUD, lo que agravaría efectivamente la crisis de vivienda asequible para todos.
"La norma propuesta por HUD está en directa contradicción con el mandato de la agencia de brindar oportunidades de vivienda justa. Las poblaciones inmigrantes ya enfrentan discriminación en materia de vivienda, y la promulgación de esta norma propuesta agravaría aún más este problema. Desacata abiertamente la voluntad legislativa del Congreso y trastornaría la vida de miles de familias, tanto ciudadanas como inmigrantes", escribieron los legisladores.
"En un momento en que más de 21 millones de hogares inquilinos destinan una parte excesiva de sus ingresos al pago de la vivienda y existe un déficit de 7.2 millones de viviendas de alquiler asequibles, HUD no debería intentar restringir los programas de vivienda de la red de seguridad social", concluyeron los legisladores.
Puede leer la carta completa AQUÍ.
Torres Slams House GOP for Protecting Predatory Surveillance Pricing and Price-Gouging Over Working Families | U.S. Congresswoman Norma Torres of California's 35th District
Position: Congresswoman Torres opposes House Republican blocking of an amendment that would have directed the FTC to investigate retailer use of digital price tags and personal data for real-time, individualized pricing. She argues such practices constitute price gouging that harms working families.
WASHINGTON, DC – Today, Congresswoman Norma Torres (CA-35), a senior member of the House Appropriations Committee, introduced an amendment in the Financial Services and General Government (FSGG) appropriations bill aimed at protecting American families from predatory surveillance pricing and price gouging algorithms.
The amendment would have directed the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to investigate how retailers use digital price tags (also known as electronic shelf labels), digital tools, and personal data to change prices in real-time. By blocking the measure, House Republicans have effectively cleared the way for stores to continue using "individualized pricing" to charge different customers different prices for the same basic goods.
“Today, House Republicans sold out hardworking families to protect the profits of corporate giants. My amendment was a common-sense demand for transparency: why should neighbors pay different prices for the same loaf of bread at the same store based on data from their phones?” said Congresswoman Torres. “By killing this investigation, the GOP has effectively green-lit corporations using digital tools to shake you down at the checkout line. They can’t pretend to care about inflation while actively voting to keep grocery prices high and corporate greed hidden from the public.”
The rise of electronic shelf labels (ESLs) risks allowing grocery stores and other retailers to change prices thousands of times a day. When paired with the amount of surveillance data retailers have access to and increasingly sophisticated technologies, including artificial intelligence, these tools allow for "predatory" models that target a consumer’s perceived "willingness to pay," often resulting in higher costs for those who can least afford it.
Rep. Norma Torres Opposes NSRP Bill, Citing “Dangerous Retreat” from Anti-Corruption and Regional Security Efforts | U.S. Congresswoman Norma Torres of California's 35th District
Position: Rep. Torres opposes the fiscal year 2027 SFOPS funding bill, arguing that it eliminates anti-corruption oversight mechanisms, defunds proven regional security programs like the Inter-American Foundation, and undermines U.S. influence in Central America and the Western Hemisphere.
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Representative Norma J. Torres (CA-35), a senior member of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs (NSRP) and Co-Chair of the Central America Caucus, announced she will vote NO on the fiscal year 2027 SFOPS funding bill as currently written.
As the only Member of Congress born in Central America, Torres is a recognized expert on the Northern Triangle and a leading advocate for the rule of law. In her subcommittee remarks, she characterized the bill as a strategic failure that ignores the reality of migration, narcotrafficking, and governance in the Western Hemisphere.
“I am voting against this bill because it abandons the bipartisan anti-corruption standards that we have spent years establishing. As an Appropriator, my job is to ensure taxpayer dollars are an investment in stability, not a subsidy for autocrats,” said Congresswoman Torres. “By stripping away basic oversight and gutting proven programs like the Inter-American Foundation, this bill makes America less secure. If we are serious about addressing root causes of migration, we must be committed to supporting the programs that have proven results instead of turning a blind eye by supporting autocratic regimes. This isn't just a budget; it's a strategic retreat that signals to the world that America is no longer interested in leading on transparency or the rule of law. I will not put my name on a document that surrenders our influence in our own hemisphere to our adversaries.”
Torres, a recognized authority on the Northern Triangle, argued that the bill’s elimination of the Inter-American Foundation (IAF) is a self-inflicted wound to U.S. national security. She noted that one program successfully reduced criminal activity among participants by 90%, this bill guts that funding while the administration simultaneously facilitates the release of convicted corrupt actors like former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández.
Furthermore, Torres warned that the bill creates a vacuum by stripping away bipartisan anti-corruption safeguards and leaving half of U.S. embassies without confirmed ambassadors, a move that effectively surrenders regional influence to China and Russia.
Congresswoman Torres Condemns ICE for Leaving Released Detainee Without Support, Calls for Basic Human Dignity | U.S. Congresswoman Norma Torres of California's 35th District
Position: Congresswoman Torres criticizes ICE's release procedures for detainees and calls for implementation of clear, humane protocols that ensure individuals have transportation, family communication, and basic support upon release from detention.
Washington, D.C – Congresswoman Norma Torres (CA-35) issued the following statement after Maykel Andree Fonseca Cabrera was released from the Adelanto Detention Center by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and left without assistance to reach his family in South Carolina from California:
“After more than a year and a half in detention, Maykel Andrew Fonseca Cabrera was released by ICE Adelanto with no plan, no support, and no safe way to get home. ICE didn’t just release him, they abandoned him.
“This is unacceptable. No one should be dumped at an airport or on the street and told to figure it out on their own after prolonged detention. That is not how a government that claims to value human dignity should operate. Mr. Fonseca Cabrera was released without confirmed travel arrangements or clear guidance on how to reunite with his family. With no one available to receive him upon release, he was left in a vulnerable and confusing situation.
“My office stepped in to make sure Mr. Fonseca Cabrera had at least a meal and immediate support but that should not fall on congressional offices or outside groups scrambling at the last minute. ICE must do better.”
Rep. Torres is calling on ICE to implement clear, humane release protocols that ensure individuals are not left stranded without basic necessities, transportation coordination, or communication with family members.
Rep. Norma Torres Fights to Keep January 6 Rioters Off Federal Payroll | U.S. Congresswoman Norma Torres of California's 35th District
Position: Rep. Torres opposes hiring federal employees who were pardoned for roles in the January 6 insurrection, arguing that taxpayer funds should not support individuals convicted of violence or crimes related to the Capitol attack.
Washington, D.C – Today, Congresswoman Norma Torres (CA-35), a member of the House Appropriations Committee, introduced an amendment to the FY27 Financial Services and General Government (FSGG) Appropriations bill to block the federal government from hiring individuals pardoned for their roles in the January 6 insurrection.
The amendment would ensure that no taxpayer dollars are used to hire or pay individuals covered under presidential pardons tied to January 6 or efforts to overturn the 2020 election.
“This amendment was simple. If you attacked our democracy or assaulted police officers, you should never get a taxpayer-funded job,” said Congresswoman Torres. “Republicans should stop standing up for violent insurrectionists and start standing up for our democracy. This bill already falls short and Republicans refused a simple fix.”
More than 1,500 individuals connected to January 6 were pardoned, including those convicted of violent assaults on law enforcement. Several have since been linked to additional serious crimes, and child sexual abuse cases, raising public safety concerns.
“This is what happens when you hand out mass pardons with no accountability,” Torres added. “Now Republicans are okay with putting those same individuals on the federal payroll. We know that at least one January 6 rioter was employed by the federal government and the Administration has refused to disclose whether others are currently on payroll.”
“The Trump administration and Republicans are not even protecting our children and are sending a dangerous message by protecting pardoned January 6 rioters,” Torres continued. “They are ignoring or downplaying the fact that some of those same individuals have been convicted of child sexual abuse, reinforcing a pattern of tolerance and support for individuals who commit sexual violence.”
Last summer, the Trump Administration hired Jared Wise, a January 6 insurrectionist who was caught on camera urging fellow rioters to “kill” police and calling them “Nazi” and “Gestapo” while they defended the Capitol, was employed as a senior advisor for Trump’s Department of Justice for nearly a year.
Last week, President Trump’s Department of Justice also moved to erase the seditious conspiracy convictions of Proud Boys and Oath Keeper leaders, far-right extremist groups who helped plan and orchestrate the attack on the Capitol. Trump had previously commuted their prison sentences.
“I was here on January 6. I won’t stand by while those who tried to tear this country apart are rewarded with federal jobs,” Torres said. “Oversight is not optional and accountability is not negotiable.”
Republicans Kill Torres Amendment, But Admit There is a Problem | U.S. Congresswoman Norma Torres of California's 35th District
Position: Congresswoman Torres advocates for federal legislation requiring legal representation and due process protections for non-citizen veterans facing deportation, and criticizes Republican opposition to her amendment as inadequate.
Washington, D.C – Today, Congresswoman Norma J. Torres, a member of the House Appropriations Committee, introduced an amendment to the FY27 Military Construction and Veterans Affairs Appropriations bill aimed at ensuring non-citizen veterans are not deported without access to legal counsel and a fair hearing.
The amendment would have prohibited federal funds from being used to deport a veteran unless they are first provided legal representation and due process in immigration court, and it would require transparent reporting on how many veterans are impacted by Donald Trump’s immigration policies.
During consideration of the amendment, Republicans introduced a change replacing these legal protections with a statement that merely reaffirms current law. The statement by House Republicans admits the reality that there is a serious problem with this Administration deporting veterans, but fails to address the serious gaps that continue to leave veterans vulnerable to deportation without adequate protections.
“In my district, I’ve seen veterans, especially Latino veterans, treated with suspicion, questioned, and targeted, even after serving our country with honor. It’s happening to people who wore the uniform and came home expecting dignity, not fear. My amendment would actually change the law and ensure veterans get a fair day in court before facing deportation,” said Congresswoman Torres. “Republicans chose to offer an amendment that admits that Donald Trump’s immigration policies have created a severe problem in this country for more than 100,000 non-citizen veterans, but ultimately does nothing more than restate the law as it already exists. It’s a first step, admitting you have a problem and I’m glad we are taking a step. But that’s not leadership, that’s avoidance. If you wore the uniform of our country, you deserve due process, dignity, and respect. Republicans seem intent on ignoring the problems being created by Donald Trump and his minions.”
Congresswoman Torres continues to lead efforts in Congress to protect veterans, uphold due process, and ensure the federal government is held accountable in its treatment of those who served.
Congresswoman Torres Votes No on FISA Reauthorization | U.S. Congresswoman Norma Torres of California's 35th District
Position: Congresswoman Torres opposes FISA reauthorization without stronger constitutional safeguards, citing concerns that the current law permits warrantless surveillance of Americans' communications and that the Trump Administration is misusing existing law enforcement authorities.
Washington, D.C. — Congresswoman Norma Torres (CA-35) voted against reauthorizing the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), warning that current law allows the government to collect and search Americans’ communications without a warrant.
“I will not support expanding surveillance powers without real safeguards to prevent abuse by the Trump Administration. If Congress won’t enforce constitutional limits, we’re not strengthening security, we’re eroding the very freedoms we claim to defend.”
“It is already happening. The Trump Administration is misusing law enforcement authorities intended to protect Americans and directing them against the very people they are meant to serve. They are attacking political opponents and using our intelligence services to chase down false conspiracy theories. They cannot be trusted with additional powers to surveil Americans.”
Torres Statement on DOD Inspector General Findings Confirming Unsafe Conditions for National Guard Troops Deployed to Los Angeles | U.S. Congresswoman Norma Torres of California's 35th District
Position: Rep. Torres calls for accountability from the Department of Defense regarding unsafe conditions—specifically unsafe food, lack of clean water, and unsanitary living conditions—experienced by National Guard troops and Marines deployed to Los Angeles in 2025, as confirmed by DOD Inspector General findings. She argues the military was unprepared for the deployment and demands improved oversight and leadership.
Washington, D.C. — Congresswoman Norma Torres released the following statement after receiving a response from the Department of Defense Inspector General substantiating whistleblower complaints regarding unsafe conditions for National Guard troops and Marines deployed to Los Angeles in 2025:
“Last year, I raised serious concerns after hearing directly from whistleblowers about unacceptable conditions facing our service members deployed to Los Angeles, including reports of unsafe food, lack of clean water, and unsanitary living conditions.
“This week, the Department of Defense Inspector General has confirmed what those whistleblowers risked everything to report: our troops were served unsafe and unsanitary food during that deployment. That is unacceptable.
“These findings show just how unprepared the Department of Defense was for this mobilization, because it was a task they should not have been asked to do in the first place. We ask our service members to put their lives on the line for our country. The bare minimum we owe them is safe food, clean water, and dignified living conditions. Anything less is a failure of leadership.
“These findings also raise serious concerns about our military’s operational readiness. How was the food contract awarded? Did they follow the Request for Proposal (RFP) process? If we cannot properly support our troops here at home where logistics should be easy, how can we expect to sustain them in more complex deployments abroad?
“Oversight is not optional and I will continue to demand accountability from the Department of Defense and ensure that no service member is ever put in harm’s way due to negligence or mismanagement.”
In July 2025, Rep. Torres sent a formal letter to the Department of Defense Inspector General raising whistleblower complaints about the treatment of National Guard troops and Marines deployed to Los Angeles.
The complaints included concerns about food safety, access to clean water, and basic sanitary conditions.
The Department of Defense Inspector General has now substantiated key elements of those complaints, specifically confirming that service members were served unsafe and unsanitary food.
Articles from a curated list of national outlets that mention Norma J. Torres.
No recent news mentions yet.
Source: GDELT 2.0 GKG, filtered to a curated list of national outlets. Inclusion is not endorsement; opinion pieces and reported news are mixed.
Recent stock activity
Periodic transaction reports filed under the STOCK Act — disclosed by the rep, sourced from public filings.
No disclosed trades on record.
Source: open-data mirrors of the Senate eFD and House Clerk financial-disclosure systems. Disclosure within 30 days of trade is required by law (45 for spouse/dependent trades).
Top PAC donors · 2026 cycle
Political action committees that gave the most to this rep's principal campaign committee this cycle. PAC giving is direct organizational support — industry, ideological, or leadership.
1.AIPAC PAC(AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE PAC)21 contributions$180,970
2.AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY PACAgriculture8 contributionsAgricultural company PAC for a major sugar producer — backs candidates supporting farm subsidies, tariff protections, and agricultural trade policies.AI$40,000
3.MACHINIST NON-PARTISAN POLITICAL LEAGUE5 contributions$25,000
4.IBEW PAC VOLUNTARY FUNDLabor5 contributionsTrade-union PAC for the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers — backs candidates supporting union organizing, prevailing wages, and infrastructure investment.AI$25,000
5.PRO-ISRAEL AMERICA PAC3 contributions$23,350
6.AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS COPELabor4 contributionsTrade-union PAC for the American Federation of Teachers — backs candidates supporting public education funding, teacher compensation, and collective-bargaining rights.AI$20,000
7.DRIVE COMMITTEELeadership3 contributionsLeadership or member-affiliated PAC — specific positions and affiliated member not inferable from the name alone.AI · low$15,000
8.THE NATIONAL ASSOC. OF REALTORS (RPAC)3 contributions$15,000
9.UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC3 contributions$15,000
Source: OpenFEC (api.open.fec.gov) Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “committee.” Aggregated by contributing committee. Self-transfers from joint-fundraising / victory committees are excluded.
Top individual contributors · 2026 cycle
Itemized individual contributions over $200 to this rep's campaign committee, aggregated by donor employer. PAC giving is shown above; this section is people, not organizations.
1.ROUTE 66 SHOOTING SPORTS PARK$14,000
2.MILLER BARONDESS$8,000
3.BROWN & BROWN INSURANCE$7,000
4.HACKMAN CAPITAL$7,000
5.BGR GROUP$5,250
6.CHINO VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER$4,500
7.DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP$4,000
8.RK LAW$4,000
9.RIDA$4,000
10.SPRUCE CAPITAL PARTNERS$4,000
Source: OpenFEC Schedule A receipts where contributor type is “individual,” aggregated by the donor's self-reported employer. This is a geographic / industry correlation, not a corporate endorsement.
