2026 race

LA-04 — U.S. House

5 candidates on the November ballot. Incumbent: Mike Johnson.

Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See where these candidates stand — and who's funding them.

DeepSyte tracks the money and the record in every race against the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your alignment.

Election held
Counting
Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Results appear here once a race is called and verified. Official returns from the Louisiana Secretary of State.

Disclosed money in race
$27M
Candidate + outside spending. See finance breakdown below.
Incumbent

Currently in office

Challengers

Sorted by fundraising

Conrad Cable

D
ChallengerFEC H6LA04187

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$1.8M
Cash on hand: $409K

Matt Gromlich

D
ChallengerFEC H6LA04195

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$452K
Cash on hand: $17K

Gordon Heslop

R
ChallengerFEC H6LA04229

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$129K
Cash on hand: $6K

Mike Nichols

R
ChallengerFEC H6LA04203

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$72K
Cash on hand: $82
Local signal

Early read on LA-04 — U.S. House

A directional read on where this seat is trending, from the signals we have so far. This is an early scaffold — more inputs light up as coverage and constituent activity accrue.

Coverage tone · leans negative
Recent news coverage of Mike Johnson over the last 90 days.
10 positive259 neutral35 negative
304 articles · AI-assessed sentiment toward the rep. A media signal, not a poll of the district.
Constituent stakes
No one here has staked a position on a tracked vote yet. As neighbors weigh in on /pressure campaigns, the district's lean will show up here.
Money in the race

Finance breakdown

Disclosed funding shaping this race — both the money candidates raise themselves and the outside spending dropped by independent groups. Issue-ad spending by 501(c)(4) groups is excluded; the FEC doesn't require disclosure of it. See the note below for details.

Candidate fundraising: FEC reports through October 14, 2026 · 2025–26 cycle

Total disclosed
$27M
Candidate fundraising + independent expenditures (FEC).
Candidate-direct (Schedule A)
$27M
Raised by candidate committees themselves.
Outside spending (Schedule E)
$2
$2 for · $0 against
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Mike Johnson(R)incumbent
+ FREEDOM CAUCUS FUND $2
$25M$2—$25M
Conrad Cable(D)
$1.8M——$1.8M
Matt Gromlich(D)
$452K——$452K
Gordon Heslop(R)
$129K——$129K
Mike Nichols(R)
$72K——$72K
Where the money comes from

In-state vs out-of-state

Share of each candidate's itemized individual contributions from donors inside LA versus the rest of the country. Excludes sub-$200 unitemized donations (no geography on file) and PAC money — see note below.

Mike Johnson(R)8% in-state · $18M itemized
$1.5M in-state$16M out-of-state
Conrad Cable(D)38% in-state · $146K itemized
$55K in-state$91K out-of-state
Matt Gromlich(D)45% in-state · $21K itemized
$10K in-state$12K out-of-state
Mike Nichols(R)100% in-state · $5K itemized
$5K in-state$0 out-of-state
What's counted, what isn't

Candidate-direct is each campaign's reported receipts on FEC Schedule A — individual contributions plus PAC contributions to the candidate's own committee — through the most recent filing.

Outside spending is independent expenditures on FEC Schedule E: money spent by PACs, super PACs, and party committees for or against a candidate, without legal coordination with the campaign. The committees listed under each candidate are the largest disclosed spenders on either side.

In-state vs out-of-state covers only itemized individual contributions — donations over $200, which are the only ones that carry a contributor address at the FEC. Sub-$200 unitemized donations (often a large share for grassroots campaigns) have no geography on file and are excluded, as is PAC money. So the percentages describe where a candidate's itemized individual money comes from, not where every dollar raised comes from.

Not counted: 501(c)(4) "social welfare" organizations run issue ads that frequently mention candidates by name but aren't classified as express advocacy under FEC rules — they file no Schedule E and don't appear in this breakdown. Press reporting on a race may cite figures that include this dark-money spending; ours doesn't.

Where they stand

Issue-by-issue comparison

Positions extracted from each candidate's campaign issues page by AI. Contested rows — where candidates disagree with each other — appear first.

StatementJohnsonCableGromlichHeslopNicholsYou
Abortion
Access to in vitro fertilization (IVF) and other fertility treatments should be protected by federal law.
—
Criminal Justice
The federal government should send more money to local police departments.
—
Economy
The federal minimum wage should be raised.
—
Economy
Tariffs on foreign goods should be used to protect American jobs.
—
Education
The government should forgive some federal student loan debt.
—
Foreign Policy
The U.S. should keep sending military aid to Ukraine.
—
Healthcare
The government should provide healthcare for everyone.
—
Healthcare
Enhanced ACA premium subsidies should be made permanent at expanded levels.
—
Housing
The government should spend more building affordable housing.
—
Immigration
The U.S. should do more to enforce immigration laws and secure the border.
—
Immigration
The U.S. should allow more legal immigration each year.
—
Governance & Other
There should be term limits for senators and representatives.
—
Social Security
High earners should pay Social Security taxes on more of their income.
—
Taxes
People making over $400,000 a year should pay higher taxes.
—
Trade
Presidents should be able to impose broad tariffs unilaterally under emergency powers (IEEPA-style authority).
—

SupportsOpposesNo public positionRinged = confirmed by the campaign

About this race page

Candidate roster is sourced from the FEC's active-candidate list for the 2026 cycle. Fundraising totals reflect committee filings through the last reporting period.

Alignment % compares the candidate's extracted policy positions against your quiz answers. Positions are pulled from the candidate's campaign issues page by AI; we save the source quote for each position so you can verify the extraction. Candidates without a campaign issues page show position data pending — we're working through the roster and re-checking stale extractions every 90 days.

News coverage is from the GDELT 2.0 global news feed, filtered to a curated list of national, political, and regional outlets.