2026 race

CA-35 — U.S. House

2 candidates on the November ballot. Incumbent: Norma J. Torres.

Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See where these candidates stand — and who's funding them.

DeepSyte tracks the money and the record in every race against the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your alignment.

How we got here · 1 earlier contest
Primary · Tuesday, June 2, 2026
Called by audit: web-verified
Top-two primary — Norma J. Torres and Mike Cargile advanced to the general election.
  • DNorma J. Torres· inc.Advanced to general
  • RMike CargileAdvanced to general
  • RMichael HorvathDefeated
  • DWh LaneDefeated
Election held
Counting
Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Results appear here once a race is called and verified. Official returns from the California Secretary of State.

Disclosed money in race
$933K
Candidate + outside spending. See finance breakdown below.
Incumbent

Currently in office

Challengers

Sorted by fundraising

Mike Cargile

R
ChallengerFEC H0CA35146

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$10K
Cash on hand: $448

Wh Lane

D
ChallengerFEC H6CA35143

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$0
Cash on hand: $0

Michael Horvath

R
ChallengerFEC H6CA35135

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle—
Cash on hand: —
Local signal

Early read on CA-35 — U.S. House

A directional read on where this seat is trending, from the signals we have so far. This is an early scaffold — more inputs light up as coverage and constituent activity accrue.

Coverage tone · mixed
Recent news coverage of Norma J. Torres over the last 90 days.
0 positive2 neutral0 negative
2 articles · AI-assessed sentiment toward the rep. A media signal, not a poll of the district.
Constituent stakes
No one here has staked a position on a tracked vote yet. As neighbors weigh in on /pressure campaigns, the district's lean will show up here.
Money in the race

Finance breakdown

Disclosed funding shaping this race — both the money candidates raise themselves and the outside spending dropped by independent groups. Issue-ad spending by 501(c)(4) groups is excluded; the FEC doesn't require disclosure of it. See the note below for details.

Candidate fundraising: FEC reports through October 14, 2026 · 2025–26 cycle

Total disclosed
$933K
Candidate fundraising + independent expenditures (FEC).
Candidate-direct (Schedule A)
$933K
Raised by candidate committees themselves.
Outside spending (Schedule E)
$29
$29 for · $0 against
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Norma J. Torres(D)incumbent
+ PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ORANGE AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES' COMMUNITY ACTION FUND PAC $29
$923K$29—$923K
Mike Cargile(R)
$10K——$10K
Wh Lane(D)
$0——$0
Michael Horvath(R)
$0——$0
Where the money comes from

In-state vs out-of-state

Share of each candidate's itemized individual contributions from donors inside CA versus the rest of the country. Excludes sub-$200 unitemized donations (no geography on file) and PAC money — see note below.

Norma J. Torres(D)57% in-state · $312K itemized
$178K in-state$134K out-of-state
Mike Cargile(R)100% in-state · $8K itemized
$8K in-state$0 out-of-state
What's counted, what isn't

Candidate-direct is each campaign's reported receipts on FEC Schedule A — individual contributions plus PAC contributions to the candidate's own committee — through the most recent filing.

Outside spending is independent expenditures on FEC Schedule E: money spent by PACs, super PACs, and party committees for or against a candidate, without legal coordination with the campaign. The committees listed under each candidate are the largest disclosed spenders on either side.

In-state vs out-of-state covers only itemized individual contributions — donations over $200, which are the only ones that carry a contributor address at the FEC. Sub-$200 unitemized donations (often a large share for grassroots campaigns) have no geography on file and are excluded, as is PAC money. So the percentages describe where a candidate's itemized individual money comes from, not where every dollar raised comes from.

Not counted: 501(c)(4) "social welfare" organizations run issue ads that frequently mention candidates by name but aren't classified as express advocacy under FEC rules — they file no Schedule E and don't appear in this breakdown. Press reporting on a race may cite figures that include this dark-money spending; ours doesn't.

Where they stand

Issue-by-issue comparison

Positions extracted from each candidate's campaign issues page by AI. Contested rows — where candidates disagree with each other — appear first.

StatementTorresCargileLaneHorvathYou
Abortion
A national law should protect access to abortion in every state.
—
Criminal Justice
Marijuana should be legal under federal law.
—
Criminal Justice
Federal law should allow individuals to sue police officers for civil-rights violations even when officers claim qualified immunity.
—
Education
Federal Title IX protections should explicitly include sexual orientation and gender identity.
—
Foreign Policy
The U.S. should keep sending military aid to Ukraine.
—
Foreign Policy
Conditions on U.S. military aid to Israel — tied to humanitarian or human-rights compliance — should be strengthened.
—
Guns
Civilian ownership of AR-15-style rifles should be restricted.
—
Guns
Federal law should authorize court-issued red-flag orders allowing temporary firearm removal from people deemed a danger.
—
Guns
Ghost guns and unfinished firearm components should be regulated as firearms under federal law.
—
Immigration
People who were brought to the U.S. illegally as children should have a path to citizenship.
—
Immigration
The U.S. should do more to enforce immigration laws and secure the border.
—
Governance & Other
Voters should be required to show photo ID, with the same rule in every state.
—

SupportsOpposesNo public positionRinged = confirmed by the campaign

About this race page

Candidate roster is sourced from the FEC's active-candidate list for the 2026 cycle. Fundraising totals reflect committee filings through the last reporting period.

Alignment % compares the candidate's extracted policy positions against your quiz answers. Positions are pulled from the candidate's campaign issues page by AI; we save the source quote for each position so you can verify the extraction. Candidates without a campaign issues page show position data pending — we're working through the roster and re-checking stale extractions every 90 days.

News coverage is from the GDELT 2.0 global news feed, filtered to a curated list of national, political, and regional outlets.