2026 race

FL-15 — U.S. House

2 candidates on the November ballot. Incumbent: Laurel M. Lee.

Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See where these candidates stand — and who's funding them.

DeepSyte tracks the money and the record in every race against the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your alignment.

How we got here · 2 earlier contests
Democratic primary · Tuesday, August 18, 2026
Called by Florida Division of Elections results
Robert PeopleWon53.6%
  • DChristopher IrizarryDefeated46.4%
Republican primary · Tuesday, August 18, 2026
Called by audit: web-verified
Laurel M. LeeWon
Election held
Counting
Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Results appear here once a race is called and verified. Official returns from the Florida Department of State, Division of Elections.

Disclosed money in race
$2.8M
Candidate + outside spending. See finance breakdown below.
Incumbent

Currently in office

Challengers

Sorted by fundraising

Robert People

D
ChallengerFEC H6FL15168

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$83K
Cash on hand: $27K
1 defeated candidate — show

Christopher Irizarry

DDefeated
ChallengerFEC H6FL12199

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$24K
Cash on hand: $3K
Local signal

Early read on FL-15 — U.S. House

A directional read on where this seat is trending, from the signals we have so far. This is an early scaffold — more inputs light up as coverage and constituent activity accrue.

Coverage tone · the matchup
Recent news coverage of the nominees heading to the general election.
Laurel M. Leemixed
0 pos1 neutral0 neg1 articles
Robert Peoplelimited coverage
No coverage in our tracked outlets in the last 90 days.
A media signal, not a poll of the district.
Constituent stakes
No one here has staked a position on a tracked vote yet. As neighbors weigh in on /pressure campaigns, the district's lean will show up here.
Money in the race

Finance breakdown

Disclosed funding shaping this race — both the money candidates raise themselves and the outside spending dropped by independent groups. Issue-ad spending by 501(c)(4) groups is excluded; the FEC doesn't require disclosure of it. See the note below for details.

Candidate fundraising: FEC reports through October 14, 2026 · 2025–26 cycle

Total disclosed
$2.8M
Candidate fundraising + independent expenditures (FEC).
Candidate-direct (Schedule A)
$2.8M
Raised by candidate committees themselves.
Outside spending (Schedule E)
$0
No outside spending reported yet.
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Laurel M. Lee(R)incumbent
$2.7M——$2.7M
Robert People(D)
$83K——$83K
1 defeated candidate — show finances
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Christopher Irizarry(D)defeated
$24K——$24K
Where the money comes from

In-state vs out-of-state

Share of each candidate's itemized individual contributions from donors inside FL versus the rest of the country. Excludes sub-$200 unitemized donations (no geography on file) and PAC money — see note below.

Laurel M. Lee(R)72% in-state · $1.7M itemized
$1.2M in-state$458K out-of-state
Robert People(D)76% in-state · $8K itemized
$6K in-state$2K out-of-state
1 defeated candidate — show
Christopher Irizarry(D)defeated97% in-state · $10K itemized
$10K in-state$299 out-of-state
What's counted, what isn't

Candidate-direct is each campaign's reported receipts on FEC Schedule A — individual contributions plus PAC contributions to the candidate's own committee — through the most recent filing.

Outside spending is independent expenditures on FEC Schedule E: money spent by PACs, super PACs, and party committees for or against a candidate, without legal coordination with the campaign. The committees listed under each candidate are the largest disclosed spenders on either side.

In-state vs out-of-state covers only itemized individual contributions — donations over $200, which are the only ones that carry a contributor address at the FEC. Sub-$200 unitemized donations (often a large share for grassroots campaigns) have no geography on file and are excluded, as is PAC money. So the percentages describe where a candidate's itemized individual money comes from, not where every dollar raised comes from.

Not counted: 501(c)(4) "social welfare" organizations run issue ads that frequently mention candidates by name but aren't classified as express advocacy under FEC rules — they file no Schedule E and don't appear in this breakdown. Press reporting on a race may cite figures that include this dark-money spending; ours doesn't.

Where they stand

Issue-by-issue comparison

Positions extracted from each candidate's campaign issues page by AI. Contested rows — where candidates disagree with each other — appear first.

StatementLeePeopleYou
Criminal Justice
The federal government should send more money to local police departments.
—
Economy
The expanded child tax credit (refundable, paid monthly) should be made permanent.
—
Education
Parents should be able to use public funds — through vouchers — to send their kids to private or charter schools.
—
Environment
Government environmental reviews for energy and infrastructure projects should move faster, even if it means fewer reviews.
—
Environment
The government should stop subsidizing oil and gas companies.
—
Foreign Policy
The U.S. should spend more on the military.
—
Guns
Civilian ownership of AR-15-style rifles should be restricted.
—
Healthcare
Federal enforcement of mental-health insurance parity (equal coverage to medical care) should be strengthened.
—
Immigration
The U.S. should do more to enforce immigration laws and secure the border.
—
Taxes
People making over $400,000 a year should pay higher taxes.
—
Taxes
Corporate taxes should be lower.
—
Technology
When the government uses AI, it should be required to disclose how those systems work.
—
Veterans
The VA should cover more veterans and more health conditions.
—

SupportsOpposesNo public positionRinged = confirmed by the campaign

About this race page

Candidate roster is sourced from the FEC's active-candidate list for the 2026 cycle. Fundraising totals reflect committee filings through the last reporting period.

Alignment % compares the candidate's extracted policy positions against your quiz answers. Positions are pulled from the candidate's campaign issues page by AI; we save the source quote for each position so you can verify the extraction. Candidates without a campaign issues page show position data pending — we're working through the roster and re-checking stale extractions every 90 days.

News coverage is from the GDELT 2.0 global news feed, filtered to a curated list of national, political, and regional outlets.