2026 race

CA-21 — U.S. House

2 candidates on the November ballot. Incumbent: Jim Costa.

Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See where these candidates stand — and who's funding them.

DeepSyte tracks the money and the record in every race against the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your alignment.

How we got here · 1 earlier contest
Primary · Tuesday, June 2, 2026
Called by California Secretary of State (certified Statement of Vote)
Top-two primary — Jim Costa and Kyle Kirkland advanced to the general election.
  • DJim Costa· inc.Advanced to general42.2%
  • RKyle KirklandAdvanced to general26.3%
  • RLorenzo RiosDefeated14.9%
  • DLourin HubbardDefeated10.3%
  • DEric GarciaDefeated5.1%
  • Lance Alvin KruseDefeated1.2%
Election held
Counting
Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Results appear here once a race is called and verified. Official returns from the California Secretary of State.

Disclosed money in race
$2.6M
Candidate + outside spending. See finance breakdown below.
Incumbent

Currently in office

Challengers

Sorted by fundraising

Kyle Kirkland

R
ChallengerFEC H6CA13199

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$465K
Cash on hand: $13K

Lorenzo Rios

R
ChallengerFEC H6CA21234

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$427K
Cash on hand: $8K

Lance Alvin Kruse

I
ChallengerFEC H6CA21275

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$2K
Cash on hand: $160

Eric Garcia

D
ChallengerFEC H0CA22110

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$613
Cash on hand: $19

Lourin Hubbard

D
ChallengerFEC H6CA21259

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$0
Cash on hand: $0
Money in the race

Finance breakdown

Disclosed funding shaping this race — both the money candidates raise themselves and the outside spending dropped by independent groups. Issue-ad spending by 501(c)(4) groups is excluded; the FEC doesn't require disclosure of it. See the note below for details.

Candidate fundraising: FEC reports through October 14, 2026 · 2025–26 cycle

Total disclosed
$2.6M
Candidate fundraising + independent expenditures (FEC).
Candidate-direct (Schedule A)
$2.6M
Raised by candidate committees themselves.
Outside spending (Schedule E)
$5K
$400 for · $5K against
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Jim Costa(D)incumbent
− THE CONSERVATIVE CAUCUS DBA AMERICANS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL LIBERTY $5K
$1.7M—$5K$1.7M
Kyle Kirkland(R)
+ REFORM LEADERS PAC $200
$465K$200—$465K
Lorenzo Rios(R)
+ REFORM LEADERS PAC $200
$427K$200—$427K
Lance Alvin Kruse
$2K——$2K
Eric Garcia(D)
$613——$613
Lourin Hubbard(D)
$0——$0
Where the money comes from

In-state vs out-of-state

Share of each candidate's itemized individual contributions from donors inside CA versus the rest of the country. Excludes sub-$200 unitemized donations (no geography on file) and PAC money — see note below.

Jim Costa(D)80% in-state · $510K itemized
$408K in-state$103K out-of-state
Kyle Kirkland(R)81% in-state · $171K itemized
$139K in-state$32K out-of-state
Lorenzo Rios(R)84% in-state · $230K itemized
$193K in-state$37K out-of-state
Eric Garcia(D)100% in-state · $500 itemized
$500 in-state$0 out-of-state
What's counted, what isn't

Candidate-direct is each campaign's reported receipts on FEC Schedule A — individual contributions plus PAC contributions to the candidate's own committee — through the most recent filing.

Outside spending is independent expenditures on FEC Schedule E: money spent by PACs, super PACs, and party committees for or against a candidate, without legal coordination with the campaign. The committees listed under each candidate are the largest disclosed spenders on either side.

In-state vs out-of-state covers only itemized individual contributions — donations over $200, which are the only ones that carry a contributor address at the FEC. Sub-$200 unitemized donations (often a large share for grassroots campaigns) have no geography on file and are excluded, as is PAC money. So the percentages describe where a candidate's itemized individual money comes from, not where every dollar raised comes from.

Not counted: 501(c)(4) "social welfare" organizations run issue ads that frequently mention candidates by name but aren't classified as express advocacy under FEC rules — they file no Schedule E and don't appear in this breakdown. Press reporting on a race may cite figures that include this dark-money spending; ours doesn't.

Where they stand

Issue-by-issue comparison

Positions extracted from each candidate's campaign issues page by AI. Contested rows — where candidates disagree with each other — appear first.

StatementCostaKirklandRiosKruseGarciaHubbardYou
Criminal Justice
The federal government should send more money to local police departments.
—
Economy
Reducing the national debt should be a higher priority than new spending.
—
Education
Parents should be able to use public funds — through vouchers — to send their kids to private or charter schools.
—
Environment
Government environmental reviews for energy and infrastructure projects should move faster, even if it means fewer reviews.
—
Immigration
The U.S. should do more to enforce immigration laws and secure the border.
—

SupportsOpposesNo public positionRinged = confirmed by the campaign

Recent coverage

In the news

About this race page

Candidate roster is sourced from the FEC's active-candidate list for the 2026 cycle. Fundraising totals reflect committee filings through the last reporting period.

Alignment % compares the candidate's extracted policy positions against your quiz answers. Positions are pulled from the candidate's campaign issues page by AI; we save the source quote for each position so you can verify the extraction. Candidates without a campaign issues page show position data pending — we're working through the roster and re-checking stale extractions every 90 days.

News coverage is from the GDELT 2.0 global news feed, filtered to a curated list of national, political, and regional outlets.