2026 race

DE — U.S. Senate

2 candidates on the November ballot. Incumbent: Christopher A. Coons.

Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See where these candidates stand — and who's funding them.

DeepSyte tracks the money and the record in every race against the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your alignment.

How we got here · 2 earlier contests
Democratic primary · Tuesday, September 15, 2026
Called by AP
Christopher A. CoonsWon78.0%
  • DJeffery Ryan AppelhansDefeated10.6%
  • DMary LouveDefeated7.5%
  • DNo-Trump HansenDefeated3.9%
Republican primary · Tuesday, September 15, 2026
Called by AP
Michael "Dr. Mike" KatzWon77.3%
  • RJohn ShulliDefeated22.7%
Election held
Counting
Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Results appear here once a race is called and verified. Official returns from the Delaware Department of Elections.

Disclosed money in race
$5.3M
Candidate + outside spending. See finance breakdown below.
Incumbent

Currently in office

Challengers

Sorted by fundraising

Michael "Dr. Mike" Katz

R
ChallengerFEC S6DE00206

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$190K
Cash on hand: $16K
5 defeated candidates — show

John Shulli

RDefeated
ChallengerFEC S6DE00198

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$126K
Cash on hand: $51

Christopher Beardsley

DDefeated
ChallengerFEC S6DE00156

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$22K
Cash on hand: $9K

Jeffery Ryan Appelhans

DDefeated
ChallengerFEC S6DE00263

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$2K
Cash on hand: $2K

Mary Louve

DDefeated
ChallengerFEC S6DE00230

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$0
Cash on hand: $0

No-Trump Hansen

DDefeated
ChallengerFEC S6DE00271

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$0
Cash on hand: $0
Local signal

Early read on DE — U.S. Senate

A directional read on where this seat is trending, from the signals we have so far. This is an early scaffold — more inputs light up as coverage and constituent activity accrue.

Coverage tone · the matchup
Recent news coverage of the nominees heading to the general election.
Christopher A. Coonslimited coverage
No coverage in our tracked outlets in the last 90 days.
Michael "Dr. Mike" Katzlimited coverage
No coverage in our tracked outlets in the last 90 days.
A media signal, not a poll of the district.
Constituent stakes
No one here has staked a position on a tracked vote yet. As neighbors weigh in on /pressure campaigns, the district's lean will show up here.
Money in the race

Finance breakdown

Disclosed funding shaping this race — both the money candidates raise themselves and the outside spending dropped by independent groups. Issue-ad spending by 501(c)(4) groups is excluded; the FEC doesn't require disclosure of it. See the note below for details.

Candidate fundraising: FEC reports through October 14, 2026 · 2025–26 cycle

Total disclosed
$5.3M
Candidate fundraising + independent expenditures (FEC).
Candidate-direct (Schedule A)
$5.3M
Raised by candidate committees themselves.
Outside spending (Schedule E)
$12K
$12K for · $0 against
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Christopher A. Coons(D)incumbent
+ NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $12K
+ SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION $10
$5.0M$12K—$5.0M
Michael "Dr. Mike" Katz(R)
$190K——$190K
5 defeated candidates — show finances
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
John Shulli(R)defeated
$126K——$126K
Christopher Beardsley(D)defeated
$22K——$22K
Jeffery Ryan Appelhans(D)defeated
$2K——$2K
Mary Louve(D)defeated
$0——$0
No-Trump Hansen(D)defeated
$0——$0
Where the money comes from

In-state vs out-of-state

Share of each candidate's itemized individual contributions from donors inside DE versus the rest of the country. Excludes sub-$200 unitemized donations (no geography on file) and PAC money — see note below.

Christopher A. Coons(D)11% in-state · $2.6M itemized
$290K in-state$2.3M out-of-state
Michael "Dr. Mike" Katz(R)72% in-state · $20K itemized
$14K in-state$6K out-of-state
3 defeated candidates — show
John Shulli(R)defeated100% in-state · $14K itemized
$14K in-state$0 out-of-state
Christopher Beardsley(D)defeated96% in-state · $7K itemized
$7K in-state$300 out-of-state
Jeffery Ryan Appelhans(D)defeated100% in-state · $1K itemized
$1K in-state$0 out-of-state
What's counted, what isn't

Candidate-direct is each campaign's reported receipts on FEC Schedule A — individual contributions plus PAC contributions to the candidate's own committee — through the most recent filing.

Outside spending is independent expenditures on FEC Schedule E: money spent by PACs, super PACs, and party committees for or against a candidate, without legal coordination with the campaign. The committees listed under each candidate are the largest disclosed spenders on either side.

In-state vs out-of-state covers only itemized individual contributions — donations over $200, which are the only ones that carry a contributor address at the FEC. Sub-$200 unitemized donations (often a large share for grassroots campaigns) have no geography on file and are excluded, as is PAC money. So the percentages describe where a candidate's itemized individual money comes from, not where every dollar raised comes from.

Not counted: 501(c)(4) "social welfare" organizations run issue ads that frequently mention candidates by name but aren't classified as express advocacy under FEC rules — they file no Schedule E and don't appear in this breakdown. Press reporting on a race may cite figures that include this dark-money spending; ours doesn't.

Where they stand

Issue-by-issue comparison

Positions extracted from each candidate's campaign issues page by AI. Contested rows — where candidates disagree with each other — appear first.

StatementCoonsKatzYou
Environmentcontested
The government should stop subsidizing oil and gas companies.
—
Trade
U.S. trade policy should reduce economic interdependence with China, especially on technology and critical minerals.
—
Trade
Federal procurement should give strong preference to U.S.-made goods, even at higher cost.
—
Criminal Justice
The federal government should send more money to local police departments.
—
Economy
Reducing the national debt should be a higher priority than new spending.
—
Economy
Tariffs on foreign goods should be used to protect American jobs.
—
Environment
The government should set legally enforceable limits on greenhouse gas emissions.
—
Environment
Government environmental reviews for energy and infrastructure projects should move faster, even if it means fewer reviews.
—
Environment
Federal permitting and subsidies for new nuclear power plants should be expanded.
—
Foreign Policy
The U.S. should keep sending military aid to Ukraine.
—
Foreign Policy
The U.S. should spend more on the military.
—
Guns
Civilian ownership of AR-15-style rifles should be restricted.
—
Healthcare
States, not the federal government, should decide who gets Medicaid and what it covers.
—
Healthcare
Enhanced ACA premium subsidies should be made permanent at expanded levels.
—
Housing
The government should spend more building affordable housing.
—
Immigration
People who were brought to the U.S. illegally as children should have a path to citizenship.
—
Immigration
The U.S. should do more to enforce immigration laws and secure the border.
—
Judicial Reform
Supreme Court justices should be bound by a binding code of ethics enforceable by Congress.
—
Labor
Federal labor law should make it easier for workers to form unions (PRO Act-style reforms).
—
Taxes
People making over $400,000 a year should pay higher taxes.
—
Taxes
Corporate taxes should be lower.
—
Trade
Presidents should be able to impose broad tariffs unilaterally under emergency powers (IEEPA-style authority).
—
Veterans
The VA should cover more veterans and more health conditions.
—

SupportsOpposesNo public positionRinged = confirmed by the campaign

About this race page

Candidate roster is sourced from the FEC's active-candidate list for the 2026 cycle. Fundraising totals reflect committee filings through the last reporting period.

Alignment % compares the candidate's extracted policy positions against your quiz answers. Positions are pulled from the candidate's campaign issues page by AI; we save the source quote for each position so you can verify the extraction. Candidates without a campaign issues page show position data pending — we're working through the roster and re-checking stale extractions every 90 days.

News coverage is from the GDELT 2.0 global news feed, filtered to a curated list of national, political, and regional outlets.