2026 race

TX-16 — U.S. House

2 candidates on the November ballot. Incumbent: Veronica Escobar.

Read the record. Not the rhetoric.

See where these candidates stand — and who's funding them.

DeepSyte tracks the money and the record in every race against the issues you care about — not party, not press releases. Take the 2-minute values quiz to see your alignment.

How we got here · 3 earlier contests
Republican runoff · Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Called by audit: web-verified
Adam BaumanWon69.0%
  • RManuel BarrazaDefeated31.0%
Democratic primary · Tuesday, March 3, 2026
Called by audit: web-verified
Veronica EscobarWon100.0%
Republican primary · Tuesday, March 3, 2026
Called by audit: web-verified
No candidate won a majority — the top two advanced to a runoff: Adam Bauman and Manuel Barraza.
  • RAdam BaumanAdvanced to runoff23.9%
  • RManuel BarrazaAdvanced to runoff18.1%
  • RRuben RiosDefeated14.5%
  • RHector Miguel CabildoDefeated14.4%
  • RRaul Jesus CastanedaDefeated11.8%
  • RDeliris Montanez Berrios (dmb)Defeated8.0%
Election held
Counting
Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Results appear here once a race is called and verified. Official returns from the Texas Secretary of State.

Make sure you can vote
Disclosed money in race
$1.1M
Candidate + outside spending. See finance breakdown below.
Incumbent

Currently in office

Challengers

Sorted by fundraising

Adam Bauman

R
ChallengerFEC H6TX16152

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$3K
Cash on hand: $3K
5 defeated candidates — show

Hector Miguel Cabildo

RDefeated
ChallengerFEC H6TX16160

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$11K
Cash on hand: $5K

Deliris Montanez Berrios (dmb)

RDefeated
ChallengerFEC H2TX16250

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$7K
Cash on hand: $130

Manuel Barraza

RDefeated
ChallengerFEC H6TX16202

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$4K
Cash on hand: $268

Raul Jesus Castaneda

RDefeated
ChallengerFEC H6TX16194

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$0
Cash on hand: $0

Ruben Rios

RDefeated
ChallengerFEC H6TX16210

Sign in + take the quiz to see alignment.

Raised this cycle$0
Cash on hand: $0
Local signal

Early read on TX-16 — U.S. House

A directional read on where this seat is trending, from the signals we have so far. This is an early scaffold — more inputs light up as coverage and constituent activity accrue.

Coverage tone · the matchup
Recent news coverage of the nominees heading to the general election.
Veronica Escobarleans negative
0 pos4 neutral3 neg7 articles
Adam Baumanlimited coverage
No coverage in our tracked outlets in the last 90 days.
A media signal, not a poll of the district.
Constituent stakes
No one here has staked a position on a tracked vote yet. As neighbors weigh in on /pressure campaigns, the district's lean will show up here.
Money in the race

Finance breakdown

Disclosed funding shaping this race — both the money candidates raise themselves and the outside spending dropped by independent groups. Issue-ad spending by 501(c)(4) groups is excluded; the FEC doesn't require disclosure of it. See the note below for details.

Candidate fundraising: FEC reports through October 14, 2026 · 2025–26 cycle

Total disclosed
$1.1M
Candidate fundraising + independent expenditures (FEC).
Candidate-direct (Schedule A)
$1.1M
Raised by candidate committees themselves.
Outside spending (Schedule E)
$0
No outside spending reported yet.
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Veronica Escobar(D)incumbent
$1.1M——$1.1M
Adam Bauman(R)
$3K——$3K
5 defeated candidates — show finances
CandidateRaised directlyOutside forOutside againstNet in corner
Hector Miguel Cabildo(R)defeated
$11K——$11K
Deliris Montanez Berrios (dmb)(R)defeated
$7K——$7K
Manuel Barraza(R)defeated
$4K——$4K
Raul Jesus Castaneda(R)defeated
$0——$0
Ruben Rios(R)defeated
$0——$0
Where the money comes from

In-state vs out-of-state

Share of each candidate's itemized individual contributions from donors inside TX versus the rest of the country. Excludes sub-$200 unitemized donations (no geography on file) and PAC money — see note below.

Veronica Escobar(D)85% in-state · $471K itemized
$399K in-state$72K out-of-state
3 defeated candidates — show
Hector Miguel Cabildo(R)defeated100% in-state · $4K itemized
$4K in-state$0 out-of-state
Deliris Montanez Berrios (dmb)(R)defeated48% in-state · $479 itemized
$229 in-state$250 out-of-state
Manuel Barraza(R)defeated13% in-state · $4K itemized
$500 in-state$4K out-of-state
What's counted, what isn't

Candidate-direct is each campaign's reported receipts on FEC Schedule A — individual contributions plus PAC contributions to the candidate's own committee — through the most recent filing.

Outside spending is independent expenditures on FEC Schedule E: money spent by PACs, super PACs, and party committees for or against a candidate, without legal coordination with the campaign. The committees listed under each candidate are the largest disclosed spenders on either side.

In-state vs out-of-state covers only itemized individual contributions — donations over $200, which are the only ones that carry a contributor address at the FEC. Sub-$200 unitemized donations (often a large share for grassroots campaigns) have no geography on file and are excluded, as is PAC money. So the percentages describe where a candidate's itemized individual money comes from, not where every dollar raised comes from.

Not counted: 501(c)(4) "social welfare" organizations run issue ads that frequently mention candidates by name but aren't classified as express advocacy under FEC rules — they file no Schedule E and don't appear in this breakdown. Press reporting on a race may cite figures that include this dark-money spending; ours doesn't.

Where they stand

Issue-by-issue comparison

Positions extracted from each candidate's campaign issues page by AI. Contested rows — where candidates disagree with each other — appear first.

StatementEscobarBaumanYou
Abortion
A national law should protect access to abortion in every state.
—
Abortion
Each state should set its own abortion laws.
—
Agriculture
SNAP (food stamp) eligibility and benefit levels should be expanded.
—
Agriculture
Federal funding to extend broadband access to rural areas should be expanded.
—
Economy
The federal minimum wage should be raised.
—
Economy
The expanded child tax credit (refundable, paid monthly) should be made permanent.
—
Economy
The federal government should require employers to provide paid family and medical leave.
—
Education
Parents should be able to use public funds — through vouchers — to send their kids to private or charter schools.
—
Education
Federal Title IX protections should explicitly include sexual orientation and gender identity.
—
Environment
The government should set legally enforceable limits on greenhouse gas emissions.
—
Guns
All gun sales — including private ones — should require a background check.
—
Guns
Civilian ownership of AR-15-style rifles should be restricted.
—
Healthcare
The government should provide healthcare for everyone.
—
Housing
The government should spend more building affordable housing.
—
Immigration
People who were brought to the U.S. illegally as children should have a path to citizenship.
—
Immigration
The U.S. should allow more legal immigration each year.
—
Governance & Other
Voters should be required to show photo ID, with the same rule in every state.
—
Governance & Other
Outside political spending — from PACs and super PACs — should be limited more strictly.
—
Social Security
Workers should be able to invest part of their Social Security in the stock market.
—
Taxes
People making over $400,000 a year should pay higher taxes.
—
Veterans
The VA should cover more veterans and more health conditions.
—
Veterans
Federal support for veterans exposed to burn pits and other toxic environments should be expanded.
—

SupportsOpposesNo public positionRinged = confirmed by the campaign

About this race page

Candidate roster is sourced from the FEC's active-candidate list for the 2026 cycle. Fundraising totals reflect committee filings through the last reporting period.

Alignment % compares the candidate's extracted policy positions against your quiz answers. Positions are pulled from the candidate's campaign issues page by AI; we save the source quote for each position so you can verify the extraction. Candidates without a campaign issues page show position data pending — we're working through the roster and re-checking stale extractions every 90 days.

News coverage is from the GDELT 2.0 global news feed, filtered to a curated list of national, political, and regional outlets.